Marx Anthony's banner
Marx Anthony's profile picture

Marx Anthony

@10MarXmen21,267 subscribers

Author | Rising Lions series. Husband • Father • Builder • Creator. Strong marriages create strong families and strong nations 🇬🇧 13 children, from one wife.

Shorts

On April 28, 2025, the lights went out across Spain and Portugal. Millions were left stranded, had no electricity, no internet, no transport, no way to buy food, or call for help. The official story? A mysterious grid failure. How do entire countries go dark in 2025? This was no accident. This was a test. Governments and global institutions have been preparing for the big one for years, not just a power outage but a controlled collapse of society itself. Events like Cyber Polygon (a World Economic Forum project) and repeated warnings about cyberattacks are not predictions they are scripts. Behind the blackout lies a simple truth they are testing how fast they can switch off civilization. How obedient will citizens be without electricity? How long will it take for chaos to start? Who will comply with curfews, food rationing, and internet shutdowns? How can cashless societies be controlled when the power is cut? The blackout is a message: We can take everything from you in an instant. It’s no secret that elites have long fantasised about using crises to push their agendas: Climate lockdowns under the excuse of emergency energy savings Mandatory rationing of food, fuel, and internet access Digital ID systems are tied to your ability to travel, shop, or communicate Centralised control of national energy grids by unelected bureaucrats Today it’s Spain and Portugal. Tomorrow it’s France, Germany, Britain maybe your city, your street, your home. They will call it an unfortunate cyberattack or a climate necessity. In reality, it’s the beginning of a global control grid where freedom is conditional and electricity is a weapon. Prepper’s Survival Checklist for Blackouts You cannot wait for governments to save you. Prepare now. Essentials Solar-powered or crank-charged radios Portable power banks (charged regularly) LED lanterns and headlamps Fire starters (matches, lighters, magnesium rods) Food and Water Minimum 30-day supply of non-perishable foods (canned goods, rice, beans, freeze-dried meals) Water purification tablets and portable filters (like LifeStraw) 20–50 litres of stored drinking water per person Security Home defence tools (where legal) Strong door locks and window reinforcements Medical First aid kits (stocked, not just basic) Essential medications (at least 3-month supply) Medical reference books (printed) Communications Two-way radios (walkie-talkies) Offline maps of your local area Pre-arranged meeting points with family/friends Energy Backup Solar chargers Small gasoline generator (and fuel reserves safely stored) Rechargeable AA/AAA batteries and multiple chargers Cash and Documents Emergency cash in small bills Printed copies of IDs, insurance, and emergency contacts Faraday bag (for protecting electronics) Final Word The blackout was a warning shot. If you wait for the next one, it may be too late. Prepare now. Trust no official story. And remember: when the lights go out, you're on your own.

On April 28, 2025, the lights went out across Spain and Portugal. Millions were left stranded, had no electricity, no internet, no transport, no way to buy food, or call for help. The official story? A mysterious grid failure. How do entire countries go dark in 2025? This was no accident. This was a test. Governments and global institutions have been preparing for the big one for years, not just a power outage but a controlled collapse of society itself. Events like Cyber Polygon (a World Economic Forum project) and repeated warnings about cyberattacks are not predictions they are scripts. Behind the blackout lies a simple truth they are testing how fast they can switch off civilization. How obedient will citizens be without electricity? How long will it take for chaos to start? Who will comply with curfews, food rationing, and internet shutdowns? How can cashless societies be controlled when the power is cut? The blackout is a message: We can take everything from you in an instant. It’s no secret that elites have long fantasised about using crises to push their agendas: Climate lockdowns under the excuse of emergency energy savings Mandatory rationing of food, fuel, and internet access Digital ID systems are tied to your ability to travel, shop, or communicate Centralised control of national energy grids by unelected bureaucrats Today it’s Spain and Portugal. Tomorrow it’s France, Germany, Britain maybe your city, your street, your home. They will call it an unfortunate cyberattack or a climate necessity. In reality, it’s the beginning of a global control grid where freedom is conditional and electricity is a weapon. Prepper’s Survival Checklist for Blackouts You cannot wait for governments to save you. Prepare now. Essentials Solar-powered or crank-charged radios Portable power banks (charged regularly) LED lanterns and headlamps Fire starters (matches, lighters, magnesium rods) Food and Water Minimum 30-day supply of non-perishable foods (canned goods, rice, beans, freeze-dried meals) Water purification tablets and portable filters (like LifeStraw) 20–50 litres of stored drinking water per person Security Home defence tools (where legal) Strong door locks and window reinforcements Medical First aid kits (stocked, not just basic) Essential medications (at least 3-month supply) Medical reference books (printed) Communications Two-way radios (walkie-talkies) Offline maps of your local area Pre-arranged meeting points with family/friends Energy Backup Solar chargers Small gasoline generator (and fuel reserves safely stored) Rechargeable AA/AAA batteries and multiple chargers Cash and Documents Emergency cash in small bills Printed copies of IDs, insurance, and emergency contacts Faraday bag (for protecting electronics) Final Word The blackout was a warning shot. If you wait for the next one, it may be too late. Prepare now. Trust no official story. And remember: when the lights go out, you're on your own.

1,238,935 Aufrufe

The moment the hero tries to put out the fire, just misses getting blown up.

The moment the hero tries to put out the fire, just misses getting blown up.

190,702 Aufrufe

🇬🇧 As a UK lawyer addressing the Prime Minister's inaction towards armed gangs running the streets, it's important to evaluate the legal framework and the Prime Minister's obligations under the law 🇬🇧 UK Legal Obligations and Potential Offences of the Prime Minister 🇬🇧 1. Dereliction of Duty. The Prime Minister, as the head of the government, has a duty to uphold the law and ensure the safety of the public. Ignoring armed gangs and dismissing public concerns could be seen as a failure to fulfil this duty, potentially amounting to dereliction of duty. 2. Misconduct in Public Office. The common law offence of misconduct in public office applies when a public official willfully neglects to perform their duties or acts in a way that amounts to an abuse of the public's trust. Ignoring violent gangs and accusing the public of racism for their concerns could be interpreted as such misconduct. 3. Negligence. Under civil law, negligence occurs when someone fails to take reasonable care to avoid causing injury or loss to another person. The Prime Minister's inaction could be seen as a form of negligence if it can be shown that it has led to harm or risk to the public. 4. Breach of the Human Rights Act 1998. The European Convention on Human Rights, incorporated into UK law by the Human Rights Act 1998, protects individuals' rights to life (Article 2) and security (Article 5). The state's failure to address violent gangs could be seen as a breach of these rights, especially if the violence results in harm to individuals. 5. Incitement to Racial Hatred. While the Prime Minister is accusing the public of racism and far right extremism, it's crucial to ensure that his statements do not incite racial hatred, which is an offence under the Public Order Act 1986. However, this is more about ensuring balanced rhetoric rather than an offence the Prime Minister himself might be committing. Potential Offences Committed by the Armed Muslim gangs. 1. Possession of Firearms and Offensive Weapons. Under the Firearms Act 1968 and the Prevention of Crime Act 1953, carrying firearms and other weapons in public without a license is a serious offence. 2. Public Order Offences. Their actions likely violate the Public Order Act 1986, prohibiting behaviour that causes harassment, alarm, or distress. 3. Terrorism Offences Chanting extremist slogans while armed could fall under the Terrorism Act 2000, which includes the glorification of terrorism and inciting violence. 4. Incitement to Violence. Encouraging violent acts is a criminal offence under the Serious Crime Act 2007. 5. Affray. Engaging in behaviour causing others to fear for their safety violates the Public Order Act 1986. 6. Trespassing and Damage to Property Likely offences under the Criminal Damage Act 1971 if they are trespassing and causing property damage. 7. Conspiracy to Commit Offences. Organizing and participating in coordinated attacks is a conspiracy to commit multiple offences, punishable under the Criminal Law Act 1977. Conclusion The Prime Minister's inaction in the face of such blatant lawlessness is deeply troubling. It could be construed as misconduct in public office or even negligence, given the duty to protect the public and uphold the law. Moreover, the public's concerns are legitimate and should be addressed with due seriousness, not dismissed as racist or far right extremism. This is a critical issue requiring immediate and effective action to maintain public order and trust in the government. Share,like,follow and comment for your opinion to be heard. 🇬🇧

🇬🇧 As a UK lawyer addressing the Prime Minister's inaction towards armed gangs running the streets, it's important to evaluate the legal framework and the Prime Minister's obligations under the law 🇬🇧 UK Legal Obligations and Potential Offences of the Prime Minister 🇬🇧 1. Dereliction of Duty. The Prime Minister, as the head of the government, has a duty to uphold the law and ensure the safety of the public. Ignoring armed gangs and dismissing public concerns could be seen as a failure to fulfil this duty, potentially amounting to dereliction of duty. 2. Misconduct in Public Office. The common law offence of misconduct in public office applies when a public official willfully neglects to perform their duties or acts in a way that amounts to an abuse of the public's trust. Ignoring violent gangs and accusing the public of racism for their concerns could be interpreted as such misconduct. 3. Negligence. Under civil law, negligence occurs when someone fails to take reasonable care to avoid causing injury or loss to another person. The Prime Minister's inaction could be seen as a form of negligence if it can be shown that it has led to harm or risk to the public. 4. Breach of the Human Rights Act 1998. The European Convention on Human Rights, incorporated into UK law by the Human Rights Act 1998, protects individuals' rights to life (Article 2) and security (Article 5). The state's failure to address violent gangs could be seen as a breach of these rights, especially if the violence results in harm to individuals. 5. Incitement to Racial Hatred. While the Prime Minister is accusing the public of racism and far right extremism, it's crucial to ensure that his statements do not incite racial hatred, which is an offence under the Public Order Act 1986. However, this is more about ensuring balanced rhetoric rather than an offence the Prime Minister himself might be committing. Potential Offences Committed by the Armed Muslim gangs. 1. Possession of Firearms and Offensive Weapons. Under the Firearms Act 1968 and the Prevention of Crime Act 1953, carrying firearms and other weapons in public without a license is a serious offence. 2. Public Order Offences. Their actions likely violate the Public Order Act 1986, prohibiting behaviour that causes harassment, alarm, or distress. 3. Terrorism Offences Chanting extremist slogans while armed could fall under the Terrorism Act 2000, which includes the glorification of terrorism and inciting violence. 4. Incitement to Violence. Encouraging violent acts is a criminal offence under the Serious Crime Act 2007. 5. Affray. Engaging in behaviour causing others to fear for their safety violates the Public Order Act 1986. 6. Trespassing and Damage to Property Likely offences under the Criminal Damage Act 1971 if they are trespassing and causing property damage. 7. Conspiracy to Commit Offences. Organizing and participating in coordinated attacks is a conspiracy to commit multiple offences, punishable under the Criminal Law Act 1977. Conclusion The Prime Minister's inaction in the face of such blatant lawlessness is deeply troubling. It could be construed as misconduct in public office or even negligence, given the duty to protect the public and uphold the law. Moreover, the public's concerns are legitimate and should be addressed with due seriousness, not dismissed as racist or far right extremism. This is a critical issue requiring immediate and effective action to maintain public order and trust in the government. Share,like,follow and comment for your opinion to be heard. 🇬🇧

369,415 Aufrufe

What kind of man allows a monster like that hurt their child.

What kind of man allows a monster like that hurt their child.

163,814 Aufrufe

Videos

10MarXmen's profile picture

🇬🇧 As a UK lawyer addressing the Prime Minister's inaction towards armed gangs running the streets, it's important to evaluate the legal framework and the Prime Minister's obligations under the law 🇬🇧 UK Legal Obligations and Potential Offences of the Prime Minister 🇬🇧 1. Dereliction of Duty. The Prime Minister, as the head of the government, has a duty to uphold the law and ensure the safety of the public. Ignoring armed gangs and dismissing public concerns could be seen as a failure to fulfil this duty, potentially amounting to dereliction of duty. 2. Misconduct in Public Office. The common law offence of misconduct in public office applies when a public official willfully neglects to perform their duties or acts in a way that amounts to an abuse of the public's trust. Ignoring violent gangs and accusing the public of racism for their concerns could be interpreted as such misconduct. 3. Negligence. Under civil law, negligence occurs when someone fails to take reasonable care to avoid causing injury or loss to another person. The Prime Minister's inaction could be seen as a form of negligence if it can be shown that it has led to harm or risk to the public. 4. Breach of the Human Rights Act 1998. The European Convention on Human Rights, incorporated into UK law by the Human Rights Act 1998, protects individuals' rights to life (Article 2) and security (Article 5). The state's failure to address violent gangs could be seen as a breach of these rights, especially if the violence results in harm to individuals. 5. Incitement to Racial Hatred. While the Prime Minister is accusing the public of racism and far right extremism, it's crucial to ensure that his statements do not incite racial hatred, which is an offence under the Public Order Act 1986. However, this is more about ensuring balanced rhetoric rather than an offence the Prime Minister himself might be committing. Potential Offences Committed by the Armed Muslim gangs. 1. Possession of Firearms and Offensive Weapons. Under the Firearms Act 1968 and the Prevention of Crime Act 1953, carrying firearms and other weapons in public without a license is a serious offence. 2. Public Order Offences. Their actions likely violate the Public Order Act 1986, prohibiting behaviour that causes harassment, alarm, or distress. 3. Terrorism Offences Chanting extremist slogans while armed could fall under the Terrorism Act 2000, which includes the glorification of terrorism and inciting violence. 4. Incitement to Violence. Encouraging violent acts is a criminal offence under the Serious Crime Act 2007. 5. Affray. Engaging in behaviour causing others to fear for their safety violates the Public Order Act 1986. 6. Trespassing and Damage to Property Likely offences under the Criminal Damage Act 1971 if they are trespassing and causing property damage. 7. Conspiracy to Commit Offences. Organizing and participating in coordinated attacks is a conspiracy to commit multiple offences, punishable under the Criminal Law Act 1977. Conclusion The Prime Minister's inaction in the face of such blatant lawlessness is deeply troubling. It could be construed as misconduct in public office or even negligence, given the duty to protect the public and uphold the law. Moreover, the public's concerns are legitimate and should be addressed with due seriousness, not dismissed as racist or far right extremism. This is a critical issue requiring immediate and effective action to maintain public order and trust in the government. Share,like,follow and comment for your opinion to be heard. 🇬🇧

Marx Anthony

369,415 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

10MarXmen's profile picture

🇮🇪 IRELAND BLEEDS. EVEN WHEN IT’S ONE OF THEIR OWN 🇮🇪 Carlow. It was a quiet town until earlier this evening. A child shot. Supermarket shoppers diving for cover. Fairgreen turned into a battleground. And now the Gardaí confirm what many didn’t expect: the suspect is a white Irish male. So what now? Do we all go back to sleep? Do the media vultures descend with their usual smirk, “See? There's nothing to see here. Just one of your own”? Not this time. While this incident may not be the work of a foreign terrorist or migrant extremist, it still represents what Ireland has become: fractured, unstable, and teetering on the edge of collapse. They have allowed their communities to rot from within. They've opened their borders to mass immigration legal and illegal and watched as services buckled, streets changed, and identity eroded. And now they find their own sons lost, broken, violent, snapping under the pressure of a country that no longer feels like a home but a dumping ground for globalist experiments. This wasn’t a sectarian killing. It wasn’t jihad. But it was another Irish child caught in the crossfire of a nation in decline. You see, violence doesn’t always arrive wearing a turban or waving a foreign flag. Sometimes, it comes in the empty eyes of a man who grew up in a land that told him he was toxic. That his culture was outdated. That Ireland isn’t for the Irish anymore. This is what happens when men have no identity, no nation to belong to, no pride left to fight for and when millions are imported who have no loyalty to the flag, no roots in the soil, and no intention to build alongside them. Carlow wasn’t caused by one immigrant. But it’s part of a deeper, darker truth: Ireland is broken, and it's leaders broke it. So ask yourself: How many more must be shot before the Gardaí regain real power? How many children must bleed before we close the gates? How many more Irish men must spiral into madness before they start rebuilding Ireland for the Irish. Whether it’s one of our own or a foreign invader, the result is the same: mothers screaming, sirens wailing, and a nation asking **how we fell this far**. They’ll tell you to calm down. They’ll say it’s a one-off. But you know better. Ireland is under siege not just from outside but from within.

Marx Anthony

132,777 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Axel Muganwa Rudakubana. A mass murderer of British children In a horrific display of unchecked rage and hatred, Axel Muganwa Rudakubana, a 17 year old born to Rwandan parents in Britain, unleashed a wave of terror that left three children dead and seven others critically injured. This brutal act has sent shockwaves through the nation, begging the question. How did a boy born and raised in Britain become so consumed with venomous hate? Axel’s disturbing journey was evident early on. His expulsion from school for carrying a knife was not just a red flag but a glaring alarm that went unheeded. His chilling declaration that a genocide, akin to the horrors of Rwanda, could (solve Britain’s problems) should have been a wake-up call to all around him. Instead, these ominous signs were ignored. Apparently, he was known to social services and the police so how did they allow his sinister thoughts to fester and grow. Born into a household dominated by martial discipline, Axel’s life would have been heavily influenced by his father, a karate expert whose existence revolved around fighting and training. This wasn't just a sport or a hobby—it is a relentless, unforgiving lifestyle. Did Axel absorb this ethos of combat, translating it into his own warped sense of justice and retribution? It seems likely. Reports confirm that Axel was trained in martial arts, possibly using these skills with lethal precision against his innocent victims. The community is left reeling, grappling with the aftermath of Axel's rampage. The sheer brutality of his actions, especially against children, has created a sense of profound sorrow and outrage. As the investigation delves deeper, we must confront the uncomfortable truths about what drove Axel to such extremes. Was it the intense pressure and expectations from his upbringing? A crisis of identity and belonging in a land where he felt perpetually marginalized? Or was it a toxic cocktail of radical ideologies and violent media that twisted his young mind? What we do know is this. Axel’s parents were given a home in Britain, a chance to build a life away from the shadows of conflict. Regardless of how tough Axel's upbringing might have been, it does not excuse the premeditated and heinous plan he carried out. This act of violence is a brutal reminder that no amount of hardship justifies the taking of innocent lives. Axel Muganwa Rudakubana's actions have forever marred the lives of those he attacked and shattered the peace of a community. This is a battle for the soul of our society, and we can not afford to lose. #EnoughIsEnough #Southport
0:42

Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

10MarXmen's profile picture

Axel Muganwa Rudakubana. A mass murderer of British children In a horrific display of unchecked rage and hatred, Axel Muganwa Rudakubana, a 17 year old born to Rwandan parents in Britain, unleashed a wave of terror that left three children dead and seven others critically injured. This brutal act has sent shockwaves through the nation, begging the question. How did a boy born and raised in Britain become so consumed with venomous hate? Axel’s disturbing journey was evident early on. His expulsion from school for carrying a knife was not just a red flag but a glaring alarm that went unheeded. His chilling declaration that a genocide, akin to the horrors of Rwanda, could (solve Britain’s problems) should have been a wake-up call to all around him. Instead, these ominous signs were ignored. Apparently, he was known to social services and the police so how did they allow his sinister thoughts to fester and grow. Born into a household dominated by martial discipline, Axel’s life would have been heavily influenced by his father, a karate expert whose existence revolved around fighting and training. This wasn't just a sport or a hobby—it is a relentless, unforgiving lifestyle. Did Axel absorb this ethos of combat, translating it into his own warped sense of justice and retribution? It seems likely. Reports confirm that Axel was trained in martial arts, possibly using these skills with lethal precision against his innocent victims. The community is left reeling, grappling with the aftermath of Axel's rampage. The sheer brutality of his actions, especially against children, has created a sense of profound sorrow and outrage. As the investigation delves deeper, we must confront the uncomfortable truths about what drove Axel to such extremes. Was it the intense pressure and expectations from his upbringing? A crisis of identity and belonging in a land where he felt perpetually marginalized? Or was it a toxic cocktail of radical ideologies and violent media that twisted his young mind? What we do know is this. Axel’s parents were given a home in Britain, a chance to build a life away from the shadows of conflict. Regardless of how tough Axel's upbringing might have been, it does not excuse the premeditated and heinous plan he carried out. This act of violence is a brutal reminder that no amount of hardship justifies the taking of innocent lives. Axel Muganwa Rudakubana's actions have forever marred the lives of those he attacked and shattered the peace of a community. This is a battle for the soul of our society, and we can not afford to lose. #EnoughIsEnough #Southport

MarXmeN

132,696 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

10MarXmen's profile picture

🇬🇧 Fews Marquees, Mass Fatality Contracts, and the Government’s Quiet Preparations 🇬🇧 The government never tells the people the full story, but every so often, the truth slips out in a contract notice or a leaked tender. The latest? Fews Marquees Ltd has been awarded a Home Office contract for “Mass Fatality Resilience Capability.” Not emergency tents for weddings or festivals, but infrastructure to deal with large-scale death. Temporary morgues. Emergency structures for the unthinkable. Why would the state be spending taxpayers’ money on this right now? What do they know that we don’t? At the same time as this contract lands, schools across the country are being put through lockdown drills. Children as young as seven are told to sit in silence, doors locked, lights off. Teachers are trained to act as if under siege. We’re told it’s “just a precaution.” But when you line it all up mass fatality planning, lockdown training in schools, the constant drumbeat of “preparedness” it paints a darker picture. The public is reassured that everything is fine, that these contracts are “routine.” Yet government never spends millions without reason. They don’t prepare for something unless it’s on the horizon. Whether it’s terrorism, unrest, pandemics, or worse, the state is clearly getting ready. And ordinary families are left in the dark. Britain deserves answers. If our children are being trained for lockdowns, if our government is quietly building morgues in waiting, then we the people have a right to know what danger is coming. Because one thing is certain: governments don’t prepare for nothing.

Marx Anthony

38,464 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

10MarXmen's profile picture

Starmer Wants Your Sons for War, While Leaving the Enemy at Home. 🚨 Labour’s mask is slipping, and behind it lies a vision of Britain most of us won’t recognise. Sir Keir Starmer, the man who couldn’t define a woman until his media team forced his hand, now wants to define our future: a Britain on a “war footing,” spending billions, preparing to send our sons into yet another foreign conflict… while keeping the doors wide open to the world. This is not about defending our island. If it were, the first order of business would be securing our borders not dispatching our children to fight abroad while housing unvetted migrants in four-star hotels. What Starmer proposes is madness disguised as strategy. Billions for war, billions more for NATO pledges, weapons, surveillance, and deployments, yet no plan to make Britain safer here at home. Because if the enemy is already within our borders, what good is it sending our forces thousands of miles away? A Generation Sacrificed And Replaced Under Starmer, a new generation of British boys and girls may be conscripted whether in law or in shame into fighting battles they didn’t start and will never benefit from. Yet the migrants who poured into our country unchecked during years of lax border enforcement? They’ll remain. They’ll be protected by the same political class that refuses to protect our streets, our heritage, and our way of life. While our lads are dying in deserts or tundras, who guards the towns they leave behind? Who watches over their mothers, sisters, and children when neighbourhoods are already fractured by unchecked immigration and rising lawlessness? War for Whom? It’s worth asking: who benefits? Because it certainly isn’t the working-class communities Labour used to claim to represent. They’re the ones who’ll pay twice first in blood and then in taxes. Meanwhile, the internationalist elite jet between Brussels and Davos never lifting a finger for the country they pretend to lead. Don’t be fooled by Starmer’s sudden tough-guy routine. This is the same man who supported open borders, who kneeled for causes abroad while ignoring British veterans sleeping on the streets. Now, he wants to wrap himself in the Union Jack and talk about national security. The Real Threat is Within. Before we talk about foreign threats, we must confront the internal one. British culture, identity, and unity are under siege from within. Mass migration without integration has created parallel societies, not a shared future. And while the armed forces shrink, so too does the sense of what it means to be British. If we’re serious about defence, it starts at home. Repatriate foreign criminals, halt the boats, end taxpayer-funded hotel stays for those who despise our values. This is a call for priorities. Britain is bleeding internally, culturally, socially, and spiritually. A real leader would turn inward first, heal the homeland, and demand loyalty from those who live here before conscripting the nation to bleed for causes abroad. Keir Starmer wants to lead Britain into war. But many of us are asking: a war for what and for whom?

MarXmeN

23,693 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

10MarXmen's profile picture

🇬🇧 KNOW YOUR RIGHTS: THE BATTLE FOR BRITANNIA HOTEL 🇬🇧 They Can’t Silence You: Protesters Must Know Their Rights as Police Roll Out Unconventional Tactics to Protect Illegal Migrants. London, Canary Wharf. A 28-day dispersal order has been slapped on protesters outside the Britannia Hotel, where dozens of young, fighting-age men illegally ferried into our country have been put up in taxpayer-funded accommodation. The reason? They say your presence causes them “alarm and distress.” Here’s what they won’t tell you: you have rights. And those rights don’t get suspended just because some migrants feel uncomfortable. The Real Agenda Behind the Dispersal Order This is not about “safety.” This is about silencing dissent. It’s about protecting a government policy that has deliberately imported chaos while calling it compassion. This 28-day “dispersal zone” isn’t even clearly legal. The law under the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 only allows 48-hour dispersal powers at a time. To extend this, police must: * Re-authorise it every 48 hours, * Show credible risk of ongoing harm or intimidation. * Avoid blocking lawful protests and access to homes, medical appointments, or workplaces. If none of this has been done, the entire enforcement is open to legal challenge. What You’re Legally Allowed to Do Every protester should remember the following: You have the right to peaceful protest under Article 11 of the Human Rights Act (freedom of assembly). You can record the police and their conduct. If stopped under a dispersal order, ask: * “Who authorised this?” * “Where is the documentation?” * “Is this a public space?” * “Am I under arrest or free to go?” Do not identify yourself unless legally required. They must have a valid reason to demand ID. You may challenge any fines or arrests in court if the dispersal order was not properly issued or proportionate. Unconventional Police Tactics Being Used We are seeing disturbing tactics across the country: “Rolling Dispersal Orders” renewed every 48 hours, in what amounts to a legal sleight of hand. Exaggerated language, “harassment and distress” used to describe legal protest. Meanwhile, 12-year-old British girls get harassed in parks by the very same men housed inside these hotels, no dispersal orders for them. Covert filming and facial recognition tech is being deployed on peaceful demonstrators. Police liaison officers posing as friendly contacts, collecting names, affiliations, and protest plans. This is psychological warfare masquerading as public safety. The Loopholes THEY Use (and How to Expose Them) The police may try to say the hotel is “private property” and protests “interfere with business” but this only applies within the building, not the pavement, park, or public road outside. They may cite “alarm and distress” but case law (e.g., Redmond-Bate v DPP) says people being offended is not enough to criminalise free speech. If it’s a PSPO (Public Spaces Protection Order) it must: * Be properly consulted on, * Be published with clear signage, * Include a right of appeal in the Magistrates’ Court. If none of that has happened, it’s unenforceable. Message to the British Public Enough. The British people are being pushed out of their own country told to keep quiet, go home, and let the government flood every town with unvetted men who show no loyalty, no gratitude, and no intention to integrate. You have every right to say "NO." You have every right to stand shoulder to shoulder and protect your neighbourhood, your women, your country. Don’t be intimidated by blue lights and buzzwords. The law still belongs to the people for now. Stand Stong 🇬🇧 Stand United

MarXmeN

18,483 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten