NMSI - Oscillating Physics's banner
NMSI - Oscillating Physics's profile picture

NMSI - Oscillating Physics

@PCosmologist4,019 subscribers

#TQC - Twin Quantum Computing - will compute the Future, Past and Present of the Earth, and the Universe #QuantumComputing #GeoPredict #NMSI #FollowBack

Videos

PCosmologist's profile picture

Particles are not “billiard balls”: an explicit mini-history Step by step, leading physicists showed the solid-ball picture is only an approximation: Max Planck (1900): energy quantization treats matter and radiation as oscillators with discrete energies, shifting focus to resonance and frequencies. Albert Einstein (1905): light as quanta of a field, suggesting particles are field excitations, not rigid beads. Louis de Broglie (1924): every “particle” carries a wavelength λ = h/p, so wave nature is intrinsic. Erwin Schrödinger (1926): dynamics via the wavefunction, i.e., oscillatory evolution instead of hard trajectories. Werner Heisenberg (1927): the uncertainty principle forbids perfectly defined classical paths. Max Born (1926): wavefunction intensity gives probabilities, not deterministic hits by solid balls. David Bohm (1950s): implicate order and pilot wave. A deeper, folded structure underlies the visible, consistent with a coherent informational substrate. Richard Feynman (1940s–60s): sum over histories. Outcomes arise from interference of all possible paths, a logic of phases and amplitudes. Link to NMSI NMSI models particles as stabilized informational oscillations in a subquantum substrate, with mass and gravity emerging from phase interference and alignment. This resonates with Planck’s oscillators, de Broglie + Schrödinger’s waves, Heisenberg + Born’s non-classical probabilities, Bohm’s implicate order, and Feynman’s interference. Bottom line: not solid beads, but resonant nodes and phased information.

NMSI - Oscillating Physics

2,183,191 views • 11 months ago

No more content to load