MajToure999
@MajToure • 50,354 subscribers
Maj Toure |Health 💪🏽 Protection 🔫 Purpose 🧠
Shorts
Videos
0:26
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
Who’s the aggressor here to you? The officer? Or the now deceased man?
MajToure9992,922,980 次观看 • 4 个月前
2:13
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
And some of yall take this collectivist clown seriously. 🤣🤣🤣 “The people have to believe in the authority of the state.” “Forget about liberty and safety. It’s about order.” “I don’t believe in the individual.” “Individualism only makes sense in a white, Christian, patriarchal society.” All DIRECT quotes, from this two minute clip. No edits. 😂😂😂
MajToure999494,865 次观看 • 6 个月前
1:29
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
We can speculate all we want about the situation involving “Chud The Builder” and Joshua Fox… But investigators used ACTUAL surveillance footage from the courthouse to determine charges. Not to mention there were SEVERAL officers in the IMMEDIATE vicinity who SAW WHAT HAPPENED. That’s why he was charged how he was. Not because “they’re trying to make an example of him.” Claiming he “dindu nuffin” while pretending his case is about “suppressing free speech” is inaccurate. Or the theory that many are arguing that saying “nigger” should mean a death sentence to non white people. Inaccurate reframing at best and total victim mentality cope at worst. Just like most claims being pushed online by bigots, bots or the “I’m a victim” energy the BLM crowd was on for awhile. Here’s the irony: His schtick was built on the idea that words alone shouldn’t provoke violence. And by police accounts of the SURVEILLANCE footage…. This started as a VERBAL confrontation. Then HE allegedly attempted to draw a firearm and use it over an argument. So basically HE chimped out OVER WORDS. Either believe the police in the affidavit or… Wait until THAT surveillance footage THEY used as a reference comes out. To speculate without being robust about the process exposes ignorance and/or bias. Neither are solid moves. If HE initiated and drew a firearm…. It becomes very plausible that the victim reacted out of fear and fight or flight. When someone draws a gun to intimidate (which is brandishing) it’s reasonable the victim defend themselves. Eventually, the surveillance footage (and possibly the livestream) will become public and if it shows what the police allege… All some who’ve spoken prematurely will have done is showcased their victim mentality or lack of understanding of this process. So I’ll get ahead of this by saying.. In my view, based on the charges and statements from authorities, they clearly believe Dalton was responsible for escalating the situation. So based on THOSE initial reports… He’s not a martyr or a free speech hero. He’s a horrible representation of gun owners that anti gunners will paint as the standard gun owner AND MORE SPECIFICALLY… Will paint as most WHITE MALE gun owners. Smart money move for those who ARE safe and responsible gun owners? Call him the erratic gun owner he currently appears to be, which is NOT the standard gun owners hold themselves to. Maintain that stance until new evidence proves to the contrary. Then berobust and OBJECTIVE on that new position based on new FACTS. Anything else is sub par tactics.
MajToure99932,024 次观看 • 22 天前
I’ve gotten a few emails from folks saying they’re withdrawing support from our 2A work. Why? Because I’ve been critical of MAGA, President Trump and unconstitutional positions. Positions that contradict the 2nd amendment and limited govt. The people claiming to stand for limited govt are upset I’m vocal about holding govt to limits. Same who say they defend the Constitution are angry because I refuse to abandon constitutional standards.... Because the right side of the political aisle is in power. That’s not conservatism. That’s fandom. Opposing new wars, defending the Bill of Rights and demanding fiscal responsibility isn’t betrayal in ANY way. It’s the baseline standard we’re supposed to maintain. If your principles only apply when the “other side” is in office, then those aren’t principles, they’re preferences. Here’s the dangerous part: When people excuse overreach, they normalize the very power later used against them. History proves that every single time. For nine years at BGM we’ve trained Americans in firearms safety and responsibility. The 2nd amendment is the gateway drug to the Constitution. Someone learns firearms responsibility? Then they learn their rights, civic duty and become politically engaged. That’s how you build real conservatism. Not slogans, but Americans who understand liberty and the codified Bill of Rights. And all of this work exists because of voluntary donations. The same donations some people now threaten to remove because I refuse to stay silent when govt crosses constitutional lines. I am not your enemy. I am your partner in defending freedom and protecting human rights. Even when it’s uncomfortable. ESPECIALLY then. If standing on principle offends you, the problem aint the principle. If you agree that freedom requires standards, not mindless cheerleaders, then help us continue the work. Repost this and support the mission at the link in the comments. (GiveSendGo. com/solutionary) 214 more $100 donors to get the goal of this fundraising drive. Standards over slogans. Principles over personalities. Freedom over factions. Hit the link now and let’s keep building an America worth conserving.
MajToure99992,115 次观看 • 3 个月前
So here’s the whole video. It came out awhile back initially. My take? This administration does goofy shit that has NOTHING to do with improving American quality of life. It’s just not a serious admin AT ALL. Virginia is turning into, or potentially IS a battle ground state now… But this dude or one of his staff is reposting worthless shit to his page. Go do some actual work instead of playing on social media guys. Harsh? Disagree? Agree? Let’s discuss.
MajToure99942,203 次观看 • 4 个月前
