Lauren Neidigh's banner
Lauren Neidigh's profile picture

Lauren Neidigh

@LethalLauren9046,876 subscribers

Like the court of public opinion, but more random. Not a lawyer. The devil works hard, but I work faster. [email protected]

Shorts

Lindsay Clancy conspiracy theorists are so focused on harassing Patrick Clancy and his wife that we have content creators lying and refusing to correct the lie when confronted by the people involved. Intent creators have spread fiction that Patrick Clancy’s now wife, Rachel Danis, was his mistress and that they went to Costa Rica together after the kids’ funeral. Not only is there so much wrong with this based on the idiotic “screenshot evidence” of a review, the actual woman who made the review has come forward. She is an entirely different woman with the same name. Now this woman and the innocent man whose business she left a review on are being harassed by strangers who are raging out to project their trauma onto people they know nothing about. She has reached out to creators and tried to get them to remove the content and correct it, and they have ignored her. Lying about a man and his wife is not supporting women. These people do not care about this tragedy or Lindsay Clancy. They’re bored and want engagement, which is fine unless you are actually hurting real people. Don’t even get me started on the comments, where people are literally commenting about it being Patrick’s wife on this woman’s explanation video while not reading or watching the content. This woman’s video with factual information barely got any reach, while slop content creators posting trash get millions of views on posts they never fact check. We are screwed as a society. Link:

Lindsay Clancy conspiracy theorists are so focused on harassing Patrick Clancy and his wife that we have content creators lying and refusing to correct the lie when confronted by the people involved. Intent creators have spread fiction that Patrick Clancy’s now wife, Rachel Danis, was his mistress and that they went to Costa Rica together after the kids’ funeral. Not only is there so much wrong with this based on the idiotic “screenshot evidence” of a review, the actual woman who made the review has come forward. She is an entirely different woman with the same name. Now this woman and the innocent man whose business she left a review on are being harassed by strangers who are raging out to project their trauma onto people they know nothing about. She has reached out to creators and tried to get them to remove the content and correct it, and they have ignored her. Lying about a man and his wife is not supporting women. These people do not care about this tragedy or Lindsay Clancy. They’re bored and want engagement, which is fine unless you are actually hurting real people. Don’t even get me started on the comments, where people are literally commenting about it being Patrick’s wife on this woman’s explanation video while not reading or watching the content. This woman’s video with factual information barely got any reach, while slop content creators posting trash get millions of views on posts they never fact check. We are screwed as a society. Link:

21,233 görüntüleme

Videos

LethalLauren904's profile picture

Blake Lively and Jenny Slate bizarrely try to blow up Slate’s own comment about Britney Spears into inappropriate behavior by Justin Baldoni. Lively’s narrative about other women “coming forward” fails when you look at the facts. The “complaints” have no merit and do not come close to qualifying as harassment. For example, here are some (not all) of these complaints by the other women (who did NOT “come forward” but rather they were forced into this due to Lively’s court process): - Baldoni directed an actress in character to lick a spoon. This is something that character does in the book this movie is based upon. - Slate made a comment about how something was “bad for sex” and Baldoni participated in the conversation, saying “totally, bad for sex” which she found offensive. - Hoover, the book’s author, was unhappy that she wasn’t included enough or things weren’t done exactly the way she liked. This was not her call to make as she sold the intellectual property rights to Baldoni. This is also not harassment. - The primary complaint by Slate was a comment made by the director (Baldoni) about the characters’ wardrobes looking sexy on the actresses. Sony asked Baldoni and Wayfarer to put “more sexy” into the movie, and appearing “sexy” was part of the creative process. Lively acknowledged the importance of “sexiness” in her own messages. The comment made by Baldoni was very clearly not predatory. Regardless, an apology was made and this never happened again. - Another of the women was upset because she wanted to direct. Baldoni was the director. She felt dismissed. Not her project or intellectual property, not her call. I’m sure she can direct a beautiful project of her own that doesn’t belong to someone else. - Another of the women was upset because she wanted to be the main producer and didn’t think Heath needed to be involved. She also complained that Baldoni (the director) yelled on set. Almost all of these complaints had absolutely zero to do with harassment. The women felt they weren’t given as much influence or control as they wanted. This is something many people feel in the workplace every day. It sucks. But it isn’t harassment.

Lauren Neidigh

41,927 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Daha fazla içerik yok.