Bhavy☄️'s banner

Bhavy☄️

@Bhavani_00007 • 7,244 subscribers

AI | SaaS | Startups | DM for collabs 📩

Shorts

Wtf is going on 😭 Sam Altman agreeing with Dario was not on my bingo card. And not only that… Elon was on the same line. This video I generated actually came true

Wtf is going on 😭 Sam Altman agreeing with Dario was not on my bingo card. And not only that… Elon was on the same line. This video I generated actually came true

230,624 görüntüleme

WTH, Ox Alpha is literally 10x better today. I gave it the exact same prompt I used yesterday, but the output is completely different. The quality is way better than yesterday. Is it learning continuously or something? 😭

WTH, Ox Alpha is literally 10x better today. I gave it the exact same prompt I used yesterday, but the output is completely different. The quality is way better than yesterday. Is it learning continuously or something? 😭

322,965 görüntüleme

Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Tested both models with the same prompt at the highest reasoning level available. > Fable took 18 minutes to complete this test and cost $12.60 > Kimi K3 took 10 minutes and cost around $6.95 Which one wins here?

Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Tested both models with the same prompt at the highest reasoning level available. > Fable took 18 minutes to complete this test and cost $12.60 > Kimi K3 took 10 minutes and cost around $6.95 Which one wins here?

147,705 görüntüleme

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.

479,144 görüntüleme

I tested Union Alpha. Asked it to generate this car scene in Three.js. It took 2 hours to get something I could show Honestly, this doesn’t feel anywhere close to Kimi’s level of realism. Feels more like another Flash model. Maybe another GLM? IDK. What do you think?

I tested Union Alpha. Asked it to generate this car scene in Three.js. It took 2 hours to get something I could show Honestly, this doesn’t feel anywhere close to Kimi’s level of realism. Feels more like another Flash model. Maybe another GLM? IDK. What do you think?

25,797 görüntüleme

POV: everyone’s got a macbook and you walk in with a gaming laptop 😂

POV: everyone’s got a macbook and you walk in with a gaming laptop 😂

1,018,692 görüntüleme

GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs Sol Astra: Took 11 minutes. This is from a follow-up after the first attempt had rendering and UI bugs. The smoke feels a little off. I expected more detail, but it did a good job understanding the intent. Cost: $12.85. Fable 5.1: Took 18 minutes to complete the same test with high detailing. Cost: $12.60. Kimi K3: Took 10 minutes with a similar level of output and cost only $6.95. SOL: Took 7 minutes, but the output seemed messy. Cost: $5.78. Personally, I like Kimi K3 for delivering similar quality with better token efficiency, followed by fable 5.1 for realism. What about you? I’ll do a couple more tests before coming to a conclusion.

GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs Sol Astra: Took 11 minutes. This is from a follow-up after the first attempt had rendering and UI bugs. The smoke feels a little off. I expected more detail, but it did a good job understanding the intent. Cost: $12.85. Fable 5.1: Took 18 minutes to complete the same test with high detailing. Cost: $12.60. Kimi K3: Took 10 minutes with a similar level of output and cost only $6.95. SOL: Took 7 minutes, but the output seemed messy. Cost: $5.78. Personally, I like Kimi K3 for delivering similar quality with better token efficiency, followed by fable 5.1 for realism. What about you? I’ll do a couple more tests before coming to a conclusion.

77,499 görüntüleme

Developers after Claude :

Developers after Claude :

380,927 görüntüleme

GPT-6 Astra vs Kimi K3. I'm comparing these because the gap between US models and Chinese models is already getting small. If US AI labs slow down, they will be the ones most affected by it. > Astra did it in one shot 6m 20s and $8. > Kimi K3 got almost the same result, but I had to use 2 follow-up prompts. Total: 12 min and $6.35. The results are almost identical. If US labs slow down, China takes the AI race. They will ship Astra-level open-weight models. China is already good at this. Open weights become the default. That's a nightmare for US labs.

GPT-6 Astra vs Kimi K3. I'm comparing these because the gap between US models and Chinese models is already getting small. If US AI labs slow down, they will be the ones most affected by it. > Astra did it in one shot 6m 20s and $8. > Kimi K3 got almost the same result, but I had to use 2 follow-up prompts. Total: 12 min and $6.35. The results are almost identical. If US labs slow down, China takes the AI race. They will ship Astra-level open-weight models. China is already good at this. Open weights become the default. That's a nightmare for US labs.

25,831 görüntüleme

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 Same prompt, 2 scenes: a harvester and farmers working. honestly? Qwen 3.8 impressed me. it just did what I asked. Grok 4.6 failed on coloring. Qwen>GLM> Grok> Gemini which one did better for you?

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 Same prompt, 2 scenes: a harvester and farmers working. honestly? Qwen 3.8 impressed me. it just did what I asked. Grok 4.6 failed on coloring. Qwen>GLM> Grok> Gemini which one did better for you?

110,316 görüntüleme

GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs SOL Astra is a clear jump from SOL. It understands intent really well. These models are getting so powerful, it’s hard to pick a winner. Fable is great at realism, while Kimi K3 has improved a lot since launch. Which one do you like?

GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs SOL Astra is a clear jump from SOL. It understands intent really well. These models are getting so powerful, it’s hard to pick a winner. Fable is great at realism, while Kimi K3 has improved a lot since launch. Which one do you like?

42,313 görüntüleme

I tested again Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 same prompt: a family having lunch in 3D. Qwen 3.8 wins again for me on quality. but Gemini finished in under 2 mins, the others took 6+. Which one wins for you?

I tested again Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 same prompt: a family having lunch in 3D. Qwen 3.8 wins again for me on quality. but Gemini finished in under 2 mins, the others took 6+. Which one wins for you?

71,444 görüntüleme

I tested GLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3. Same prompts, both capped at $2 per scene. > Same cost, but GLM Flash couldn't build realistic scenes with proper physics. > Kimi K3 nailed it. It actually seemed to understand how objects should move and interact. What are your thoughts?

I tested GLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3. Same prompts, both capped at $2 per scene. > Same cost, but GLM Flash couldn't build realistic scenes with proper physics. > Kimi K3 nailed it. It actually seemed to understand how objects should move and interact. What are your thoughts?

43,560 görüntüleme

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.3 same prompt: a busy train interior, then leaving the station. Qwen 3.8 and GLM 5.3 look best to me. but Gemini did it in 1 min 45 secs lol, others took more than 7 mins. Which one wins for you?

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.3 same prompt: a busy train interior, then leaving the station. Qwen 3.8 and GLM 5.3 look best to me. but Gemini did it in 1 min 45 secs lol, others took more than 7 mins. Which one wins for you?

24,968 görüntüleme

I tested Qwen 3.8 Max vs Kimi K3 Same scene, lighting, props, detail requirements. Qwen's output is decent, but it's not close to Kimi K3. Qwen's output came out messy, text handling was off, and the composition felt unorganized next to Kimi's version. In my opinion, Qwen isn't second to Fable 5 either, and it's also below GPT-5.6 Sol. It's a solid model, but not at that tier. Kimi K3 is still clearly ahead here.

I tested Qwen 3.8 Max vs Kimi K3 Same scene, lighting, props, detail requirements. Qwen's output is decent, but it's not close to Kimi K3. Qwen's output came out messy, text handling was off, and the composition felt unorganized next to Kimi's version. In my opinion, Qwen isn't second to Fable 5 either, and it's also below GPT-5.6 Sol. It's a solid model, but not at that tier. Kimi K3 is still clearly ahead here.

34,045 görüntüleme

WE ARE SO BACK 😭 > AI was miscounting inventory at Starbucks > Microsoft blocked Claude Code for its own engineers > Uber can't find the ROI after spending billions on AI 3 AI defeats this week

WE ARE SO BACK 😭 > AI was miscounting inventory at Starbucks > Microsoft blocked Claude Code for its own engineers > Uber can't find the ROI after spending billions on AI 3 AI defeats this week

11,255 görüntüleme

Videos

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.ai•Sponsored•Livecam

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

Exclusive private shows

1.2k viewers online

Private Show

Join now for exclusive access

Free preview available • Premium content

Astra (launch day) vs Astra (Today). Same prompt. Today's result looks off. The photo realism is gone. It clearly looks nerfed. GPT-5.6 Sol is unusable for me right now too.

Astra (launch day) vs Astra (Today). Same prompt. Today's result looks off. The photo realism is gone. It clearly looks nerfed. GPT-5.6 Sol is unusable for me right now too.

1,174,464 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce

Fable 5.2 vs Opus 5.2 I've seen claims that Fable 5.1 and Opus 5 may now route to 5.2 so I ran the same Rocket test on both. The results looked much better than before. The outputs are seriously realistic. OpenAI better be ready for Astra’s successor.

Fable 5.2 vs Opus 5.2 I've seen claims that Fable 5.1 and Opus 5 may now route to 5.2 so I ran the same Rocket test on both. The results looked much better than before. The outputs are seriously realistic. OpenAI better be ready for Astra’s successor.

32,985 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

Opus 5 (before) vs Opus 5 (now) I tested this rocket scene again after people started saying Opus 5 might be getting routed to Opus 5.2. And yeah, the difference is pretty clear. I know these models aren't deterministic, but I ran the same scene multiple times with Opus 5 before, and it never got this level of realism in one shot. If this is actually Opus 5.2, it could be a game-changing model for Anthropic. I’m starting to think Opus 5.2 could mog Astra in frontend and 3D.

Opus 5 (before) vs Opus 5 (now) I tested this rocket scene again after people started saying Opus 5 might be getting routed to Opus 5.2. And yeah, the difference is pretty clear. I know these models aren't deterministic, but I ran the same scene multiple times with Opus 5 before, and it never got this level of realism in one shot. If this is actually Opus 5.2, it could be a game-changing model for Anthropic. I’m starting to think Opus 5.2 could mog Astra in frontend and 3D.

63,717 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

WTH, Ox Alpha is literally 10x better today. I gave it the exact same prompt I used yesterday, but the output is completely different. The quality is way better than yesterday. Is it learning continuously or something? 😭

WTH, Ox Alpha is literally 10x better today. I gave it the exact same prompt I used yesterday, but the output is completely different. The quality is way better than yesterday. Is it learning continuously or something? 😭

322,965 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce

Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Tested both models with the same prompt at the highest reasoning level available. > Fable took 18 minutes to complete this test and cost $12.60 > Kimi K3 took 10 minutes and cost around $6.95 Which one wins here?

Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Tested both models with the same prompt at the highest reasoning level available. > Fable took 18 minutes to complete this test and cost $12.60 > Kimi K3 took 10 minutes and cost around $6.95 Which one wins here?

147,705 görüntüleme • 18 gün önce

I tested Union Alpha. Asked it to generate this car scene in Three.js. It took 2 hours to get something I could show Honestly, this doesn’t feel anywhere close to Kimi’s level of realism. Feels more like another Flash model. Maybe another GLM? IDK. What do you think?

I tested Union Alpha. Asked it to generate this car scene in Three.js. It took 2 hours to get something I could show Honestly, this doesn’t feel anywhere close to Kimi’s level of realism. Feels more like another Flash model. Maybe another GLM? IDK. What do you think?

25,797 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (High) vs Kimi K3 (Low) Same farming scene prompt. This is the result. > DeepSeek High took 1 min 15s and cost $0.45. > Kimi K3 took 2m 10s and cost $1.20. Almost as good as Kimi, but honestly, one of the best Flash models ever released.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (High) vs Kimi K3 (Low) Same farming scene prompt. This is the result. > DeepSeek High took 1 min 15s and cost $0.45. > Kimi K3 took 2m 10s and cost $1.20. Almost as good as Kimi, but honestly, one of the best Flash models ever released.

57,114 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce

I tested Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 I gave 3 same prompts to both, here are the results IMO, both created beautiful scenes, but the color picking problem is still there in Fable 5.1. Kimi K3 is better at this. Fable: ~$12/scene | Kimi: <$5/scene More tests coming up

I tested Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 I gave 3 same prompts to both, here are the results IMO, both created beautiful scenes, but the color picking problem is still there in Fable 5.1. Kimi K3 is better at this. Fable: ~$12/scene | Kimi: <$5/scene More tests coming up

81,687 görüntüleme • 18 gün önce

I tested Ox Alpha vs Kimi K3 Ran Ox Alpha through the Claude Code harness. Honestly, I expected much more from Ox Alpha. IMO, it wasn't even close to GPT-5.6 Terra. Kimi K3 was the clear winner for me. What model could this be?

I tested Ox Alpha vs Kimi K3 Ran Ox Alpha through the Claude Code harness. Honestly, I expected much more from Ox Alpha. IMO, it wasn't even close to GPT-5.6 Terra. Kimi K3 was the clear winner for me. What model could this be?

105,665 görüntüleme • 27 gün önce

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3 This is not one-shot from DeepSeek btw. The first result was boxy and not realistic, so I iterated with a $6 cap. Kimi did this in one shot, costing $6.95. Not as good as Kimi K3, but it did better than the other Flash models I’ve tried.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3 This is not one-shot from DeepSeek btw. The first result was boxy and not realistic, so I iterated with a $6 cap. Kimi did this in one shot, costing $6.95. Not as good as Kimi K3, but it did better than the other Flash models I’ve tried.

34,313 görüntüleme • 10 gün önce

GPT-6 Astra lost to Kimi K3 in chess, LOL I built a chess game where they play against each other via API. Thought Astra would win easily since it’s the best model right now. But Kimi K3 played surprisingly well and beat it. Is Astra nerfed or what?

GPT-6 Astra lost to Kimi K3 in chess, LOL I built a chess game where they play against each other via API. Thought Astra would win easily since it’s the best model right now. But Kimi K3 played surprisingly well and beat it. Is Astra nerfed or what?

31,779 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

Qwen 3.8 vs GLM 5.3 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek v4.1 Flash Prompt: Build an Angry Birds clone Qwen 3.8 took $0.49 in 3 min GLM 5.3 took $0.46 in 2 min Gemini 3.8 Flash took $0.29 in 2 min 23 sec DeepSeek v4.1 Flash took $0.11 in 1 min 28 sec Which one wins for you?

Qwen 3.8 vs GLM 5.3 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek v4.1 Flash Prompt: Build an Angry Birds clone Qwen 3.8 took $0.49 in 3 min GLM 5.3 took $0.46 in 2 min Gemini 3.8 Flash took $0.29 in 2 min 23 sec DeepSeek v4.1 Flash took $0.11 in 1 min 28 sec Which one wins for you?

27,799 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce

I tested Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs GPT 5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.8 Flash I capped Fable, Kimi & Sol at $2 and asked them to generate this beach scene. Fable 5.1: Looks good at first glance, but made many mistakes, like people sitting on the volleyball court. Kimi K3: It did well. There were no major bugs like in Fable 5.1, and everything looks good. Sol: Bad at 3D scenes as usual, but Astra will definitely fix that. Gemini 3.8 Flash: I ran it in a loop for 35+ mins and it cost $0.95. It didn’t understand what it was fixing. The output here is the enhanced version. IMO, not even Terra level. Gemini's benchmarks say Opus 5-level, but maybe not for spatial understanding. Gemini has other use cases. Which one did the best job?

I tested Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs GPT 5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.8 Flash I capped Fable, Kimi & Sol at $2 and asked them to generate this beach scene. Fable 5.1: Looks good at first glance, but made many mistakes, like people sitting on the volleyball court. Kimi K3: It did well. There were no major bugs like in Fable 5.1, and everything looks good. Sol: Bad at 3D scenes as usual, but Astra will definitely fix that. Gemini 3.8 Flash: I ran it in a loop for 35+ mins and it cost $0.95. It didn’t understand what it was fixing. The output here is the enhanced version. IMO, not even Terra level. Gemini's benchmarks say Opus 5-level, but maybe not for spatial understanding. Gemini has other use cases. Which one did the best job?

33,971 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce

Ox Alpha is behaving weirdly. I gave both of them 3 scenes to build. When the scene is something it's likely seen before, it generates nicely. Give it an unfamiliar scene, and it just doesn't understand it. Kimi K3 nailed all 3 and understood exactly what I was asking for.

Ox Alpha is behaving weirdly. I gave both of them 3 scenes to build. When the scene is something it's likely seen before, it generates nicely. Give it an unfamiliar scene, and it just doesn't understand it. Kimi K3 nailed all 3 and understood exactly what I was asking for.

22,392 görüntüleme • 25 gün önce

Introducing Devgle - Omegle for Developers Omegle connects random people… but most of the time, it's a waste. So I built, Devgle : random video chat, but for tech. Instantly meet developers, engineers, and tech folks worldwide. You can: Show your project, Share screen & debug, Ask or help, Learn from real devs, Find referrals or gigs. Random chats. Real value. Try it out 👇 Link in the replies 🫶

Introducing Devgle - Omegle for Developers Omegle connects random people… but most of the time, it's a waste. So I built, Devgle : random video chat, but for tech. Instantly meet developers, engineers, and tech folks worldwide. You can: Show your project, Share screen & debug, Ask or help, Learn from real devs, Find referrals or gigs. Random chats. Real value. Try it out 👇 Link in the replies 🫶

108,976 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Ronny Chieng told Harvard grads their mission is to destroy AI 🗿

Ronny Chieng told Harvard grads their mission is to destroy AI 🗿

19,798 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Daha fazla içerik yok.