9/11 Revisited's banner

9/11 Revisited

@911Revisionist • 87,791 subscribers

“9/11 was an inside job,” or "dem djoos did it", is scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it".

Shorts

World Trade Center before and after the dust settled. Where did the towers go?

World Trade Center before and after the dust settled. Where did the towers go?

369,714 просмотров

Sincere question: We all know the government narrative of jet fuel causing this, is absolute hogwash and anyone believing that a small little jet can do this to a building, has a serious lack of intellectual humility and serious problems with critical thinking. MY QUESTION: Why do you believe that thermite or bombs took down the Towers? Is it just because it counteracts the official narrative? What is the most solid evidence that makes you think it was bombs or thermite? Let's have a discussion in the comment section...

Sincere question: We all know the government narrative of jet fuel causing this, is absolute hogwash and anyone believing that a small little jet can do this to a building, has a serious lack of intellectual humility and serious problems with critical thinking. MY QUESTION: Why do you believe that thermite or bombs took down the Towers? Is it just because it counteracts the official narrative? What is the most solid evidence that makes you think it was bombs or thermite? Let's have a discussion in the comment section...

180,083 просмотров

Remember the miracle wings that knocked over 5 lamp posts at the Pentagon on 9/11? Or the wings that left marks on the ground in Shanksville? Or what about those wing imprints against massive steel columns of the Twin towers... Also, are you stupid, gullible and can't think critically?

Remember the miracle wings that knocked over 5 lamp posts at the Pentagon on 9/11? Or the wings that left marks on the ground in Shanksville? Or what about those wing imprints against massive steel columns of the Twin towers... Also, are you stupid, gullible and can't think critically?

20,249 просмотров

Videos

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.ai•Sponsored•Livecam

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

Exclusive private shows

1.2k viewers online

Private Show

Join now for exclusive access

Free preview available • Premium content

The Notorious Banned 2001 Fox News Segment. The Israeli Mossad 9/11 Connection, and the 2002 Fox News Fallout that ensued.

The Notorious Banned 2001 Fox News Segment. The Israeli Mossad 9/11 Connection, and the 2002 Fox News Fallout that ensued.

4,052,791 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

People look, but they struggle to see. BUT, once you see it, it cannot be unseen...

People look, but they struggle to see. BUT, once you see it, it cannot be unseen...

1,651,197 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The September 12 & 13, 2001 news reports they want you to forget about...

The September 12 & 13, 2001 news reports they want you to forget about...

1,133,439 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The "three fingers in front of your face" test (also called the 3-Finger Test) is a simple, viral trick popularized in early 2026 for spotting deepfakes or AI-generated video during live calls, especially with scammers. How It Works On a video call (Zoom, FaceTime, etc.), you ask the other person: "Can you hold up three fingers in front of your face?" A real human does this easily — their hand overlaps their face naturally. Many (especially older) deepfake or real-time face-swap systems struggle with this because: - They have trouble rendering occlusion (when the hand blocks part of the face) accurately in real time. - This often causes visible glitches: blurring, warping, distortion, unnatural blending, or the AI refusing / hesitating because it can't process the complex interaction properly. In the original viral clip (from cybersecurity researchers like Jim Browning and Huntress Labs), a suspected scammer hesitates, deflects ("That's too much..."), partially complies poorly, or the video glitches — exposing the fake. Why It Fits the Cognitive Wild West This test is a practical example of the "Cognitive Wild West" idea: in an era of synthetic media, people are developing quick hacks and personal "defenses" because there's no widespread, reliable system for verifying reality. It's low-tech cognitive security against high-tech deception — part of the arms race between AI creators and everyday users trying not to get scammed or manipulated. Limitations (It's Not Foolproof) Already becoming obsolete — Newer, more advanced deepfake models (as of mid-2026) handle hand-face interactions much better. Scammers now know the trick and can train around it or use better tech. It works best on real-time generated deepfakes, not pre-recorded or highly polished ones. False confidence is a risk: relying on one trick can make you less safe if you ignore other red flags (odd lighting, unnatural eye movement, audio mismatches, etc.). Better Practices in the Wild West Security experts recommend combining it with: - Asking for unpredictable actions (e.g., specific movements or objects). - Verifying identity through other channels (call back on a known number, check details independently). - Using emerging detection tools or just defaulting to higher scepticism on unsolicited video calls. It's a fun, memorable meme in the broader discussion of living with AI-generated content, but like everything in this space, it's temporary — the frontier keeps moving.

The "three fingers in front of your face" test (also called the 3-Finger Test) is a simple, viral trick popularized in early 2026 for spotting deepfakes or AI-generated video during live calls, especially with scammers. How It Works On a video call (Zoom, FaceTime, etc.), you ask the other person: "Can you hold up three fingers in front of your face?" A real human does this easily — their hand overlaps their face naturally. Many (especially older) deepfake or real-time face-swap systems struggle with this because: - They have trouble rendering occlusion (when the hand blocks part of the face) accurately in real time. - This often causes visible glitches: blurring, warping, distortion, unnatural blending, or the AI refusing / hesitating because it can't process the complex interaction properly. In the original viral clip (from cybersecurity researchers like Jim Browning and Huntress Labs), a suspected scammer hesitates, deflects ("That's too much..."), partially complies poorly, or the video glitches — exposing the fake. Why It Fits the Cognitive Wild West This test is a practical example of the "Cognitive Wild West" idea: in an era of synthetic media, people are developing quick hacks and personal "defenses" because there's no widespread, reliable system for verifying reality. It's low-tech cognitive security against high-tech deception — part of the arms race between AI creators and everyday users trying not to get scammed or manipulated. Limitations (It's Not Foolproof) Already becoming obsolete — Newer, more advanced deepfake models (as of mid-2026) handle hand-face interactions much better. Scammers now know the trick and can train around it or use better tech. It works best on real-time generated deepfakes, not pre-recorded or highly polished ones. False confidence is a risk: relying on one trick can make you less safe if you ignore other red flags (odd lighting, unnatural eye movement, audio mismatches, etc.). Better Practices in the Wild West Security experts recommend combining it with: - Asking for unpredictable actions (e.g., specific movements or objects). - Verifying identity through other channels (call back on a known number, check details independently). - Using emerging detection tools or just defaulting to higher scepticism on unsolicited video calls. It's a fun, memorable meme in the broader discussion of living with AI-generated content, but like everything in this space, it's temporary — the frontier keeps moving.

2,343,929 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11

The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11

4,049,819 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

"Cell phones don't work on a plane, that's what I'm thinking". Police officer Lorne Lyles wondered how his wife, CeeCee, had been able to call him from Flight 93 on 9/11 since, when he looked at the caller ID, he "noticed that it was a call and it was from her cell phone".

"Cell phones don't work on a plane, that's what I'm thinking". Police officer Lorne Lyles wondered how his wife, CeeCee, had been able to call him from Flight 93 on 9/11 since, when he looked at the caller ID, he "noticed that it was a call and it was from her cell phone".

1,799,095 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

People think they know what they saw, because they were told to see a "collapse", but in actual fact, it was a disintegration on a molecular level.

People think they know what they saw, because they were told to see a "collapse", but in actual fact, it was a disintegration on a molecular level.

7,984,011 просмотров • 1 год назад

Video credit Bjørn Authén, a structural engineer.

Video credit Bjørn Authén, a structural engineer.

1,988,616 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

A plane hitting a tower, would be like a pencil, puncturing through the mosquito netting of your screen door...

A plane hitting a tower, would be like a pencil, puncturing through the mosquito netting of your screen door...

243,463 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

North Tower "spire" - Look at what happens to it

North Tower "spire" - Look at what happens to it

2,699,537 просмотров • 1 год назад

Arriving at the bottom of the North Tower, and immediately it just turns to dust, the sound of a freight train coming at you, like a tornado and a huricaine combined.

Arriving at the bottom of the North Tower, and immediately it just turns to dust, the sound of a freight train coming at you, like a tornado and a huricaine combined.

81,937 просмотров • 21 дней назад

The 2006 PBS Special - The Miracle of Stairway B 16 Survivors (9/11 surfer included) - 110 stories, equal to 10 Titanic’s in weight, stacked on top of one another. The survivors heard no loud explosions, no flashes of bright light, no molten steel raining on them, they did not go blind or deaf due to light flashes or explosions, they weren’t hit by falling debris. POOF the building is gone into a HUGE DUST cloud.

The 2006 PBS Special - The Miracle of Stairway B 16 Survivors (9/11 surfer included) - 110 stories, equal to 10 Titanic’s in weight, stacked on top of one another. The survivors heard no loud explosions, no flashes of bright light, no molten steel raining on them, they did not go blind or deaf due to light flashes or explosions, they weren’t hit by falling debris. POOF the building is gone into a HUGE DUST cloud.

112,730 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Remember the Banned SNL "Conspiracy Theory Rock" clip from 1998? Now this is a cartoon that you should definitely watch with your kids. This skit only aired one time before it was pulled from the air and banned from ever being used again, now why would that be?

Remember the Banned SNL "Conspiracy Theory Rock" clip from 1998? Now this is a cartoon that you should definitely watch with your kids. This skit only aired one time before it was pulled from the air and banned from ever being used again, now why would that be?

717,674 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

NO Plane at the PentaCON on 9/11 and the released footage was messed with.

NO Plane at the PentaCON on 9/11 and the released footage was messed with.

130,527 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Once you break your 9/11 programming and you see... Then it cannot be unseen...

Once you break your 9/11 programming and you see... Then it cannot be unseen...

1,441,778 просмотров • 1 год назад

An U.S. Air Force F-16C crashed in the California desert on Wednesday, Dec. 3, 2025. A military jet is A LOT smaller than a commercial jetliner. What do we learn from this crash site, when we look back at Flight 93, that crashed in Shanksville on 9/11?

An U.S. Air Force F-16C crashed in the California desert on Wednesday, Dec. 3, 2025. A military jet is A LOT smaller than a commercial jetliner. What do we learn from this crash site, when we look back at Flight 93, that crashed in Shanksville on 9/11?

785,177 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

One of the best proofs, that 9/11 wasn't a structural failure (collapse), or a controlled demolition, using any thermal or kinetic mechanisms, are the 16 survivors in stairwell B of the North Tower. 16 Survivors (“9/11 surfer” included) - 110 stories, equal to 10 Titanic’s in weight, stacked on top of one another. The survivors heard no loud explosions, no flashes of bright light, no molten steel raining on them, they did not go blind or deaf due to light flashes or explosions, they weren’t hit by falling debris - POOF the building is gone into a HUGE DUST cloud.

One of the best proofs, that 9/11 wasn't a structural failure (collapse), or a controlled demolition, using any thermal or kinetic mechanisms, are the 16 survivors in stairwell B of the North Tower. 16 Survivors (“9/11 surfer” included) - 110 stories, equal to 10 Titanic’s in weight, stacked on top of one another. The survivors heard no loud explosions, no flashes of bright light, no molten steel raining on them, they did not go blind or deaf due to light flashes or explosions, they weren’t hit by falling debris - POOF the building is gone into a HUGE DUST cloud.

1,281,584 просмотров • 1 год назад

I find it astounding that people still think that what we are looking at here is a structural collapse or a conventional controlled demolition using thermal or kinetic mechanisms. The towers disintegrated on a molecular level.

I find it astounding that people still think that what we are looking at here is a structural collapse or a conventional controlled demolition using thermal or kinetic mechanisms. The towers disintegrated on a molecular level.

886,444 просмотров • 1 год назад

ABC News - Where's all the rubble gone? Broadcast at 12:44pm - Sept 12, 2001. No mention was ever made about the lack of rubble after this broadcast.

ABC News - Where's all the rubble gone? Broadcast at 12:44pm - Sept 12, 2001. No mention was ever made about the lack of rubble after this broadcast.

1,093,238 просмотров • 1 год назад