正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

The difference between rhetoric and dialectic. “That’s offensive” is meaningless rhetoric. This is something that you will benefit greatly from understanding.

17,252 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

8 条评论

Roberto 的头像
Roberto1 年前

It’s necessary for us to be overtly offensive now. What was once thought of as self-censoring to be kind, is now known to be about control. The communist fences you in with language. Time to call people retarded.

Rock Paper Sizzle 的头像
Rock Paper Sizzle1 年前

💪If you're seeing this, it must mean you support Trump. 👏 Let us help you show it. ✅ Classic, Tough, Real American Gear Here:

Djek Deign 的头像
Djek Deign1 年前

Big Bear I really liked your video but being a grammar Graham I have to point out that the correct use is "for whom" and not "for who", "who for" would also do.

RE:Peter 的头像
RE:Peter1 年前

Close but terms are off. You are describing the difference between a enthymemes and syllogisms. An enthymeme is a statement that requires you to both understand the sentiment. So saying "That's offensive" is a rhetorical enthymeme because you haven't explained why with logic.

Ming Yin 的头像
Ming Yin1 年前

Good for Yeti make Yeti strong

Kerrin Naude 的头像
Kerrin Naude1 年前

All true.

Generic Midwesterner 的头像
Generic Midwesterner1 年前

When people say things like that, I ask them to articulate why. Usually they can't.

Robert Connolly 的头像
Robert Connolly1 年前

I get why you would want to leave Hollywood and live off the land and homestead.... why are you still hanging on you won ......

相关视频