Marx Anthony
@10MarXmen • 21,267 subscribers
Author | Rising Lions series. Husband • Father • Builder • Creator. Strong marriages create strong families and strong nations 🇬🇧 13 children, from one wife.
Shorts
Videos
🇬🇧 ALLEGED ATTEMPTED CHILD ABDUCTION IN LIVERPOOL YESTERDAY 🇬🇧 Reports are emerging from Liverpool of a shocking incident involving an attempted child abduction. Eyewitnesses claim that a van containing a group of illegal migrants was spotted trying to abduct schoolchildren off the streets. In a dramatic turn of events, another van filled with white men confronted the would-be abductors, leading to a violent altercation in which one of the illegal migrants from the first van was reportedly killed. This incident highlights the growing concerns about safety in our communities and raises questions about the implications of mass migration. #MigrantBritain #BrokenBritain
Marx Anthony1,078,776 次观看 • 1 年前
Breaking news 🚨 The vape shop owner Arslan is devastated that he burned down one of Glasgow's iconic buildings; he only opened the shop two weeks ago and has no idea how it happened. Homeless migrant was frustrated, subway's fire extinguisher was half empty, described the fire as a small fire in the middle of the shop. Arslan is a Pakistani name.
Marx Anthony158,748 次观看 • 4 个月前
🇬🇧 KNOW YOUR RIGHTS: THE BATTLE FOR BRITANNIA HOTEL 🇬🇧 They Can’t Silence You: Protesters Must Know Their Rights as Police Roll Out Unconventional Tactics to Protect Illegal Migrants. London, Canary Wharf. A 28-day dispersal order has been slapped on protesters outside the Britannia Hotel, where dozens of young, fighting-age men illegally ferried into our country have been put up in taxpayer-funded accommodation. The reason? They say your presence causes them “alarm and distress.” Here’s what they won’t tell you: you have rights. And those rights don’t get suspended just because some migrants feel uncomfortable. The Real Agenda Behind the Dispersal Order This is not about “safety.” This is about silencing dissent. It’s about protecting a government policy that has deliberately imported chaos while calling it compassion. This 28-day “dispersal zone” isn’t even clearly legal. The law under the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 only allows 48-hour dispersal powers at a time. To extend this, police must: * Re-authorise it every 48 hours, * Show credible risk of ongoing harm or intimidation. * Avoid blocking lawful protests and access to homes, medical appointments, or workplaces. If none of this has been done, the entire enforcement is open to legal challenge. What You’re Legally Allowed to Do Every protester should remember the following: You have the right to peaceful protest under Article 11 of the Human Rights Act (freedom of assembly). You can record the police and their conduct. If stopped under a dispersal order, ask: * “Who authorised this?” * “Where is the documentation?” * “Is this a public space?” * “Am I under arrest or free to go?” Do not identify yourself unless legally required. They must have a valid reason to demand ID. You may challenge any fines or arrests in court if the dispersal order was not properly issued or proportionate. Unconventional Police Tactics Being Used We are seeing disturbing tactics across the country: “Rolling Dispersal Orders” renewed every 48 hours, in what amounts to a legal sleight of hand. Exaggerated language, “harassment and distress” used to describe legal protest. Meanwhile, 12-year-old British girls get harassed in parks by the very same men housed inside these hotels, no dispersal orders for them. Covert filming and facial recognition tech is being deployed on peaceful demonstrators. Police liaison officers posing as friendly contacts, collecting names, affiliations, and protest plans. This is psychological warfare masquerading as public safety. The Loopholes THEY Use (and How to Expose Them) The police may try to say the hotel is “private property” and protests “interfere with business” but this only applies within the building, not the pavement, park, or public road outside. They may cite “alarm and distress” but case law (e.g., Redmond-Bate v DPP) says people being offended is not enough to criminalise free speech. If it’s a PSPO (Public Spaces Protection Order) it must: * Be properly consulted on, * Be published with clear signage, * Include a right of appeal in the Magistrates’ Court. If none of that has happened, it’s unenforceable. Message to the British Public Enough. The British people are being pushed out of their own country told to keep quiet, go home, and let the government flood every town with unvetted men who show no loyalty, no gratitude, and no intention to integrate. You have every right to say "NO." You have every right to stand shoulder to shoulder and protect your neighbourhood, your women, your country. Don’t be intimidated by blue lights and buzzwords. The law still belongs to the people for now. Stand Stong 🇬🇧 Stand United
MarXmeN18,483 次观看 • 11 个月前
In the wake of the Manchester Airport incident, where an armed officer was suspended after a video showed him using force during an arrest, the rush to judgment is not only unjust but perilous for public safety. The full video release, which clearly shows the officer being violently assaulted before responding, underscores a critical issue. The growing trend of scrutinising police actions without considering the full context or immediate threats faced by officers. The video footage from Manchester Airport reveals a chaotic and dangerous situation. The officer dazed after being punched in the head three times, found himself in a fight for survival. The aggressive behaviour of the suspect necessitated a rapid and forceful response. According to principles governing police use of force, officers are entitled to defend themselves and others from imminent harm. When under assault, the officer’s priority was to neutralise the threat swiftly, a decision made in split seconds and under extreme duress. Critics argue that the force used was excessive, but it's crucial to understand the legal framework. Armed officers are trained to respond proportionately to threats. In situations where their own lives or the lives of others are at immediate risk, what may appear excessive in hindsight can be entirely justified. The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) is investigating the incident, considering all circumstances, including the severity of the assault on the officer and the perceived threat. This incident is symptomatic of a broader, troubling trend. The tendency to vilify police officers without due process. Immediate public outrage, often fuelled by incomplete footage or social media snippets, leads to premature judgments and severe consequences for the officers involved. This witch hunt mentality not only demoralises the police force but also emboldens criminals who see a weakened, scrutinised police presence as an opportunity. The witch hunt against police is not an isolated phenomenon. It is part of a larger strategy employed by certain groups to manipulate public perception and cry wolf. Consider the case of Bailey and the Syrian bully in Huddersfield, where a fabricated narrative was constructed around the alleged bullying of a Syrian boy. The ensuing media frenzy and public outcry were based on misleading information, weaponising the boy's background to generate sympathy, and vilifying the supposed aggressor. This tactic is being used again in the Manchester Airport incident, where Muslim groups are quick to label the police response as racist and ignoring the violent assault on the officer. By crying wolf and manipulating public sentiment, these groups undermine legitimate law enforcement efforts and create an environment where officers are hesitant to act, fearing backlash and accusations of bias. When police officers are hesitant to act out of fear of suspension or legal repercussions, public safety is compromised. Officers must have the confidence that they can perform their duties without facing undue persecution. The constant second-guessing of their split-second decisions can lead to hesitation, endangering both officers and the public they are sworn to protect. The Manchester Airport incident should serve as a reminder of the complexities and dangers of police work. Instead of rushing to condemn, we should ensure that our officers are supported and that their actions are judged fairly, considering the full context and the immediate threats they face. The witch hunt against police officers, often fuelled by manipulative tactics and false accusations, not only undermines their ability to protect us but also threatens the very fabric of public safety. It's time to stand by our police and ensure they have the support and respect they need to do their jobs effectively.
MarXmeN26,043 次观看 • 2 年前
没有更多内容可加载