Amy Suzanne Martin MA JD
@KimWexlerMAJD • 24,827 subscribers
In Psywar, the enemy is deception. ☃️ Law & crime blogger. Creator-centered rationalist. Critical thinker. Unmonetized. Did you read the article?
Videos
MASSIE: Secret Service cell phone records were deleted for January 6? Who was Secretary of Homeland Security when you discovered the records were deleted? THOMPSON: Alejandro Mayorkas. MASSIE: Do you still believe there may have been a violation of the Federal Records Act? THOMPSON: Yes.
Amy Suzanne Martin MA JD879,306 views • 2 years ago
⚖️A new form of UNRESTRICTED LAWFARE? Are politically-guided civil rights lawyers weaponizing their individual First Amendment rights to spew harmful misinformation? Does this misinformation tend to encourage unlawful, dangerous confrontations? Under the shield of commentary Jenin Younes, national legal director for the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Council, incorrectly and absurdly advised X readers that ICE officers had “no law enforcement authority over” Renee Good, and “no authority to search a U.S. citizen or arrest her.” Younes, a former appellate advocate for indigent criminal defendants, prefaces her commentary with her credentials, framing herself as a neutral expert: “I’m a former defense attorney and currently a civil liberties attorney with no political dog in this fight.” Admitting she has “the right to change” her opinion “if additional information changes the calculus,” Younes says she has reviewed early video of the tragic confrontation between Renee Good and ICE and confidently asserts: “It is very clear that the officers instigated the confrontation.” As a trained attorney myself, I am astounded at Younes’ willingness to risk her reputation on such a strange hill without first investigating the facts of what occurred BEFORE the scene that emerges from the 9-second video clips. But what’s more astonishing (and frankly shocking) are Younes’ statements of law that are dangerously, absurdly incorrect. In the first wave of commentary about the encounter, many inferred Good was free to leave the scene — despite audio in some clips with the voice of an agent shouting to Good, “get out of the f—— vehicle!” There is no “right to flee” a law enforcement encounter simply because one believes it may be unlawful. And there is no reason to believe the encounter was unlawful. Because contrary to Younes’ assertions, ICE agents in the course of executing their enforcement duties have statutory authority to stop, question, detain and arrest U.S. citizens, codified at 8 U.S. Code § 1357(a)(5). For activists who seek to exercise their First Amendment rights, civil rights attorneys like Younes should advise on the limits of their rights to protest lawfully and on how to protest safely. And they should make it clear that actively interfering with ICE activities is absolutely outside the bounds of Constitutionally protected expression. Under Younes’ view, the assertion that ICE officers have “no law enforcement authority over” U.S. citizens tends to suggest that citizens can interfere with their operations or commit crimes against them with impunity. Clearly that is not the case. Statements from Good’s family members and eyewitnesses suggest that Good had coordinated with local activists and was consciously leading or participating in an operation to obstruct ICE by blocking the road with their vehicles. Obviously, investigation is ongoing, and more facts will come to light. I agree with Younes on one thing: Renee Good should not have died. If Renee had had a proper understanding of the law, and of the dangerousness of putting herself physically between ICE and the execution of their law enforcement duties, the 37-year-old mom might have thought twice before taking part. Was it foreseeable? Could a mistaken belief that the law does not apply to her, in someone who adheres to zealous anti-ICE ideology, be the catalyst to radicalize a mom to commit an act of obstruction, sabotage or terrorism? Being in a vehicle may have enhanced the dangerousness compared to anti-ICE activism we saw in 2025, where protestors blocked roads with their bodies. Driving a 2-ton vehicle means Renee was operating a potentially lethal weapon, justifying lethal force in a self-defense situation. Does Younes have a “political dog in this fight”? Glenn Greenwald touts Younes’ work combatting censorship, leading a lawsuit against the Biden administration, as evidence of her lack of political bias. But to assume, on the basis of minimal evidence, that ICE agents must be held accountable for “overreach” is the very definition of prejudice: to hold a preconceived opinion. Lawyers have opinions. But a preconceived opinion against law enforcement in this context strongly suggests a political agenda. Does Younes’ misstatement of law suggest a new form of “unrestricted lawfare”? You decide.
Amy Suzanne Martin MA JD235,531 views • 7 months ago
🔥ELI CRANE: I had a hearing this week in Homeland Security about foreign adversaries using direct energy weapons against U.S. citizens…. Havana Syndrome. When I went down to that SCIF, that was one of the most terrifying briefings I’ve ever been a part of.
Kimberly “Kim” Wexler MA JD553,435 views • 2 years ago
SHAWN RYAN: I was doing a lot of stuff I shouldn’t be doing. Cocaine. And then once I left the agency, I started building a network down there. I wanted to see how far into the narcos network I could get myself. I started at street level and built the network out.
Kimberly “Kim” Wexler MA JD209,447 views • 1 year ago
The Obama administration and Hillary Clinton’s State Department deliberately and knowingly implemented a U.S. foreign policy to aid and abet Islamic jihadists — our enemies. The policy in 2011 was to help the Muslim Brotherhood Islamic uprising come to power in Tunisia, Libya and Egypt. Obama enacted the “great purge” in the U.S. government in 2011 and 2012, in which all official discourse, including presentations and training curricula, was purged of everything related to finding and identifying the global jihadist enemy we face. That means: Department of State, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, the military, the Pentagon, and so on, including the intelligence community. Because they either did not know, or were not allowed to know, anymore, who the enemy is — the global jihad movement and all who support jihad in the fight for Sharia, that is the enemy — because our officers were not permitted to speak of that, to know that, to pursue that, I think that had a lot to do with the policies in Benghazi specifically. The day before the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, the head of Al Qaeda issued a video on jihadi websites and called for “sons of Libya” to rise up and kill Americans because the CIA had assassinated his deputy, a Libyan, some months before in the Afghanistan-Pakistan region, with a drone strike. “That, I have always thought, was the green light to attack the next day.” Warnings were ignored. There was collusion at the White House level, from the very beginning, to disseminated a false narrative, to blame the attack on the compound at Benghazi, which was an Islamic jihad attack by Ansar al-Sharia, an Al-Qaeda affiliate, to blame that on a YouTube video. (On June 29, 2016, the Citizens Commission on National Security held a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington to discuss the release of its new report on the events surrounding the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack on the Special Mission Compound and CIA Annex, resulting in the deaths of four Americans. The title of the CCNS report is Betrayal in Benghazi: A Dereliction of Duty. An overview was provided by Claire Lopez, a defense intelligence consultant and former career operations officer for the CIA. The CCNS report was published two days after the U.S. House Select Committee on Benghazi, chaired by Rep. Trey Gowdy, issued their official report.)
Kimberly “Kim” Wexler MA JD143,467 views • 1 year ago
![UNCENSORED TESTIMONY Pelosi and House Democrats Refused to Hear From Experts in 2022 about How the United Nations, Non-Profit Advocacy Groups and Criminal Human Smuggling Cartels COLLABORATED to OVERRUN U.S. BORDER In February 2022, the House Freedom Caucus held a panel to hear bombshell testimony about the growing mass migration crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border. Caucus chair Scott Perry explained that the House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, had refused to green-light an official hearing and had even refused to allow the caucus to use a Congressional hearing room to hold the panel. Todd Bensman, Senior National Security Fellow for the Center for Immigration Studies, detailed his investigation into the United Nations’ activities on the migration trail, and he shared evidence of how UN agencies appeared to be colluding with non-governmental organizations and human smuggling gangs. Bensman testified the UN was offering cash handouts, pre-paid debit cards, and even legal and psychological counseling to coach “migrants” in how to answer immigration authorities’ questions about persecution in their home countries. Part of the audio from Bensman’s testimony has been censored or corrupted, but I have reconstructed the missing segment [italicized] from his written notes. Bensman testified: “I have interviewed hundreds of the immigrants, most recently on an eight-day fact-finding journey to the Guatemala-Mexico border city of Tapachula. From my vantage point, I can confidently report that there is but one root cause that they — the immigrating foreign nationals — most often cite for coming now. “It is that President Joe Biden opened the American southern border wide to them. “They see, over their cell phone social media, many hundreds of thousands who have gone before secure quick releases and resettlement into America. “And they decide to also gamble huge smuggling fee investments that criminal smuggling gangs will get them in to stay, too. “With such an enticing, motivating return on smuggling investment, no thinking person should wonder why this global migration hit the all-time national record of nearly two million border patrol apprehensions in a single year. With probably 500,000 more gotaways, and that’s an undercount. “But the Caucus should also know that ‘non-profit advocacy groups — and more notably the United Nations — appear to be working side-by-side with the criminal smuggling organizations on the very same mission. “United Nations agencies such as the International [Organization for] Migration (IOM) and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) are providing hard cash, food, shelter, legal services, psychological services — all along the migrant trails. “Which also materially facilitate journeys that everyone involved very well knows, despite any protestations to the contrary, always lead to an illegal American border-crossing. “In whatever small or large way, the United Nations and the non-profits it funnels money to can reasonably be said to contribute to the current mass migration crisis. “I found my first clue on a Rio Grande riverbank, on the Mexican side: A discarded UNHCR-stamped booket advising in great detail how migrants can and should travel north for the greatest chance of safety and success. Later, in Reynosa, Mexico, I witnessed the United Nations grantee, the IOM, hand out cash debit cards to migrants in long, snaking lines. The workers handing them out said they give $400 every 15 days to families of four, renewable every two weeks. “The UN tells me only the most vulnerable get this cash. But in Reynosa and again most recently in Tapachula, Mexico, where I saw the same long lines at the UNHCR office, nothing about them indicated acute vulnerability. They were regular family units of the sort crossing by the tens of thousands right now. Some showed me their debit cards there, too, and said were it not for this money they might have to leave the migrant trail and go home. “Further inquiry showed the cards are just part of a vast and sharply escalating UN program called ‘Cash-Based Interventions’ all along the migrant trail through Latin America. “According to the UN documents and migrants, these include the unrestricted, unconditionally useable plastic cash cards, and also cash-filled envelopes in some areas (never a good look — cash filled envelopes), money transfers for lodging, pharmaceutical prescriptions, and for something called ‘movement assistance’, which means transportation money to move forward when camps empty and reform further north. “Credible reporting shows that the UN is providing these forms of assistance all along the migrant trail, from South America to Texas. On a Cúcuta to Bogotá, Colombia segment, the UN was seen handing out food, clothing, and necessities worth an estimated $200 to $300 a day per migrant. “And then there’s important non-cash assistance keeping migrants on the U.S. trail. “In Tapachula, approval for Mexican asylum these days is important for permission to move legally beyond the southern provinces (where I was) — always to the U.S. border, of course. But many coming in from Guatemala innocently tell Mexican immigration they’re going for U.S. jobs — which is not an eligible asylum claim, so they get denied. “But I found a UN-funded solution recently. The manager of a UN-funded migrant advocacy center told me a full-time staff of certified psychologists helps these migrants recover ‘repressed memories’ of more eligible government persecution. This manager told me in a recorded conversation that his group also trains migrants on the front end of the process how to pass muster with Mexican asylum interviewers the first time around. “He said these operations produce a 90 percent success rate for thousands a year. Other UN-funded psychologists offer what sounds like similar work. If this is all true, the UNHCR in Mexico has found another way to keep thousands more on the trail over the American border. “Many can, and, will defend this UN assistance as lifesaving, but others who learn of it reasonably interpret it — [*SEE BELOW FOR CONTINUATION OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT] — in a very different way, and they want to know more, of course. “However Americans want to interpret this assistance to migrants they undoubtedly know they are joining an historic mass migration. All Americans deserve to know the full extent of it, because the United States is the UN’s largest donor and the U.S. Congress appropriates a huge amount of money to the UN every year. “I also would mention that the border is a national security concern. Just recently I was able to report that a Venezuelan crossed the Rio Grande from Matamoros to Brownsville, and that the FBI wanted that FBI-watchlisted individual held, and that ICE headquarters here in Washington, DC, intervened and demanded that, ordered that he be cut loose because he might get Covid in detention. That individual is now living freely, pursuing an asylum claim in Detroit. Thank you.” *[WHAT FOLLOWS IS THE WRITTEN STATEMENT PUBLISHED ON MR. BENSMAN’S WEBSITE ToddBensman dot com] “— as material support for mass illegal migration. “However Americans interpret UN assistance in the new context of a historic mass migration event, public debate in the American square is necessary because the United States is the UN’s largest donor. In 2019, the last year in which expenditures are fully known, the executive branch and Congress separately allocated $11 billion, $5.5 billion of which filled accounts that fund migration and refugee support activities, Congressional Research Services recently reported. “It’s unclear what the U.S. will contribute in 2022. The Biden administration proposes $3.7 billion, and it remains to be seen what Congress will want to appropriate separately.” For FY 2025 CONGRESS MUST CUT FUNDING TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF POPULATION, REFUGEES AND MIGRATION (PRM) which funds “migration and refugee assistance” programs including IOM and UNHCR.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1917338849543410001/amplify_video_thumb/1917333483338252289/img/ec1tACwu0TY1iXys.jpg)
UNCENSORED TESTIMONY Pelosi and House Democrats Refused to Hear From Experts in 2022 about How the United Nations, Non-Profit Advocacy Groups and Criminal Human Smuggling Cartels COLLABORATED to OVERRUN U.S. BORDER In February 2022, the House Freedom Caucus held a panel to hear bombshell testimony about the growing mass migration crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border. Caucus chair Scott Perry explained that the House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, had refused to green-light an official hearing and had even refused to allow the caucus to use a Congressional hearing room to hold the panel. Todd Bensman, Senior National Security Fellow for the Center for Immigration Studies, detailed his investigation into the United Nations’ activities on the migration trail, and he shared evidence of how UN agencies appeared to be colluding with non-governmental organizations and human smuggling gangs. Bensman testified the UN was offering cash handouts, pre-paid debit cards, and even legal and psychological counseling to coach “migrants” in how to answer immigration authorities’ questions about persecution in their home countries. Part of the audio from Bensman’s testimony has been censored or corrupted, but I have reconstructed the missing segment [italicized] from his written notes. Bensman testified: “I have interviewed hundreds of the immigrants, most recently on an eight-day fact-finding journey to the Guatemala-Mexico border city of Tapachula. From my vantage point, I can confidently report that there is but one root cause that they — the immigrating foreign nationals — most often cite for coming now. “It is that President Joe Biden opened the American southern border wide to them. “They see, over their cell phone social media, many hundreds of thousands who have gone before secure quick releases and resettlement into America. “And they decide to also gamble huge smuggling fee investments that criminal smuggling gangs will get them in to stay, too. “With such an enticing, motivating return on smuggling investment, no thinking person should wonder why this global migration hit the all-time national record of nearly two million border patrol apprehensions in a single year. With probably 500,000 more gotaways, and that’s an undercount. “But the Caucus should also know that ‘non-profit advocacy groups — and more notably the United Nations — appear to be working side-by-side with the criminal smuggling organizations on the very same mission. “United Nations agencies such as the International [Organization for] Migration (IOM) and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) are providing hard cash, food, shelter, legal services, psychological services — all along the migrant trails. “Which also materially facilitate journeys that everyone involved very well knows, despite any protestations to the contrary, always lead to an illegal American border-crossing. “In whatever small or large way, the United Nations and the non-profits it funnels money to can reasonably be said to contribute to the current mass migration crisis. “I found my first clue on a Rio Grande riverbank, on the Mexican side: A discarded UNHCR-stamped booket advising in great detail how migrants can and should travel north for the greatest chance of safety and success. Later, in Reynosa, Mexico, I witnessed the United Nations grantee, the IOM, hand out cash debit cards to migrants in long, snaking lines. The workers handing them out said they give $400 every 15 days to families of four, renewable every two weeks. “The UN tells me only the most vulnerable get this cash. But in Reynosa and again most recently in Tapachula, Mexico, where I saw the same long lines at the UNHCR office, nothing about them indicated acute vulnerability. They were regular family units of the sort crossing by the tens of thousands right now. Some showed me their debit cards there, too, and said were it not for this money they might have to leave the migrant trail and go home. “Further inquiry showed the cards are just part of a vast and sharply escalating UN program called ‘Cash-Based Interventions’ all along the migrant trail through Latin America. “According to the UN documents and migrants, these include the unrestricted, unconditionally useable plastic cash cards, and also cash-filled envelopes in some areas (never a good look — cash filled envelopes), money transfers for lodging, pharmaceutical prescriptions, and for something called ‘movement assistance’, which means transportation money to move forward when camps empty and reform further north. “Credible reporting shows that the UN is providing these forms of assistance all along the migrant trail, from South America to Texas. On a Cúcuta to Bogotá, Colombia segment, the UN was seen handing out food, clothing, and necessities worth an estimated $200 to $300 a day per migrant. “And then there’s important non-cash assistance keeping migrants on the U.S. trail. “In Tapachula, approval for Mexican asylum these days is important for permission to move legally beyond the southern provinces (where I was) — always to the U.S. border, of course. But many coming in from Guatemala innocently tell Mexican immigration they’re going for U.S. jobs — which is not an eligible asylum claim, so they get denied. “But I found a UN-funded solution recently. The manager of a UN-funded migrant advocacy center told me a full-time staff of certified psychologists helps these migrants recover ‘repressed memories’ of more eligible government persecution. This manager told me in a recorded conversation that his group also trains migrants on the front end of the process how to pass muster with Mexican asylum interviewers the first time around. “He said these operations produce a 90 percent success rate for thousands a year. Other UN-funded psychologists offer what sounds like similar work. If this is all true, the UNHCR in Mexico has found another way to keep thousands more on the trail over the American border. “Many can, and, will defend this UN assistance as lifesaving, but others who learn of it reasonably interpret it — [*SEE BELOW FOR CONTINUATION OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT] — in a very different way, and they want to know more, of course. “However Americans want to interpret this assistance to migrants they undoubtedly know they are joining an historic mass migration. All Americans deserve to know the full extent of it, because the United States is the UN’s largest donor and the U.S. Congress appropriates a huge amount of money to the UN every year. “I also would mention that the border is a national security concern. Just recently I was able to report that a Venezuelan crossed the Rio Grande from Matamoros to Brownsville, and that the FBI wanted that FBI-watchlisted individual held, and that ICE headquarters here in Washington, DC, intervened and demanded that, ordered that he be cut loose because he might get Covid in detention. That individual is now living freely, pursuing an asylum claim in Detroit. Thank you.” *[WHAT FOLLOWS IS THE WRITTEN STATEMENT PUBLISHED ON MR. BENSMAN’S WEBSITE ToddBensman dot com] “— as material support for mass illegal migration. “However Americans interpret UN assistance in the new context of a historic mass migration event, public debate in the American square is necessary because the United States is the UN’s largest donor. In 2019, the last year in which expenditures are fully known, the executive branch and Congress separately allocated $11 billion, $5.5 billion of which filled accounts that fund migration and refugee support activities, Congressional Research Services recently reported. “It’s unclear what the U.S. will contribute in 2022. The Biden administration proposes $3.7 billion, and it remains to be seen what Congress will want to appropriate separately.” For FY 2025 CONGRESS MUST CUT FUNDING TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF POPULATION, REFUGEES AND MIGRATION (PRM) which funds “migration and refugee assistance” programs including IOM and UNHCR.
Kimberly “Kim” Wexler MA JD127,805 views • 1 year ago
![Why is LIZ CROKIN defending ANDREW TATE? TATE: I became a multimillionaire by creating a webcam [porn] studio. By taking girls who had never been on webcam before … [and who] didn’t have the will … to make money with this exchange. I created a system that allowed me to convince girls to do this, allowed me to retain one hundred percent control of their income, allowed me to make sure they were effective … I learned every tip and trick it takes to make sure a girl gets paid. I know how to make sure the girl can’t run away. Because once you teach a girl how to do this, she has the ability to earn unlimited money from home. Why would she give it to you? Why wouldn’t she just run off? CROKIN: I don’t think it’s black and white, with him. … I think there’s a lot of truth to every viewpoint on his situation. … I guess he was involved in kind of encouraging girls to do OnlyFans type of stuff. I actually would really like to see him come out and, you know, um, speak out against that. And say that, you know, that was something he did in his past that was a mistake. You know, he regrets that. … Did he do anything that was criminal? I’m not sure, because I’ve heard that, you know, when he was doing his business, you know, he was in a country where the legal age of consent was 16. Um, but I didn’t know about the other girl possibly being 15. If she was, clearly that’s wrong, and it sounds like illegal, to me. I just don’t know enough about that to know if he has done anything criminal. I’ve also heard that there’s no victims that have come forward. I do believe that he is being unfairly persecuted. … Based off of what I’ve investigated about him, what he did comes nowhere close to what Hillary Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein and their associates are guilty of. I would love to see him ask for redemption. And to say, you know, porn isn’t the way, I regret doing this, any of the women, you know, that I brought into this, I’m sorry. MAGA is a very forgiving community. And I would like to see him encourage women to, you know, not get involved in porn, and to respect their bodies, and respect themselves. (Hey LIZ CROKIN, convincing women to do porn when they don’t have the will is recruitment. Doing it under the false pretense of a favor for a romantic partner is deception. Retaining their money is use of payment to control someone. Making sure they can’t run away is slavery. Andrew Tate literally confessed to being a trafficker, and you want to claim he’s being unfairly persecuted? REALLY? Other evidence of Tate’s violence, including his habit of strangling while raping his girlfriends, is circulating online. He doesn’t just pimp and enslave young women and girls. He teaches other men how to do it, too. This is not MAGA, and if someone in the MAGA movement wants to go easy on Andrew Tate, that is not someone we can trust.)](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1898162424299090009/ext_tw_video_thumb/1898157661993959424/pu/img/bRJ7Tbi3r_a_t2xg.jpg)
Why is LIZ CROKIN defending ANDREW TATE? TATE: I became a multimillionaire by creating a webcam [porn] studio. By taking girls who had never been on webcam before … [and who] didn’t have the will … to make money with this exchange. I created a system that allowed me to convince girls to do this, allowed me to retain one hundred percent control of their income, allowed me to make sure they were effective … I learned every tip and trick it takes to make sure a girl gets paid. I know how to make sure the girl can’t run away. Because once you teach a girl how to do this, she has the ability to earn unlimited money from home. Why would she give it to you? Why wouldn’t she just run off? CROKIN: I don’t think it’s black and white, with him. … I think there’s a lot of truth to every viewpoint on his situation. … I guess he was involved in kind of encouraging girls to do OnlyFans type of stuff. I actually would really like to see him come out and, you know, um, speak out against that. And say that, you know, that was something he did in his past that was a mistake. You know, he regrets that. … Did he do anything that was criminal? I’m not sure, because I’ve heard that, you know, when he was doing his business, you know, he was in a country where the legal age of consent was 16. Um, but I didn’t know about the other girl possibly being 15. If she was, clearly that’s wrong, and it sounds like illegal, to me. I just don’t know enough about that to know if he has done anything criminal. I’ve also heard that there’s no victims that have come forward. I do believe that he is being unfairly persecuted. … Based off of what I’ve investigated about him, what he did comes nowhere close to what Hillary Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein and their associates are guilty of. I would love to see him ask for redemption. And to say, you know, porn isn’t the way, I regret doing this, any of the women, you know, that I brought into this, I’m sorry. MAGA is a very forgiving community. And I would like to see him encourage women to, you know, not get involved in porn, and to respect their bodies, and respect themselves. (Hey LIZ CROKIN, convincing women to do porn when they don’t have the will is recruitment. Doing it under the false pretense of a favor for a romantic partner is deception. Retaining their money is use of payment to control someone. Making sure they can’t run away is slavery. Andrew Tate literally confessed to being a trafficker, and you want to claim he’s being unfairly persecuted? REALLY? Other evidence of Tate’s violence, including his habit of strangling while raping his girlfriends, is circulating online. He doesn’t just pimp and enslave young women and girls. He teaches other men how to do it, too. This is not MAGA, and if someone in the MAGA movement wants to go easy on Andrew Tate, that is not someone we can trust.)
Amy Suzanne Martin MA JD131,633 views • 1 year ago
![SADULSKI: Those pieces of paper — those names and phone numbers and addresses of sponsors the child is supposed to ask for — [are] being handed to the children by cartel members. So, they are processed into a trafficking situation once they get released from ORR to that sponsor. LANKFORD: What is the training for vetting sponsors? WHITE: There is no training, Senator, for vetting sponsors.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1812553186256806326/amplify_video_thumb/1812552826893066240/img/6zC5yGokgQ8YcSJD.jpg)
SADULSKI: Those pieces of paper — those names and phone numbers and addresses of sponsors the child is supposed to ask for — [are] being handed to the children by cartel members. So, they are processed into a trafficking situation once they get released from ORR to that sponsor. LANKFORD: What is the training for vetting sponsors? WHITE: There is no training, Senator, for vetting sponsors.
Kimberly “Kim” Wexler MA JD165,557 views • 2 years ago
🧵TODD BENSMAN (2023): Ending familial DNA testing for migrant children at the border, which was effective in detecting and deterring child trafficking, “has got to be one of the most terrible, egregious things I’ve seen the Biden administration do….” — Todd Bensman
Amy Suzanne Martin MA JD155,787 views • 2 years ago
🤡 Yup. Both Shawn Ryan and Sarah Adams are Obama-era CIA “alums,” and Adams currently works for the Biden DOD in an intelligence analyst capacity (watch the one-minute video).👇🏼 Which means the Shawn Ryan Show has “hallmarks” of a government propaganda campaign of some sort 🤷🏼♀️
Kimberly “Kim” Wexler MA JD104,157 views • 1 year ago
![🔥“THE MAIN LINK IS IN CARACAS”: Tren de Aragua is an aspect of 🇻🇪 Venezuela’s unrestricted warfare against the U.S., expert says Jose Gustavo Jose Arocha, a former Lieutenant Colonel in the Venezuelan military and national security expert at Center for a Secure Free Society, responded for Fox News Digital on the recently released intelligence assessment on Tren de Aragua (TDA). Arocha says the memo, prepared by the National Intelligence Council on April 7, failed to comprehend the Maduro regime’s relationship with Tren de Aragua. “I feel that the missing point, here, is that the intelligence report is just a narrow lens about TDA. It’s about crime and immigration, but they’re missing the warfare dimension,” Arocha said. “They’re missing that, for the Maduro regime, the United States is the enemy — has been the enemy for years, since Hugo Chavez came to power.” Arocha points out that the Tocorón prison, from which TDA’s leader Hector “El Niño” Guerrero Flores and others reportedly escaped during a military operation to retain control of the prison from the inmates, is not a real prison but a “palace” serving as “the epicenter of crime in Venezuela.” When Tocorón was raided in September 2023, news reports revealed Tocorón’s swimming pool, nightclub, and even a zoo — as well as tunnels allowing inmates to pass in and out of the compound. Arocha believes the raid was staged to convince the public that Maduro’s government was attempting to regain control of the prison. “On the contrary, the TDA has safe haven in Venezuela,” he said. “The TDA is not a gang. It’s a [military] arm of the Venezuelan regime in the hybrid warfare strategy. That’s the missing point. And that is the point that explains how a local gang [is] now in more than 10 countries, including the United States. That’s incredible. That is not possible without a state sponsor behind them.” Arocha says the Venezuelan regime acts as a proxy of Russia, China and Iran — “especially China right now” — to create chaos in Latin America. He said the regime exploits Russian and Chinese expertise in propaganda, spinning a narrative that “the United States is against Latin America, is racist.” According to Arocha, the U.S. intelligence community is failing to see the full picture. “Unrestricted warfare,” Arocha said, “means using criminals, using disinformation, using every single tool they have” short of a direct military confrontation with the United States. “We not only have to chase criminals, but start targeting command structures, which means nodes. That is very important right now,” Arocha said. Arocha praised U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi for pursuing a suspected high-ranking TDA leader in custody in Colombia. The Justice Department intends to prosecute Jose “Chuqui” Enrique Martinez Flores, 24, in Texas for drug offenses and for providing material support to a terrorist organization. The State Department designated TDA a foreign terrorist organization on Feb. 20. Arocha also encourages U.S. agencies to collaborate with law enforcement in Chile, Argentina, Peru and other countries with experience of TDA, to understand what they have learned. “We have to continue targeting command structures to totally dismantle TDA,” Arocha said. “And not only see them as criminals. Of course, we have to chase criminals outside from the street. But we also have to look for the command structures. “And we have to put all the pieces together to have the big picture instead of the local one. And then I’m very sure that we are going to realize the missing and the main link is in Caracas.”](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1930389742446608394/amplify_video_thumb/1930383252461654016/img/5oS7bJW5IOLQydqh.jpg)
🔥“THE MAIN LINK IS IN CARACAS”: Tren de Aragua is an aspect of 🇻🇪 Venezuela’s unrestricted warfare against the U.S., expert says Jose Gustavo Jose Arocha, a former Lieutenant Colonel in the Venezuelan military and national security expert at Center for a Secure Free Society, responded for Fox News Digital on the recently released intelligence assessment on Tren de Aragua (TDA). Arocha says the memo, prepared by the National Intelligence Council on April 7, failed to comprehend the Maduro regime’s relationship with Tren de Aragua. “I feel that the missing point, here, is that the intelligence report is just a narrow lens about TDA. It’s about crime and immigration, but they’re missing the warfare dimension,” Arocha said. “They’re missing that, for the Maduro regime, the United States is the enemy — has been the enemy for years, since Hugo Chavez came to power.” Arocha points out that the Tocorón prison, from which TDA’s leader Hector “El Niño” Guerrero Flores and others reportedly escaped during a military operation to retain control of the prison from the inmates, is not a real prison but a “palace” serving as “the epicenter of crime in Venezuela.” When Tocorón was raided in September 2023, news reports revealed Tocorón’s swimming pool, nightclub, and even a zoo — as well as tunnels allowing inmates to pass in and out of the compound. Arocha believes the raid was staged to convince the public that Maduro’s government was attempting to regain control of the prison. “On the contrary, the TDA has safe haven in Venezuela,” he said. “The TDA is not a gang. It’s a [military] arm of the Venezuelan regime in the hybrid warfare strategy. That’s the missing point. And that is the point that explains how a local gang [is] now in more than 10 countries, including the United States. That’s incredible. That is not possible without a state sponsor behind them.” Arocha says the Venezuelan regime acts as a proxy of Russia, China and Iran — “especially China right now” — to create chaos in Latin America. He said the regime exploits Russian and Chinese expertise in propaganda, spinning a narrative that “the United States is against Latin America, is racist.” According to Arocha, the U.S. intelligence community is failing to see the full picture. “Unrestricted warfare,” Arocha said, “means using criminals, using disinformation, using every single tool they have” short of a direct military confrontation with the United States. “We not only have to chase criminals, but start targeting command structures, which means nodes. That is very important right now,” Arocha said. Arocha praised U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi for pursuing a suspected high-ranking TDA leader in custody in Colombia. The Justice Department intends to prosecute Jose “Chuqui” Enrique Martinez Flores, 24, in Texas for drug offenses and for providing material support to a terrorist organization. The State Department designated TDA a foreign terrorist organization on Feb. 20. Arocha also encourages U.S. agencies to collaborate with law enforcement in Chile, Argentina, Peru and other countries with experience of TDA, to understand what they have learned. “We have to continue targeting command structures to totally dismantle TDA,” Arocha said. “And not only see them as criminals. Of course, we have to chase criminals outside from the street. But we also have to look for the command structures. “And we have to put all the pieces together to have the big picture instead of the local one. And then I’m very sure that we are going to realize the missing and the main link is in Caracas.”
Kimberly “Kim” Wexler MA JD59,621 views • 1 year ago
MICHAEL HARDT: Social movements today are the most powerful agents for social change. Most of us associated with the lab have long had a kind of dual intellectual life. WE HAVE A DAY JOB IN THE UNIVERSITY AND A NIGHT JOB AS ACTIVISTS. The Social Movements Lab at Duke University
Kimberly “Kim” Wexler MA JD28,849 views • 5 months ago