أبو عمّار
@MaajidNawaz • 475,797 subscribers
resisting the democratisation of truth - nolite te bastardes carborundorum
Shorts
Videos
Debating ex-Tory Minister Sir Michael Ellis on 43,000 Covid care home DEATHS & MIDAZOLAM for GB News with Michelle Dewberry: “I am DISGUSTED… out of those that died of Covid, 90% of them died under Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders..when you’re put on one of those placed towards an End of Life Care Pathway.. from 3rd April 2020 until 2021 the..the End of Life Care pathway that the government protocol had adopted was known as NG163… you’re basically given the combination of MIDAZOLAM & and Opioid.. the government’s own website before all of this happened by a month, in March 2020, said that if you place patients on MIDAZOLAM & opioids, to quote, ‘increases the risk of sedation, respiratory depression, coma and DEATH’…the question to you Sir Michael, and you were Attorney General.. did Matt Hancock your Health Secretary ignore their own guidelines when using NG163 all the way through this period up until 2021?”
أبو عمّار192,951 просмотров • 4 дней назад
“These are sexual crimes that the Labour Party - with Keir Starmer - are held complicit for covering up” GB News
أبو عمّار19,813 просмотров • 1 день назад
BBC political reporter Michael: “Just, talk me through your message for the prime minister” Actor Danny Danny Dyer: "I don’t know who the Prime Minister is, mate. Do you?” BBC: “Andy Burnham.” Danny Dyer: “Nah but who is he? And I don’t understand. Anyone vote for him? Because I didn’t vote for him. So, I think we’ve had successive Prime Ministers that are c*nts. End of. Put that on the fu^%ing BBC"
أبو عمّار318,849 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
Maajid Nawaz on GB News: “Well, in one sense Michelle Dewberry, we’re at war already, both in Ukraine and of course with our allies, with Iran. So there is this going on. I wish it wasn’t going on. But in another sense, I find it It’s very strange because the strongest and closest ally we have is the United States of America. Now, the President of the United States of America, has currently just lifted sanctions on Russia, has made a diesel deal with them, has publicly come out to the world’s media and said it’s Zelensky that’s the obstacle to peace, not Putin, and that he wishes somebody would depose Zelensky inside Ukraine. And that he wants to make peace, potentially even with China on board negotiating with Russia and America. And I also, of course, remember that we almost had a peace deal back in 2022. Sir Michael, you may remember this. We almost had a peace deal negotiated by the lead negotiator for the Ukrainians, David Braun. He went to Istanbul. He met with Putin’s negotiators. They had a deal in place that they were prepared to sign, according to that lead negotiator, and then out flew our own Prime Minister, out of nowhere in an unexpected visit, Boris Johnson went to Ukraine and forbade Zelensky from agreeing to that peace deal, as reported by Politico and the Ukrainian newspaper Pravda. And since then, the war’s carried on. So what I really want to know is why did we scupper, your Prime Minister, why did we scupper that peace deal, and why are we now under Andy Burnham, not your Prime Minister, not working with the President, our closest ally, Trump, to actually make peace with Russia instead of continue the war?”
أبو عمّار28,576 просмотров • 3 дней назад
1) We do not worship the Hijab, we worship God alone. 2) For those who take the (weak) view that the headscarf is obligatory for women, it certainly does not apply to children, even from their own sources. 3) The hadīth used to obligate the headscarf (concerning Asma’ in Abu Dawūd) is WEAK (da’īf) according to the MAJORITY of classical scholars due to it being Mursal (containing a missing link in its narration). Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Ibn Ma'in, and Abu Dawud himself graded the narrator Sa'īd ibn Bashīr as weak. The chain of narration also includes Qatādah and al-Waīd ibn Muslim who practiced tadlīs (hiding defects in transmission), further contributing to its weakness. 4) there is absolutely nowhere in the Qur’an that obligates covering the head. Qur’an 24:31 explicitly only obligates covering the bosom for modesty. It does NOT explicitly obligate covering THE HEAD. The reason (‘illa) for modesty in covering the bosom was to differentiate from slave women, who used to be bare breasted during that time. So, the ruling revolves with its ‘illa (الحكم يدور مع علته وجودا و عدما) 5) All other Quran’ic passages relate NOT to head scarves, but to screens (Hijāb) behind which the Prophet’s (peace be upon him) wives were told to speak, “because they are not like other women” (33:32). Hence, talking from behind a screen (Hijāb) is obviously not for general application. These passages are explicit in their specificity (khās) to the Prophet’s wives, whereas 24:31 about covering the bosom is addressed to all believing women. 6) This poor girl is distressed because she’s been raised all her life by her parents to believe that this is a defining symbol of her faith. It is not. It is a disputed matter. We’ve just shown that. 7) Consequently, schools are permitted to set a school uniform, and so they should. This, as you say, is in a Muslim-majority country, so why are you, an American-born Muslim, bothered about their own interpretation of scripture (ijtihād)? 8) This is precisely why we do not have idols. Nor do we have a clergy. We do not consider the theologians who teach religion as our “Lords”, placing them above our independent reasoning. 9) Do not become so attached to symbolism (idols) so that, if taken away, we feel we are unable to worship God. والله أعلم
أبو عمّار37,874 просмотров • 5 дней назад
On Being English: 1) England is a *country* - which confers a nationality to those who belong to that country. 2) English is also used colloquially as a synonym to mean the ethnicity of *Anglo-Saxon. People are talking across each other. Nationality and ethnicity are distinct. I have been using the word English to mean my country of England since my LBC days until today. We will not give up our country to the restrictive linguistic rigidity of ethno-nationalists. Maajid Nawaz: "Perhaps where we may disagree is where I'd like to now move this to on the issue of Englishness and Britishness is: do you think that Englishness is just an ethnicity or can it also be a country? And what I mean by that is there is something called English ethnicity. I may perhaps for the purposes of avoiding confusion, and I've done so on LBC, somebody called up once and had this conversation with me, for the purposes of avoiding confusion and making sure everyone understands what's being discussed, I may refer to it as a white Anglo-Saxon ethnicity. Just to be very precise as to what we're speaking about, speaking about white people who have either a Celtic or an Anglo-Saxon or a Norman background who live in the British Isles. So there is such a thing as a lineage and ethnicity, and a culture, that emanates from that grouping. Is there a second category in your mind? And I'm posing this as a question because I'm not trying to force my view on you. I want to hear your view. So is there a second category in your mind that if you look at England as a country and Scotland as a country and Wales as a country and Ireland as a country, say, putting aside the North Ireland versus Republic of Ireland debate for a minute, if these are countries, and as countries that have a polity, and they have an administrative state that defines their boundaries, is there a civic notion of being English? And if you want, we can use a different word for that. Perhaps, I don't know, English versus Englander, or whatever word you want to use, or perhaps even The opposite, white Anglo-Saxon English people versus just English citizens. Is there room, in your view, for a civic identity that sits on top of that lineage-based identity?" Connor Tomlinson: "I wouldn't say it's a civic identity. The way that I've described it before is you can describe adopted family members or national friends who have other heritage as an Anglophile. We can make special dispensations for people that have a genuinely positive relationship with the majority. But if you just have self-governing communities who self-identify as English because they say, well, there is a civic identity that doesn't require me to have any of that lineage, then what you get is you have to face the proposition of it's well, you could say it's an absurd hypothetical, but demographically we're trending in that direction. If there were no English people left in England, nobody of Anglo-Saxon, Celtic or even earlier Brittonic, you know, ethnic heritage, which plenty of us have. And it was here before the ice sheets, and they would still define themselves as English, if you had England of 100% Somalians, but they call themselves English, would it be England? And most people, you would say no, I would say no. And that means that even if you have a reverence for the place, even if you fulfilled what you would say that the civic criteria of Englishness is, there's still this essential component that if it isn't present would cause the destruction of the country, the dispossession of the people from their land. And those people are the, the nation is the people, and that is the beating heart of the nation state. You can learn to love the country, you might even be accepted as an adopted family member, but just as you can't write yourself into my family's will and entitle yourself to my parents' home, you also can't say, I am English, and entitle yourself to the country. Maajid Nawaz: "So, again, this is important, and I think where we're going to end up disagreeing is probably on terms, actually, semantic, in the sense that I see that you're, probably for understandable reasons, territorial over the word English to describe the ethnicity, and I'm saying the ethnicity is important, but perhaps the word is a synonym, and that's probably where our disagreement would be."
أبو عمّار121,822 просмотров • 27 дней назад
.Connor Tomlinson says that entire communities - even those four generations in and born here - should have their citizenship revoked, be detained and then forcibly deported: Maajid Nawaz: “…How would you practically take a fourth generation brown, bunch of people, so it’s not just one person we’re talking of, communities that are four generations in, who have no political representation, how would you practically ‘remigrate’ them if they don’t want to be ‘remigrated’?” Connor Tomlinson: “Okay, you would give them advance notice that their residency has been withdrawn.” Maajid Nawaz: “That would be cancelling their citizenship as well then, yeah?” Connor Tomlinson: “Yeah, sure. Yeah. You would give them, again, enough advance warning to get their affairs in order. You would say to them, ‘okay, we have worked out this deal with this respective country. We’ve given you a settlement package. We would be able to pay for your flight. We can cover all sorts of things with that country to make it comfortable for you. Here’s your deadline’. Okay? And if they don’t meet that deadline, then they should be assisted with expedition to the airport…” Maajid Nawaz: “So when you say assisted, that sounds to me - sorry - that sounds to me like a euphemism. Do you mean arrested, detained and deported?” Connor Tomlinson: “Yes.”
أبو عمّار95,804 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
Why can’t you just answer the questions though C-Benjie my nigga? Is your male lineage “fully black” & immigrant through your Dad and grandad? Did you boast about them “breeding” with white women, while racially insulting white people, multiple times? Would you deport your “fully black” grandad? Did your wife catch you online flirting with a transgender person? Would this all make you an ethno-nationalist transracial black man, who is into transgender people?
أبو عمّار60,507 просмотров • 20 дней назад
Egypt’s disqualified goal last night is hall of fame level brilliance. The ref didn’t blow the whistle until he realised it would mean Egypt would win. So he retroactively blew it. Stinks. Reminiscent of Argentina vs England 1986 World Cup final after Maradona’s infamous (caught on live TV) handball into goal leading to an Argentina win.
أبو عمّار256,677 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад
.Connor Tomlinson says that non-whites - including Suella Braverman - should not be allowed to hold political office in Britain: Maajid Nawaz: “So what word would you use to describe those that have qualified by whatever criteria to be here who are non-Anglo-Saxon white? Would they have the same rights as the white Anglo-Saxons or Celts or whatever?” Connor Tomlinson: “I promise I’m not being evasive. I don’t have a word in mind because I tend to describe them by their relationships rather than an abstract category..As far as would they have the same rights, would they have equal protections under the law? Yes. Would they be able to, for example, hold political office? No. I don’t think that would be sensible. Elected office, at the very least. And I’m saying that as a precaution...I like Suella Braveman, for example. I think we disagree on certain foreign affairs matters, but I’ve met Suella a few times and she’s very nice. Now, for every Suella Braveman, there is an Apsana Begum and an Iqbal Muhammad and a Shabana Mahmood and a Priti Patel and a Rishi Sunak, right? And so, as a precautionary principle, would it be sensible to exclude people that do not have any British heritage from holding public office? Yes. Would it mean you lose out on a couple of decent politicians? Yes, but ultimately, It’s a sensible move.”
أبو عمّار60,914 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
“The Ministry of Justice has launched legal action to prevent the publication of crime statistics by nationality. The Information Commissioner’s Office has ordered the Department to release conviction data from between 2018 and 2024, which the department is now appealing. We have, potentially, we are sitting on data that could reveal that there is a Sicilian Mafia-like organisation that has been operating in this country for decades, providing drugs and sexually exploiting and raping underage, predominantly white-British girls. And the government has decided that the revelation of crime stats that could prove this claim is to be blocked. And we leave you to wonder as to why the government thinks it’s a good idea to try and block such a claim.” Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED.
أبو عمّار87,479 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
"And I'll break this down for you. So Mehdi Hasan the left-wing working class spokesperson. First of all, he's privately educated. So that tells you straight away there. Then he went to Oxbridge. As you may know, he applied for a job at the Daily Mail. And in the application letter, basically elaborated on all the things he is right-wing about, and agrees with the Daily Mail on. That's why I'm calling them all fake, right? He put in their abortion and family values and everything. When he didn't get that job, he basically started grifting on the left and became the political editor for The New Statesman, we'll explain, is the prestigious left-wing magazine, The New Statesman. And he was the political editor for the New Statesman after having applied for a job at a right-wing tabloid, but having written in his application all the things he's right-wing for, so why he deserves the job. And that only came out because he was on a BBC Question Time panel, where he was confronting the editor of the Daily Mail and by that time he was doing his left wing grift. So he started attacking the Daily Mail guy for being right wing, Paul Dacre, the editor. And so Dacre decided as editor to literally publish Mehdi Hasan's application letter to the Daily Mail on the front page. The audience can look all of this up. So that's why he's fake. He's a grifter. And from multiple angles, he's not what he represents. What he claims on the tin, he simply isn't. Privately educated, claiming his left wing when he actually wanted to work for a right wing tabloid, as a hack. And then, of course, when that all got exposed because they put it on the front page, he ran from the country and went and lived in America. Now, that is a microcosm of the kind of representation that has been artificially propped up. All of these voices you see on the media that are so-called Muslim leaders are fake. They are fake." Maajid Nawaz WARRIOR CREED
أبو عمّار64,076 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
Watch it all dawn upon him slowly as he awakens in real time. And time is vindicating. Medical academic Dr John Cambell
أبو عمّار1,479,471 просмотров • 3 лет назад
.Connor Tomlinson on the idea of deploying state forces to patrol & enforce house arrest on entire non-white areas in British cities - even if they are LEGAL & have been born here from four generations ago - prior to stripping their citizenship & mass deportation, because they’re not deemed English. Maajid Nawaz: “…But we’re not talking about illegals at this stage, are we? We’re talking about...” Connor Tomlinson: “No, I’m not saying just illegals. I’m saying people who... you would get people who would be, I don’t know, forfeiting their British citizenship of their own accord, and that would be fine.” Maajid Nawaz: “So we’re talking for the purpose of the thought experiment of those who don’t, and they’re four generations in, and they don’t have political representation, and so they’re upset. In that scenario, you said house arrest, but of course, what if they don’t stick to that? If somebody doesn’t want to be deported and they believe they are equal to you and they’re four generations in, it’s difficult to convince them that they should be not allowed to leave their homes. So you’d have to then police that, right? So I’m just trying to get, what does your vision look like?” Connor Tomlinson: “Yep.” Maajid Nawaz: “So then you’ve got, say, I don’t know, Bury Park in Luton or you’ve got whatever in Birmingham or Whitechapel. So what, you then police those areas? What do you do?” Connor Tomlinson: “We are running up against the limits of my foresight, I’m afraid. So again, I’m not trying to be evasive. Part of the problem here is that the scale of such a thing escapes our imagination. Because large-scale population transfers have happened in the past, but when you read about them retrospectively, it’s kind of It’s kind of difficult to imagine.” Maajid Nawaz: “So how do you avoid it? That’s what I’m trying to ask you. The Jewish ghettos in Europe led to the same. How do you avoid that?” Connor Tomlinson: “This is the difficulty I’m having grappling with your question, because I don’t have all the answers on that. All I have is the sort of pain and despair as you can see you being dispossessed of your country and knowing that that situation is intolerable.” Maajid Nawaz: “I sympathise, by the way, with your despair. I don’t agree with your solutions proposed, but I do sympathise with your despair and I do agree with the importance of preserving lineage. I just wonder if there’s another way, another vision forward, you know, and that’s why I was talking about the difference between being English or white Anglo-Saxon ethnically and being somebody that is granted the civic rights of the country of England.”
أبو عمّار43,548 просмотров • 29 дней назад
