Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

The difference between rhetoric and dialectic. “That’s offensive” is meaningless rhetoric. This is something that you will benefit greatly from understanding.

17,252 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

8 Comments

Roberto's profile picture
Roberto1 year ago

It’s necessary for us to be overtly offensive now. What was once thought of as self-censoring to be kind, is now known to be about control. The communist fences you in with language. Time to call people retarded.

Rock Paper Sizzle's profile picture
Rock Paper Sizzle1 year ago

💪If you're seeing this, it must mean you support Trump. 👏 Let us help you show it. ✅ Classic, Tough, Real American Gear Here:

Djek Deign's profile picture
Djek Deign1 year ago

Big Bear I really liked your video but being a grammar Graham I have to point out that the correct use is "for whom" and not "for who", "who for" would also do.

RE:Peter's profile picture
RE:Peter1 year ago

Close but terms are off. You are describing the difference between a enthymemes and syllogisms. An enthymeme is a statement that requires you to both understand the sentiment. So saying "That's offensive" is a rhetorical enthymeme because you haven't explained why with logic.

Ming Yin's profile picture
Ming Yin1 year ago

Good for Yeti make Yeti strong

Kerrin Naude's profile picture
Kerrin Naude1 year ago

All true.

Generic Midwesterner's profile picture
Generic Midwesterner1 year ago

When people say things like that, I ask them to articulate why. Usually they can't.

Robert Connolly's profile picture
Robert Connolly1 year ago

I get why you would want to leave Hollywood and live off the land and homestead.... why are you still hanging on you won ......

Related Videos