Jesus Martinez
@JesusMartinez • 318,546 subscribers
🇺🇸🇨🇺 | 70K+ on YouTube, come make millions with me
Videos
NO WAY… The Founder of $ADA Just Exposed He has no power over Cardano???? WTF
Jesus Martinez191,315 views • 24 days ago
Claude Just Killed A 10 BILLION DOLLAR Crypto Project $ZEC is cooked
Jesus Martinez154,115 views • 22 days ago
1:27
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
The NEAR Protocol is currently the hottest AI Crypto in the market at the moment I got elliot braem from the NEAR Foundation on to break down what's happening over at $NEAR Timestamps: 0:00 The New #1 AI Coin 7:12 NEAR x ZEC (Intents) 12:31 Where The Fees Go 17:52 The AI Connection 23:14 Is AI Selling Your Data? We go over: >the privacy dilemma in AI >why NEAR is the "best" blockchain out there >why he got into NEAR >what's the current focus >prior narratives >ironclaw, near intents, near(dot)com
Jesus Martinez27,072 views • 29 days ago
A Bittensor subnet just outscored Claude and Cursor on the SWE benchmark. They spent less than $1 million to get there. Anthropic spent billions. I sat down with Mark Jeffrey, one of the most connected people in the Bittensor ecosystem, and he broke down everything. Here's what most people don't know about TAO. Bittensor takes Bitcoin's mining concept and makes it programmable. Instead of solving meaningless hash puzzles, miners compete on real AI tasks. Best freelancer wins. Blockchain pays them. No company. No CEO. No permission needed. Bitcoin did this for energy. Bittensor does it for talent. The numbers are wild: • Ridges (Subnet 62) built a Claude/Cursor competitor for under $1M • Miners on Ridges were earning $50K per day at peak • The Bittensor network has 128 subnets, each like its own AI startup • Mark says 20-30 of them could become multi-billion dollar companies • Only 20% of TAO is staked in subnets right now • Stakers are earning up to 80% yield on some subnets Mark has been in crypto since 2013. He was in the Ethereum ICO. He's seen every cycle. His take: Bittensor is the most important thing to happen in crypto since Ethereum. He calls TAO the "third great coin" alongside Bitcoin and ETH. The comparison to early Bitcoin is hard to ignore. TAO just had its first halving in December. Same 21 million supply cap. Same post-halving setup. When Bitcoin went through this phase, it jumped from $250 to $10,000. Mark's conservative target for TAO by end of 2026: $3,000. But the real insight was about demand. More subnets means more TAO gets locked up. Subnet cap going from 128 to 256. Staking will absorb most of the supply. And AI agents need crypto to transact. They can't open bank accounts. Bittensor is building the rails for that. Jensen Huang just talked about Templar, a Bittensor subnet, on stage. This isn't theoretical anymore. People are using this stuff. The products on Bittensor are 10 to 100x better than what we saw in early Ethereum. And we're still early.
Jesus Martinez73,314 views • 3 months ago
What 1,000 LINK Tokens Will Be Worth in 2026 No BS, I go over the revenue & what it'll take for Chainlink to succeed. Timestamps 0:00 - The Chainlink paradox 02:44 - What Chainlink actually does 04:23 - The bull case: SWIFT, JPMorgan, AWS 07:21 - The $27 Billion RWA market & ETF grandfather clause 11:03 - So why is LINK still down? 12:07 - The $124 Million unlock receipt 14:18 - Why LINK doesn't capture the success 15:17 - The fix on the roadmap 17:51 - Bear, base, and bull price targets 19:43 - Who should actually buy LINK
Jesus Martinez48,683 views • 2 months ago
$TAO Founder Const Announced Changes Coming in... 2 days! Here's everything you need to know to get up to speed & my thoughts: Timestamps: 0:00 Emergency Change Coming 0:49 Const Calls It Out 2:56 Who Gets Blocked? 5:13 Burn Radar 7:27 Subnet Burning Problem 10:05 Why I Prefer TAO
Jesus Martinez27,882 views • 1 month ago
Once you watch this you’ll understand why $ZEC is going to $1,000
Jesus Martinez98,684 views • 8 months ago
Covenant Labs just did a 90-minute AMA breaking down their 3 Bittensor subnets. templar. basilica. grail. Pre-training, compute, and post-training under one roof. Most people missed it. Here's everything they said. Covenant is building what they call the "end to end intelligence continuum." Three subnets. Three layers of the AI stack. All permissionless. Templar (SN3) handles decentralized pre-training. Basilica (SN39) handles compute. Grail (SN81) handles RL post-training. Sam Dare, the lead, put it bluntly. Decentralized training is "humanity's last dance." Not about beating OpenAI head to head. About creating optionality. About making it cheap enough for anyone to train models. The gap between academia and frontier labs is growing exponentially. Researchers can't afford to experiment. The actual training run costs 5% of the reported budget. The other 95% is experimentation. If Covenant cracks cheap training, that entire surface area opens up. On Templar specifically: • Hit 39% emission on Bittensor. Highest since Apex was the only subnet on the network • Covenant-72B trained permissionlessly with 70+ contributors on commodity internet • 1.1 trillion tokens processed. No centralized data center • Performance competitive with LLaMA-2-70B On Grail, something flew under the radar. They built Pulse. A weight synchronization method that compresses model updates by 100x. • In RL post-training, only ~1% of weights update per step • Pulse exploits that sparsity. Lossless compression • Prime Intellect's comparable system took 14 minutes to sync a 30B model • Pulse makes decentralized RL training actually feasible at scale • Already used by Cursor The lead researcher on Grail said they've trained on math, code, and GPU kernels. Got 40-60% improvement on benchmarks. Working toward agentic training with 100K+ token context and 30B+ parameter models. On Basilica, the compute subnet: The team was blunt. Just reselling GPU hours is a 5-10% margin game. Traditional compute providers already do that. Their play is value-added services. • "GPU as code." No dashboard. No UI. Agents interact via SDK • Custom scheduler that places workloads across heterogeneous hardware • Verification checks for GPU, CPU, bandwidth, memory, storage, and OS security • Partnerships with providers like Mass Compute for 10-20% below market pricing • Miners compete on useful infrastructure, not just GPU hours Sam then went on a rant about the miner burn debate. His take: Bittensor had to grow up. dTAO introduced investors. The old "miners are God" philosophy doesn't hold. • Subnet owners have a duty to protect token value • Miners are a resource optimization exercise, not a cost reduction exercise • 100% miner emissions on compute subnets = immediate sell pressure • The 41% miner allocation is arbitrary. Different business models need different splits • Fish (who started burns) agreed. Burns usually mean the validation isn't mature enough The bigger point. You can't police burns. Subnets just send to their own keys instead of the burn address. Subnet 28 does exactly that. Sam's position: judge subnets on outcomes, not process. Const has changed the protocol 9-10 times in 2 years. That iteration speed is Bittensor's actual moat. The whole Covenant thesis is playing out in real time. TAO is up 100%+ in a month. Jensen Huang name-dropped the network. Grayscale has an ETF filing. But the real story is three subnets quietly building every layer of decentralized AI.
Jesus Martinez26,642 views • 3 months ago
My Tesla door won’t open We need a button to heat the Tesla handles Elon Musk
Jesus Martinez31,769 views • 5 months ago
