Kaiser von Lohengramm's banner
Kaiser von Lohengramm's profile picture

Kaiser von Lohengramm

@KaiserLoengramm21,462 subscribers

Pseuodonymous Extremist, Duke Lacrosse Nationalist, & Classical Liberal. Nathanael Greene Appreciator, Fraternal Networker in NC. substack & YouTube in the link

Shorts

Everyone go follow Punished Cromwell he’s one of my favorite patriots, among the greatest I’ve ever known.

Everyone go follow Punished Cromwell he’s one of my favorite patriots, among the greatest I’ve ever known.

38,260 просмотров

Two hundred and fifty years ago the Greatest Nation that the Earth has ever known declared its independence. May it endure for two hundred and fifty thousand years. The Shining City on the Hill. The Rebirth of the Saxons. The New Rome. Happy birthday, America.

Two hundred and fifty years ago the Greatest Nation that the Earth has ever known declared its independence. May it endure for two hundred and fifty thousand years. The Shining City on the Hill. The Rebirth of the Saxons. The New Rome. Happy birthday, America.

45,178 просмотров

In complete and total agreement that we need to resurrect a Cavalier Spirit, a Southern Spirit, whatever you’d like to refer to it as. However, Cromwell and John Brown don’t deserve to be said in the same sentence. Napoleon idolized Cromwell. He was Hitlers favorite too. Both did this for quite good reason. Cromwell was also the one who first most truly unified England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland. A great man to be emulated, and looked to in many regards, who led the New Model Army to victory, and Charles I did deserve what he got. Meanwhile, John Brown was just an insane murderer who led one of the most hilariously poorly planned operations that relied on the slaves all rising up, and even though thousands could’ve joined him, he got a grand total of 2, and then was rightfully crushed by Robert E. Lee and JEB Stuart. There’s a reason why John Brown pretty much exclusively resonates with insane leftists. However, most of those who still speak of Cromwell? They’re right wing nationalists. There’s no need to trash him, when he’s a great man who can be used and resonated with.

In complete and total agreement that we need to resurrect a Cavalier Spirit, a Southern Spirit, whatever you’d like to refer to it as. However, Cromwell and John Brown don’t deserve to be said in the same sentence. Napoleon idolized Cromwell. He was Hitlers favorite too. Both did this for quite good reason. Cromwell was also the one who first most truly unified England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland. A great man to be emulated, and looked to in many regards, who led the New Model Army to victory, and Charles I did deserve what he got. Meanwhile, John Brown was just an insane murderer who led one of the most hilariously poorly planned operations that relied on the slaves all rising up, and even though thousands could’ve joined him, he got a grand total of 2, and then was rightfully crushed by Robert E. Lee and JEB Stuart. There’s a reason why John Brown pretty much exclusively resonates with insane leftists. However, most of those who still speak of Cromwell? They’re right wing nationalists. There’s no need to trash him, when he’s a great man who can be used and resonated with.

92,031 просмотров

Videos

KaiserLoengramm's profile picture

Let me explain why I have such fervor for the Patriots during the War for Independence by placing you into the seat of history. Place yourselves in the shoes of a Virginian planter, who just got told that the land you personally put your blood, sweat and tears surveying during which you nearly died, then fighting the French and savages over over where you also had comrades in arms die, nearly died yourself again, well all that land you fought over is actually not going to be yours to settle, it’s actually going to become an Indian buffer state given right back into the hands of the savages you just got done fighting it for. And if you want any of it, you want to use any of it, the land you personally surveyed, the land you fought to keep, you’re going to have to negotiate with parliament for any change in boundaries or for any legal usage of it. Then, on top of that, you now get direct taxes levied against you by that same parliament that says you don’t get to use that land, which itself was largely unprecedented as prior to this any acts which Parliament had undertaken were relegated primarily to international commerce which, understandably, they would get to regulate as it concerned the empire as a whole rather than the internal colonial affairs. But now they’re taxing you. To pay for the war you just paid for in the blood you spilt of the enemies of the crown and the bodies of your fellow Virginians left behind in the wilderness. And this is again, pretty much unprecedented. They’d passed a few silly laws in the past but hardly anyone even remembers them because they went totally unenforced because of how ridiculous they were. Telling people they can’t make hats? Telling people they can’t make their own iron tools? All absurd, and so they went completely disregarded. But now they actually are trying to enforce these things. So you work against it, protesting it, pushing back against it in the houses you have, your own legislatures at home. A Legislature, the house burgesses, which you yourself are a member of. And eventually it becomes so untenable they rescind it. Then, that very same day, that same parliament passes a law declaring that they are the supreme authority over you, in all matters, in all affairs, that whatever they say goes and your own legislatures are all subordinate to them. And there is no recourse for you. You don’t get any representatives of your own. You have no political representation, even though you are, again, a member of the house burgesses, modeled directly off of the English Parliament. In spite of that fact that you own 5,500 acres of land, that you are profiting 2000 British Pounds a year, when an English county only required land in evaluation of 2 pounds to vote, in spite of the fact that you have 1000x as much value as that tiny freeholding yeoman, that yeoman got to have more political say over the course of your life than you did. Because he got to at least vote, which was entirely denied to you. And of course it was. You were 3000 miles away. It would be untenable to have your lands be considered as English counties and send your representatives across the ocean back and forth to cast votes in Parliament. That's why you had the house of burgesses in the first place. Because the ancient charter struck between King James I and the first men of Virginia 150 years prior said quite clearly that they, and all their descendants, which was to say you, were to receive all liberties, immunities, and franchises that you would have had had you been born an England. That you were to be treated equally. There is no world where this situation could ever be construed as honoring the very agreement which set this forth in the first place as equal, when you no longer even had a vote in what laws might be passed over you, and that Parliament could now do whatever it wanted. A parliament which had just denied you the lands that you surveyed, that you fought for. And then as a thank you for the blood you shed, taxed you and rendered you as lesser than an English peasant with a few acres. And all of that, that's what it was to have been George Washington prior to the War for Independence. It is a testimony to his grace, goodwill, temperament, and character as a gentleman that it took him a decade to start killing people over this horrific miscarriage of justice. And to try to claim that because your gross twisting of the letter of a law in total violation of the spirit means somehow, you were the bad guy in all of this, is incredibly offensive in how terrible a read of history it is.

Kaiser von Lohengramm

107,025 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

KaiserLoengramm's profile picture

Techno-fascism is on the rise.

Kaiser von Lohengramm

241,991 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

KaiserLoengramm's profile picture

There is an incredible lack of understanding of how politics works among political podcasters. The funniest is when you see people saying he might be gone in 2 months, because that shows they have absolutely no grasp of how impeachment works, but one of the most common ones you will find is "Trump is going to be gone soon so he doesn't matter anymore." Politics in America, since its inception, has been defined by major presidential figures ruling well after they have left office and that a party will be defined for decades to come by its most captivating Presidents. The easiest example stretching back is Thomas Jefferson. His dynasty succeeded him with two direct presidents tying back, and even Jackson operating as though he was taking on the mantle of Jefferson even as he himself would go on to redefine American politics. This has continued on, with the most recent example being Reagan. Till 2016, nearly 30 years after the end of the Reagan presidency, the Republican Party was defined by Reagan. Around taking up Reaganism, and who succeeded was who could claim the mantle of Reagan. This is what even Pat Buchanan campaigned on and understood as a challenger to the Bushes who did take that mantle. He campaigned, and in so far as he succeeded, it was tied to him being the one who was truly carrying on the Reagan legacy, that the Bushes he was challenging had subverted it. Now, if you understand this, you understand how Republican politics will be after Trump. Everything to come after him will be defined by Trump, by who can claim the mantle of Trump as his successor, until a figure comes about who by themselves can supplant Trump, as Trump supplanted Reagan. Until that figure comes, everyone who is trying to make it in any real sense in Right Wing Politics as anti-Trump or trying to be something entirely new will simply just fail, and they will fail miserably, because none of them actually understands how politics works. It's never coming down.

Kaiser von Lohengramm

20,984 просмотров • 17 дней назад

KaiserLoengramm's profile picture

Pride is a sin unless it’s Pride for your country

Kaiser von Lohengramm

71,237 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

KaiserLoengramm's profile picture

In terms of owning slaves and wanting abolition, for Thomas Jefferson it actually was a very principled and well thought out set of beliefs. Once you really dig into what he believed it makes complete and total sense why he both held slaves and believed in the abolition of slavery. Essentially, Jefferson inherited this system which began before he was born. He believed that slavery was wrong, that they should be free. However, Jefferson also believed that they were so fundamentally different from Americans down to their very nature as well as due to the history between our two groups that we could never coexist in a way as equals under the same government. Thus, slavery had to be maintained until an actual solution could be found. The solution he arrived at was then to work on gradual abolition combined with subsequent deportation from the United States to their own country. This is also why Liberia exists. Slavery was an inherited problem which could not be dealt with simply by freeing them all, as it would produce endless societal convulsions which would never be possible to correct by giving them citizenship. Once you understand this, it now makes a whole lot of sense why he owned slaves and believed in the abolition of slavery. There were no massive contradictions of "unprincipled exceptions." That is a complete myth created later to impose modern views of egalitarianism onto the founders they never themselves held. That is where the actual contradiction lies. It is a contradiction between modern American beliefs and the beliefs of those the founders held, not on the founders themselves. Here is what Thomas Jefferson believed: "Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free. Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them. It is still in our power to direct the process of emancipation and deportation peaceably and in such slow degree as that the evil will wear off insensibly, and their place be pari passu filled up by free white laborers." - Thomas Jefferson That is a totally consistent set of views, beliefs, and actions he took. Believing that they are inconsistent is actually an anachronistic reading and imposing modern views onto the past. "All men are created equal" simply does not mean what you think it does. That itself was a crafted and controlled narrative made well after the 18th century.

Kaiser von Lohengramm

36,140 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

KaiserLoengramm's profile picture

The Founding Fathers would’ve hated Pride Month, by the way.

Kaiser von Lohengramm

39,817 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад