Frank McCormick
@CBHeresy • 88,236 subscribers
Educator | Writer | Political Dissident 🇺🇸 Saying What Other Teachers Won’t
Shorts
Videos
0:33
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
This is what the Chicago Teachers Union did today instead of teaching children, the majority of whom are already academically behind. This speaker is a “youth organizer” (indoctrinator) and refers to the Trump administration as a “white supremacist regime.” Defund the CTU!
Frank McCormick229,856 次观看 • 1 个月前
In response to my ChatGPT post, Candace Owens just live-streamed texts between her and Charlie Kirk. Look, I’m a reasonable man. Maybe I was wrong, but there is one small detail I can’t ignore: She didn’t actually show the dates. Don’t be mad- I’m just asking questions.
Frank McCormick241,286 次观看 • 7 个月前
Dear Ian Carroll, I want to take a moment to address what you said about me and my comments in your video—without snark or personal animus. When you say, “The Jews are wonderful,” and insist you’re merely exploring a connection between Israel, Epstein, and Jewish influence, I want to believe you. But based on your past statements, I think at best, you are naively playing with fire, and at worst, you are being disingenuous—aware that making certain insinuations under the guise of intellectual curiosity is enough to set in motion others who will state more explicitly what you only imply. It’s not any single remark that alarms me, but the pattern of statements you’ve made, including: 1.Suggesting that Israel was behind 9/11 and that Israelis—or Jews—celebrated the attacks, even going so far as to claim Israel mocked 9/11 in its 10/7 post about “dancing again.” 2.Claiming that the Scofield Bible was bankrolled by the Rothschilds as a Zionist operation to subvert Christianity and advance Jewish/Zionist interests. 3.Failing to push back in a conversation on the Hodgetwins podcast when it was suggested that Jews are “behind pornography” as part of an anti-civilizational plot. Instead, you commented that you had heard about it and found it intriguing. While you didn’t originate the claim, public figures have a responsibility to challenge such narratives when they are put forward in front of large audiences. Again, this isn’t about one isolated comment but the totality of your rhetoric, which indicates you are either recklessly entertaining antisemitic tropes or deliberately introducing them in a way that lets others take them further. As with all conspiracy theories, there are kernels of truth. No theory is entirely fabricated—they gain traction because they weave in elements of reality. But that doesn’t make them harmless. I believe you are irresponsibly connecting horrific events—9/11, pedophilia sex rings, and the subversion of Christianity—directly to the only Jewish nation on earth. While you may insist you are only criticizing Israel’s government, your language and framing suggest otherwise. Maybe this is naïveté on your part. I’m not saying the rise in antisemitism—or the increasing risk Jews face in America—is solely your responsibility. But you are, knowingly or not, helping lay the groundwork for the kind of rhetoric that has historically fueled antisemitic oppression and violence. I hope you reflect honestly on this, even if only small parts resonate with you. I will always defend your right to say whatever you want—I’m not calling for you to be deplatformed or banned. But I am asking you to consider the responsibility that comes with influence, and the ways in which our words can shape discourse for better or worse. Thank you for your time.
Frank McCormick279,553 次观看 • 1 年前
This is a fascinating 2022 conversation with Candace Owens because I’m outlining the dangers of collective guilt, conspiratorial reasoning, and demagogic politics; precisely the framework she would later adopt in her attacks on Jews. She agreed. What happened to her?
Frank McCormick15,281 次观看 • 17 天前
1:01
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
