Igor Kyivskyi's banner
Igor Kyivskyi's profile picture

Igor Kyivskyi

@Ihor_from_Kyiv47,779 subscribers

Living with honor means being true to God, truth, and yourself, even if the whole world is against you. Truth is above all crowns and thrones.

Shorts

Russian warship, go to f***…

Russian warship, go to f***…

145,675 views

His last meeting with his parents 💔 Glory to the heroes... and eternal peace! Never forget them....🇺🇦🫡

His last meeting with his parents 💔 Glory to the heroes... and eternal peace! Never forget them....🇺🇦🫡

11,151 views

Videos

Ihor_from_Kyiv's profile picture

Archive. Chechnya. The russian occupiers complain about the enormous losses their army suffered during the Chechen war. And they want everything to be resolved peacefully. Finally, one of them complains that the locals hate them. And in the end, he says without holding back, "I'm so nervous, I just want to shoot them and be done with it." So you understand the logic of these killers: they came to kill people and take other people's property and land. But they are also angry that they are hated for it, and therefore they want to inflict even more pain and evil on them. Indeed, why do they hate them? They simply killed, raped, and robbed them, right? And besides this, “good russian boys” don’t do anything bad. russia always hides behind fine words about the "right of peoples to self-determination," but applies this right selectively—only where it benefits itself. When Chechnya demanded independence, russia called it "terrorism" and "separatism" and unleashed two bloody wars, wiping cities off the face of the earth. Thousands of civilians were killed, tens of thousands went missing, Grozny was razed to the ground. Where was their "right to self-determination" then? It was simply destroyed, along with the people. But when russia itself invades a foreign country—like Ukraine—it suddenly "remembers" self-determination. But this is no longer the will of the people, but violence at gunpoint. The so-called "referendums" in Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia were held under the supervision of russian troops. This isn't self-determination—it's occupation disguised as a "referendum." russia doesn't grant freedom—it imposes subordination. It doesn't protect peoples—it enslaves them. And this is the essence of russian policy—double standards and systemic lies. When someone demands freedom from moscow, it's "extremism" and "terrorism." But when russia invades another country, it's "liberation," "fraternal aid," and "the will of the people." This is how it acted in Chechnya, this is how it acts in Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, everywhere where people have tried to break free from its control. This isn't concern for people—it's a thirst for empire, which cannot exist without conquered territories. Its "peace" is silence after destruction, its "unity" is fear at gunpoint, its "self-determination" is violent annexation. russia has never respected the right of peoples to freedom—neither others' nor its own. It destroys those who dare to be independent, because russia itself is built on subjugation and lies.

Igor Kyivskyi

181,804 views • 8 months ago

Ihor_from_Kyiv's profile picture

I would like to remind you of several interesting factors about how Putin and Russia’s rhetoric about NATO has changed, as well as about Ukraine’s accession to NATO. In 2002, in Rome, when asked by a journalist about how Ukraine’s accession to NATO would affect relations between Russia and Ukraine, Putin replied that Ukraine is a sovereign state. And she herself has the right to freely choose her future, including the future of her security. And that Russia is not against if Ukraine and the Alliance decide that Ukraine will become a member of NATO. Now these liars are using NATO expansion as one of the reasons for their invasion. And this despite the fact that Ukraine has never been a member of this military bloc, and there were no plans to admit it there in the near future. And we all understand that all these reasons for the invasion are manipulation and lies in order to justify their aggression, terror and attempt to occupy Ukraine. Regarding the second part of the video, Putin says that NATO expansion is unacceptable in 2022. Some time later, when he is asked about Finland and Sweden joining NATO. He says he doesn't mind. NATO is the Defense Alliance. Even Article 5 of NATO implies collective security in the event of an attack on one of the Alliance countries. But this in no way obliges all NATO members to fight for a country that is itself an aggressor. Even if he is a member of NATO. Therefore, Putin’s manipulations that if Ukraine had joined NATO, it would have attacked Russia and started a war between NATO and Russia is a complete lie. Article 5 does not oblige one to fight for a side that itself is the aggressor. But only to protect a NATO member from attack and invasion by other countries. Against the backdrop of all this, all these fairy tales and Russian propaganda that Ukraine wanted to attack Russia is a lie. (I remind you that until 2014 Ukraine was not a member of NATO and there were no plans to admit it there, at least in the near future). And if Ukraine wanted to attack, why did it give up nuclear weapons? Why didn’t she carry out a massive militarization of the country, but, on the contrary, reduced the army? Why now, when the war is already going on, does Ukraine not enter Russian territory with its troops? After all, propaganda says that it was Ukraine that wanted to attack.

Igor Kyivskyi

226,429 views • 2 years ago