Lynnwood Times
@LynnwoodTimes • 6,486 subscribers
The premier and trusted news source in South Snohomish County committed to providing HONEST news you can TRUST! 🚨NOT STATE FUNDED nor STATE SPONSORED MEDIA🚨
Shorts
Videos
🚨#BreakingNews Trump Fires WA State Court-Appointed Interim U.S. Attorney Minutes After Swearing-In Federal judges in Washington state appointed a new interim U.S. attorney Wednesday morning, who President Donald J Trump fired just minutes later. The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington swore in Roger Rogoff, a former King County Superior Court judge, at 7:40 a.m. as its choice to lead the office. The White House fired him by 8:24 a.m. Trump’s preferred candidate, Neil Floyd, has served as the top federal prosecutor in the district since October 2025. He was initially appointed interim U.S. attorney and later named first assistant after his statutory term expired in February. Senior Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., had said she would block Floyd’s confirmation if nominated, and his name was never advanced to the Senate. Under Senate tradition, home-state senators can use a “blue slip” process to signal opposition to U.S. attorney nominees, often preventing hearings in the Judiciary Committee chaired by Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa. The judges acted under a federal law allowing district courts to appoint an interim U.S. attorney when a vacancy continues. Trump holds constitutional authority to remove such officials. Rogoff told The Seattle Times he is preparing to sue Trump and the Justice Department to regain the position.
Lynnwood Times122,297 просмотров • 1 день назад
![🚨BREAKING: AG Brown warned with up to 1-year in federal prison by DOJ if his office impedes citizen journalist in Somali fraud probe! WA AG Nick Brown’s statement on reports of Somali-run home-based daycare providers being harassed alleging that “showing up on someone’s porch, threatening, or harassing them isn’t an investigation” is being met with stern criticism by U.S. Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division, Harmeet K. Dhillon. Brown’s statement was posted on X approximately 4 hours after WA independent investigative journalists Cam Higby and Jonathan Choe published their exposé on Tuesday, Dec. 30. Both Cam Higby 🇺🇸 and Jonathan Choe, along with Nick shirley attended President Donald J Trump’s a roundtable at the White House on Oct. 8 to address what administration officials described as a growing epidemic of left-wing political violence. In response to a Libs of TikTok post highlighting AG Brown’s statement encouraging “anyone experiencing threats or harassment to either contact local law enforcement or our [WA AG] office’s Hate Crimes & Bias Incident Hotline at 1-855-225-1010,” AAG Dhillon affirmed her office’s commitment to protecting a free press from “state officials” who “threaten” journalist. 🟥AAG DHILLON: “ANY state official who chills or threatens to chill a journalist’s 1A rights will have some ‘splainin to do. DOJ Civil Rights Division takes potential violations of 18 USC § 242 seriously! Govern yourselves accordingly!” AG Nick Brown then responded to Dhillon, stating that he hasn’t “threatened anyone, especially not journalists.” Brown, in a display of ironic sarcasm, included snapshots from various news headlines of President Donald J Trump allegedly threatening media and journalists. 🟥AG BROWN: “Not sure how you square your newfound concern for journalists with working for Donald Trump. We quite obviously haven’t threatened anyone, especially not journalists. But maybe you need to have a hard conversation with your bosses.” 18 U.S.C. § 242 is a federal criminal statute that makes it illegal for anyone acting under color of law (such as government officials or law enforcement) to willfully deprive a person of their constitutional rights, privileges, or immunities. The First Amendment explicitly safeguards freedom of the press. Investigative journalists rely on public records and on-site interviews and observations. If state officials label these activities as "harassment" or direct people to hate crimes hotlines without justification, it could be interpreted by the courts as an attempt to stifle a free press. Courts have applied § 242 in civil rights cases involving suppression of a free press. US Assistant AG Dhillon is warning Washington state AG Brown of legal action against him by alleging his actions or future actions may be interpreted by the DOJ as misusing his official power to deter reporting fraud in Washington state which could expose him and other elected officials to federal criminal scrutiny under this statute. The penalty for a basic offense of journalists’ 1A rights is a fine up to $100,000 and/or federal imprisonment for up to one year. If bodily injury is involved, a fine up to $250,000 and/or federal imprisonment for up to 10 years. If death, attempted murder, or kidnapping of a journalist, a fine up to $250,000 and/or federal imprisonment for up to 10 years. Fines are higher for organizations found in violation of journalists’ 1A rights.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2006492792101724411/amplify_video_thumb/2006492541068439552/img/n1WfNbo1D_8txX1C.jpg)
🚨BREAKING: AG Brown warned with up to 1-year in federal prison by DOJ if his office impedes citizen journalist in Somali fraud probe! WA AG Nick Brown’s statement on reports of Somali-run home-based daycare providers being harassed alleging that “showing up on someone’s porch, threatening, or harassing them isn’t an investigation” is being met with stern criticism by U.S. Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division, Harmeet K. Dhillon. Brown’s statement was posted on X approximately 4 hours after WA independent investigative journalists Cam Higby and Jonathan Choe published their exposé on Tuesday, Dec. 30. Both Cam Higby 🇺🇸 and Jonathan Choe, along with Nick shirley attended President Donald J Trump’s a roundtable at the White House on Oct. 8 to address what administration officials described as a growing epidemic of left-wing political violence. In response to a Libs of TikTok post highlighting AG Brown’s statement encouraging “anyone experiencing threats or harassment to either contact local law enforcement or our [WA AG] office’s Hate Crimes & Bias Incident Hotline at 1-855-225-1010,” AAG Dhillon affirmed her office’s commitment to protecting a free press from “state officials” who “threaten” journalist. 🟥AAG DHILLON: “ANY state official who chills or threatens to chill a journalist’s 1A rights will have some ‘splainin to do. DOJ Civil Rights Division takes potential violations of 18 USC § 242 seriously! Govern yourselves accordingly!” AG Nick Brown then responded to Dhillon, stating that he hasn’t “threatened anyone, especially not journalists.” Brown, in a display of ironic sarcasm, included snapshots from various news headlines of President Donald J Trump allegedly threatening media and journalists. 🟥AG BROWN: “Not sure how you square your newfound concern for journalists with working for Donald Trump. We quite obviously haven’t threatened anyone, especially not journalists. But maybe you need to have a hard conversation with your bosses.” 18 U.S.C. § 242 is a federal criminal statute that makes it illegal for anyone acting under color of law (such as government officials or law enforcement) to willfully deprive a person of their constitutional rights, privileges, or immunities. The First Amendment explicitly safeguards freedom of the press. Investigative journalists rely on public records and on-site interviews and observations. If state officials label these activities as "harassment" or direct people to hate crimes hotlines without justification, it could be interpreted by the courts as an attempt to stifle a free press. Courts have applied § 242 in civil rights cases involving suppression of a free press. US Assistant AG Dhillon is warning Washington state AG Brown of legal action against him by alleging his actions or future actions may be interpreted by the DOJ as misusing his official power to deter reporting fraud in Washington state which could expose him and other elected officials to federal criminal scrutiny under this statute. The penalty for a basic offense of journalists’ 1A rights is a fine up to $100,000 and/or federal imprisonment for up to one year. If bodily injury is involved, a fine up to $250,000 and/or federal imprisonment for up to 10 years. If death, attempted murder, or kidnapping of a journalist, a fine up to $250,000 and/or federal imprisonment for up to 10 years. Fines are higher for organizations found in violation of journalists’ 1A rights.
Lynnwood Times97,543 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад
🚨Seattle-based manufacturer challenges Chinese dominance of public safety drones Over the weekend, 25-year-old Blake Resnick, founder and CEO of Seattle-based BRINC Drones, appeared on Fox & Friends to lay bare a stark reality that eight in ten American public safety agencies rely on drones manufactured in China, leaving critical response tools vulnerable to foreign influence. He is aiming to change that with BRINC Drones. The interview, aired December 6, arrived amid escalating U.S. scrutiny of Chinese tech dominance. Just weeks earlier, Congress embedded a potential ban on new DJI drone sales in the 2025 National Defense Authorization Act, set to activate December 23, 2025. DJI, the Shenzhen-based behemoth, commands roughly 70% of the global commercial drone market—a $18.6 billion arena in 2024—fueled by billions in Chinese government subsidies. Resnick, whose firm holds a mere 7% slice of the U.S. public safety segment, called the imbalance "not a good state of affairs." BRINC's Responder drone is compact enough to launch from an armored vehicle's roof, the quadcopter targets structures harboring armed suspects. A specialized glass-breaching tool shatters entry points, allowing the device to slip indoors where its onboard LIDAR sensor maps floor plans in real time—delivering tactical intel without endangering officers. Already, BRINC units have resolved dozens of incidents autonomously, from remote car crashes to welfare checks, arriving on scene before human responders in some cases. Resnick enrolled in college at 14, only to drop out months later, deeming it "an indirect path" to his passion: engineering tools that save lives. He started BRINC after the 2017 Las Vegas mass shooting claimed that 60 lives. By 2019, BRINC was already generating revenue and shipping drones, initially sustained by early sales before raising significant funding from investors including OpenAI’s Sam Altman and PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel. Today, valued at $480 million after $157 million in funding, the company serves 700 clients, including the Redmond Police Department and the New York Police Department. 👉BRINC's website: 🎬Fox News
Lynnwood Times77,309 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад
🚨BREAKING: Democrat-controlled Senate passes multi-billion-dollar Millionaires’ Tax With a vote of 27-22, the Washington State Senate on Monday passed Senate Bill 6346, a proposal to impose a 9.9% tax on individuals earning more than $1 million annually. Three Democrat lawmakers—Sens. Adrien Cortes (D-Battle Ground), Deb Krishnadasen (D-Gig Harbor) and Drew Hansen (D-Bainbridge Island) — joined all Republicans in voting against the measure. Supporters cast the bill as a vital step toward fixing what they call a regressive tax system and funding essential services like education and health care, while critics warned it would hammer small businesses, drive away jobs, and set the stage for broader income taxes despite voters’ repeated rejections. SB 6346—also known as the “Millionaires’ Tax”— introduced by Senate Majority Leader Jaime Pedersen (D-Capitol Hill), would start with federal adjusted gross income and make adjustments to arrive at “Washington taxable income.” It excludes long-term capital gains unless already subject to the state’s capital gains tax, adds back certain state and local taxes deducted federally, and provides a $1 million standard deduction per household—adjusted for inflation from 2030—and a $50,000 charitable deduction. Non-residents of Washington state pay only on Washington-sourced income, apportioned based on activity within the state. The Millionaires’ Tax would take effect January 1, 2028, with first returns due in 2029. It exempts real estate sales, qualified family-owned small businesses, and retirement income from public pensions. Estimated to affect about 30,000 taxpayers—roughly 0.5% of households—it is expected to generate approximately $3.7 billion annually, with 5% ($175 million) dedicated to county public defense and the remainder to the general fund for education, health care, and other services. However, these monies are not earmarked for education nor health care and can be used as the legislature sees fit when it is allocated to the state’s general fund. The bill starts with federal adjusted gross income, currently excludes all long-term capital gains and losses initially, then adds back only net long-term capital gains subject to Washington’s capital gains tax (plus the standard and charitable deductions that reduced the taxable amount). Thus, real estate sales that qualify for exemption under the capital gains rules—such as qualified family-owned small businesses or residential property—remain untaxed, avoiding any undoing of exemptions. During the hearing on Feb. 6, it was revealed that although SB-6346 targets only individuals with at least $1 million in annual income, no current law can permanently bind future legislatures should a future legislature expand the tax to other income brackets. The bill now heads to the House for vote. 🎬Source: TVW
Lynnwood Times52,440 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад
🚨 HAPPENING NOW: Protest at the Snohomish County Lincoln Day event at HWY 9 and Marsh Rd in the City of Snohomish. The protest is in response to keynote speaker for the Republican event, Katy Faust, a vocal critic of gay marriage and allowing transwomen in female sports. They are also critical of Brandi Kruse and Protect Girls Sports initiative funder Brian Heywood, who are also here tonight.
Lynnwood Times22,658 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад
🚨BREAKING: CONSERVATIVE FIREBRAND SCOTT PRESLER TO STORM WA STATE TO PUSH FOR ELECTION INTEGRITY Scott Presler, the unstoppable force behind Donald J Trump's 2024 landslide victories in battleground states, just dropped a bombshell announcement that he is packing his bags and heading to Washington State to launch a signature blitz for Initiative Measure IL26-126, which would require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote and could lead to the cancellation of registrations for those unable to provide it, "Washington's been a playground for the radical left's voter fraud factory for too long," Presler stated in his announcement on X. "I'm coming to fight – and we're going to WIN!" The initiative, filed by the Washington State Republican Party in 2025, seeks to align state law with federal requirements but has drawn criticism from groups like the League of Women Voters, progressive organizations, and Democratic-leaning commentators. The League of Women Voters allege that the initiative would "disenfranchise a significant number of persons who are legally eligible to cast a ballot" by creating barriers for those without immediate access to citizenship documents. Northwest Progressive Institute call the initiative an "enthusiastic Trump backer" effort by GOP Chair Jim Walsh that's unnecessary and harmful to voter access. Presler, who is gay, co-founded and chaired Gays for Trump and founded and now leads Early Vote Action, has focused on voter registration, turnout, and grassroots mobilization for Republican causes throughout the US. To qualify for the November 2026 ballot, the initiative needs approximately 418,000 valid signatures by July 2026. Video Source: ThePersistence
Lynnwood Times65,906 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад
🚨BREAKING: TRUMP TO CONSIDER PULLING 2026 WORLD CUP FROM SEATTLE IF PUBLIC SAFETY NOT ADDRESSED BY LOCAL LEADERS During the signing of several executive orders today in the Oval Office, President Donald J Trump, when answering a reporter’s question about whether he would consider moving the 2026 FIFA World Cup from cities pushing “back against your immigration” and “crime initiatives,” he replied, “I guess. But we're going to make sure they're safe. They're run by radical left lunatics and they don't know what they're doing.” The reporter specifically referred to the cities of Seattle and San Francisco in his question. Seattle is scheduled to host six 2026 FIFA World Cup matches at Lumen Field between June and July 2026 as part of the joint U.S.-Canada-Mexico tournament. While President Trump lacks direct authority to unilaterally shift games, he could apply pressure to the FIFA Council to do so. FIFA and federal funding (including $625 million for security) have already been allocated. Losing these matches would equate to an estimated $1 billion in total economic impact to King County alone according to Visit Seattle. This includes an estimated $100+ million in direct state and local taxes. 🟥PRESIDENT TRUMP: “It will be safe for the World Cup. If I think it isn't safe, we'll move it into a different city. Absolutely. We'll take the World Cup. If I think it's not, it's actually a very fair question. If I think it's not safe, we're going to move it out of that city…. “if any city we think is going to be even a little bit dangerous for the World Cup or for the Olympics, you know, where they have Olympic overthrow, right? But for the World Cup in particular, because they're playing in so many cities, we won't allow it to go. We'll move it around a little bit. But I hope that's not going to happen.”
Lynnwood Times65,997 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад
![🚨Brandi Kruse denies opposing gay marriage in confrontation with protester Brandi Kruse told a group of protesters at the Snohomish County Republican Party that she has never opposed gay marriage and accused her critics of spreading lies to frighten people. She remained steadfast of her support for initiative IL26-638, declaring that men are not women and should not compete in women’s sports. “I don’t oppose gay marriage. I’ve never opposed gay marriage,” Kruse said during Saturday's exchange in the City of Snohomish. “If you took me, Barack Obama, and Hillary Clinton and put us in a room, only one of us in that room will have [n]ever opposed gay marriage. I have no interest in changing the laws on gay marriage.” Kruse added that the false claim that she opposes same-sex marriage was first made by "No Hate Washington state" the very group of which the signs by the protesters read. “You guys need to stop spreading lies and stop supporting organizations that lie to make people scared,” she said. “That’s all they do. They lie to make people scared. It’s wrong. … If you believe in what you’re saying, use the truth. Just debate based on the truth, and we won’t have any issues.” Both President Barack Obama and Sen. Hillary Clinton publicly opposed same-sex marriage for years before reversing course. Obama said during his 2004 Senate race and 2008 presidential campaign that marriage is “between a man and a woman.” He announced his support for gay marriage in May 2012, saying his views had evolved. Clinton supported the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act as first lady and described marriage in 2004 as “a sacred bond between a man and a woman.” She publicly backed same-sex marriage in a March 2013 video. President Bill Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act into law on Sept. 21, 1996. Between 2013 and 2015, the United States Supreme Court ruled the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional, stating that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry. Many (but not majority) gay and lesbian activists and intellectuals opposed same-sex marriage in the 1970s through the early 2000s, viewing it as a conservative, assimilationist "heteronormative" goal that clashed with the broader aims of gay liberation. Also, more many members of the gay community, marriage was seen as a middle-class, white, privileged issue during an AIDS crisis many LGBT people argued were of higher priority. Other parts of gay culture valued sexual openness and non-traditional relationships arguing that legal marriage would pressure conformity to monogamy and nuclear-family heteronormative ideals, marginalizing polyamorous, non-monogamous, or other consenting queer arrangements. However, opponents made a compelling argument tying the need for marriage equality to health insurance benefits, inheritance benefits, and tax benefits. Also, during the AIDS crisis, many LGBT partners were refused to be alongside their partners in hospitals--a privilege of being married.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2055890267715293318/amplify_video_thumb/2055884903632486400/img/-tIGLAFQ1b910KDg.jpg)
🚨Brandi Kruse denies opposing gay marriage in confrontation with protester Brandi Kruse told a group of protesters at the Snohomish County Republican Party that she has never opposed gay marriage and accused her critics of spreading lies to frighten people. She remained steadfast of her support for initiative IL26-638, declaring that men are not women and should not compete in women’s sports. “I don’t oppose gay marriage. I’ve never opposed gay marriage,” Kruse said during Saturday's exchange in the City of Snohomish. “If you took me, Barack Obama, and Hillary Clinton and put us in a room, only one of us in that room will have [n]ever opposed gay marriage. I have no interest in changing the laws on gay marriage.” Kruse added that the false claim that she opposes same-sex marriage was first made by "No Hate Washington state" the very group of which the signs by the protesters read. “You guys need to stop spreading lies and stop supporting organizations that lie to make people scared,” she said. “That’s all they do. They lie to make people scared. It’s wrong. … If you believe in what you’re saying, use the truth. Just debate based on the truth, and we won’t have any issues.” Both President Barack Obama and Sen. Hillary Clinton publicly opposed same-sex marriage for years before reversing course. Obama said during his 2004 Senate race and 2008 presidential campaign that marriage is “between a man and a woman.” He announced his support for gay marriage in May 2012, saying his views had evolved. Clinton supported the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act as first lady and described marriage in 2004 as “a sacred bond between a man and a woman.” She publicly backed same-sex marriage in a March 2013 video. President Bill Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act into law on Sept. 21, 1996. Between 2013 and 2015, the United States Supreme Court ruled the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional, stating that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry. Many (but not majority) gay and lesbian activists and intellectuals opposed same-sex marriage in the 1970s through the early 2000s, viewing it as a conservative, assimilationist "heteronormative" goal that clashed with the broader aims of gay liberation. Also, more many members of the gay community, marriage was seen as a middle-class, white, privileged issue during an AIDS crisis many LGBT people argued were of higher priority. Other parts of gay culture valued sexual openness and non-traditional relationships arguing that legal marriage would pressure conformity to monogamy and nuclear-family heteronormative ideals, marginalizing polyamorous, non-monogamous, or other consenting queer arrangements. However, opponents made a compelling argument tying the need for marriage equality to health insurance benefits, inheritance benefits, and tax benefits. Also, during the AIDS crisis, many LGBT partners were refused to be alongside their partners in hospitals--a privilege of being married.
Lynnwood Times18,657 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад
🚨#BreakingNews Thurston County judge blocks law allowing state commission to decertify elected sheriffs Judge Christine Schaller halted portions of Senate Bill 5974, signed by Gov. Bob Ferguson on April 1, one day before it was set to take effect. The measure would have required sheriffs and other law enforcement leaders to maintain certification with the Criminal Justice Training Commission, with decertification automatically creating a vacancy in elected office. 🟦 JUDGE CHRISTINE SCHALLER: "The statute allows an elected sheriff to have their peace officer certificate revoked by an administrative body based upon unconstitutional language. Such a revocation under the new law would result in a vacancy of the office of sheriff with the sheriff being removed. This also allows, again, an elected official, someone chosen by the voters, to be removed in the same way as an employee of theirs, another peace officer employee, could be removed. "And again, although a sheriff could seek judicial review, that would be after a decision was made by an administrative body and the vacancy and removal would be immediate. And the decision to revoke an elected official certificate would not be by someone in an elected and or public office, which is contrary to how removal of elected officials is treated by the constitution and, as far as the court is aware, for every other elected official in the state of Washington. " This process authorizes arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement. I find that the plaintiffs have a well-grounded fear of imminent invasion of their rights based upon what they have set forth in their statements and based upon my finding as it relates to number one, because the law is set to go into effect tomorrow. "And I find that the acts complained of are either resulting in or will result in actual and substantial injury. It impacts current sheriffs, the four, who have indicated they are seeking re-election. It affects their ability to fill out a declaration of candidacy form to declare themselves as candidates for the next election cycle. "Those three factors are also considered in light of the equitable factors, including balancing the relative interests of the parties and the interests of the public. The state has properly argued that this is a law that was passed by the Washington State Legislature. The legislators are elected by the people of the State of Washington and it should be given its due weight. And I have done that. "I also have considered the interest of the public in the right to allow a free elective process as well. And the public has a significant interest in the right to a free elective process, the freedom to choose candidates, and the freedom for candidates to set forth that they want to run for political office. "Accordingly, I find that those equitable interests weigh in favor of the plaintiff, and I will grant the preliminary injunction." 👇FULL VIDEO: 🎬 Dana Cruz, Puget Sound Patriots
Lynnwood Times22,275 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад
🚨BREAKING: WA STATE HAS 30 DAYS TO COMPLY WITH CDL ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY STANDARDS OR LOSE $10.5 MILLION IN FEDERAL FUNDING California, Washington and New Mexico could lose millions of dollars of federal funding if they continue failing to enforce English language requirements for truckers, U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said today, August 26, at a presser. On March 1, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order 14224, “Designating English as the Official Language of The United States.” Since the new language standards took effect in March, Duffy disclosed that an investigation found that Washington state had more than 6,000 violations of safety rules during inspections but only pulled four drivers out of service for English language violations. Duffy added that states will lose millions of dollars from the Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program if they don't comply with the rules within 30 days—that is roughly $10.5 million for Washington state alone. California could lose $30 million and New Mexico, $7 million in federal funds. Duffy further added that this is only Phase I as USDOT is looking at more enforcement options to penalize non-compliance. The actions by Duffy stems from the issuance of a commercial driver's licenses to Harjinder Singh, an illegal immigrant who failed multiple language tests, by the states of Washington and California. Singh later killed 3 people on the Florida Turnpike earlier in August during an illegal U-turn.
Lynnwood Times53,003 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад
🚨BREAKING: Just minutes ago, SB-6346, which would impose a 9.9% tax on individuals earning more than $1 million annually, advanced the Senate Ways & Means Committee to the Rules Committee bringing it closer to a floor vote. The bill is sponsored by Sen. Jaimie Pedersen, D-Capital Hill. Tim Eyman protested its passage from committee and was escorted out of the room by security.
Lynnwood Times19,846 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад
🚨BREAKING: ICE PREPARING MAJOR MASS ARREST OPERATIONS TO “FLOOD” SEATTLE AND PORTLAND, BORDER CZAR ANNOUNCES Border Czar Tom Homan outside the White House today told reports that ICE is going to “flood” sanctuary cities of Seattle and Portland with agents to arrest what he called illegal aliens who pose “safety threats.” Today's announcement comes on the same day as ICE Seattle released a statement from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) setting the record straight on the Seattle Times’ defense of Pakistani criminal illegal alien and alleged fraudster Muhammad Chaudhry. "While Seattle Mayor Bruce Harrell and the media attempt to paint a sob story of this career criminal, DHS is providing the facts about this criminal illegal alien’s extensive rap sheet and arrest by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)," DHS opened in its statement. 🔽BELOW IS THE FULL STATEMENT FROM DHS DEBUNKING SEATLLE MAYOR BRUCE HARRELL'S STATEMENT ON THE ARREST OF MUHAMMAD KAHID CHAUNDHRY: Chaudhry first entered the U.S. in 1998 on B-2 visitor visa—after he lied to the U.S. government about his criminal history in Australia. His criminal history in Australia includes five counts of financial deception, possession of stolen goods, and falsifying passports. Additionally, he lied about his criminal history in Australia in order to obtain a green card in the U.S. and subsequently been denied citizenship twice —dating back to 2008, and then he applied for citizenship eight more times while continuing to lie and provide false information to immigration authorities. This fraudster not only concealed his criminal history from the U.S. government, but he also falsely claimed that he was deployed to Iraq. Department of Defense records indicate he was never deployed. Furthermore, this criminal illegal alien collected $449,459.82 in taxpayer dollars from the Department of Veterans Affairs’ Veteran’s Benefits Administration (VBA), according to an Inspector General’s report dated September 13, 2021. Chaudhry currently owes the United States government a negotiated payment of $81,080 for a mortgage reduction grant from the VBA according to an investigation. He has made no payments to date on the amount owed. After immigration officials determined he misrepresented his criminal history on immigration forms, he was issued a Notice to Appear by U.S. Citizenship AND Immigration Services (USCIS) in 2008. He appealed his final order of removal multiple times over the course of 17 years. 🟥DHS SPOKESMAN: “Sanctuary politician Bruce Harrell and the media are peddling a FALSE sob story on this serial fraudster. Following lies about his military service, he owes the U.S. taxpayers more than $81,000. President Trump and Secretary Noem’s message is clear: criminal illegal aliens are not welcome in the United States. Why do sanctuary politicians and the media continue to peddle sob stories of criminal illegals and smear our brave ICE law enforcement officers? Make no mistake, these types of lies are contributing to our ICE law enforcement officers facing a 1000% increase in assaults against them.” On August 21, 2025, ICE arrested Muhammad Zahid Chaudhry in close coordination with USCIS. Chaudhry appeared at a USCIS appointment in Tukwila, Washington and was apprehended after law enforcement determined he was in violation of federal immigration law and had a final order of removal by an immigration judge. He has since been placed into removal proceedings.
Lynnwood Times29,640 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад
🚨Lynnwood Times reporting at a Tesla Takedown Rally today at the Tesla Dealership located at 17731 Pacific Hwy (HWY 99) in Lynnwood. Over 400 Protesters occupied both sides of the street from the 176th to 179th blocks of HWY 99. In the sea of anti-Trump and anti-Elon demonstrators were an island of three pro-Tesla supporters. They support DOGE and the pro-climate purposes for driving Tesla vehicles. Those we spoke to protesting in the Tesla Takedown Rally shared with the Lynnwood Times that they don't trust DOGE and believe Trump is destroying America. When asked specifically what they don't trust about DOGE or how Trump is destroying America their grievances centered around the were the following themes: 1. DOGE is not presenting any evidence of their claims of fraud to the American people and Congress 2. Lack of oversight of DOGE and Elon Musk by Congress 3. Distrust with the FBI and DOJ because these departments are being led by Trump appointees 4. Disappointment in US foreign policy relating to Canada, Panama, Greenland, Ukraine, and the European Union 5. DOGE actions related to Medicaid 6. DOGE actions related to the Dept of Education 7. DOGE actions related to Social Security (a lot were afraid that DOGE may be taking Social Security benefits away from eligible people) 8. Trump administration's immigration enforcement believing it to be a means that would lead to the normalization of removing political dissidents akin to 1930's Germany The Lynnwood Times observed protesters waving US, Canadian, and Ukrainian flags. Local business owners or store managers on the wings of the Tesla dealership (from retail to restaurants) we spoke with all said that the protestors can protest but their actions were blocking access to their business and/or customers were complaining about the lack of parking spaces to patronize the store. After the protest a vast majority of the protesters left orderly in their vehicles, but we did not observe any of them visiting any of the adjacent restaurants. All-in-all, those we spoke with were able to articulate why they support the Tesla Takedown movement and believe it is growing.
Lynnwood Times21,691 просмотров • 1 год назад
🚨Rep. Lilian Ortiz-Self (D-Mukilteo) at 21st Legislative District Town Hall on March 15, 2025, shares why she NOW supports changes to the Parental Bill of Rights the Washington State Senate unanimously passed, 49-0, and the State House, 82-15. Rep. Ortiz-Self voted for the initiative, and it was signed by Gov. Jay Inslee in 2024. Ortiz-Self SUPPORTS removing notification to parents if their child is offered medical services, a school arranges for medical treatment, or if their child receives gender affirming care. Ortiz-Self implied at the Town Hall that the Parental Bill of Rights is NOW an anti-trans bill that needs to be changed.
Lynnwood Times21,436 просмотров • 1 год назад
Больше нет контента для загрузки