Katie's banner
Katie's profile picture

Katie

@KazooKatherine4,680 subscribers

80s baby, veteran, aficionado of cool things, crypto, finance, and geopolitics. My sarcasm isn’t for everyone. All opinions my own (and probably misunderstood).

Shorts

When RAI asks Paolo Zampolli about his sexual assault allegations, he loses control and starts calling Sacha Biazzo nonstop, warning him that he has contacted the U.S. State Department and the Italian embassy in Washington. He rants: "About Amanda Ungaro you can say all the bullshit you want. No problem. But about Vittoria Drake: I am suing RAI and I am suing everyone. Trust me. Put this one in… and the lawsuit starts immediately. Actually put her in, because that one has to pay. Because I never touched her. That whore…" He uses the word “puttana,” which is the most common translation for "whore" in Italian. He tells Sacha he has sent the videos shot by his collaborators during their meeting straight to the State Department where he works. He even alerted the Italian Embassy in Washington. He then threatens to use the full machinery of the American administration against Victoria Drake, who accuses him of sexual violence, exactly as it is claimed he already did with his ex-girlfriend.

Sensitive content

When RAI asks Paolo Zampolli about his sexual assault allegations, he loses control and starts calling Sacha Biazzo nonstop, warning him that he has contacted the U.S. State Department and the Italian embassy in Washington. He rants: "About Amanda Ungaro you can say all the bullshit you want. No problem. But about Vittoria Drake: I am suing RAI and I am suing everyone. Trust me. Put this one in… and the lawsuit starts immediately. Actually put her in, because that one has to pay. Because I never touched her. That whore…" He uses the word “puttana,” which is the most common translation for "whore" in Italian. He tells Sacha he has sent the videos shot by his collaborators during their meeting straight to the State Department where he works. He even alerted the Italian Embassy in Washington. He then threatens to use the full machinery of the American administration against Victoria Drake, who accuses him of sexual violence, exactly as it is claimed he already did with his ex-girlfriend.

91,872 Aufrufe

Paolo Zampolli told Italian national television that he knew Epstein had very “young girls, minors, masseuses.” Asked on RAI Report if he knew about Epstein’s “giri,” the Italian word for rings or rackets, not girlfriends, here is what he said: “I knew he had the girls. I knew. But they weren’t mine, because they weren’t even models. They were young girls, minors, masseuses. The models were a cover-up for this Epstein.” “Erano ragazzine, minorenni, massaggiatrici.” There are four admissions in one statement. He knew Epstein had girls. Not suspected. Not heard rumors. “Sapevo.” I knew. He knew they were minors. He did not use “donne” or “ragazze.” He chose “ragazzine,” the Italian diminutive for very young girls, then clarified with “minorenni,” the legal term for under 18. He knew what they were there for. “Massaggiatrici.” Masseuses. That is the exact euphemism in Palm Beach police reports, in the 2007 non-prosecution agreement, in the Maxwell trial. Anyone near Epstein’s operation knew what “massage” meant. By using the word, Zampolli confirms he did too. He described the structure. “Le modelle erano un cover-up.” The models were a cover-up. You do not describe something as a cover-up unless you understand what was being covered. “They weren’t mine” is doing a lot of work in that sentence. He wants the listener to hear: I ran a real agency, Epstein ran a trafficking operation, those are two separate things. But he just said the models were a cover-up for the minors. A cover-up requires something on top and something underneath. He is telling you he understood both layers. One of his models, Adriana Mucinska, was named in Epstein’s 2007 non-prosecution agreement as one of the four women granted immunity as potential co-conspirators in the trafficking of minors. Zampolli’s models were not a cover-up in the abstract. One of them was sitting inside the operation. He knew about the girls who were minors.

Paolo Zampolli told Italian national television that he knew Epstein had very “young girls, minors, masseuses.” Asked on RAI Report if he knew about Epstein’s “giri,” the Italian word for rings or rackets, not girlfriends, here is what he said: “I knew he had the girls. I knew. But they weren’t mine, because they weren’t even models. They were young girls, minors, masseuses. The models were a cover-up for this Epstein.” “Erano ragazzine, minorenni, massaggiatrici.” There are four admissions in one statement. He knew Epstein had girls. Not suspected. Not heard rumors. “Sapevo.” I knew. He knew they were minors. He did not use “donne” or “ragazze.” He chose “ragazzine,” the Italian diminutive for very young girls, then clarified with “minorenni,” the legal term for under 18. He knew what they were there for. “Massaggiatrici.” Masseuses. That is the exact euphemism in Palm Beach police reports, in the 2007 non-prosecution agreement, in the Maxwell trial. Anyone near Epstein’s operation knew what “massage” meant. By using the word, Zampolli confirms he did too. He described the structure. “Le modelle erano un cover-up.” The models were a cover-up. You do not describe something as a cover-up unless you understand what was being covered. “They weren’t mine” is doing a lot of work in that sentence. He wants the listener to hear: I ran a real agency, Epstein ran a trafficking operation, those are two separate things. But he just said the models were a cover-up for the minors. A cover-up requires something on top and something underneath. He is telling you he understood both layers. One of his models, Adriana Mucinska, was named in Epstein’s 2007 non-prosecution agreement as one of the four women granted immunity as potential co-conspirators in the trafficking of minors. Zampolli’s models were not a cover-up in the abstract. One of them was sitting inside the operation. He knew about the girls who were minors.

66,527 Aufrufe

Paolo Zampolli seriously decided he should post this amid all his allegations. Is this an “I’m untouchable” production or narcissism vibes? We get it, Paolo. You’re very important. Paolo pointing to make sure they get the police escort in the back is wild. Who is filming this? Music audio was added by me 🤣

Paolo Zampolli seriously decided he should post this amid all his allegations. Is this an “I’m untouchable” production or narcissism vibes? We get it, Paolo. You’re very important. Paolo pointing to make sure they get the police escort in the back is wild. Who is filming this? Music audio was added by me 🤣

36,880 Aufrufe

Paolo Zampolli is confronted about 20 years of alleged physical and sexual abuse, including strangulation attempts. His defense was that she did kickboxing. The interviewer corrects him: “Actually, she did CrossFit, not kickboxing.” Zampolli instantly switches to: “I have never touched a woman. After twenty years we were raping each other? Maybe mentally.” Attributing serious abuse injuries to “kickboxing” is already weak, but getting called out and immediately pivoting to denial and sarcasm makes his defense even more ridiculous.

Paolo Zampolli is confronted about 20 years of alleged physical and sexual abuse, including strangulation attempts. His defense was that she did kickboxing. The interviewer corrects him: “Actually, she did CrossFit, not kickboxing.” Zampolli instantly switches to: “I have never touched a woman. After twenty years we were raping each other? Maybe mentally.” Attributing serious abuse injuries to “kickboxing” is already weak, but getting called out and immediately pivoting to denial and sarcasm makes his defense even more ridiculous.

15,916 Aufrufe

Videos

KazooKatherine's profile picture

Please share this far and wide. It’s an important story that needs to be heard. To me, this is the most important post I’ve made on this platform. I need to address this head-on, because the truth matters, and I refuse to let baseless accusations silence me. Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 has said I am running the fed network and mutiny against him because I am a VETERAN. That’s not just wrong, it’s hurtful and dangerous. I’m no federal agent. I’m a retired military veteran, 100% disabled, who served my country with honor. Until now, I haven’t shared this publicly here, but I care about Epstein because I was sexually assaulted by my own commander. My story is why I fight against men like Diligent who are in it for the clicks. He has made baseless claims against a woman who was reporting on Epstein and also happened to be one of his greatest supporters. Getting justice in the military especially for sexual assault can be rare. Very few succeed in filing a complaint that leads to justice. People who know my story often ask how I did it because my Commander was removed from his position. I give them partial answers, but the full truth is darker: I had to omit the worst part, the assault itself. It’s like the Epstein cases we see now, where powerful people face charges for everything but the core abuse. My commander wasn’t removed for the assault, but for loss of confidence and conduct unbecoming an officer and gentleman. My posts are supporting another survivor who has shared her story, and Diligent continues to spew baseless lies about her without any receipts because she was shining brighter. Neither of us pushed for people to leave his community or unsubscribe. This is peak paranoia without any receipts except someone told him. Diligent’s paranoia hits a new low, claiming my passion for protecting women makes me a CIA operative. That’s narcissism at its peak, twisting advocacy into conspiracy. If any independent journalist specializing in sexual assault reporting wants to verify everything, I’m open. I’ll share my full military records from an honorable career, my disabled veteran status and ratings, plus all paperwork on the assault. And Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 acting like he’s the sole voice on Les Wexner? Come on. Wexner’s deposition has everyone reporting on it, from major outlets to Epstein journalists. He’s not breaking ground; he’s echoing what’s already out there. This is my story, my pain, my fight. If it resonates, please repost and share. Let’s amplify survivors’ voices, not smears. #Survivor #Veteran #EpsteinJustice

Katie

27,808 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

KazooKatherine's profile picture

Paolo Zampolli told the Financial Times this week: “Whenever people see me, they want something. They want access to the president. I tell them: ‘Buy Boeing.’ If you want to make the president happy, buy Boeing. It’s the simplest thing in the world.” He is Trump’s Special Envoy for Global Partnerships. He traveled with VP JD Vance to Hungary. He negotiated a Boeing aircraft deal in Uzbekistan. He is brokering foreign investment deals across Europe and the Middle East. He told the FT he is not getting paid by the government. He was never confirmed by the Senate. Presidents have dispatched unconfirmed special envoys since George Washington. The legal justification has always been the same: the mission is temporary and limited in scope. Zampolli has been operating across multiple countries and multiple cabinet departments for over a year. That is not a temporary mission. That is a standing diplomatic operation. Congress recognized exactly this distinction. Federal statute 22 U.S.C. 7817 requires Senate confirmation for the Special Envoy for North Korean Human Rights precisely because the role is ongoing rather than temporary. The Appointments Clause of the Constitution requires Senate confirmation for Officers of the United States who exercise significant authority on behalf of the federal government. The Supreme Court established this in Buckley v. Valeo in 1976. When the FT asked the White House about his role they referred the question to the State Department. The State Department confirmed his involvement in the Uzbekistan deal. They cannot agree on who he works for. The Constitution is clear on what that requires. An unconfirmed, unpaid official brokering billion dollar sovereign deals and selling access to the President of the United States. No Senate oversight. No public disclosure. No accountability. That is not diplomacy. That is pay-to-play.

Katie

14,517 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Keine weiteren Inhalte verfügbar