Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio
@LeoKearse • 114,677 subscribers
Comedian and civilisationist YouTube & GB News Exclusive content on Patreon Links/gigs: https://t.co/YpJ6bAt9rT Delighted to appal everyone Pronouns: she/her
Shorts
Videos
A British town rejects the "far right" - and gets exactly what it asked for. Llantwit Major is a small seaside town in Wales. A few years ago, the government proposed a migrant camp in the centre of town. Anti-migrant groups warned that this would be bad for the town. Then, far-left groups came into the town and convinced the residents that the migrant camp would be good (no more than 90 people, mostly young Ukrainian women fleeing the war) and reminded them that they must reject the far right, or they would look racist. Eager to not look racist, the townspeople staged a counter-protest to the supposed far right and said, "We reject racism! Refugees are welcome here!" The town's voices - Jack, the football club DJ; Father Edwin Counsell, the town's punk-turned-priest; Councillor Gwyn John - all spoke out to condemn "far-right bigots". 73 year old Annie voiced support for the migrant camp. She "loves guerrilla gardening and co-ordinates a seed-swap with other gardening enthusiasts in her community.” Well, that's good, because you're about to get 300 young men just off a boat who want to swap their seed as well. A huge victory for the left, with local townspeople speaking out about how definitely not racist they are, and the BBC writing gushing articles about the plucky little town that rejected the far right. But then the migrant camp was built. The townspeople got what they asked for, and now they're not happy. At the time, Councillor Gwyn John slammed residents' objections to the migrant camp. Now that it's been built, he's complaining about phoning his doctor and being 33rd in the queue. (The migrant camp was built on the site of a proposed medical centre, which has been shelved). And the proposed blonde, nubile Ukrainian women have stopped coming, but the refugees who haven't stopped coming are men from Africa, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and the Middle East. They're going to be put up in a sprawling complex that butts right up against residents' gardens, with the housing units peering directly into their homes, just metres away. I hope British towns are ready for this. Andy Burnham wants to move migrants around the country to anywhere where the Labour vote needs to be bolstered by some imported Third World leftists. So either get used to this - or be prepared to be called racist.
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio250,112 views • 8 days ago
Is Elliot Page's transition reversing itself? Elliot Page must be the only person who has become more like their original gender since transitioning. This manliest of all manmen released footage of HIMMMself boxing training, whacking some pool noodles, getting ready to get in the water at Centre Parcs (Hollywood celebs are the only people who can afford Center Parcs). But what stood out to me are a couple of interviews HEEEE did; one on transgender rights and one on what masculinity means to HIMMMM. They were both the least masculine things I've ever seen in my life. If any of my male friends had acted like Elliot Page in these interviews, I'd insist that they transition to being a woman.
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio1,056,047 views • 2 months ago
Elliot Page, the genuine 100% definitely male manliest man who ever manned Is complaining that heeeee can't get any work since portraying some sort of very skinny female-looking man with a girly voice in Christopher Nolan's Odyssey film. I just don't know what role heeeeee wants to play. "Honey, I Shrunk the Actress"? Maybe a reboot of Snow White with Elliot Page as new dwarf, “Indoctrinated”? Dundee's healthiest junkie? What did heeeeee think was going to happen when heeeeee transitioned to being a white man? Did heeeeee really believe all the guff about "white male privilege"? I've seen this before. People transition to being a man, and then they find out it's actually hard being a man. It's similar to Reddititis - when people get led down a harmful progressive path on internet forums. You see sex workers ask things like, "Will I be able to find a husband?" and all the Reddit people say, "Oh, of course. Your history has no bearing. Sex work is real work." Then, in the real world, they can't find a husband. The whole world was a Reddit forum for Ellen Page. They all told her that she would be the most stunning, bravest, most wonderful male of all time. If you go on Reddit and ask, "Will I be able to find work as an actor after transitioning to being a man and looking like the skinniest, most female-looking man of all time?" they'll all say, "Oh yes, of course, of course you will." But in the real world, you can't, because And with Elliot Page now famous for transitioning, if you cast himmmmmm in a film, that transition story becomes the dominant thing about the film. Page isn't playing a role in the film. The film has cast a transitioned actor in it. For all the gushing lefty liberals who stand on the stage at the Oscars and say, "We must be inclusive, and trans men are real men” - in real life, nobody wants the film to be dominated by that narrative. They want the film to allow people to suspend their disbelief and for a couple of hours, be lost in a world that isn't about contemporary politics. Fortunately, Elliot, the manliest man who ever lived, has managed to find work narrating documentaries. When I say documentaries, I mean absolute nonsensical gender propaganda pretending to be a documentary. I can tell you right now, this documentary is going to say that there are millions of transgender animals. Animals transition. There are queer animals. Animals support Palestine. Animals are concerned about climate change. Animals vote democrat. Animals think we should have more asylum seekers from the Horn of Africa. Animals think we should tax the rich (but other rich, not Hollywood elites). You basically can't trust any academia, history books, or documentaries that are made after about 2014, because that's when everything became infected with woke ideology. The ideology became the prism through which everything is viewed. You can't trust anything anymore. The only thing you can trust is my YouTube channel.
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio58,817 views • 4 days ago
A radical leftist named Oliver Hutchings has just been found guilty of blackmailing 27 comedy venues into cancelling Katie Hopkins' shows. Hutchings warned the venues due to host Ms Hopkins that, if they failed to cancel the event, he would personally ensure the show was disrupted. He told the venues he would arrange for people in the audience to shout, make noise and set off party poppers to disrupt the event. He also made complaints alleging that venues watered down drinks and had failed to conduct proper staff checks. Which, to be fair, is pretty accurate for most comedy clubs. The prosecutor said Hutchings had told the venues: “If you think I will give up, you are very, very wrong. I will not stop until the evening is cancelled or your business is shut down.” Hutchings also warned: “I will flyer outside your business, I will continue to post about your business in online groups – I swear that on my family’s life.” Hutchings tried to cast himself as the victim and moral guardian of every fashionable protected group. As a gay man, he claimed to represent the LGBT community; because his grandfather had dementia, he positioned himself as a defender of disabled and elderly people; and because he was raised by a single mother, he took offence on behalf of stay-at-home mothers. He assembled a sort of personal grievance Pokémon victimhood collection and used it to justify bullying small venues into cancelling Katie. "Be tolerant, or I will destroy you!" Is this the end for cancel culture in comedy? As a comedian who occasionally says things that might upset you if you're a fat communist with blue hair and a nose ring, I hope so. Cancel culture is a genuine problem. I used to do a solo show every month at a comedy club in London, and they showed me a complaint email they'd received. It said, "We came to see Leo Kearse's show in July, and he was horrific and offensive and we left in disgust. We came back to see him again in October, and he was still horrific and offensive. Can you please stop putting him on?" There's another option you're not looking at here! Other comedians are available. You could see Nish Kumar? Rosie Jones? (if you've got a spare 9 hours). If comedy can only say what the most offendable people in society think then it's going to die because comedy depends on people being able to be irreverent and say an unsayable truth. In spite of the lack of coverage in the media, this conviction is momentous. For too long there's been no cost attached to cancel culture. The people who partake in it, who destroy people's lives and livelihoods, drive people to suicide and their children to starvation, are applauded as heroes by the left. They're not heroes. They're bitter little communist scumbags and it's about time a cost was attached to their bullying. For a long time I was wondering what the cost could be. Could it be social - could cancel culture go out of fashion? I thought that was unlikely. From the Maoist mobs to modern college campuses, there's never been a social negative to cancelling people. I thought: what if a right-wing government gets in and enforces freedom of speech, encourages meritocracy in comedy and allows people to earn if they're right-wing? But the blob is too entrenched. You'll never be able to shift the culture at the BBC. But this conviction is finally attaching a cost to cancel culture. It's great to see.
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio81,286 views • 7 days ago
![The spat between Restore and Zionists is infuriating. They both want the same thing. Now to alienate my fellow rightoids AND my “Zionist paymasters” at the same time... There is a concerted effort to bring down Britain's insurgent right-wing party, Restore. They've been accused of racism and anti-Semitism following Restore co-founder Charlie Downes' insinuations that Nigel Farage has been bought by Israel, and his claim that "Restore believe that Britain is a people defined by indigenous British ancestry and Christian faith." Before I, an Anglo-Saxon white man, start talking about Zionism and Israel and the Jews, I should point out I'm a massive fan. I'm a Zionist. I believe the Jews have a right to a homeland, a right to self-determination and to control their borders. The thing is - I believe that the men and women of Britain have this right as well. And this seems to be where I diverge from the people criticising Restore. Jewish journalist Melanie Phillips thundered, "The far right noisily identify British identity with Christianity...[but]... A Hindu or a Sikh, a Jew or a Muslim is as British as anyone else." And she said of migrants, "Upon taking citizenship, all become equally British." But this clashes with her vision of Israel. "Israel is a Jewish state. Its national identity is Israeli and Jewish. So Arabs can only have the first, civic identity, but not the culturally fundamental second one." Hmmm...no "just as Israeli as anyone else" there. Melanie Phillips accepts an ancestral/peoplehood basis for Jewish national self-determination in Israel while expressly denying that British national identity has an equivalent ethnic or ancestry-based character. In the Telegraph, Alister Heath said "Rupert Lowe’s racist cheerleaders can no longer hide their despicable extremism. Downes believes that the fact that 54 per cent of babies were born to white British mothers in 2024 – and thus that 46 per cent were born to “white other”, mixed race or non-white mothers – as “an existential threat to our nation”. This claim, this specific sentence, is racist" But wait a minute. Surely the fact that people whose lineage is outside Britain are popping out nearly half of the babies in the UK is a bit alarming? For all that we might pretend that these people are just as British as anyone else, there's evidence that many are not. I see flags of barbarous third-world regimes waved on Britain's streets. I see a newspaper for black Britons telling me that only one in ten black feel proud to be British. I see David Lammy, a poster boy for an integrated minority, agitate for reparations for foreign countries. I'm a civic nationalist at heart, I genuinely believe people can come here and integrate. But civic nationalism is an ideal. It doesn't necessarily work as planned in the real world, and as distasteful as it might be to bleeding heart liberals such as me, it requires a certain amount of ethno-nationalism. We all know that if Britain became 99% Eritrean overnight, then regardless of what "values" the Eritreans had, we would have a very different country. There's an interesting term that's arisen on the right, "demographic security", where a certain proportion of the British population has to be of British lineage before more migrants are allowed in. This makes sense to me. It preserves the harmony and security of this country and makes it a better place for migrants as well. Israel understands this. They publish the fertility rates of their Arab Muslims alongside the Jewish population as a nudge to Israeli Jews to keep up, or be replaced. Restore have been criticised for presenting over-simplified solutions to complex problems, but there genuinely are simple solutions. Pakistan deported 2.4 million Afghan migrants. They just did it. They told them to go home and, in some cases, laid on coaches to help. Given that Britain used to control a third of the world, I think we can achieve a goal of "being able to do what Pakistan is capable of doing". The right should be the natural ally of Israel and Jews. Israel is the front line of Western civilisation. Israel shows the West how to handle the threat of Islamism, and how to have a healthy nationalism. And what's interesting is that every Jew I know, every Israeli I spoke to, wants Britain to have this healthy nationalism and wants Britain to control its borders. I think a lot of Jews understand that their survival in both countries is dependent on those countries not being overrun by third world barbarians who want to kill Jews. We all know it's not smartly dressed young Restore candidates who are going on stabbing rampages at synagogues.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2088971875397308914/amplify_video_thumb/2088967990322601984/img/CvAsALn9HWiEgQwf.jpg)
The spat between Restore and Zionists is infuriating. They both want the same thing. Now to alienate my fellow rightoids AND my “Zionist paymasters” at the same time... There is a concerted effort to bring down Britain's insurgent right-wing party, Restore. They've been accused of racism and anti-Semitism following Restore co-founder Charlie Downes' insinuations that Nigel Farage has been bought by Israel, and his claim that "Restore believe that Britain is a people defined by indigenous British ancestry and Christian faith." Before I, an Anglo-Saxon white man, start talking about Zionism and Israel and the Jews, I should point out I'm a massive fan. I'm a Zionist. I believe the Jews have a right to a homeland, a right to self-determination and to control their borders. The thing is - I believe that the men and women of Britain have this right as well. And this seems to be where I diverge from the people criticising Restore. Jewish journalist Melanie Phillips thundered, "The far right noisily identify British identity with Christianity...[but]... A Hindu or a Sikh, a Jew or a Muslim is as British as anyone else." And she said of migrants, "Upon taking citizenship, all become equally British." But this clashes with her vision of Israel. "Israel is a Jewish state. Its national identity is Israeli and Jewish. So Arabs can only have the first, civic identity, but not the culturally fundamental second one." Hmmm...no "just as Israeli as anyone else" there. Melanie Phillips accepts an ancestral/peoplehood basis for Jewish national self-determination in Israel while expressly denying that British national identity has an equivalent ethnic or ancestry-based character. In the Telegraph, Alister Heath said "Rupert Lowe’s racist cheerleaders can no longer hide their despicable extremism. Downes believes that the fact that 54 per cent of babies were born to white British mothers in 2024 – and thus that 46 per cent were born to “white other”, mixed race or non-white mothers – as “an existential threat to our nation”. This claim, this specific sentence, is racist" But wait a minute. Surely the fact that people whose lineage is outside Britain are popping out nearly half of the babies in the UK is a bit alarming? For all that we might pretend that these people are just as British as anyone else, there's evidence that many are not. I see flags of barbarous third-world regimes waved on Britain's streets. I see a newspaper for black Britons telling me that only one in ten black feel proud to be British. I see David Lammy, a poster boy for an integrated minority, agitate for reparations for foreign countries. I'm a civic nationalist at heart, I genuinely believe people can come here and integrate. But civic nationalism is an ideal. It doesn't necessarily work as planned in the real world, and as distasteful as it might be to bleeding heart liberals such as me, it requires a certain amount of ethno-nationalism. We all know that if Britain became 99% Eritrean overnight, then regardless of what "values" the Eritreans had, we would have a very different country. There's an interesting term that's arisen on the right, "demographic security", where a certain proportion of the British population has to be of British lineage before more migrants are allowed in. This makes sense to me. It preserves the harmony and security of this country and makes it a better place for migrants as well. Israel understands this. They publish the fertility rates of their Arab Muslims alongside the Jewish population as a nudge to Israeli Jews to keep up, or be replaced. Restore have been criticised for presenting over-simplified solutions to complex problems, but there genuinely are simple solutions. Pakistan deported 2.4 million Afghan migrants. They just did it. They told them to go home and, in some cases, laid on coaches to help. Given that Britain used to control a third of the world, I think we can achieve a goal of "being able to do what Pakistan is capable of doing". The right should be the natural ally of Israel and Jews. Israel is the front line of Western civilisation. Israel shows the West how to handle the threat of Islamism, and how to have a healthy nationalism. And what's interesting is that every Jew I know, every Israeli I spoke to, wants Britain to have this healthy nationalism and wants Britain to control its borders. I think a lot of Jews understand that their survival in both countries is dependent on those countries not being overrun by third world barbarians who want to kill Jews. We all know it's not smartly dressed young Restore candidates who are going on stabbing rampages at synagogues.
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio277,940 views • 27 days ago
A divide is opening up in Reform. And I’m not talking about the fight at the conference, which revealed a divide among Reform members who prefer Brazilian jiu-jitsu and those who prefer Wing Chung Kung Fu. This divide was laid bare by the protests in Dover and Portsmouth at the weekend. Farage condemned the men in balaclavas as “disgusting”. Richard Tice castigated them as “disgraceful” and the protest as “militia style intimidation”. Robert Jenrick compared them to Just Stop Oil and suggested that the police should be “lock them up” and “do your worst”. (I should probably point out that all of these men have also spoken about understanding why people are angry and why people are protesting, but who needs nuance? Nuance is for pussies.) Meanwhile Zia Yusuf, the politician formerly known as Cat Stevens, went down to the beach in Portsmouth to meet the protesters and speak to their de facto leader, Danny Tommo. I know Zia looks like he’s about to sell you a monkey’s paw in a 1980s film, or behead someone with a scimitar sword in front of Indiana Jones, but he’s actually incredibly based. He’s so based that I worry that he might get carried away and deport himself. He’ll walk onto that last departing ferry, like Arnold Schwarzenegger lowering himself into the molten steel at the end of Terminator 2. Why have Reform’s top brass made such a misstep? It’s hard to imagine the Green Party condemning Just Stop Oil in this way. I understand the desire to put distance between Black Bloc protesters and a mainstream political party, and the nervousness around scaring the horses when an election could be imminent, but it would have been an easy pivot for Farage et al to attack the establishment’s failings instead of condemning these men as “disgraceful”. The way Reform handled this is bad for two reasons: 1) They look weak, and they’re alienating their own base by doing it. It suggests that they take it for granted that people on the right who support the protesters are going to vote for them anyway. 2) This has given a boost to Zia Yusuf, and there are rumours that he’s going to challenge Farage for the leadership. This could destroy Reform. Electoral plausibility takes decades to build up. Farage has been in British politics for a long time, and he knows what he’s doing. I don’t think the party would prosper under Muhammad Ziauddin Yusuf as it has done under Farage. For all that we criticise Reform, we have to recognise that they are best placed to get into power and implement the things that need to be done to save Britain and to save Western civilisation. The next general election could be the last chance to settle this at the ballot box before people see men in balaclavas as the only option.
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio16,810 views • 1 day ago
Could anybody tell me if this is a Black carnival or a White carnival? I'm unable to tell because the concept of "race" is vague, socially defined and contentious. The idea that there are noticeable group differences is debunked pseudoscience. We simply may never know if this is a Black festival or a White festival.
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio88,384 views • 13 days ago
The people behind Professor Arday - and the racism row over the academic whistleblower. Jason Arday is the barrel I can’t stop scraping. This week, more footage has emerged to cast doubt on his fantastical claims. A former school friend of his says that Jason was not only able to speak, but he was able to maintain an acapella harmony. And a clip from Surprise Surprise had his girlfriend reeling off his achievements while Jason sweats listening to the bullshit piling up. None of the evidence mounting against him has stopped the usual suspects from rushing to the trenches to defend him. Dr Shola Mos-Eisley-Cantina-bing-bong accused everyone of racism. She could be the next diversity academic to be scrutinised. Bus station tramp James O’Brien put down the bottle of cooking sherry long enough to tell us that only a racist would question Arday - unwittingly making an excellent case for racism, as he implies they’re the only people brave enough to pursue the truth. Nathan Cofnas, an academic who broke rank to ask awkward questions about Professor Arday, was indeed accused of racism for doing so. Journalist Dan Neidle asked “Why was the Jason Arday story broken by a racist blogger and not the mainstream press?”, a question that answers itself (anyone who broke the story would be accused of being a racist blogger by you, Dan). And who were the academics who propelled Professor Arday to such an improbable position? His boss at Cambridge, Hilary Cremin, doesn’t seem to have a professional relationship with him. She holds his hands, stares into his eyes, and gushes over him in a way we wouldn’t see if Jason was a 55-year-old white professor with male-pattern baldness and spectacles. Other academics on the board that unanimously selected him seem to have their own racism problem, condemning “whiteness”, which they described as “pernicious”, and calling for the “re-education of whites”. Haven’t we had enough re-education already? The appointment of Professor Arday, and the condemnation of Nathan Cofnas as “racist” for correctly questioning his appointment, point to a bigger problem in academia where the truth is ignored in favour of expedient ideology. Nathan has researched race science - such landmines as the distribution of IQ by demographic group and the heritability of IQ - and has been condemned for it. It’s academia’s flat-earth belief. No amount of evidence will convince them to drop the mantra that we’re all absolutely equal when it comes to IQ. (I’m being a bit unfair to flat-earthers here because at least the earth looks flat up close.) Harvard psychologist Howard Gardner explicitly states on stage: even if proponents of hereditarian views on intelligence (whom he refers to as “the bad guys”) are correct, “life is short, and we have to make choices about how we spend our time...even if the scientific evidence doesn’t support it.” Yeah, who needs such outmoded ideas as scientific evidence? Certainly not the academic community, that’s for sure.
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio138,126 views • 29 days ago
Anti-immigration protests are convulsing Spain. The establishment narrative that this is a fringe of far-right bigots fell apart with one video of a man on a moped crying tears of relief as the protest walked past him, overcome with emotion that people were finally standing up for his country that he thought was lost. (Or maybe he was chopping onions under his helmet, or his gerbil had just died. I don't know. I like to project my own opinions onto things.) The Spanish government, like most governments across Europe, has been importing young men from alien, mediaeval, misogynistic, homophobic, violent cultures. The men are offered citizenship by the million. Politicians are open about the fact that this isn't being done for the good of Spain. This is being done to bring in left-wing voters, to disenfranchise the native Spanish who are seen as bigots. The situation came to a head with the invasion of Ceuta, when 70,000 migrants stormed the Spanish enclave. Even though mainstream media told us they'd all gone home, they didn't. They stayed, building shantytowns, committing crime, harassing locals, developing tuberculosis, measles, scabies, and infectious diarrhoea. They even set up Turkish barber shops because obviously you need to have a sharp skin fade while you're sleeping under driftwood on a beach, venturing out at night to grope some Spanish women. Just as in Britain, the government is complicit in encouraging illegal immigration and does nothing to help the locals, so local men have taken matters into their own hands, dismantling the migrant camps. Instead of protecting local residents, state-funded NGOs have been caught handing out pepper spray to migrants to help them fight back against the locals. I don't know if there's a better example of the fact that this experiment in mass immigration isn't being done for our good than seeing NGOs hand out pepper spray to a group of men who are sexually assaulting local women. Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has appeared on TV to condemn Russian, Israeli and Elon Muskian "disinformation". But everybody knows that it's the establishment disinforming them. Mainstream media still tries to push the notion of evil racist mobs being mean to these poor, innocent African men who, through no fault of their own, broke into Ceuta, built a camp, shat on the beach, and accidentally committed a few crimes. And you can see how loathed they are from the reaction of locals giving mainstream reporters the finger. Across Europe, the establishment narrative is unravelling.
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio12,065 views • 2 days ago
J.K. Rowling vs Nathan Cofnas: race realism is a taboo too far for some brave, truth-telling gender realists. Nathan Cofnas is the race realist academic who was instrumental in exposing Jason Arday as a non-realist academic. J.K. Rowling just called him "racist" on Twitter. I'm a big fan of J.K. Rowling. She's resolute in her resistance to gender ideology even though it hurts her financially, subjects her to vitriol and puts her at risk. You might think J.K. Rowling would have some solidarity with another person who's been hauled over the coals for promoting scientific realism over cultural norms, but no. He's t̶r̶a̶n̶s̶p̶h̶o̶b̶i̶c̶ "racist". This exposes her blind spot. Gender ideology is where her realism stops. When it comes to race realism, she turns into Owen Jones. Which is a shame. I've seen other TERFs stand up for, if not race realism, then at least nationalism. There are parallels between the way that men are allowed to "identify" as women and the way that Rwandan men are allowed to identify as Welsh choirboys. But when it comes to Cofnas, many TERFs are saying that human sex is dimorphic, whereas race is nebulous and hard to define. Nebulous? Maybe. But if I'm walking around London, half the time I can't tell if a person is a man or a woman. But I immediately know if I'm at Wimbledon or if I'm at the Notting Hill Carnival. If a big bunch of black "yoot" gets on my train carriage, I can tell with my eyes shut. If I drive through a Muslim area, there are usually a few tell-tale signs (written in Urdu). The ratio of males to females is pretty constant around the world, but there are huge discrepancies in what those areas are like. Calcutta and Lagos are not like Durham or Bergen. I suspect there may be factors other than masculinity and femininity guiding behaviour at the population level. I understand that it's a taboo with the potential to destroy careers, and I also understand that there are easy get-outs. In-group variance is greater than inter-group variance. Any differences at the group level don't mean that an individual will have any particular traits. I firmly believe that a man from the Horn of Africa can be intelligent and civilised, and I look forward to science proving me correct by one day finding one who is. But the weakness of the attacks on Nathan Cofnas is revealing. Nick Ferrari could only accuse him of "causing distress to a black student". This, in itself, was seen as reason enough to shut down anything that Nathan Cofnas might say. But if we're going to end all academic work that might cause distress, why not scrap the theory of evolution? It distresses creationists. Perhaps the cardinals were correct to condemn Galileo for presenting a heliocentric model, because the heliocentric model had distressed them? Academia's credibility has taken a beating over the last couple of months, but as the taboos around race realism evaporate, Cofnas may end up resurrecting it - and finally be appointed "Head of Eugenics & Race Science at Harvard".
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio43,701 views • 13 days ago
The Ann Widdecombe narrative unravelled - and the left are celebrating and exploiting her murder. Ann Widdecombe had a very eventful death. First she died from natural causes, then she was bludgeoned to death by a white man - let’s be very clear, a white man, we found a white man everyone - during a "bungled burglary" - then another white man, definitely a white man, was arrested who "wasn't politically motivated" and had just randomly driven 300 miles from Rotherham to Ann’s house and back with a weapon. Then it turned out that yes, it’s being investigated by counter terror police and the suspect is a man who was reading communist literature and has learning difficulties. To be honest, if he's a communist, you don't need to tell me he's got learning difficulties, because if he didn't, he wouldn't be a communist. Nudge Unit Despite the recent exposure of the government's RICU unit, which is tasked with steering public sentiment and the official narrative, there were very clunky attempts to do just that. The Mail On Sunday ran a piece claiming "A highly placed source told the MoS last night that Ms Widdecombe’s family ‘don’t want her death hijacked for political purposes’, adding that they ‘are very uneasy’ about Mr Farage being at the scene." Really? What family? She was what, 78, 79? No husband, no kids? Her mum and dad contacted a Mail on Sunday journalist via a seance to say Anne wouldn't want her death to be exploited for political purposes? There were reports that our nephew was laying a wreath with Nigel Farage. And Anne was a politician and a supporter of Nigel Farage. And the media quickly pivoted away to talk about "12 arrested over a far-right terror plot" threatening an Islamic event near Ipswich. Politicians said that this involved a credible threat to life, but there are independent reports saying it was just men flying a drone to see what was going on at the Islamic event. It looks like there are good reasons to see what was going on at the Islamic event, as it was affiliated with Tablighi Jamaat, a movement prohibited in Saudi Arabia and banned as extremist in several Central Asian countries and Russia. Saudi authorities have described it as a danger to society and a gateway to terrorism. Exploited by Labour Despite the accusations that Farage and others on the right were exploiting Annabelle Dickens' death, it was Labour who exploited it, using it as an excuse to push forward their plans for regulating social media and tweaking the algorithm to show state propaganda instead of people like me. Leftist hatred If these politicians actually want to stop this kind of violence, tweaking YouTube algorithms isn't the way to do it. Much of the hateful rhetoric came from establishment figures on the Left, such as Heather Herbert, a transgender employee of Aberdeen University and former Labour candidate, who is now being investigated by the police after glorying in Ann Widdecombe's death. Ann Widdecombe's death feels like a turning point in British politics. Despite the constant drumbeat about the mythical "far right", we can see that the far left are openly hateful and violent. And as the establishment rhetoric against Nigel Farage ramps up, I hope it puts paid to the claims that Farage is an establishment shill for just controlled opposition there to syphon off and contain public sentiment.
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio155,177 views • 1 month ago
"Stop speaking Irish!" - how Irish nationalists were conquered by British wokeism. Ebun Joseph is a Nigerian woman who moved to Ireland. She’s now the government-appointed “Racism Czar”. And she’s just told Irish people that she’s “inherited Ireland” and they need to “stop speaking Irish”. Charming! As a Westerner, it’s always nice to get bossed around and spoken down to by someone who’d be lying next to a Red Cross tin of powdered egg with flies on her face if it wasn’t for Westerners. This is incredible, not just because a migrant feels sufficiently emboldened to make such demands on their host country, and not just because she’s a “Racism Czar” so is supposed to be reducing racism, not making people more racist. What’s truly incredible about this is that the same Irish nationalists who fought to keep Ireland Irish - Sinn Féin, Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael - support this woman. These supposed nationalists who fought against British influence in Ireland now want Ireland to be subsumed by third world immigration, to the point that Irish culture and language is erased. Brits out, Eritreans in. What these Nationalists might not realise is that the Wokeism that they are implementing is an invention of the Anglosphere, especially America and Britain. British authorities tried to restrict the Irish language in Ireland over a period spanning nearly 600 years, beginning with the Statute of Kilkenny in 1367. If Margaret Thatcher had gone across to Ireland and told them “stop speaking Irish!”, there would have been blood in the streets. But forty years later, Irish nationalists have been conquered by British wokeism, and are appointing mad looking Nigerians to order Irish people to erase their culture. We see this British capture of Irish culture at every level. Kneecap received nearly £2 million of British funding. Why did Britain spend that money? Kneecap are now hanging out with Greta Thunberg, pushing climate ideology and calling for mass immigration. Kneecap are a paid-for asset of the British cultural establishment, and a vector for wokeism in Ireland. It reminds me of the late great PJ O’Rourke visiting Vietnam decades after the war and seeing American cultural influences and capitalism everywhere, and realising that cultural sublimation had worked where military might hadn’t. Anyway, I have a feeling that Sinn Féin and other supposedly nationalist Irish organisations have somewhat diverged from what genuine Irish nationalists want, and there’s about to be an almighty backlash.
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio63,134 views • 23 days ago
"The flags!" Lefty snob moves to Essex - and regrets it. But what about the ethnic cleansing of Cockneys? A clip went viral this week of left-wing journalist Serena Kutchinsky telling the tear-jerking story of how she moved her family out of London to Essex by accident. She then discovered it wasn't a multicultural paradise full of mosques, schizophrenic yardies and vape shops, so moved them back. Her main complaints? People flew the St George's Cross and Union Jack. How dare people put up British flags? What do they think this place is, Britain or something? No, it's communist zone number 5612 of the global Socialist Utopian Council! For a long time, East London flew Palestinian flags, and I bet she didn't complain once. I wonder if it's the cohesiveness, the sense of community, that she didn't like? Living in central London is a very atomised experience. You don't have the issue of people talking about you in the pub because nobody knows who you are. And the pub's been converted into a mosque. Also Buckhurst Hill, the place in Essex that she moved to, isn't a remote rural coastal community. It's in the M25! And it's pretty multi-ethnic - obviously not as brown as Hackney, where white people have been pushed off their land by wave after wave of migration, but it's around 20% ethnic minority. And we need to talk about the Cockney land clearances. Cockneys are an indigenous tribe to Britain. They have their own identity and culture - a culture that’s been around for about 800 years. They were the character of London - Britain’s biggest soap opera, Eastenders, is based on Cockney culture. Their land has been colonised, and they've been pushed off it. If you travel through East London now, you'll find Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani, African, Somali cultures, but very few Cockneys. They've been forced out through organised state-run ethnic cleansing, placing alien cultures in their areas until the Cockneys had to move out to Essex. Now, if the Cockneys were an Amazonian tribe, people like Serena Kutchinsky would be falling over themselves to protect Cockney culture and preserve their land as a reservation. UNESCO would have designated the Dagenham River Basin a World Heritage Site, where Millwall fans, pearly queens and pie and mash shops would receive government subsidies to live as their authentic selves. Cockneys would perhaps even get to run casinos (or at least dog tracks). She's moving back to the ancestral tribal lands of the Cockney. If these were the lands of any other Aboriginal tribe, she wouldn't move there out of respect, and when she visited those lands, she'd be careful to give a land acknowledgement. Do you think anybody's giving land acknowledgements to the Cockneys? "We acknowledge and honour the First Nations Cockneys as the Traditional Custodians on whose stolen ancestral lands our multicultural utopia is built, and whose taxes are harvested to pay the benefits of the people we imported to replace them because Cockneys are not leftwing enough." "We reflect on the forced exile and the sanctioned dispossession of the Cockney Peoples, whose pubs and pie and mash shops were erased to make way for mosques and vape shops. We affirm the Cockneys sovereignty of East London, and commit ourselves to upholding their ancient language of Cockney rhyming slang - I’m not telling porky pies, you’ve got to adam and eve me. Mill-wall." "However, I'd just like to reiterate that you're not getting your land back. My £2 million terraced house is there, and the slave class that clean it and raise my children around the corner in social housing, subsidised by your taxes."
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio67,474 views • 26 days ago
0:38
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
"Hello, I'm Helen, I'm your Government Asylum Support Worker" "I ONLY INTERESTED TO FOCK" "It's so wonderful to be enriched by your diverse perspectives" "I WANT FOCK DE WIMMIN" "Here's a list of courses you can attend on citizenship and integration" "I FOCK BRITISH WHORES WHERE FOCK" "We have a contemplation and prayer area in line with your cultural expectations" "I WANT FOCK BITCH" "Here are three tokens for the state-provisioned brothel where women who haven't paid their TV licence are chained to a radiator for you" "FOCK WHORE FOCK"
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio57,474 views • 24 days ago
When you think of Notting Hill, you might think of the delightful romcom with Julia Roberts and Hugh Grant wafting around a nice, polite, genteel part of West London. Well, London's changed a bit since then. White Brits are now a minority in London and for one weekend a year, all those nice, polite people in Notting Hill have to board up their windows because it becomes...CARNIVAL! I drove through it on Monday night. I've never seen so many obese buttocks draped in mesh, like walruses caught in nets hauled up by a Japanese trawlerman. And the behaviour is anything but genteel. Walruses have a more refined courtship process. Because it's a festival of black culture, white women pretend that it's wonderful. One particularly telling moment was when a white woman whipped out her phone to record a video about how safe she felt and how great the atmosphere was, and then a black man wearing a full face covering immediately put his arm around her and copped a feel. Caught between a rock and a hard accusation of racism, she grimaced a smile and said how romantic everybody was. There were deaths linked to the carnival. I'm assuming most of them were people who cringed themselves inside out after seeing London's mayor, Sadiq Khan, give everyone high-fives, call a black man "brudda" and talk about garage music as if he's an MTV presenter in the '90s instead of a middle-aged non-binary Muslim mayor. Other scenes made you cringe for different reasons. People's patios were treated like toilets. Drugs were openly sold in the streets. Unattractive, prediabetic women bent over and wobbled their buttocks so that you could see what they had for elevenses while African men and security guards gyrated against them. Some may have resulted in pregnancy. Other men humped trees and traffic lights. The total annual public cost of securing the Notting Hill Carnival is around £20 million, most of which goes to the police, who spend £5.7 million and deploy 7,000 officers Despite the heavy deterrent, there were a record 636 arrests at the carnival this year for offences including possession and supply of drugs, possession of weapons, public order offences, sexual offences, and assaults (including attacks on emergency workers) But according to mainstream media, it's an "overwhelmingly positive event". Meanwhile, Tommy Robinson's Unite the Kingdom rally also attracts hundreds of thousands of people and only resulted in 22 arrests - but is described as an "evil far-right racist hate march". The coverage of Notting Hill Carnival is condemned as racist, as it focuses on big groups of Black men armed with knives committing crime. If there are big groups of men at Wimbledon armed with knives committing crime, I'm sure the media would focus on that too. The reporting doesn't pander to racial stereotypes. If the people at the carnival want to combat racial stereotypes, the first thing they should do is stop reinforcing them.
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio17,366 views • 6 days ago