Artur Nadolny
@ArturNadol7566 • 9,712 subscribers
Citizen investigator. Exposing fraud and cover-ups. Evidence first, justice always.
Shorts
Videos
0.001% TAX A junior auditor at PwC in Luxembourg is getting ready to leave his job. Before he goes he goes looking for some training documents to take with him. Instead he finds a folder that anyone in the company could open. No password. No warning. Just sitting there. Inside are hundreds of secret deals between the Luxembourg government and some of the biggest companies on the planet. Deals that let them pay next to nothing in tax. His name is Antoine Deltour. He copies 30,000 pages. That is the whole story. He copies a folder. Let me explain what was actually in it, because this is where it gets interesting. Between 2002 and 2010, PwC alone helped broker 548 of these secret tax agreements, known as tax rulings, for over 340 companies. Apple. Ikea. Pepsi. Disney. Deutsche Bank. AIG. Koch Industries. Skype. GlaxoSmithKline. Coach. Abbott Laboratories. Household names, every one of them. The trick was simple. Companies moved profits through Luxembourg shell structures and Luxembourg quietly agreed in writing to look the other way on tax. Some of these companies ended up paying an effective tax rate under 1 percent. In some cases as low as 0.001 percent. On billions of dollars. Who was running Luxembourg for almost 20 years while this machine was built and protected? Jean-Claude Juncker, Prime Minister of Luxembourg until 2013. Deltour did not leak straight to the world. In 2012 he passed the documents to French journalist Edouard Perrin, who used them for a TV documentary. PwC noticed and filed a complaint with the Luxembourg courts. Then in November 2014, ICIJ ICIJ pulled together over 80 journalists across more than 30 media outlets in 26 countries and published the full scale of it as LuxLeaks. The timing could not have been worse for Juncker, or depending how you look at it, could not have been better. He had just been elected President of the European Commission days before the story broke. The man who ran the tax haven for two decades was now running Europe. A month later ICIJ dropped LuxLeaks 2, showing the other Big 4 accounting firms Deloitte, EY and KPMG were running the exact same playbook. This was never one bad apple. It was standard practice. Juncker faced a no confidence vote in the European Parliament over it. He survived. Deltour was not so lucky. December 2014, Luxembourg charges him with theft, violation of trade secrecy and fraudulent access to a computer system. He is facing up to 5 years in prison and a fine of 1,250,000 euros. For opening an unlocked folder on his way out the door. April 2016, the criminal trial. Deltour and his colleague Raphael Halet, another former PwC employee who leaked a second batch of documents, are both convicted. Deltour gets 12 months suspended and a 1,500 euro fine. Perrin the journalist is acquitted. Deltour appeals. Loses. Appeals again. Finally in May 2018 the Luxembourg Court of Appeal fully recognises him as a genuine whistleblower under European Court of Human Rights standards and acquits him completely. Halet's fight took even longer. He lost his Luxembourg appeals and only won at the European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber in 2023, nearly a decade after he first spoke up. The European Commission that Juncker went on to lead never opened a single formal investigation into a single LuxLeaks tax ruling. Not one. It did chase Starbucks, Fiat and Amazon over separate deals, but the mountain of paperwork Deltour handed over sat there untouched. So that is the LuxLeaks story. Build a tax avoidance machine for 20 years and get promoted to run the continent. Copy the evidence of it and spend most of a decade fighting to stay out of prison. BBC News (UK) · ICIJ · Reuters · Le Monde and others.
Artur Nadolny97,267 次观看 • 3 天前
UNDERCOVER REPORTER EXPOSES WHORLTON HALL In 2019, BBC Panorama (BBC Panorama) sent an undercover reporter, Olivia Davies, to work 38 days as a carer inside Whorlton Hall. It was a 17 bed hospital in County Durham for adults with learning disabilities and autism. @NHS funded. Privately run by Cygnet Health Care. The footage showed staff mocking, taunting, restraining and threatening patients. One of them was Alex, a 20 year old autistic woman who had been there almost a year. Her family had no idea until the BBC showed them the tape. Care Quality Commission) had already inspected Whorlton Hall in 2018, off the back of a whistleblower raising concerns. They found some issues, including heavy use of restraint. They did not properly investigate the group of staff at the centre of it. A later independent review of the regulator's own conduct found the CQC had also sat on a 2015 report flagging serious concerns instead of publishing it, which would have triggered closer scrutiny years earlier. So the regulator had the warning. Twice. It still took a journalist with a hidden camera to actually do something about it. Whorlton Hall traces back through the same corporate lineage as Winterbourne View, the hospital Panorama exposed for abusing people with learning disabilities back in 2011. Same type of unit. Same broadcaster catching it on tape. 8 years apart. Nobody in the system managed to learn a single lesson in between. Whorlton Hall closed after the programme aired. Durham Police (Durham Constabulary) opened a criminal investigation. 9 former staff were charged with 27 counts of ill treatment or wilful neglect. The trial concluded in 2023. 10 charges were upheld. 4 men were convicted. In 2024 they got suspended sentences. The judge described the place as an unpredictable and inherently frightening place to live. Suspended sentences for filmed cruelty against some of the most vulnerable adults in the country. That's the going rate. The hospital closed. The pattern didn't. SOURCES BBC Panorama BBCNews Care Quality Commission and others
Artur Nadolny26,466 次观看 • 1 天前
ROBIN COOK QUIT OVER A WAR DIED ON A SCOTTISH HILL AND THE CASE CLOSED BEFORE TEA TIME Robin Cook spent his career being right at the worst possible time for his career. In March 2003 he resigned as Leader of the Commons rather than back the Iraq War. His resignation speech got a standing ovation from MPs on all sides, something that had never happened in the chamber before. He spent the next two years telling anyone who would listen that Tony Blair had marched Britain into a war built on nothing. Two years later he was dead. 6 August 2005. Ben Stack, a remote mountain in Sutherland. Cook collapsed of a heart attack while hillwalking with his wife Gaynor, fell down a ridge, and was airlifted to Raigmore Hospital in Inverness, where he was pronounced dead within the hour. The post mortem two days later gave the cause as hypertensive heart disease. Police on the scene treated it as a medical matter and that was the end of their involvement. No inquest reopening. No criminal inquiry. Just a senior politician who had publicly humiliated the government over an illegal war, dropping dead in one of the most remote spots in the country, with the official file shut almost as fast as it was opened. Norman Baker, the Lib Dem MP and later Home Office minister who spent years digging into the death of weapons inspector David Kelly, said in 2007 that Cook had been on Ministry of Defence linked land when he died and that he had real doubts about the official account. He got called a conspiracy theorist for asking the question. Funny how that label only gets handed out to the people asking questions, never to the people refusing to answer them. Then there is the bit nobody mentions enough. Starting in 2020, someone filed Freedom of Information requests with Police Scotland asking for the basic details of that day. What time officers were alerted. Whether witnesses were interviewed. Whether the people who came to help Gaynor Cook were ever identified. Police Scotland refused. The case went to the Scottish Information Commissioner, who in 2021 and again in 2022 sided with the police and let them keep it sealed under a legal exemption. So twenty years on, the basic facts of how a former Foreign Secretary actually died on a hillside are still officially none of your business. That is not evidence of a murder BUT it is evidence of an institution that would rather you stop asking than ever have to answer. Britain does not need conspiracy theories when the real story is this embarrassing on its own. SOURCES The Herald - Norman Baker doubts over Robin Cook's death Scottish Information Commissioner - Decision 074/2021 and Decision 011/2022, Police Scotland FOI refusals on Robin Cook case file Police Scotland - original statement treating death as a medical matter BBC - Robin Cook resignation speech
Artur Nadolny511,165 次观看 • 29 天前
WHISTLEBLOWER VS FIFA CORRUPTION Bonita Mersiades worked on Australia's team trying to win the right to host the 2022 World Cup. She left that job in 2010. Then she did something braver than her old job ever asked of her. She told the truth. FIFA hired an American lawyer called Michael Garcia to investigate corruption in how countries won the right to host the World Cup. Bonita Mersiades gave him evidence. She said FIFA officials were asking bid teams for personal favours and money in exchange for votes. She said Australia paid up too. She only agreed to talk because FIFA promised to keep her identity secret. Here is how FIFA kept that promise. In 2014 a judge called Hans-Joachim Eckert wrote a summary of Garcia's findings for the public. It described her in enough detail that everyone figured out who she was within days. The summary also cast doubt on whether she could be trusted. So the reward for helping FIFA investigate itself was getting exposed and then called unreliable in the same document. Mersiades and another whistleblower who worked on Qatar's bid complained. They said FIFA broke its promise of confidentiality. FIFA looked into its own conduct and decided there was nothing wrong. Their excuse was that the summary never used her actual name. Just enough detail that everyone knew anyway. Even Garcia, the man FIFA hired to do the investigating, was angry about how his work got rewritten. He quit his job at FIFA and tried to appeal the summary. FIFA then sat on his full report for 3 more years. It only came out in 2017 after a German newspaper got hold of a leaked copy and published it first. Once people finally read the whole thing, it backed up everything Mersiades had been saying since 2010. Fast forward to 2026. The World Cup just finished in North America. FIFA's current president Gianni Infantino spent the tournament getting friendly with Donald Trump. A watchdog group called FairSquare has now filed a formal complaint about it. And guess who is helping lead that campaign. Bonita Mersiades again. 16 years after she first spoke up, she is still saying the same thing. Nothing has really changed. SOURCES BBC News (UK) CNN ESPN FIFA and others
Artur Nadolny57,264 次观看 • 3 天前
BEFORE YOU BOARD YOUR NEXT FLIGHT READ THIS A former airline captain named John Hoyte reached out to me recently. He spent nearly 30 years flying commercial aircraft, developed serious neurological damage, lost his career, and has been trying to get this story properly investigated ever since. He sent me documents spanning two decades. The scale of what is in them is HUGE. What he shared includes parliamentary records, a 320-page published report from the British pilots union, BBC coverage, House of Lords testimony, and active litigation in multiple countries. This has been heard at the highest levels. It has largely been buried. Most commercial jet aircraft use a system called bleed air. Instead of drawing fresh air from outside, the plane takes compressed air directly from the engines and pumps it into the cabin. That is the air you breathe for the entire flight. When engine seals wear down, oil and hydraulic fluid can leak into that air supply. Those fluids contain organophosphates, the same compounds found in certain pesticides and nerve agents. Inhaling them can cause neurological damage, memory loss, and chronic fatigue. In documented cases, far worse. This design has been in use since the 1950s. The health risk has been documented for just as long. In 2005, BALPA, the British pilots union, published a full conference report on this with the University of New South Wales. The following year, 27 BALPA pilots were tested by University College London. All 27 showed evidence of toxic poisoning and reduced cognitive function. Not some of them. All of them. BBCPanorama covered it in 2008. The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee heard evidence on it in 2007 and 2008. In February 2007, 40 unrelated passengers on a single XL Airways flight were seriously injured by contaminated cabin air. Their cases went to court. Twenty of them won a US jurisdiction ruling in 2010. A UK coroner recorded a death linked to this in 2015. France has formally recognised aerotoxic syndrome as an occupational disease. In the US, a law professor is suing Boeing for $40 million after a single exposure left him permanently injured. Morgan & Morgan, America's largest personal injury firm, is now actively taking mass cases on behalf of passengers and crew. John himself was one of those 27 pilots tested by UCL. He founded the Aerotoxic Association in 2007 at the Houses of Parliament to support other survivors. He has been fighting for this for nearly 20 years. Almost every commercial jet aircraft except the Boeing 787 Dreamliner uses the bleed air system. The 787 uses a different design that avoids this problem entirely. That safer design has existed for years. That fact alone says everything. BBC has not covered this story since 2020. The UK Civil Aviation Authority continues to say there is no positive evidence of a link. The Aerotoxic Association has been contacted by more than 2,500 people who believe they have been affected. John is looking for mainstream investigative journalists who want to dig deep into this. He is an expert witness with decades of evidence and is willing to answer every question. He has a passenger injured on that 2007 flight, Samantha Sabatino, whose case is in the parliamentary record. This is a genuine story of enormous public interest and it deserves proper investigation. If you are a journalist or researcher and want to speak to John directly, his contact details are in the comments. I will add media coverage links in the comments section. Sources: Aerotoxic Association (Aerotoxic Association) BALPA (British Airline Pilots Association) Morgan & Morgan (Morgan & Morgan) gcaqe org (Global Cabin Air Quality Executive) BBCPanorama covered it in 2008 with a full documentary titled Something in the Air. Herald Scotland The Wall Street Journal FlightGlobal Canary @the_ecologist
Artur Nadolny759,694 次观看 • 1 个月前
ONE TAPE NOBODY WANTED TO WATCH In 2008 a teenage girl in Rochdale told police she had been ra*ed. The Crown Prosecution Service Crown Prosecution Service watched hours of her taped testimony, had DNA evidence, and decided a jury would not find her credible. They dropped the case. While that was happening, an NHS sexual health worker named Sara Rowbotham was doing the opposite of nothing. Between 2004 and 2011 she sent 181 referrals to police and social services flagging the exploitation of girls in the area. Nobody acted on them. In 2014, 2 years after 9 men went to prison off the back of this, the council made her redundant. In 2011 a new chief prosecutor landed in the job. Nazir Afzal nazir afzal pulled up the same interview tape everyone else had ignored. Partway through the girl's testimony, the officer interviewing her yawned. Afzal reversed the CPS decision within days. 9 men were convicted in 2012. Years later a second, entirely separate Rochdale network surfaced, different girls, different men, decades of abuse nobody caught the first time round. Its ringleader Mohammed Zahid got 35 years in October 2025. Same town, 2 rings, both missed for over a decade. Afzal didn't stop there. He prosecuted BBC News (UK) presenter Stuart Hall for decades of child abuse. Then he turned on the Metropolitan Police, who have declined to investigate allegations involving Prince Andrew 3 separate times, in 2015, 2021 and again in December 2025. He told Channel 4 News "I can't think of any other reason" why the Met wouldn't investigate. For saying that out loud he got death threats. The English Defence League camped outside his house demanding he be deported. He was born in Birmingham. The CPS let him go in 2015. Their official line was efficiency savings. So here's the scoreboard. The woman who spent a decade raising the alarm lost her job. The man who finally acted on it lost his job too. The force that spent a decade finding reasons not to look at a prince kept theirs intact. Nobody who behaved badly in this story paid for it. Everybody who did the right thing did. SOURCES BBC News (UK) Channel 4 News ITV News The Guardian Reuters
Artur Nadolny78,958 次观看 • 5 天前
THE MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH ABOUT BENT COPS Daniel Morgan was a private investigator who was about to sell a newspaper story exposing police corruption. On 10 March 1987 he was found with an axe in his head in a pub car park in Sydenham. Should have been a straightforward case for any competent police force. Except the Metropolitan Police Metropolitan Police left the crime scene unsearched and unguarded, which is an odd way to run a murder investigation unless you already know who did it. Five separate police investigations followed over the next 24 years. All five collapsed. 67 people were arrested along the way, including 8 serving or former police officers. Nobody was ever convicted. Morgan's case also got tangled up with corrupt officers linked to the News of the World, the newspaper that later imploded in the phone hacking scandal. In 2013 the Home Secretary finally set up an independent panel to find out what actually happened. It took the Daniel Morgan Independent Panel, chaired by Baroness Nuala O'Loan, 8 years to produce an answer, partly because the Met refused to give the panel access to its own case management system for 7 of those years ... ... The police obstructed the inquiry into how the police obstructed the investigation. The final report landed in June 2021, running to 1251 pages. Its conclusion was blunt. The Metropolitan Police was institutionally corrupt, more concerned with protecting its own image than solving the murder of a father of two. Then commissioner Cressida Dick was personally called out for the years of delay and obstruction. The Met's response hit every note of a corporate crisis playbook. It admitted corruption played a role in the failed original investigation, then in the same breath said it did not accept it was institutionally corrupt. A separate watchdog review the following year decided it would not use that label either. So the country ended up with a 1251 page report calling the force corrupt, followed by polite disagreement about the wording, while the murder stays unsolved 39 years on. The Morgan family fought for over three decades to get even this far. Not because Scotland Yard offered them the truth. Because they refused to accept anything less. This is what institutional accountability looks like when the institution under investigation gets to mark its own homework. If you have ever wondered why whistleblowers inside British policing keep getting ignored, start here. SOURCES BBC News (UK) The Times and Sunday Times Sky News The Guardian and others.
Artur Nadolny81,838 次观看 • 8 天前
456 PATIENTS DIED This is one of the biggest medical scandals in British history and there is a decent chance you have never heard of it. Between 1988 and 2000, patients admitted to Gosport War Memorial Hospital in Hampshire for things like hip fractures and chest infections were routinely put on syringe drivers pumping a steady stream of diamorphine, a powerful opioid. Many were not in pain. Most died within days of being hooked up. Nurses noticed straight away. In 1988, staff on the Redclyffe Annexe told their managers something was badly wrong. They told their union, the Royal College of Nursing. They kept raising it for years. Management's response was to tell them to stop making waves. The doctor overseeing the prescribing was Dr Jane Barton. In 2010 the General Medical Council GMC found her guilty of serious professional misconduct in the care of 12 patients. She was not struck off. She retired instead, presumably somewhere with no syringe drivers. 3 separate police investigations by Hampshire Constabulary went absolutely nowhere across 3 decades. Zero prosecutions. Grieving families asking why their relatives died 5 days after routine surgery were treated as the problem. Then in 2018, after a 4 year inquiry costing 14 million pounds, the Gosport Independent Panel confirmed what those nurses said in 1988. 456 patients died after being given opioids with no medical justification. The panel said probably 200 more died the same way, but their records had gone missing, because of course they had. Kent Police Kent Police (UK) then launched Operation Magenta, reviewing over 750 patient records, taking 1200 witness statements and eventually naming 24 suspects. In November 2025, 7 years into that investigation and 37 years after the first nurse spoke up, police told the families of 101 patients there would be no charges. Their cases did not meet the evidential test. The rest remain under review, with the Crown Prosecution Service Crown Prosecution Service holding the final say on any charges, whenever that call finally comes. So here is where things stand. A regulator confirmed the misconduct. A panel confirmed the cover-up. Nurses were proven right 30 years after the fact. And to this date, not one person has been prosecuted for any of the 456 deaths. If you raise a concern about patient safety and get ignored for 3 decades, congratulations, you were right all along. Doesn't bring anyone back though. SOURCES The Guardian BBC News (UK) The Telegraph Daily Mail The News, Portsmouth and many others
Artur Nadolny87,628 次观看 • 10 天前
YOUR LASAGNE WAS UP TO 100% HORSE AND NOBODY TOLD YOU In 2013 you could grab a Findus lasagne for dinner and unknowingly eat a horse. An actual horse, DNA confirmed, up to 100 percent horse in some batches. It started in January that year when tests found horse DNA in frozen burgers on shelves at Tesco, Lidl, Aldi Stores UK, Iceland Foods ❄️ and Dunnes Stores. One Tesco burger came back at 29 percent horse. Nobody in that supply chain apparently noticed the difference between a cow and a horse for months. Then Findus admitted its beef lasagne tested between 60 and 100 percent horse. The UK's Food Standards Agency Food Standards Agency confirmed it. Findus blamed its supplier Comigel in Luxembourg. Comigel blamed French meat firm Spanghero. Spanghero blamed Romanian abattoirs. The Romanian government said its slaughterhouses never even dealt with Comigel directly and had done nothing wrong. Everyone pointed at everyone else while the horse kept crossing borders undetected the whole time. Follow the actual trail and it gets better. Dutch trader Willy Selten and a company called Draap Trading, registered in Cyprus and run out of Belgium, bought cheap Romanian horsemeat, shipped it to the Netherlands, relabelled it as beef, then sold it on to processors who fed it into your ready meals. One man involved, Jan Fasen, had already been convicted for the exact same fraud in 2007. He just did it again, bigger, across more countries. This went beyond mislabelling. France confirmed some of the horse carcasses in the food chain had likely been treated with phenylbutazone, a drug not meant for human consumption. So this was a food safety problem too, one that took years and a criminal trial to even get acknowledged properly. It took until 2019 for Spanghero's former director to actually get convicted and jailed in Paris. That is 6 years for an operation French officials said ran across 13 countries and roughly 28 companies. The supermarkets pulled the products, apologised, and moved on. The system that let a criminal network swap horse for beef across an entire continent for months without a single check barely changed. Food fraud units got a bit more funding. Audits got a bit less predictable. That was largely it. Next time a company tells you it takes food safety extremely seriously, remember it took actual horse DNA in your dinner before anyone acted like it. Sources BBC News (UK) Reuters CNN NBC News ITV News The Guardian
Artur Nadolny43,822 次观看 • 5 天前
SHE FILED 181 REPORTS. POLICE TOLD HER THE CHILDREN WERE NOT RELIABLE WITNESSES.. Sara Rowbotham was an @NHS sexual health coordinator in Rochdale. From 2004, she started documenting what everyone with the authority to act had decided not to see. Girls as young as 13. Groomed, trafficked, and raped by groups of men. She wrote it all down and reported it. 181 referrals to Greater Manchester Police and social services between 2004 and 2011. The answer was always the same. The girls were not credible witnesses. Not their problem. Move along. Nine men were eventually convicted in 2012, but only because a new chief prosecutor arrived, read the evidence Sara had spent years building, and actually did something with it. The Crown Prosecution Service had previously dropped the case entirely. Sara had been right all along. Then the system turned on her. She was blamed. Accused of failing to refer cases properly. The institution that had ignored 181 reports about the rape of children decided the problem was the woman who filed them. Primetime television did what 181 referrals could not. Three Girls aired on BBC One in 2017. Maxine Peake played Sara. The public was furious. A drama series achieved what seven years of documented evidence never could. In January 2024, a damning 173-page independent review commissioned by Mayor Andy Burnham confirmed what Sara and fellow whistleblower Maggie Oliver Maggie Oliver had been saying for twenty years. They were the only people raising the alarm while GMP and Rochdale Council looked the other way. The review found 74 children who were exploited, serious failures to protect 48 of them, and 96 men still considered a current risk to children. As of late 2025, 61 men have been convicted across multiple investigations. Combined sentences total almost 630 years. Sara received an MBE in 2021. The officers who ignored her 181 reports got their pensions. Two decades of raising the alarm. A BBC drama, a 173-page review, and an MBE later, the abusers were still being found. SOURCES BBC News (UK) ITV News The Times and Sunday Times Byline Times
Artur Nadolny192,843 次观看 • 25 天前
HE KNEW THE DOSSIER WAS FAKE. WEEKS LATER HE WAS DEAD IN A FIELD Dr David Kelly was Britain's foremost weapons inspector. He spent years inspecting Iraqi facilities, earned a Nobel Peace Prize nomination, and knew more about Saddam's arsenal than almost anyone in government. In 2002, Tony Blair's government published a dossier claiming Iraq could deploy chemical and biological weapons within 45 minutes. Britain went to war on the back of it. No weapons were ever found. Kelly knew the dossier was rubbish. He said so, quietly, to a BBC journalist. That conversation ended his career, his privacy, and ultimately his life. The MOD carefully allowed his name to leak to the press as the BBC's source. He was then hauled before parliamentary committees, stripped apart by his own employer, and thrown to a media frenzy he never asked for. Two days after giving evidence to MPs, the 59-year-old was found dead in woodland near his Oxfordshire home. Instead of a proper inquest, Tony Blair asked Lord Hutton to run a private inquiry. Hutton concluded suicide. The inquest was opened, then suspended, and never resumed. Eight senior legal and medical figures, including a coroner, later wrote to The Times and Sunday Times saying the verdict was unsafe. They argued the wound found on Kelly's wrist, a severed ulnar artery, would not have caused sufficient blood loss to kill a healthy person. There were no fingerprints on the knife found beside his body, even though he was not wearing gloves. In 2011, Attorney General Dominic Grieve rejected all calls for a new inquest. He said the Hutton Inquiry was "tantamount to an inquest" and that further investigation would be dismissed by judges with irritation. A man challenged the government's justification for a war that killed hundreds of thousands of people. He was publicly destroyed, died in mysterious circumstances, never got a proper inquest, and the people who sent him into that media storm faced no consequences whatsoever. Tony Blair became a Middle East Peace Envoy the following year. You genuinely could not make it up. Sources: BBCNews, openDemocracy, Hansard, The Times and Sunday Times | Hutton Report
Artur Nadolny389,207 次观看 • 2 个月前
POST OFFICE KNEW ITS TILL BUTTON WAS ROBBING PEOPLE SINCE 2019 A subpostmaster called Denis O'Donnell messaged me on LinkedIn. He follows this page and asked me to help amplify a story he has spent six years trying to get anyone to take seriously. After checking it out I understand why he is still fighting. In 2019 O'Donnell ran a Post Office branch in Prestatyn, Wales. He noticed something wrong with the till. A screen icon on the Horizon system does two opposite jobs, take money and pay money. When several transactions stack up together, Horizon can hand cash to a customer and then log it as a payment the other way, creating an instant shortfall the subpostmaster gets blamed for. O'Donnell wrote to the top. He sent letters to then CEO Nick Read and communications boss Mark Davies. Post Office's answer was that it was a one off mistake, fixed within days. Convenient timing too, since this was 6 months after Post Office had just been humiliated in the High Court by subpostmasters who proved Horizon was faulty all along. O'Donnell kept pushing for years. He eventually got the story to ComputerWeekly and its reporter Karl Flinders Karl Flinders, and to Ron Warmington, the forensic investigator at Second Sight who was one of the original people who blew open the whole Horizon scandal back in 2012. Warmington called this new defect sufficiently serious to write directly to the public inquiry. He also called Post Office's first response to questions about it arrogant and dismissive, which by now is basically the company's official slogan. Post Office finally agreed to investigate and warn branches in December 2025. Six years after O'Donnell first told them. Their own spokesperson said it is impossible to know the true impact but they believe it is limited, based on checking 1 year of error logs out of more than 24 years Horizon has been running. O'Donnell calls that maths a joke, and it is hard to disagree when millions of transactions across two and a half decades got reduced to a single year sample. O'Donnell is trying to warn other subpostmasters and their families that the Post Office Process Review scheme closes to new applications on 30 September 2026. This scheme covers losses caused by Post Office products, policies or processes, separate from the Horizon Shortfall Scheme which already closed in January and the GLO scheme closing this month. If people affected by this specific defect do not apply before the deadline, they may lose the chance entirely. Post Office spent over two decades telling subpostmasters the system never lies. Then it spent six more years telling one particular whistleblower his bug did not matter. Forgive people for not trusting the next apology on the first read. If you are a current or former subpostmaster affected by this or unsure about the Process Review deadline, get proper advice before it closes. SOURCES ComputerWeekly Karl Flinders Post Office Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry BBC News (UK)
Artur Nadolny47,309 次观看 • 8 天前
NHS DESTROYED THE WOMAN WHO CAUGHT ITS DOCTORS STEALING FROM IT Sharmila Chowdhury sharmila chowdhury gave 30 years of spotless service to the @NHS. Not one disciplinary mark. Not one complaint. She was the budget holder for radiology at Ealing Hospital NHS Trust, which means she could see exactly where the money was going. What she saw was two consultant radiologists billing the NHS for shifts they were spending at a private hospital down the road. The Trust lost £250,000 of public money through those arrangements. She reported it to her line manager. Her medical director. HR. Counter Fraud. The Department of Health. The Treasury. Number 10. She had a paper trail so airtight that ITV undercover surveillance later caught the same consultants still absent during paid hours, and caught Miranda Harvie and Akkib Rafique taking direct cash payments from patients for private ultrasounds inside the NHS building, money going straight into their own account. So what did the Trust do with this documented, camera-confirmed, publicly broadcast fraud? They sacked her. On fabricated counter-allegations from a subordinate she had herself reported for breaching patient safety. The man who filed those allegations later sent an email signed off with "0800-F***-YOU-B****." He received a Top Mentor award from the Trust that same year. Sharmila won the Interim Relief Hearing. She won the internal appeal. The judge asked the Trust to reinstate her. The Trust said no and refused to let her return. She was blacklisted. Job offers were withdrawn the moment employers discovered who she was. She settled out of court in 2012 with two years pay, out of which she had to pay £77,500 in legal fees alone. 38 Degrees38 Degrees In July 2013, she was diagnosed with breast and lung cancer. Multiple consultants believe this is a direct result of the sustained stress of her treatment as a whistleblower. The consultants she reported kept their jobs. George Osborne said he could not get involved. Andrew Lansley said he could not get involved. David Cameron said he could not get involved. Every single official body, every single minister, every single department looked at a proven, camera-documented NHS fraud case and decided it was an employment matter. Read Sharmila's full case: sharmilachowdhury com Sources: Health Select Committee written evidence | Daily Mail | The Independent | BBC News (UK) | Channel 4 | The Guardian | The Times and Sunday Times | The Mirror | Channel 4News | ITV
Artur Nadolny391,935 次观看 • 2 个月前
THE JOURNALIST WHO BROKE CAMBRIDGE ANALYTICA WAS THANKED WITH A £1 MILLION LEGAL BILL Carole Cadwalladr Carole Cadwalladr exposed one of the biggest political scandals in modern British history. Cambridge Analytica. Brexit dark money. Possible Russian influence in UK democracy. The kind of journalism that wins Pulitzer nominations and keeps people in power very nervous. So what happened next? Arron Banks the man who made the biggest single political donation in UK history at around £9 million to Brexit campaigns, sued her personally. Not The Observer , which published her work for years. Not TED Talks, which hosted her talk. Her. Individually. A freelance journalist. The suit was over one sentence in a 2019 TED Talk and a single tweet, in which she said Banks had lied about a secret relationship with the Russian government. Banks denied it. He had, however, admitted meeting Russian embassy officials multiple times more than he originally told a Parliamentary committee. The Guardian, her own publisher, declined to fund her defence. She crowdfunded her legal costs from 29,000 members of the public. She faced potential costs of up to £1 million. She eventually won on the main issues in the High Court in 2022, but lost on appeal on one narrow point. She was ordered to pay Banks £35,000 in damages, issue an apology, and delete certain tweets. She was also hit with a costs order of over £1 million. The woman who exposed how democracy gets bought had to beg the public for money to stay solvent while doing it. Seventeen press freedom organisations called the case an attempt to intimidate and silence public interest journalism. The UK government eventually introduced anti-SLAPP legislation. Partly because of what happened to her. In the UK, you can crowdfund a journalist's survival costs after she exposes the possible corruption of a referendum .. .. Or you can fund the laws that protect journalists before they get financially destroyed. We chose the first option.
Artur Nadolny110,850 次观看 • 22 天前
3:05
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
HIDDEN CAMERA UNCOVERS A CULTURE OF CRUELTY A nurse tried to stop a nightmare. His own regulator sent him two auto-replies instead. Terry Bryan started work at Winterbourne View care home near Bristol in August 2010. Management called it an "assertive" service. What he found was staff teasing, threatening and ignoring people with severe learning disabilities like they weren't even in the room. He refused to help pin one patient down. Staff called him a "do-gooder" after that and kept their distance. So he did what you'd expect. He told the manager. Nothing happened. He told the manager above that manager. She booked a meeting for a day he couldn't make, then never rebooked it. He was told the safeguarding team already knew. They never contacted him once. Next he went through his union to the people whose actual job this is, the Care Quality Commission. He filled in their online form himself. He wrote the words "I have seen abuse at Winterbourne View." Over the next two months he got two automated emails back. No visit. No call. No investigation. Just a reference number and silence. At that point Bryan gave up on the system and rang the BBC. On 31 May 2011, Panorama BBCPanorama broadcast "Undercover Care: The Abuse Exposed." A hidden camera showed staff pinning residents to the floor, slapping them, soaking them in cold water fully clothed, pouring mouthwash into their eyes, trapping them under chairs while everyone laughed. One worker asked a terrified patient if he wanted his face grated off with a cheese grater. Another patient had once tried to climb out of a second floor window. Staff joked about it for months afterwards. When someone finally asked the CQC why they sat on eight months of written warnings, their answer was that it had been a "misjudgement." One word for ignoring disabled adults getting tortured on their watch. Eleven staff eventually admitted 38 charges of neglect and abuse in court. Six went to prison. The ringleader got two years. Two more got 20 months each. The rest walked out with suspended sentences, which means no jail time at all. The judge called it a "culture of cruelty." Even that feels generous. The home was shut down. The company running it apologised. All 11 were banned from ever working with vulnerable people again. None of this comes out without one nurse who wouldn't let it go, and a TV crew willing to do what the regulator was paid to do and didn't. You'll see this exact shape again and again in this series. Someone raises the alarm the right way. The organisation built to respond does as little as it can get away with. It takes a hidden camera to make them move. SOURCES BBCNews BBCPanorama The Telegraph Community Care The Guardian and others.
Artur Nadolny13,465 次观看 • 2 天前
BBC PAID A WOMAN HALF A MAN SALARY FOR THE SAME JOB AND THOUGHT NO ONE WOULD NOTICE Carrie Gracie spoke fluent Mandarin. Ran the BBC Beijing bureau. Thirty years of service. One of four international editors at Britain's most prestigious broadcaster. Then the BBC was legally forced to publish salary data in 2017. Gracie looked at the list. Her male counterpart covering North America was on up to £249,000. She was below £150,000. Not even on the published list. Neither was Europe editor Katya Adler. The two women. Funny that. She had explicitly made equal pay a condition of taking the China role. The BBC said yes. Then paid her nearly half anyway and apparently hoped she'd never check. She checked. She asked for equal pay. The BBC, with the confidence of an institution that had been getting away with this for decades, offered her a raise that still left her short. She turned it down. Resigned from the post. Published an open letter to the licence fee payers explaining exactly what their public broadcaster was doing with their money. The BBC's response was to put her through nearly a year of their own internal grievance process. Run by the same institution she was complaining about. Investigating itself. Shockingly, it went nowhere. It took three separate meetings with the Director-General and the concrete threat of an employment tribunal before the BBC caved, issued a public apology, and paid her £361,000 in backdated wages. She gave every single penny to the Fawcett Society (Fawcett Society). A publicly funded broadcaster. Breaking equality law. Caught red-handed. Dragging a 30-year employee through a year of institutional theatre. Paying up only when a judge became a realistic possibility.
Artur Nadolny213,586 次观看 • 1 个月前
NHS SPENT 11 MILLION POUNDS TRYING TO PROVE ONE CARDIOLOGIST WAS WRONG Dr Raj Mattu flagged 5 patients crammed into 4 bed cardiac bays at Walsgrave Hospital in 2001. A 35 year old died because staff could not reach him in time. He told BBC. The trust suspended him, reportedly hired private investigators, and sent over 200 complaints about him to GMC. All 200 were rejected. At the 2016 remedy hearing the trust's barrister called him greedy for wanting the compensation he was already owed, then suggested he retrain as a school teacher on 30,000 pounds a year. He won. Around 1.22 million pounds, up to 2.5 million once tax was added. The legal fight cost the trust over 11 million in public money. Patients died. He spoke up. The system spent a decade trying to prove him wrong instead of fixing the ward. Sources: BBC The Telegraph ITV News The Guardian
Artur Nadolny77,666 次观看 • 22 天前
BBC PAID HIM 6X MORE. THE TRIBUNAL SAID THAT WAS ILLEGAL. THE BBC SAID IT WAS COMPLICATED. Samira Ahmed Samira Ahmed presented Newswatch on BBC for years. Same format. Same length. Same job. Read viewer feedback on camera, wrap it up, go home. Jeremy Vine Jeremy Vine | Here, on Tiktok, Insta & Facebook did exactly the same thing on Points of View. She got £440 per episode. He got £3,000. Ahmed spent years trying to fix it quietly through internal BBC processes. The BBC said there was no problem. She filed for tribunal. In January 2020, the tribunal ruled unanimously in her favour. The BBC could not explain the difference. They tried. They argued Vine needed "a glint in the eye" and to be "cheeky." The tribunal said that was not a skill. It was a story the BBC told itself. The total underpayment was close to £700,000. Sarah Montague, another BBC woman, settled separately for around £400,000. The National Union of Journalists flagged around 70 more cases waiting resolution internally. After Ahmed won, 700 BBC women received pay rises. The BBC's statement after losing? They regretted it had gone to tribunal. Not that they paid a woman six times less than a man for the same work for years. Just that it became public. Sources: The Guardian, BBC, IFJ, Others
Artur Nadolny282,925 次观看 • 2 个月前
SIR ALAN BATES - THANKS GOD FOR THIS MAN. EH. In 1998 Alan Bates and his partner Suzanne packed up their lives in West Yorkshire and moved to a small town in North Wales. They put everything they had into a post office. Every penny. Every hope. A future they had planned together. Two years later the software started lying. Money appeared to be missing. He called the helpline 507 times. He kept going. He kept records. He kept asking. The Post Office's response was simple. It wasn't the software. It was him. In 2003 they sent him a letter terminating his contract. No reason given. He lost £65,000. Everything he and Suzanne had invested, gone. Their private notes about him, revealed at the public inquiry decades later, described the situation with devastating corporate elegance. He had become unmanageable. That is what they called a man asking why the numbers were wrong. So he did what any reasonable person would do after losing everything to an institution that called them a liar. He spent the next 25 years fighting back with nothing. No legal fund. No media empire. No government support. Just a burning refusal to let them win. He wrote letters promising his continued and increased resolve to bring this to people who would have no choice but to act, regardless of how many years it took. It took 25. While he was fighting, at least 13 people who had been through the same thing took their own lives. People who couldn't hold on long enough. People who needed someone to believe them and found nobody there. While he was fighting, the Post Office and its lawyers billed £265 million in legal fees between 2014 and 2024. Making sure the truth stayed buried. Making sure men like Alan Bates ran out of road before they ran out of fight. He didn't run out of fight. He rejected three compensation offers he considered insults. He watched an ITV drama turn his life into a television event. He watched politicians suddenly discover outrage they had been too busy to feel for two decades. He watched the country cry at a story it had been ignoring since 1999. In June 2024 they gave him a knighthood. Twenty-five years after calling him unmanageable. In November 2025 he settled his compensation claim. He received 49.2% of what he was owed. No executive has been charged. Fujitsu (Fujitsu Global) still holds government contracts. The Post Office (Post Office) is still standing. This country failed Alan Bates for 25 years. It failed every person who could not hold on long enough to see what he saw. It handed him a title instead of justice and called itself generous. He deserved better. They all did. Teach this man in every school in Britain. Not as a feel-good story. As a warning about what happens when ordinary people trust institutions that were never built to protect them. And as proof that one person, with nothing but the truth and the stubbornness to keep saying it, can make an entire country look at itself in the mirror. Even if it takes 25 years to get them to look. Sources: ComputerWeekly | BBC News (UK) AND many others
Artur Nadolny184,882 次观看 • 1 个月前
AT 93 BETTY BROWN IS STILL FIGHTING Betty Brown just turned 93 and picked up an OBE from King Charles at Windsor Castle. Lovely photo. Lovely medal on a lovely jacket. What she still does not have, six months after settling her claim, is a single penny of the compensation she was promised. Betty and her late husband Oswall ran the Annfield Plain Post Office in County Durham from 1985 to 2003. The Horizon accounting system built by Fujitsu Fujitsu UK told them money was missing from their branch. It was not missing. It was never missing. They spent around 100,000 pounds of their own savings covering shortfalls that did not exist, because that is apparently the correct response when a computer accuses you and nobody in charge believes the human standing in front of it. She is thought to be the oldest surviving victim of the Horizon scandal. She was one of the original 555 claimants who backed Alan Bates in the group legal action against the Post Office Post Office. She reached a settlement through the government redress scheme at the end of last year. At her OBE investiture in June she said she still had not received a penny. Meanwhile Fujitsu, the company whose faulty software caused this entire catastrophe, has been criticised by a committee of MPs for contributing nothing financially toward the redress bill, which is running toward 2 billion pounds. The company that broke the till keeps its money. The 93 year old it falsely accused of stealing from that till gets a medal instead of a bank transfer. She dedicated her OBE to the sub-postmasters who never lived to see this day. She has said before that at least 13 people are believed to have taken their own lives because of what Horizon did to them. She said she wears the honour for them because she still feels everything they felt. She also had a message for the Prime Minister Keir Starmer, asking him directly to sort this out as quickly as he can. That is a simple sentence. It appears to be an extremely difficult instruction to follow. Britain does love turning its victims into heroes once the damage is done and the bill has gone unpaid long enough to be embarrassing. Medals are cheap. Redress schemes, it turns out, are somehow still cheaper for the people who actually owe the money.
Artur Nadolny31,738 次观看 • 9 天前