Defiant Baptist
@DefiantBaptist • 17,361 subscribers
As for me and my house, we want to win.
Shorts
Videos
Former border hawk James White decided to comment on the Samuel Sey situation, all while saying he would not be commenting until he heard from Samuel Sey. Suffice it to say, he’s very disappointed in all of you for talking about it prematurely, especially you, Mister! Open borders proponent James White claims that a rational, moral, and ethical person should realize that an illegal immigrant like Samuel Sey should be allowed to stay, because, you know, he says and does the right (Good™️) things! White completely discounts the very likely scenario that Sey’s words and behavior are merely just a part of his grift, as a “based” black man in the reformed ghetto. Riding Voddie’s coattails as it were. Noted ICE protester James White then provides a Jesus juke, wherein he says that no one should talk about this until the accused is allowed to speak on the matter, especially the racists, Nazis, blah blah blah. White has never held to this standard when addressing his own detractors, and he’s breaking his own rule with Sam Sey in this clip! Finally, Marxist globalist traitor James White starts reciting Eli’s talking points regarding ICE and the DHS, as if they must be lying in this case, there must be some mistake regarding Samuel Sey. This narrative has already started falling apart, based on Sey’s past statements about his immigration process. But just think about it, who is Samuel Sey to the U.S. government? He’s just one of millions of visa overstays. The DHS doesn’t care that he’s a Christian blogger with a modest following. Why would it seek to make an example out of him? Obviously, it wouldn’t. The Trump Administration is simply doing what people elected it to do. James White used to be one of those people, but no longer.
Defiant Baptist62,632 views • 1 day ago
I found this interesting. Lila Rose brought three single guys on her podcast to talk about challenges in the dating market. Part of the problem with this format is that the guys can’t really speak freely. Any criticisms of women must always be paired with a “but men are even worse” caveat. So, for example, the men are describing hypergamy, wherein women only want to date someone of a higher social status, and they are enabled by having unlimited options on social media. Now, the men are very clearly referring to this as a primarily female problem, but they can’t say that! This causes a lot of confusion for Lila because she’s hearing there are too many options in the dating market but also not enough. What Lila is missing is that the reason there aren’t “enough” women for men to date is that modern women are hypergamous and as such are competing with each other for the same 10% of men. Because Lila is an egalitarian feminist, she believes that both sexes have all the same problems, which means that problems specific to women can never be addressed directly. Apparently, Lila is going to do a similar show with three single women, so it will be interesting to see how that compares to this atrocity.
Defiant Baptist261,610 views • 5 days ago
Gavin Ortlund filmed a video called “The Dangers of Christian Nationalism.” One of his chief concerns is the loss of religious toleration, a first amendment right that Ortlund considers to be sacrosanct. This is fascinating for a number of reasons. First of all, it reveals that Gavin has a religious devotion to the Constitution, over and above what he finds in Scripture. To be specific, it is the Constitution as viewed through the lens of 20th Century Liberalism. The founders never intended the 1A to protect demonic statues and Islamic ghettos. Secondly, Gavin does a Jesus juke, explaining that we actually win by losing. After accusing Christian nationalists of commingling the spiritual and the political realms, he actually does that himself by encouraging Christians to accept worldly losses (and even death) in order to be more than conquerors spiritually. Thirdly, Gavin’s a priori commitments to liberalism actually prevent him from what he says at the end, “So let us by all means do everything we can to now bring his lordship into every aspect of life, in all the ways that we can, including the political realm.” Ortlund has already conceded that public idolatry must be tolerated! So it’s not “by all means” in any sense at all. It would be more accurate to say “by all means that aren’t mean.” This is very much the same loser theology promoted by Phil Johnson and others, wherein we should vote for godly candidates and laws, but just don’t take it too far since we win by losing. Of course, this is all designed to ultimately discourage Christians from political engagement, or worse to permit them to vote for the left. As Gavin’s father Ray Ortlund posted in 2024, “Never Trump. This time Harris. Always Jesus.” 🤮
Defiant Baptist15,848 views • 1 day ago
So the next Beth Moore, Pastrix Allie Beth Stuckey, decided to step behind the Relatapulpit in the Church of the Longhouse and deliver a sermon on Judeo-Christianity. And what a banger it was. Mostly, she just reads X posts from people on both sides of the debate, starting with Wes Huff, Stephen Wolfe, and Jordan Peterson. It’s very cringe that she sees former youth pastor Mike Winger as authoritative in this debate, but we all know that discernment isn’t her strong suit. It’s also clear that she knows about “The Hyphenated Heresy,” but she refuses to reference it or its authors by name. What I really want you to focus on is the final minute. Here, Allie is emphasizing how necessary it is to understand the Jewish context of Jesus in order to really™️ understand who he is. But even more than that, she calls creation itself a Jewish idea BEFORE CHRISTIANITY, which is a major gaffe for someone that considers herself a teacher. Stuckey doesn’t realize it, but she has adopted a hyper-dispensational perspective by implying that Christianity entered into the world 2000 years ago. Christ created the universe. Christ walked with Adam in the garden. Christ killed the first animal to make a covering for Adam. THE ENTIRE BIBLE IS CHRISTIAN! This should serve as a warning for just how insidious the Judeo-Christian heresy can be. Seriously brothers, do not let your wives and daughters listen to Relatable. No good can come from it!
Defiant Baptist748,830 views • 3 months ago
3:56
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
I know most of you aren’t big fans of H. Pearl Davis, but sorry not sorry she’s the only one out there pushing back on the Con Inc boss babes. (I know I’m doing it too, but I’m a nobody.) Pearl brought Lila Rose on her show to discuss p0rn usage by men, and Lila flat out refused to recognize that it’s not her place to lecture men about this or any other issue. Lila will not give up the right to nag men…ever…because of the Imago Dei! And that’s what is so valuable about this conversation. Pearl scratched a trad wife and found a feminist. DISCLAIMER: Of course p0rn use is sinful. That’s not the point. At issue here is whether women should be lecturing men about it.
Defiant Baptist1,773,266 views • 11 months ago
2:11
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
So H. Pearl Davis sat down with a Roman Catholic chastity speaker, and man…this was hard to sit through. Jason Evert was very polite, to be fair to him. It was not a hostile conversation by any means. But that being said, he’s in complete denial of reality about the current state of dating and marriage. Jason needs to offer concrete solutions to young men other than just get married and hope for the best. In this clip, the chastity advocate literally promotes reformed porn stars speaking in church, as in having a platform! It’s really telling that Pearl has to be the one to call this out as completely insane, as these women are living degenerate lives and never suffering any consequences! Link:
Defiant Baptist279,356 views • 2 months ago
Things we like: Matt Walsh taking a hatchet to Megyn Kelly’s longhouse. Girlbosses hardest hit…
Defiant Baptist1,483,196 views • 1 year ago
Lila Rose recently hosted a panel called “Men Chase, Women Choose: Mastering the Dance of Dating.” Once again, she discussed her own dating history with her husband. I guess the poor guy hasn’t been embarrassed enough already. Lila revealed that she was put off by the fact that he scheduled their first date 5-6 weeks after he asked her out, so much so that she continued to see other men in the interim. The crazy part is that Lila was so impressed with him for being so serious and not just scheduling a coffee date (pick a lane!). Instead, he planned a formal dinner and a trip to the opera. She also noted that Joe did NOT date other women after asking Lila out. For Lila Rose, exclusivity only occurs ONLY when there is kissing, which is a bizarre standard. Conceivably, she could have kept on dating other men after the opera as long as she didn’t kiss Joe. CONCLUSION: It’s very frustrating to see the state of the modern dating scene, even in a Christian context. Women like Lila demand exclusivity and commitment from men while keeping their own options open. I simply don’t believe Lila that she was ultimately the most interested in Joe over these other guys. That might be true in retrospect, but you don’t play the field if you’re head over heels for someone. (All I cut out were clips of the weird dude talking. I did not selectively edit Lila to make her sound worse.)
Defiant Baptist531,978 views • 10 months ago
“I liked a tweet by JD Hall this morning.” Really interesting clip from James White yesterday, wherein he admits (confesses?) to liking a tweet by JD™. This can actually tell you a lot about James and how his mind works. The tweet in question was JD Hall dunking on Jenna Ellis on the topic of Calvinism, about which she is hopelessly ignorant. Hall put Ellis in her place as only Polemics Santa can do, and White ate it all up. The thing is, James White has often complained about JD’s tactics, but what this little episode shows is that White never actually had an issue with him there. Rather, it was the fact that JD decided to use those same tactics against James. That’s when everything went sideways. It had nothing to do with Hall’s struggles from a few years back. So there’s the moral of the story. James is happy to associate with literally anyone, just as long as they attack the correct targets and focus on the correct issues. Anything that James deems to be friendly fire will get you voted off the island before you can say “sacralism.” And yes, I do have a PhD in James White Studies. Unfortunately, it’s not from an accredited school. 😢
Defiant Baptist84,041 views • 1 month ago
Four months ago, Melonie Mac went on a livestream with Chrissie Mayr to talk about being a newlywed. Almost immediately, the conversation went into how to navigate a marriage announcement when you have so many “generous male fans,” aka simps. Mel shared that she was nervous about how her audience would react to the news and said that she lost a couple thousand subscribers after the engagement announcement! There’s no explaining this away, nor is there any way to justify this as a Christian woman. She used her appearance and immodesty to create a para-social bond with lonely men, so that she might extract resources from them. And she did it for YEARS. So, enough with the high and mighty morality lectures.
Defiant Baptist68,180 views • 1 month ago
How biblically ignorant do you have to be before you stop calling yourself a Christian Ethicist? I ask that because in his debate with Joel Webbon, Andrew Wilson was not aware of basic biblical principles such as being a slave to Christ. The clip below shows four instances of this happening. Overall, this debate “Do women have less agency than men?” was a missed opportunity. Webbon and Wilson have a lot in common, so there was no reason for Wilson to approach him as if he was some OF girl on the Whatever Podcast. I think the biggest issue was that Wilson refused to let Webbon define his position on agency. Andrew assumed that Joel would only base his arguments on the Bible, and when Joel didn’t, Andrew kept hammering that like it was some massive inconsistency. But as Joel patiently tried to explain, not everything that he believes is explicitly laid out in Scripture. There is natural law. There is observation. All these kinds of things. But for issues that aren’t directly addressed by Scripture, we can and should apply biblical principles where they can be found. I don’t get the sense that Andrew has ever used Scripture in this way. To me, it seems like his Christianity is tucked away in the corner so that it doesn’t get in the way of his debates. Just one man’s opinion. Anyway, I’m biased, but I thought Joel Webbon performed as well as could be expected, given the circumstances. Feel free to watch the whole debate below if you wish. Link:
Defiant Baptist81,339 views • 1 month ago
Pearl Davis (H. Pearl Davis) has been visiting churches to ask the question, “Should Christian women obey their husbands?” After surveying a Protestant megachurch, Pearl conducted the same experiment at a Catholic parish. At first, members of the church formed a sort of human shield to block Pearl and her sign from view. We have to think of the children, don’tcha know? Then, the head usher involved police officers because members of the church *might* feel uncomfortable. Pearl moved across the street to continue her interviews. At the Protestant church, a white knight came out and complained, but at least in that case the police were never called. Regardless, it’s very clear that the contagion of feminism has made its way into every Christian tradition. That’s just reality. Link:
Defiant Baptist232,239 views • 5 months ago
BREAKING: In light of the ongoing mystery regarding Andrew Wilson’s past before becoming a public figure, I’ve been provided an exclusive interview of Jake Rattlesnake by Project Constitution. The truth about Andrew Wilson is more shocking than you can imagine. Viewer discretion is advised! 😉
Defiant Baptist104,279 views • 2 months ago