S✧ᜰ
@He1s_Sammy • 9,188 subscribers
what a hassle - i fw @rakebitcom
Videos
AI KIDS SHORTS LOOK LIKE FREE MONEY. That’s the trap. Generating the cartoon was never the difficult part. Anyone can take a winning kids format, feed the idea into AI, and generate a polished 15-second clip in minutes. The real problem starts after you hit upload. Kids content is typically marked Made for Kids, which means personalized advertising is restricted. Same views. Potentially weaker RPM. And you can’t simply opt out of the rules. Then there’s another problem. YouTube says content that’s repetitive, mass-produced, template-based, or easily replicated at scale can run into monetization issues. So yes: The workflow is real. AI can generate the cartoon. The views can happen. But taking a winning channel, copying its format, and mass-producing near-identical AI videos is where the business model starts falling apart. AI made production cheap. YouTube decides whether cheap production becomes income. Full breakdown in the article below.
S✧ᜰ53,747 views • 12 days ago
YOU DON’T NEED A SECOND JOB. YOU NEED A SYSTEM THAT CAN KEEP WORKING WHILE YOU SLEEP. one example? AI generated kids content on YouTube. the workflow is surprisingly simple: → pick a simple topic: nursery rhymes, counting, animals, colors → Claude writes the script + scene by scene breakdown → AI image/video tools turn each scene into animation → an AI voice generates the narration or song → stitch everything together → upload to a faceless kids channel no camera. no studio. no need to show your face. kids content can generate strong repeat viewing when the format keeps them engaged, which can compound watch time over time. once you find a format that works, you can turn one idea into an entire library of videos. one person can manage multiple channels from a laptop. you’re not looking for another job. you’re building a repeatable content system. bookmark this.
S✧ᜰ22,616 views • 5 days ago
THIS IS F**KING INSANE THIS GUY MADE $10,188.76 WITH AI WITHOUT GETTING BETTER AT EDITING. He actually removed himself from the editing process entirely. Here’s the workflow: → Find a viral video → Remove the original captions → Feed it into Claude → Claude analyzes the structure and creates a fresh script → AI generates the visuals, voiceover, and captions → Publish Viral content → Analyze → Rewrite → Generate → Caption → Publish → Repeat. The interesting part isn’t the individual tools. It’s the system behind them. Most people ask: “How can AI help me edit faster?” That’s useful, but you’re still doing the work. A better question is: “How much of the entire production pipeline can I remove myself from?” That’s the difference between using AI as a productivity tool and building an AI-powered content business. Saving 30 minutes per video is optimization. Building a pipeline that can produce hundreds of videos without you touching the timeline? That’s a business.
S✧ᜰ42,289 views • 19 days ago
THIS IS F**KING INSANE this might be one of the craziest youtube business models i’ve seen. 🤯 one channel. $600,000+ reportedly generated. and the person behind it barely has to be on camera. the strategy is simple: → AI finds the content ideas → AI helps write the scripts → AI generates the voiceover → AI helps produce the videos → the system publishes consistently → then you double down on what works no waiting for inspiration. no filming yourself every single day. no spending years building a personal brand first. just a repeatable system that turns attention into revenue. but here’s the part that really caught my attention: he now reportedly runs 7+ channels. and one of them has generated over $600K. that changes the way i look at faceless youtube. the opportunity isn’t just making videos. it’s building the machine that makes the videos.
S✧ᜰ19,771 views • 9 days ago
No more content to load