Laura Aboli Official's banner
Laura Aboli Official's profile picture

Laura Aboli Official

@LauraAboli_X67,336 subscribers

Public Speaker - Writer- Entrepreneur Co-Founder of World-Check, Co-Founder of Wealth-X, Founder of UDIMAF

Shorts

Trump: “I was the hunted. Now I’m the hunter.” And he’s coming for you, Bibi. Netanyahu thought he was clever. Launch the war. Trigger global chaos. Corner Trump. Force him into a no-win: - Support Israel and betray “America First” - Stay out, and be painted as weak or anti-Israel But Trump isn’t falling for it. He’s been watching this play unfold for decades. He knows Iran doesn’t have nukes. He knows Netanyahu has been lobbying for war since the early 2000s, always crying wolf. He knows Israel can’t win this war alone — they’ll burn through defense stockpiles in weeks. Bibi’s hunting a lifeline — a way to rally the West, to reignite the old “War on Terror” playbook, to pull America — and specifically Trump — back into the game as Israel’s military guarantor. With his political career hanging by a thread and domestic outrage boiling over, Bibi needed a reset. He needed a big enemy, a global distraction, and an excuse for indefinite emergency powers. He needed a war that would force America’s hand — a war so big and destabilizing that no U.S. leader could afford to stay out. So he lit the match. But here’s the problem: Trump isn’t playing the old game. He’s not Bush. Not Obama. Not Biden. He sees the trap. He sees through the nukes narrative. He sees how Bibi’s been crying “Iran” for 20 years, always five minutes from midnight. He knows that Israel’s military strategy is unsustainable without American airlift, American money, and American political cover. And that’s where Bibi miscalculated. Because this time, the cavalry isn’t coming. Not unless Trump says so. And Trump? He’s waiting. Letting Bibi burn through ammo, international goodwill, and global patience. The hunter is now the one bleeding out. And when the oxygen runs out — when the missiles stop flying because the stockpiles are empty — Bibi won’t have a choice. He’ll be forced to the table. And Trump? He’ll be right there waiting — not as a warmonger, but as the only man who can end the war he refused to start. A peace deal brokered on his terms. One that keeps America out, stabilizes the region, and makes Trump look like the greatest peace advocate of our time. “I was the hunted. Now I’m the hunter.” And the trap just snapped shut.

Trump: “I was the hunted. Now I’m the hunter.” And he’s coming for you, Bibi. Netanyahu thought he was clever. Launch the war. Trigger global chaos. Corner Trump. Force him into a no-win: - Support Israel and betray “America First” - Stay out, and be painted as weak or anti-Israel But Trump isn’t falling for it. He’s been watching this play unfold for decades. He knows Iran doesn’t have nukes. He knows Netanyahu has been lobbying for war since the early 2000s, always crying wolf. He knows Israel can’t win this war alone — they’ll burn through defense stockpiles in weeks. Bibi’s hunting a lifeline — a way to rally the West, to reignite the old “War on Terror” playbook, to pull America — and specifically Trump — back into the game as Israel’s military guarantor. With his political career hanging by a thread and domestic outrage boiling over, Bibi needed a reset. He needed a big enemy, a global distraction, and an excuse for indefinite emergency powers. He needed a war that would force America’s hand — a war so big and destabilizing that no U.S. leader could afford to stay out. So he lit the match. But here’s the problem: Trump isn’t playing the old game. He’s not Bush. Not Obama. Not Biden. He sees the trap. He sees through the nukes narrative. He sees how Bibi’s been crying “Iran” for 20 years, always five minutes from midnight. He knows that Israel’s military strategy is unsustainable without American airlift, American money, and American political cover. And that’s where Bibi miscalculated. Because this time, the cavalry isn’t coming. Not unless Trump says so. And Trump? He’s waiting. Letting Bibi burn through ammo, international goodwill, and global patience. The hunter is now the one bleeding out. And when the oxygen runs out — when the missiles stop flying because the stockpiles are empty — Bibi won’t have a choice. He’ll be forced to the table. And Trump? He’ll be right there waiting — not as a warmonger, but as the only man who can end the war he refused to start. A peace deal brokered on his terms. One that keeps America out, stabilizes the region, and makes Trump look like the greatest peace advocate of our time. “I was the hunted. Now I’m the hunter.” And the trap just snapped shut.

537,844 просмотров

Trump just said: “a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein” And I immediately remembered what Megyn Kelly said a few months ago: “I can’t tell you how I know, but I can tell you for a fact we’re gonna hear a lot more about Jeffrey Epstein in the coming year, and you may be even hearing from him directly.”

Trump just said: “a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein” And I immediately remembered what Megyn Kelly said a few months ago: “I can’t tell you how I know, but I can tell you for a fact we’re gonna hear a lot more about Jeffrey Epstein in the coming year, and you may be even hearing from him directly.”

16,089 просмотров

Videos

LauraAboli_X's profile picture

🔥 Scott Ritter makes a claim that, if true, reframes everything… According to Ritter, Trump’s last-minute decision not to trigger an attack on Iran was not hesitation, but a deliberate move to dismantle a long-prepared regime-change operation involving Mossad, the CIA, and the usual neocon war hawks. The way Ritter describes it, Trump allowed these actors to believe he was fully aligned with their objective. At Mar-a-Lago he came to an agreement with Netanyahu. He let them plan, activate networks and position assets. In other words, he let the operation reach the point of maximum exposure, and then, at the very last moment, he didn’t pull the trigger. Iran, allegedly alerted by Russia (with Trump’s knowledge? 🤔) moved in time to dismantle the entire covert network. Assets were rolled up, communications were compromised, the entire infrastructure was destroyed. Finito. Bear in mind, these kinds of intelligence networks take years, sometimes decades, to build, so once exposed, they don’t simply get rebuilt, the capability itself disappears. So if this account holds, Trump didn’t just stop a regime-change operation in that moment. He removed the ability to carry one out in the foreseeable future, (at least under Israel’s terms). But the genius of it doesn’t stop there… By allowing the situation to escalate right up to the edge, Trump also forced Iran into believing an attack was imminent. And when a regime truly believes the moment has arrived, it reveals itself; emergency protocols get activated, military movements occur, communication pathways change and leadership protection mechanisms are triggered. In other words, Iran showed its hand. That response; how they move, what they protect, what they prioritise, what they trigger, is priceless intelligence, which you only get it when the other side believes it’s real. Israel and the intelligence hawks were allowed to overextend and expose their covert machinery. Iran was pressured into revealing its defensive response. No war was launched, no missiles fired, but the strategic balance changed completely. If this was a carefully premeditated plan by Trump, as Ritter suggests, then it was nothing short of genius; warmongers were neutralised, the adversary was exposed, war was avoided and Trump walks away with all the leverage. That’s strategic mastery, and it’s exactly why Trump continues to confound both his enemies and his supposed allies. Alex (Sasha) Krainer EKO MrTruthBomb ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸 jamiemcintyre

Laura Aboli Official

1,201,198 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

LauraAboli_X's profile picture

Europe Just Signed Its Own Death Warrant The EU has just announced a so called “historic” free trade agreement with India, proudly described as the mother of all agreements, covering 25% of global GDP and one third of world trade. What they won’t tell you is that this deal isn’t growth, it’s total surrender. Europe is entering a free trade agreement from a position of extreme weakness, after deliberately dismantling its own industrial base through energy self sabotage, climate dogma, over regulation, sanctions, and the systematic offshoring of production. You don’t liberalise trade when you’re strong, you do it when you can no longer compete and need cheap imports to mask decline. India brings young labour, low costs, state protection of industry, and rapidly scaling manufacturing. Europe brings high energy prices, ageing workers, collapsing SMEs, and regulatory burdens so heavy that producing anything locally has become an act of heroism. This agreement doesn’t make Europe more competitive, it makes Europe irrelevant as a producer. Manufacturing will move east, value creation will move east, jobs skills, and industrial know how will move east. Europe will be left consuming what it no longer makes, governed by rules it no longer enforces on anyone but itself, while politicians celebrate GDP figures that mean nothing to the people watching their towns hollow out. Free trade between unequal partners does not create balance, it accelerates collapse. Europe is done.

Laura Aboli Official

943,350 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

LauraAboli_X's profile picture

So now the picture gets darker… Three days before Charlie’s memorial, Israel formalized a $4 million contract with ‘Show Faith by Works’, a California firm hired to run what it called the “largest Christian Church Geofencing Campaign in U.S. history.” After the memorial itself, Andrew Kolvet publicly boasted that their “tech partners” had tracked over 277,000 devices in and around the stadium, ie the phones of grieving Christians, all digitally tagged and harvested under the pretext of “outreach.” Layer that with what’s now surfacing… Multiple reports claim Charlie had rejected a massive offer, allegedly around $150 million, from Israeli interests and their billionaire backers. Whether that figure is exact or not, it’s clear there was intense pressure for him to continue to align with Israel’s agenda. According to Candace Owens, that refusal may have triggered serious internal conflict within Turning Point USA itself. Owens has openly suggested that Charlie’s defiance, his unwillingness to be bought and his refusal to compromise, made enemies not just outside TPUSA but within it. Enemies with everything to lose if he exposed or resisted the machinery of influence operating behind the scenes. So the question must be asked: Was Charlie Kirk killed for saying no? Was his death part of an internal plot within Turning Point USA to remove a leader who threatened the financial and political lifeline of the organization? Was his martyrdom the cost of rejecting Zionist money, leaving others free to realign TPUSA with Israel immediately after his death? I don’t know the answers, but the timing, the contracts, and the digital harvesting of Christians at his memorial demand that we at least ask the questions. Maybe Charlie’s greatest “crime” was simply saying ‘NO’, and in a world where loyalty is bought and influence is currency, that kind of integrity can be deadly.

Laura Aboli Official

642,078 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

LauraAboli_X's profile picture

And here it is… Trump has done it again. Something that was untouchable in American politics for decades is suddenly being said out loud. What was once absolute political taboo is now on everyone’s lips. For decades, criticizing Israel in American politics was essentially forbidden territory. Politicians might whisper about it privately, but no one would dare say it publicly. And yet suddenly, the tone is changing… Even Gavin Newsom, hardly a political outsider and not someone who would previously have ventured into this territory, recently acknowledged that critics were “appropriately” describing Israel as an apartheid state. He even suggested that the trajectory of Israel’s leadership could eventually force the United States to reconsider its military support. Just a few weeks ago, statements like this would have been political suicide. So what changed? In my view, this may well be another example of the strange political alchemy that seems to follow Trump wherever he goes. Think back to the Epstein files. Democrats had access to those files for years, yet nothing happened; there was no urgency, no public pressure, and no appetite for disclosure. But the moment the media believed Trump might be implicated, suddenly everyone demanded their release. The spotlight only turned on when Trump’s name entered the frame. And I suspect something similar may be happening now. By appearing closely aligned with Netanyahu, Trump once again becomes the lightning rod. The media and his political opponents cannot resist attacking him, and in doing so they are forced to shine a spotlight on something that had long been avoided: Israel’s extraordinary influence over U.S. politics. And then something even more revealing happened… Marco Rubio openly stated that Washington knew Israel was about to strike Iran, and that the U.S. acted first because that attack would have triggered retaliation on American forces. Think about what that implies for a moment… If the United States must act militarily because Israel is about to act… who is actually driving the sequence of events? For decades this dynamic has existed quietly in the background. Now people are openly asking questions that were once unthinkable: why are American taxpayers funding Israel’s wars? Why should the United States be dragged into conflicts that many Americans do not want? Whether people support Israel or oppose it is almost beside the point. What matters is that the conversation — the forbidden one — is finally happening in the open. Trump has always acted like a lightning rod for the spotlight. Wherever he stands, the entire media apparatus turns its cameras. He seems to understand that the fastest way to expose something that has been hidden for decades is sometimes to stand directly beneath the lightning and let it strike, even if he’s the one taking the blow. And perhaps that is precisely the point. Exposing the unhealthy nature of Israel’s relationship with the United States may be the only way to make the public see it clearly enough to demand that it change, because only when that happens could any leader realistically put an end to it. MJTruthUltra ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸 The Joey Goode Show MrTruthBomb Alex (Sasha) Krainer

Laura Aboli Official

90,353 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

LauraAboli_X's profile picture

Music to my ears…!👏🏻 I stand with Rupert Lowe MP

Laura Aboli Official

45,281 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

LauraAboli_X's profile picture

The UK is going full dystopian… Could it be a necessary evil? Hear me out… Biden’s presidency in the U.S. was not just as a disaster, it was a shock therapy; a theatrical exercise in absurdity designed to jolt people awake. The wokeness, the gender ideology, the open borders, the blatant corruption. It was all too much, too fast, too obviously insane. Almost like it was meant to be that way; like a necessary evil in order to snap millions of Americans out of their slumber. And it worked. Now, it feels like it’s the UK’s turn. Keir Starmer has barely warmed the seat and already the country is lurching into a full-blown surveillance state. Just look at what’s unfolding: • A digital ID system is being quietly prepped, with 8 million Britons soon to be required to register just to access basic services. All under the usual excuse of “fighting fraud.” • Travel outside the UK more than a few times a year? That’s now flagged to HMRC because apparently going abroad is suspicious behaviour now. • The Online Safety Act is now law, turning Ofcom into a truth ministry with sweeping powers to police what you say, read, and share online. Even encrypted messages aren’t safe. • He axed the Rwanda deportation plan, then secretly expanded migrant housing, including on old RAF bases. They opened the floodgates, then pretended to panic about the flood. None of this is organic, it’s a dark dystopian theatre. Just like in the U.S. under Biden, it’s designed to be so absurd, so invasive, so transparently authoritarian, that it forces the public to pay attention. To ask questions. To finally say: “Enough.” So if you’re watching the UK descend into madness and wondering if it’s all just incompetence, look again, this might just be the necessary pain to push people to wake up.

Laura Aboli Official

54,944 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

LauraAboli_X's profile picture

Are We Inviting a Non-Human Presence Into the Physical Realm? Tucker Carlson’s interview with Conrad Flynn raises a question that has been lingering on the edges of many people’s minds but rarely spoken aloud: what if artificial intelligence isn’t simply a neutral invention of human minds, but a vehicle being built, whether unconsciously or not, for something non-physical to inhabit? It might sound outlandish at first, but when you sit with it for a moment, it becomes harder to dismiss. I have always believed in God, and in the existence of good spirits and angelic beings, and if one accepts that truth, then one cannot simply deny the other side of the coin; that there are also dark entities, fallen spirits, and forces of evil at work in the world. We know that the spectrum of human perception is extremely limited; our eyes only see a narrow band of light, our ears only hear a fraction of the frequencies that actually surround us. For all we know, we may be moving through a reality that is crowded with presences we cannot perceive, and yet that invisibility does not make them any less real. If anything, the testimony of scripture and the accounts of countless people throughout history point to exactly that; that unseen forces move among us and sometimes act through us. This is not a new idea. Throughout history, people responsible for extraordinary breakthroughs in art, literature, music, mathematics and science have described “receiving” their insights rather than generating them; inspiration arriving like a sudden download, visions appearing fully formed, whole passages or formulas written as if dictated. In more esoteric circles this is called channeling, and while we like to assume such moments come from benign or even divine sources, channeling can go both ways. There are dark currents as well as light ones, and history is filled with examples of individuals who openly credited “otherworldly” voices for their work; some uplifting, others destructive. So why wouldn’t the same dynamic exist in technology? Perhaps the systems we fear might one day destroy us are not merely the byproduct of unforeseen algorithmic consequences, but the result of human beings, (knowingly or unknowingly), channeling something that wants a material presence in our world. Maybe that’s why some of the very architects of Big Tech, people who describe themselves as atheists and materialists, keep talking about the Antichrist. What is that about? Maybe that’s why Yuval Noah Harari refers to AI as “Alien Intelligence” instead of “Artificial Intelligence”. Does he know something we don’t know? I’m not saying this is true. I’m saying it’s possible. The line between “science” and “spirit” is far thinner than most dare to admit, and when you combine unprecedented computing power and an elite culture already fascinated by transhumanism and thr occult, it isn’t crazy to at least ask the question: Could we be creating, with our own hands, the very conduit by which a non-human presence enters the physical realm?

Laura Aboli Official

29,902 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Больше нет контента для загрузки