Kaiser von Lohengramm's banner
Kaiser von Lohengramm's profile picture

Kaiser von Lohengramm

@KaiserLoengramm17,882 subscribers

Pseuodonymous Extremist, Duke Lacrosse Nationalist, & Classical Liberal. Nathanael Greene Appreciator, Fraternal Networker in NC. substack & YouTube in the link

Shorts

Two hundred and fifty years ago the Greatest Nation that the Earth has ever known declared its independence. May it endure for two hundred and fifty thousand years. The Shining City on the Hill. The Rebirth of the Saxons. The New Rome. Happy birthday, America.

Two hundred and fifty years ago the Greatest Nation that the Earth has ever known declared its independence. May it endure for two hundred and fifty thousand years. The Shining City on the Hill. The Rebirth of the Saxons. The New Rome. Happy birthday, America.

44,695 görüntüleme

In complete and total agreement that we need to resurrect a Cavalier Spirit, a Southern Spirit, whatever you’d like to refer to it as. However, Cromwell and John Brown don’t deserve to be said in the same sentence. Napoleon idolized Cromwell. He was Hitlers favorite too. Both did this for quite good reason. Cromwell was also the one who first most truly unified England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland. A great man to be emulated, and looked to in many regards, who led the New Model Army to victory, and Charles I did deserve what he got. Meanwhile, John Brown was just an insane murderer who led one of the most hilariously poorly planned operations that relied on the slaves all rising up, and even though thousands could’ve joined him, he got a grand total of 2, and then was rightfully crushed by Robert E. Lee and JEB Stuart. There’s a reason why John Brown pretty much exclusively resonates with insane leftists. However, most of those who still speak of Cromwell? They’re right wing nationalists. There’s no need to trash him, when he’s a great man who can be used and resonated with.

In complete and total agreement that we need to resurrect a Cavalier Spirit, a Southern Spirit, whatever you’d like to refer to it as. However, Cromwell and John Brown don’t deserve to be said in the same sentence. Napoleon idolized Cromwell. He was Hitlers favorite too. Both did this for quite good reason. Cromwell was also the one who first most truly unified England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland. A great man to be emulated, and looked to in many regards, who led the New Model Army to victory, and Charles I did deserve what he got. Meanwhile, John Brown was just an insane murderer who led one of the most hilariously poorly planned operations that relied on the slaves all rising up, and even though thousands could’ve joined him, he got a grand total of 2, and then was rightfully crushed by Robert E. Lee and JEB Stuart. There’s a reason why John Brown pretty much exclusively resonates with insane leftists. However, most of those who still speak of Cromwell? They’re right wing nationalists. There’s no need to trash him, when he’s a great man who can be used and resonated with.

92,031 görüntüleme

Videos

KaiserLoengramm's profile picture

Techno-fascism is on the rise.

Kaiser von Lohengramm

227,908 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

KaiserLoengramm's profile picture

In terms of owning slaves and wanting abolition, for Thomas Jefferson it actually was a very principled and well thought out set of beliefs. Once you really dig into what he believed it makes complete and total sense why he both held slaves and believed in the abolition of slavery. Essentially, Jefferson inherited this system which began before he was born. He believed that slavery was wrong, that they should be free. However, Jefferson also believed that they were so fundamentally different from Americans down to their very nature as well as due to the history between our two groups that we could never coexist in a way as equals under the same government. Thus, slavery had to be maintained until an actual solution could be found. The solution he arrived at was then to work on gradual abolition combined with subsequent deportation from the United States to their own country. This is also why Liberia exists. Slavery was an inherited problem which could not be dealt with simply by freeing them all, as it would produce endless societal convulsions which would never be possible to correct by giving them citizenship. Once you understand this, it now makes a whole lot of sense why he owned slaves and believed in the abolition of slavery. There were no massive contradictions of "unprincipled exceptions." That is a complete myth created later to impose modern views of egalitarianism onto the founders they never themselves held. That is where the actual contradiction lies. It is a contradiction between modern American beliefs and the beliefs of those the founders held, not on the founders themselves. Here is what Thomas Jefferson believed: "Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free. Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them. It is still in our power to direct the process of emancipation and deportation peaceably and in such slow degree as that the evil will wear off insensibly, and their place be pari passu filled up by free white laborers." - Thomas Jefferson That is a totally consistent set of views, beliefs, and actions he took. Believing that they are inconsistent is actually an anachronistic reading and imposing modern views onto the past. "All men are created equal" simply does not mean what you think it does. That itself was a crafted and controlled narrative made well after the 18th century.

Kaiser von Lohengramm

36,073 görüntüleme • 24 gün önce

Daha fazla içerik yok.