9/11 Revisited's banner
9/11 Revisited's profile picture

9/11 Revisited

@911Revisionist72,073 subscribers

“9/11 was an inside job,” or "dem djoos did it", is scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it".

Shorts

World Trade Center before and after the dust settled. Where did the towers go?

World Trade Center before and after the dust settled. Where did the towers go?

369,714 次观看

Sincere question: We all know the government narrative of jet fuel causing this, is absolute hogwash and anyone believing that a small little jet can do this to a building, has a serious lack of intellectual humility and serious problems with critical thinking. MY QUESTION: Why do you believe that thermite or bombs took down the Towers? Is it just because it counteracts the official narrative? What is the most solid evidence that makes you think it was bombs or thermite? Let's have a discussion in the comment section...

Sincere question: We all know the government narrative of jet fuel causing this, is absolute hogwash and anyone believing that a small little jet can do this to a building, has a serious lack of intellectual humility and serious problems with critical thinking. MY QUESTION: Why do you believe that thermite or bombs took down the Towers? Is it just because it counteracts the official narrative? What is the most solid evidence that makes you think it was bombs or thermite? Let's have a discussion in the comment section...

180,083 次观看

Remember the miracle wings that knocked over 5 lamp posts at the Pentagon on 9/11? Or the wings that left marks on the ground in Shanksville? Or what about those wing imprints against massive steel columns of the Twin towers... Also, are you stupid, gullible and can't think critically?

Remember the miracle wings that knocked over 5 lamp posts at the Pentagon on 9/11? Or the wings that left marks on the ground in Shanksville? Or what about those wing imprints against massive steel columns of the Twin towers... Also, are you stupid, gullible and can't think critically?

20,249 次观看

Videos

911Revisionist's profile picture

The "three fingers in front of your face" test (also called the 3-Finger Test) is a simple, viral trick popularized in early 2026 for spotting deepfakes or AI-generated video during live calls, especially with scammers. How It Works On a video call (Zoom, FaceTime, etc.), you ask the other person: "Can you hold up three fingers in front of your face?" A real human does this easily — their hand overlaps their face naturally. Many (especially older) deepfake or real-time face-swap systems struggle with this because: - They have trouble rendering occlusion (when the hand blocks part of the face) accurately in real time. - This often causes visible glitches: blurring, warping, distortion, unnatural blending, or the AI refusing / hesitating because it can't process the complex interaction properly. In the original viral clip (from cybersecurity researchers like Jim Browning and Huntress Labs), a suspected scammer hesitates, deflects ("That's too much..."), partially complies poorly, or the video glitches — exposing the fake. Why It Fits the Cognitive Wild West This test is a practical example of the "Cognitive Wild West" idea: in an era of synthetic media, people are developing quick hacks and personal "defenses" because there's no widespread, reliable system for verifying reality. It's low-tech cognitive security against high-tech deception — part of the arms race between AI creators and everyday users trying not to get scammed or manipulated. Limitations (It's Not Foolproof) Already becoming obsolete — Newer, more advanced deepfake models (as of mid-2026) handle hand-face interactions much better. Scammers now know the trick and can train around it or use better tech. It works best on real-time generated deepfakes, not pre-recorded or highly polished ones. False confidence is a risk: relying on one trick can make you less safe if you ignore other red flags (odd lighting, unnatural eye movement, audio mismatches, etc.). Better Practices in the Wild West Security experts recommend combining it with: - Asking for unpredictable actions (e.g., specific movements or objects). - Verifying identity through other channels (call back on a known number, check details independently). - Using emerging detection tools or just defaulting to higher scepticism on unsolicited video calls. It's a fun, memorable meme in the broader discussion of living with AI-generated content, but like everything in this space, it's temporary — the frontier keeps moving.

9/11 Revisited

2,332,246 次观看 • 24 天前