Avi Bitterman, MD's banner

Avi Bitterman, MD

@AviBittMD • 27,610 subscribers

Dermatopathologist (Derm trained Dermpath) It was love at first slide. Data analysis, Debates, Philosophy. https://t.co/jJQcOXJykn

Shorts

LMAO I didn't realize how amazing this Russian bread sniffer was until I rewatched

LMAO I didn't realize how amazing this Russian bread sniffer was until I rewatched

379,026 views

Videos

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.ai•Sponsored•Livecam

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

Exclusive private shows

1.2k viewers online

Private Show

Join now for exclusive access

Free preview available • Premium content

This is what I mean when I say it's OK to condemn rabid (extremist) forms of anti-Zionism as such rather than feel the need to fit it into antisemitism first. Here Hasan Piker says anyone who has ever exhibited any sort of positive feelings about the state of Israel should be precluded from even working as a local dog catcher. And that any kind of Zionist tendency should be treated in the same way as being a rabid neo-Nazi. He then says he's serious about this belief (implying he's not joking or just being hyperbolic). Now, is there an antisemitic component to this specifically? Maybe! But here's the bigger point: Whether there is or isn't, it can (and should) still be condemned as a rabid / extremist form of anti-Zionism and it should be called out as such either way. And just to do a consistency check, there would be no problem with this being recognized if the shoe was on the other foot. If Ben Shapiro said anyone who has ever exhibited any sort of positive feelings about Palestine should become unemployable / lose their jobs/ to the point where they can't even find work as a local dog catcher and should be treated as a rabid Neo-Nazi everyone would easily recognize this as an extremist form of Zionism and condemn it as such. But for some weird reason, it's only when there's an implicit need to funnel any obviously deranged statement clearly coming from one ideology (anti-Zionist extremism) into another (antisemitism) before one is allowed to condemn it as such. In fact, I was only made aware of this clip by someone who sent it to me while asking just that: if I thought this was proof of antisemitism. My response: It's some evidence, not proof. But more importantly this is VERY STRONG evidence of his deranged and RABID Anti-Zionism. And hopefully others take this approach. Extremist forms of ideology should be recognized as such and condemned as such. Anti-Zionist extremism is not a magical exception to this.

This is what I mean when I say it's OK to condemn rabid (extremist) forms of anti-Zionism as such rather than feel the need to fit it into antisemitism first. Here Hasan Piker says anyone who has ever exhibited any sort of positive feelings about the state of Israel should be precluded from even working as a local dog catcher. And that any kind of Zionist tendency should be treated in the same way as being a rabid neo-Nazi. He then says he's serious about this belief (implying he's not joking or just being hyperbolic). Now, is there an antisemitic component to this specifically? Maybe! But here's the bigger point: Whether there is or isn't, it can (and should) still be condemned as a rabid / extremist form of anti-Zionism and it should be called out as such either way. And just to do a consistency check, there would be no problem with this being recognized if the shoe was on the other foot. If Ben Shapiro said anyone who has ever exhibited any sort of positive feelings about Palestine should become unemployable / lose their jobs/ to the point where they can't even find work as a local dog catcher and should be treated as a rabid Neo-Nazi everyone would easily recognize this as an extremist form of Zionism and condemn it as such. But for some weird reason, it's only when there's an implicit need to funnel any obviously deranged statement clearly coming from one ideology (anti-Zionist extremism) into another (antisemitism) before one is allowed to condemn it as such. In fact, I was only made aware of this clip by someone who sent it to me while asking just that: if I thought this was proof of antisemitism. My response: It's some evidence, not proof. But more importantly this is VERY STRONG evidence of his deranged and RABID Anti-Zionism. And hopefully others take this approach. Extremist forms of ideology should be recognized as such and condemned as such. Anti-Zionist extremism is not a magical exception to this.

Avi Bitterman, MD

60,540 views • 11 days ago

Jimmy Dore: You said we have a Jew problem and instead of saying we have a Zionist problem. And do you think that maybe it would be smart for your campaign to try to temper [your language] so people don’t get the wrong idea? Dan Bilzerian: Nope, nope. One thing about my campaign is I’m not going to craft my message in any way, shape, or form [to appeal / etc.]. This is amazing on two levels. First, Jimmy Dore is literally spoon-feeding Dumbass Dan the palatable version of Jew-hate he himself uses ("hey idiot, here's the trick, you have to say it like this"). And secondly Dan, instead of interjecting with "no like I said it's only a "Jewish supremacy" problem not a "Jew problem" like I just said before", he instead just rolls with the "Jew problem" characterization and doubles down on it. And to be fair, Dan is basically just an honest representation of all these other deranged fucks who slather their Jew hate in such plausible deniability. He's profoundly evil, but at least he's honest about it.

Jimmy Dore: You said we have a Jew problem and instead of saying we have a Zionist problem. And do you think that maybe it would be smart for your campaign to try to temper [your language] so people don’t get the wrong idea? Dan Bilzerian: Nope, nope. One thing about my campaign is I’m not going to craft my message in any way, shape, or form [to appeal / etc.]. This is amazing on two levels. First, Jimmy Dore is literally spoon-feeding Dumbass Dan the palatable version of Jew-hate he himself uses ("hey idiot, here's the trick, you have to say it like this"). And secondly Dan, instead of interjecting with "no like I said it's only a "Jewish supremacy" problem not a "Jew problem" like I just said before", he instead just rolls with the "Jew problem" characterization and doubles down on it. And to be fair, Dan is basically just an honest representation of all these other deranged fucks who slather their Jew hate in such plausible deniability. He's profoundly evil, but at least he's honest about it.

Avi Bitterman, MD

127,040 views • 3 months ago

Effective response for this self-immolation case (the ignite to extinguish time) was 1 min 10 sec. That's faster than I expected. But not fast enough. Even just at this point, a gun would still be more merciful than a fire extinguisher. 100% BSA burn. Almost never survivable.

Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Effective response for this self-immolation case (the ignite to extinguish time) was 1 min 10 sec. That's faster than I expected. But not fast enough. Even just at this point, a gun would still be more merciful than a fire extinguisher. 100% BSA burn. Almost never survivable.

Avi Bitterman, MD

44,517 views • 2 months ago

Now everyone is starting to admit that Ben Shapiro is...well...kinda hot.

Now everyone is starting to admit that Ben Shapiro is...well...kinda hot.

Avi Bitterman, MD

51,381 views • 9 months ago

This is completely ass backwards Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸 as they specifically clarified later the 95% was from Robinson, and 5% was Twiggs. Same thing with the other sample. You got that backwards too. 89% Robinson, 11% Twiggs.

This is completely ass backwards Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸 as they specifically clarified later the 95% was from Robinson, and 5% was Twiggs. Same thing with the other sample. You got that backwards too. 89% Robinson, 11% Twiggs.

Avi Bitterman, MD

13,952 views • 1 month ago

Can't believe we're infighting so hard over just the slightest disagreements guys 😢

Can't believe we're infighting so hard over just the slightest disagreements guys 😢

Avi Bitterman, MD

23,534 views • 9 months ago

No more content to load