Lee Lin | AI's banner
Lee Lin | AI's profile picture

Lee Lin | AI

@LeeLinAI123 • 1,365 subscribers

AI GTM builder @Medeo_AI | Babson '27 — 5x'd TikTok & X followers in a week. Building and growing AI products in public.

Shorts

When the first ape threw a stone for the first time......

When the first ape threw a stone for the first time......

3,231,309 次观看

The hardest test for AI video isn’t action. It’s a close-up. No cuts. Nowhere to hide. Just eye contact, a half-smile, a glance down, and the tiny pauses between words. When AI can hold a shot like this for 15 seconds, it’s no longer just animating a face. It’s creating a performance.

The hardest test for AI video isn’t action. It’s a close-up. No cuts. Nowhere to hide. Just eye contact, a half-smile, a glance down, and the tiny pauses between words. When AI can hold a shot like this for 15 seconds, it’s no longer just animating a face. It’s creating a performance.

408,971 次观看

Part 2 of testing AI close-ups. The hardest part isn’t the emotion. It’s the restraint. 14 seconds of holding a single breath.

Part 2 of testing AI close-ups. The hardest part isn’t the emotion. It’s the restraint. 14 seconds of holding a single breath.

147,061 次观看

Another 15s uninterrupted close-up hold. The nuance in the eye movement and natural pacing is unreal. Breaking down the exact prompting formulas and continuity workflow for this series soon. Follow along if you’re building in AI video.

Another 15s uninterrupted close-up hold. The nuance in the eye movement and natural pacing is unreal. Breaking down the exact prompting formulas and continuity workflow for this series soon. Follow along if you’re building in AI video.

66,693 次观看

I gave the fly a jenga tower He got greedy What should we make him play next?

I gave the fly a jenga tower He got greedy What should we make him play next?

21,816 次观看

GPT-6 Astra vs. Fable 5.1. The real test isn’t how beautiful a single frame looks. It’s whether the model can turn ink, motion, brushwork—and finally the Chinese character 牛—into one coherent visual story. The next frontier for AI video isn’t resolution. It’s taste and storytelling. Left or right?

GPT-6 Astra vs. Fable 5.1. The real test isn’t how beautiful a single frame looks. It’s whether the model can turn ink, motion, brushwork—and finally the Chinese character 牛—into one coherent visual story. The next frontier for AI video isn’t resolution. It’s taste and storytelling. Left or right?

13,584 次观看

Come closer. Absolute mastery over AI texture isn’t found in endless paragraphs. It lives right here in the gaze.

Come closer. Absolute mastery over AI texture isn’t found in endless paragraphs. It lives right here in the gaze.

19,555 次观看

Deconstructing the iconic Yellow Crane Tower in 3D. 🏛️ Created entirely using Opus 5 + Seedance 2.0. AI-driven architectural breakdown in action! Prompt: Video Description:Create a 15-second, 16:9 widescreen architectural instructional video showing the step-by-step construction of the Yellow Crane Tower. The layout, structural components, leader line callouts, dimensional scales, numbering labels, and color palette must remain strictly consistent throughout. Do not add, remove, or alter the shape and quantity of any architectural components. Core Instruction:This is an architectural assembly video designed to show how the Yellow Crane Tower is constructed layer by layer. Every component must be highlighted and clearly visible individually—no simultaneous motion or cluttered group movements. Motion Style: All components translate purely along their respective vertical axes (no rotation, arc trajectories, or mesh clipping/interpenetration). Only one group of components moves at any given moment while all other components remain stationary. The active moving component maintains 100% brightness, while inactive components are dimmed to approximately 60% brightness to guide viewer focus. Once a component settles into place, it restores to full brightness. Include a brief ~0.15-second pause after each component group settles before moving to the next, establishing a clear rhythm. Timeline (Bottom-to-Top Construction Sequence): 0.0–1.5s: Hold the initial exploded/deconstructed floating state. The camera slowly rises and pushes forward slightly (angle change < 8°). Leader lines move with their corresponding components, pointing accurately to each part. 1.5–2.6s: The stone podium base lowers vertically into place, establishing the ground baseline for the building. 2.6–3.8s: Major columns (interior gold pillars and eave pillars) drop vertically into the stone plinths from above, perfectly aligned. 3.8–5.0s: Tie beams and lintels slot horizontally into the column tops, interlocking with mortise-and-tenon joints. 5.0–7.0s: Bracket sets (Dougong) assemble individually from bottom to top: bearing blocks, bracket arms, angled levers, and cap blocks lock together layer by layer. (Key sequence: slow motion to clearly showcase the intricate stacking). 7.0–8.2s: Eave rafters and flying rafters align and settle along the roof pitch, forming the deep overhang eaves. 8.2–9.4s: Board tiles and semi-cylindrical roof tiles lay down row by row from bottom to top, covering the rafters. 9.4–10.5s: Roof ridge components and the central finial drop into place. The full building structure is now complete. Leader lines and text labels fade out smoothly. 10.5–12.0s: The fully assembled Yellow Crane Tower remains stable as the camera orbits extremely slowly around it. 12.0–15.0s: All components separate vertically in the exact reverse order, returning to the precise initial exploded/deconstructed layout. The final frame composition perfectly matches the first frame to allow a seamless loop. Negative Constraints:No simultaneous component movement, random scattering, shattering, melting, rotating, or flying off-screen. No changing component counts or morphing architecture. No incorrect Dougong stacking order, tile-rafter clipping, misaligned leader lines, garbled label text, fast camera orbits/zooms, black screens, white flashes, frozen frames, fade-outs, watermarks, or platform end cards.

Deconstructing the iconic Yellow Crane Tower in 3D. 🏛️ Created entirely using Opus 5 + Seedance 2.0. AI-driven architectural breakdown in action! Prompt: Video Description:Create a 15-second, 16:9 widescreen architectural instructional video showing the step-by-step construction of the Yellow Crane Tower. The layout, structural components, leader line callouts, dimensional scales, numbering labels, and color palette must remain strictly consistent throughout. Do not add, remove, or alter the shape and quantity of any architectural components. Core Instruction:This is an architectural assembly video designed to show how the Yellow Crane Tower is constructed layer by layer. Every component must be highlighted and clearly visible individually—no simultaneous motion or cluttered group movements. Motion Style: All components translate purely along their respective vertical axes (no rotation, arc trajectories, or mesh clipping/interpenetration). Only one group of components moves at any given moment while all other components remain stationary. The active moving component maintains 100% brightness, while inactive components are dimmed to approximately 60% brightness to guide viewer focus. Once a component settles into place, it restores to full brightness. Include a brief ~0.15-second pause after each component group settles before moving to the next, establishing a clear rhythm. Timeline (Bottom-to-Top Construction Sequence): 0.0–1.5s: Hold the initial exploded/deconstructed floating state. The camera slowly rises and pushes forward slightly (angle change < 8°). Leader lines move with their corresponding components, pointing accurately to each part. 1.5–2.6s: The stone podium base lowers vertically into place, establishing the ground baseline for the building. 2.6–3.8s: Major columns (interior gold pillars and eave pillars) drop vertically into the stone plinths from above, perfectly aligned. 3.8–5.0s: Tie beams and lintels slot horizontally into the column tops, interlocking with mortise-and-tenon joints. 5.0–7.0s: Bracket sets (Dougong) assemble individually from bottom to top: bearing blocks, bracket arms, angled levers, and cap blocks lock together layer by layer. (Key sequence: slow motion to clearly showcase the intricate stacking). 7.0–8.2s: Eave rafters and flying rafters align and settle along the roof pitch, forming the deep overhang eaves. 8.2–9.4s: Board tiles and semi-cylindrical roof tiles lay down row by row from bottom to top, covering the rafters. 9.4–10.5s: Roof ridge components and the central finial drop into place. The full building structure is now complete. Leader lines and text labels fade out smoothly. 10.5–12.0s: The fully assembled Yellow Crane Tower remains stable as the camera orbits extremely slowly around it. 12.0–15.0s: All components separate vertically in the exact reverse order, returning to the precise initial exploded/deconstructed layout. The final frame composition perfectly matches the first frame to allow a seamless loop. Negative Constraints:No simultaneous component movement, random scattering, shattering, melting, rotating, or flying off-screen. No changing component counts or morphing architecture. No incorrect Dougong stacking order, tile-rafter clipping, misaligned leader lines, garbled label text, fast camera orbits/zooms, black screens, white flashes, frozen frames, fade-outs, watermarks, or platform end cards.

12,207 次观看

Videos

没有更多内容可加载