Armchair Warlord's banner
Armchair Warlord's profile picture

Armchair Warlord

@ArmchairW • 153,412 subscribers

Weaboo, author and battle theorist. Interactions are not endorsements.

Shorts

Considering that Ukrainian War peace plans are in vogue, here's a peace plan the Russians would actually agree to:⬇️ - Ukrainian evacuation of the Four Oblasts to their prewar administrative boundaries. - The Four Oblasts within their prewar administrative boundaries and Crimea recognized as sovereign Russian territory by the US, EU, and UN; - Neutrality and nonalignment of Ukraine; - Ban on the deployment of foreign troops in Ukraine; - Russian recognized as the second official language of Ukraine; - Ukrainian Orthodox Church in communion with the Moscow Patriarchate recognized as the state church of Ukraine; - Ban on veneration of the OUN, UPA, Galician SS, Stepan Bandera in person, and proscription of their successors in ideology to specifically include Azov; - AFU capped at 100,000 personnel including reserves, paramilitaries and auxiliaries; - Ukraine to possess or operate no weapons of any kind with a range of greater than 100 kilometers; - Termination of all Ukrainian drone programs and destruction of all extant Ukrainian combat drones under UN supervision. These represent the minimum acceptable outcomes of the "four pillars" of Russian war policy: demilitarization, denazification, neutrality, and territorial cession of all regions claimed by Russia. This is what any final peace deal in this war is going to include as a minimum, so we might as well stop coping about how letting people speak Russian in public in Kharkov is an abomination against the sovereignty of Ukraine and start telling the Ukrainians the alternative is unconditional surrender. "But AW," you say, "This would reward the Russians!" Yeah, it would. I don't care. Beyond that the Russian position is the morally correct one, as a matter of pure national interest the exact line of the western border of the Russian Federation is of no legitimate concern to the United States so long as it's somewhere generally east of the Vistula. If the Europeans want to get the Russians to agree to less than the above they're welcome to try without our assistance, I guess - they'll be singing a different tune soon enough.

Considering that Ukrainian War peace plans are in vogue, here's a peace plan the Russians would actually agree to:⬇️ - Ukrainian evacuation of the Four Oblasts to their prewar administrative boundaries. - The Four Oblasts within their prewar administrative boundaries and Crimea recognized as sovereign Russian territory by the US, EU, and UN; - Neutrality and nonalignment of Ukraine; - Ban on the deployment of foreign troops in Ukraine; - Russian recognized as the second official language of Ukraine; - Ukrainian Orthodox Church in communion with the Moscow Patriarchate recognized as the state church of Ukraine; - Ban on veneration of the OUN, UPA, Galician SS, Stepan Bandera in person, and proscription of their successors in ideology to specifically include Azov; - AFU capped at 100,000 personnel including reserves, paramilitaries and auxiliaries; - Ukraine to possess or operate no weapons of any kind with a range of greater than 100 kilometers; - Termination of all Ukrainian drone programs and destruction of all extant Ukrainian combat drones under UN supervision. These represent the minimum acceptable outcomes of the "four pillars" of Russian war policy: demilitarization, denazification, neutrality, and territorial cession of all regions claimed by Russia. This is what any final peace deal in this war is going to include as a minimum, so we might as well stop coping about how letting people speak Russian in public in Kharkov is an abomination against the sovereignty of Ukraine and start telling the Ukrainians the alternative is unconditional surrender. "But AW," you say, "This would reward the Russians!" Yeah, it would. I don't care. Beyond that the Russian position is the morally correct one, as a matter of pure national interest the exact line of the western border of the Russian Federation is of no legitimate concern to the United States so long as it's somewhere generally east of the Vistula. If the Europeans want to get the Russians to agree to less than the above they're welcome to try without our assistance, I guess - they'll be singing a different tune soon enough.

75,956 views

Lo and behold - and exactly as predicted - by striking a key Ukrainian facility with a previously unknown conventional precision-strike IRBM, Putin did nothing in the most bloodcurdling way possible in response to the last week's Ukrainian missile provocations. Your move, NATO.

Lo and behold - and exactly as predicted - by striking a key Ukrainian facility with a previously unknown conventional precision-strike IRBM, Putin did nothing in the most bloodcurdling way possible in response to the last week's Ukrainian missile provocations. Your move, NATO.

86,575 views

War mappers: The Russians are parading flags in this village but haven't brought in a marching band yet, so we're going to claim this is the "gray zone." (Russian troops appear to be making good progress reducing the large Ukrainian "pocket" southeast of Kupyansk)

War mappers: The Russians are parading flags in this village but haven't brought in a marching band yet, so we're going to claim this is the "gray zone." (Russian troops appear to be making good progress reducing the large Ukrainian "pocket" southeast of Kupyansk)

27,223 views

Watching video of delivery robots trundling around Moscow unmolested recently, it occurred to me that Russia has actually been a high-trust society for a long time. Soviet soda machines came with a single communal glass that didn't get stolen. The 1990s were just a horror show.

Watching video of delivery robots trundling around Moscow unmolested recently, it occurred to me that Russia has actually been a high-trust society for a long time. Soviet soda machines came with a single communal glass that didn't get stolen. The 1990s were just a horror show.

13,116 views

Videos

ArmchairW's profile picture

A dark theory for the evening. Let's talk about Russian strategy in Ukraine.⬇️ Looking at developments lately, specifically: (1) the Ukrainian casualty leak showing an astronomical 1.7M KIA/MIA; and (2) the Ukrainian collapse north of Pokrovsk - I thought should revisit a dark thought I had a while ago, namely that, "maybe the killing itself is the point of all of this." I've said before that the Russians have fought an extraordinarily clean war in Ukraine, but it should be understood that there is a very legalistic shade on that assessment. They've killed very few civilians, and Ukrainian propagandists are perpetually beclowning themselves trying to pretend that the usual single-digit handful of injured civilians that accompany the latest attack using hundreds of standoff weapons fired into city centers (producing secondary explosions visible from outer space as military targets hidden among civilian infrastructure are destroyed with surgical precision) somehow constitute gEnOCiDe rather than some of the most well-controlled warfighting in the history of the business. There is another and far darker side to Russia's "clean" war, however. Let us consider the fate of the Armed Forces of Ukraine - legal combatants all, whom the Russians can and do target and kill without limit. I mentioned the casualty leak earlier, but I feel this needs to have a line drawn under it - one point seven million personnel killed or missing in action in the AFU, over the course of the war. 1.7 MILLION. Seven or eight percent of Ukraine's prewar population, probably something like a quarter of the entire national cohort of military-aged males, dead or missing. Casualties on the scale of a genocide, sufficient to permanently cripple any postwar Ukrainian nation. Casualties multiple times that which I assessed two years ago as sufficient to shatter the AFU based on the experience of Nazi Germany. This brings me to the Ukrainian collapse north of Pokrovsk two weeks ago, in which a run-of-the-mill Russian attack walked through twenty kilometers of Ukrainian defensive belts and into open country. The Ukrainian propagandists coped by whining about how the single most important front sector for the AFU had somehow "run out of infantry." But did the Russians throw in a mobile reserve to collapse the front and chase the AFU back to the Dniper, despite doubtless knowing full well what was going on? No, they did not - they consolidated in the breach and awaited the inevitable, panicked Ukrainian counterattack, in which they would have the opportunity to destroy Ukraine's remaining elite troops. Which brings me to my conclusion. The Russians have had countless opportunities to make large advances in this war, especially recently - the Ukrainian front line is an absolute shambles and their "drone wall" tactic will falter against any serious attack. So ineffectual is the AFU that very few Russian moves at the front even face serious opposition these days, with most geolocations of Russian advances showing them already established in place and dealing with harassment by kill drones after having seized positions bloodlessly. The Russians have in fact consistently foregone breaking the front and taking swathes of ground in favor of killing the largest possible number of Ukrainian soldiers on the existing front line under the existing attritional combat dynamic. This "tactical directive" held true even during the Battle of Sudzha-Korenevo, fought in prewar Russia. Rather than counterattacking aggressively to evict the AFU, the Russians saw the opportunity to kill gigantic numbers of Ukrainians in a trap the enemy wouldn't be able to extract themselves from for ideological reasons, and they took it. That battle ended up being nine months of hideously lopsided butchery that broke the back of the AFU. All of this makes observing the war more than a little maddening, but it's a consistent pattern of behavior that begs for explanation. So here's my theory. The Russian government has consistently sought to end the war via peace treaty with the existing Ukrainian government, not via regime change, outright conquest, or even killing enough of that government to find a more flexible interlocutor among the Maidanites. Putin apparently wants a treaty with Zelensky. The Russians have also consistently made demands of the Ukrainian government - and its NATO sponsors - that are absolute political nonstarters for the Maidan-era regime and which that regime, by its very nature, simply cannot accept. Russian language rights, Orthodox religious rights, demilitarization, large territorial concessions which would see the AFU surrender vast urban areas without a shot fired. And yet the Russians insist, and they're going to continue killing Ukrainian soldiers at ever-more lopsided ratios until they get their way. Which leads me to the brutal conclusion: Putin doesn't want to see Ukraine conquered. He's never publicly expressed any desire for that. The consistent Russian policy is instead to see Ukraine - a "free" and "independent" Ukraine, having come to this impasse of its own sovereign will - utterly humiliated. Putin wants to make Zelensky put on a suit, come groveling to the Kremlin, and sign a treaty that will see the Maidanite government surrender its arms, disgorge huge amounts of territory, and reverse every single anti-Russian policy position it ever had. Ukrainian nationalism will be discredited overnight by the hands of those very nationalists, and the economically irrelevant, demographically shattered rump state will be sucked back into Russia's political orbit in a matter of days. So of course the Russians are only advancing in the most leisurely way possible. Their goal is to place the Ukrainian government into a militarily untenable situation so as to force a flamboyantly humiliating peace treaty upon them that includes large territorial concessions beyond the line of control - the ultimate Ukrainian taboo - so as to discredit Ukrainian nationalism by the hands of the very ultranationalists who took their nation to war in the first place.

Armchair Warlord

515,777 views • 1 year ago

ArmchairW's profile picture

General Gerasimov recently announced the village of Borovaya had been taken by the Russian Army. This set off a storm of accusations that he was lying, because no mapper had Russian troops anywhere near the town in force. Today the MoD posted proof they seized it weeks ago.⬇️ You can watch the video for yourself, it's attached. Notice that the leaves are off the trees, indicating that the assault went in and the Russians cleared the town during the March-April timeframe. Thus as far as the Russian Army was concerned, their holding Borovaya was old news and they were presumably quite surprised to see frenzied Telegram blowback on the announcement. No "serious" mapper as of yesterday had Russian troops anywhere near the town - most had their front line approximately five kilometers to the north. And as I pointed out earlier, this seizure was actually old news to the point the Russians felt comfortable announcing it officially. By now the true Russian front line is likely some ways south of the town and the area is secure. There's an old saying in America, "The people who know aren't talking, and the people who talk don't know." The Russians have always had good operational security in general, and earlier this year one of the only side-channels that voenkor commentators used to communicate with their few actual front-line sources - pirated Starlink terminals - were bricked.* Cut off from the front line, Russian civilian commentators fell back on analyzing Ukrainian propaganda (something they've always heavily relied upon) at the exact moment the Ukrainians also seem to have tightened their own OPSEC and become institutionally aware of the role their own propaganda was playing in mapping Russian advances for the public and refuting their narrative of constant success. * This is why broenkors have been screaming and rending their garments about Starlink access. It's their leak vector. The Russian Army never officially used pirated terminals to any significant extent and may have in fact intentionally triggered the crackdown to choke off an OPSEC risk by putting a couple pirated terminals on cruise drones. I specifically believe that the Ukrainians have imposed media and even propaganda blackouts in two sectors - Kupyansk and Zaporozhie - in which they attempted to launch counteroffensives in the last six months. Both of those attacks failed, but the blackouts seemingly remain to avoid embarrassment - and given the Russians only post front updates sporadically and in accordance with their own OPSEC requirements, this means that the front lines in both sectors probably bear little resemblance to the war mappers' current traces. Given that all of this also happened in the February-April timeframe this further suggests that the Russian "pause" in March of this year was simply a reporting artifact and that they're sitting on significant unrecognized gains. Which the Russian MoD has in fact reported on two occasions now during high-level updates, but the mappers refused to believe them!

Armchair Warlord

37,588 views • 4 months ago