REGENETARIANISM מידת האמת
@REGENETARIANISM • 42,587 subscribers
Writer, researcher, retired food industry consultant & aspiring microbial ecologist exploring connections betw soil, plants, nutrition & atmospheric chemistry
Videos
Being raised in a Jewish community, as you're obviously already aware, you just accept the revised historical narrative and mythology that you were indoctrinated to believe. So, when you actually start exploring the real history, it's quite shocking and disconcerting to realize what Zionist militia, only a few years after the Holocaust, did to another people. The Irgun and Stern Gang were especially immoral. Benny Morris's 1988 book, 1948 and After, is a good reference. This was before Morris became such a Zionist apologist. In this book, Morris goes through Israeli historical archives recorded during 1948 and dispels a lot of the prevailing Zionist myths. The main difference betw. Morris's book and Pappe's book, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, is that Morris argues that there was no Plan Dalet ("Plan D"). Otherwise, their conclusions were strikingly similar with Morris acknowledging Israel committed the first sin. Miko Peled's book, A General's Son, is also a very good book. In this book, Peled provides a biography of his father who served in an elite Hagana unit and was a top Israeli General in the 1967 War. Peled also provides his own autobiography, including the time he spent serving in the IDF's Special Forces where he received his Red Beret. For both his father and himself, Peled notes how and why they both left the Zionist cult. Peled's book is being made into a movie. Attached is a short trailer for that film. Anyway, it's really strange getting into arguments and exchanges with rabid Zionists because none of them know the actual history of Zionism, the formation of Israel, or the conflict with Palestinians. They all just parrot the myths and corresponding talking points that they were indoctrinated to believe and that are central to their identities.... and, sadly, have turned too many of them into psychopaths who are completely incapable of seeing beyond their false reality. Even more disturbing is that their pathology directly leads to increased antisemitism since other people realize that these Zionist are deceitful even if the Zionists are incapable of making that realization themselves due to their cognitive dissonance. cc. Zachary Foster Max Blumenthal
REGENETARIANISM מידת האמת45,270 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce
The so-called "MAHA" movement (for lack of a better term) is a pretty diverse group of people from a variety of places and backgrounds. It includes people from the Regen Ag community, metabolic health community, functional medicine doctors, chefs, some Libertarians incl Thomas Massie , some progressives, some greens, Dems and Repubs, etc. The Regen Ag community just noted above includes farmers, ranchers, scientists, soil health advocates, film makers, chefs, etc from both rural and urban environments from all across the political spectrum since soil, planetary health, human health, etc are all our common ground. Or, as my good friend Gabe Brown says, common ground for common good. So, "MAHA" is a very diverse coalition that's growing larger and stronger every day. It also really has nothing to do with which candidate you support or color tribe you belong to despite RFK Jr's association with Trump. Though there are a lot of efforts to work with both sides of the political aisle to better connect food production & food with better health and environmental health outcomes. To that end, my friend Mark Hyman, M.D. wrote this book, , and has been doing a lobbying campaign for what he advocates in his 13th NYT best seller. He has met with politicians on both sides of the aisle. I helped him a lot with this book particularly the last three chapters that deal more directly with Regen Ag. Anyway, if anyone reading this prolix post has a half hour, please watch and share the attached video, Destination Regeneration. Here's a direct link to share: This video deals with regenerative food production, restoring planetary health and food as medicine. So, there's a growing group of people who aren't looking for more IP controlled silver bullet solutions. These people aren't in anyway "anti-science." Instead through a better understanding of basic biochemistry, soil biology, botany, atmospheric chemistry, microbial ecology, etc., we can all find solutions that better allow us to live in harmony with nature rather than always in opposition to nature. Thus biomimicry rather than dominion and control. cc. Rep. Harriet Hageman Tim Ryan Dr Shawn Baker 🥩 Robert F. Kennedy Jr Ken D Berry MD Nina Teicholz, PhD Nicole Shanahan Dr David Unwin Common Ground (Movie) Kiss the Ground Joe Rogan Max Lugavere Senator Ron Johnson Congresswoman Chellie Pingree Dan Barber Jan Ellison Baszucki Marty Makary MD, MPH Glenn Greenwald Tom Philpott Chris Palmer, MD Nick Norwitz MD PhD Marion Nestle Danielle Nierenberg, Food Tank Civil Eats Austin Frerick Food Tank Perennial Pastures | Regenerative Beef
REGENETARIANISM מידת האמת84,611 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce
Hope you saw Glenn's segment today. If not, it's attached at 1.3x. This segment is all about the exploitation of CK's death by Netanyahu and other rabid Zionists. There's no bottom to Netanyahu's shamefulness, machinations, and mendacity. Netanyahu is the embodiment of pure evil. And, the scary thing is that members of his coalition, like Smothrich & Ben Gvir, are even worse even if they're not anywhere near as duplicitous as Netanyahu
REGENETARIANISM תִּקּוּן עוֹלָם19,617 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce
Jenin Younes attached is a good short video on the absurdity of Zionist "Birthright." Per this "birthright" someone Jewish like me, who "has never been there," can move to Israel, get citizenship & have more rights than any indigenous Palestinians from the river to the sea, incl. Palestinians denied their right to return after they were terrorized to flee from their homes & villages during the Nakba. cc. Mel Zachary Foster Shaiel Ben-Ephraim
REGENETARIANISM תִּקּוּן עוֹלָם16,032 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce
Attached is another clip from The #MAHA Institute Round Table. In this clip from the farmer's panel, Greg Gunthorp detailed some changes necessary to improve our food system + how improving soil health means higher quality nutrient dense food, which reduces the need for drugs. cc. Thomas Massie Dr Shawn Baker 🥩 Ken D Berry MD Tim Ryan Congresswoman Chellie Pingree 🇺🇸🇺🇦 R-CALF USA John Kempf Secretary Kennedy Secretary Brooke Rollins Nicole Shanahan Rep. Harriet Hageman Mike Callicrate American Grassfed
REGENETARIANISM תִּקּוּן עוֹלָם15,375 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce
We need REGENERATION Why? Watch the attached video via Kiss the Ground We need REGENERATION more than "rewilding". What's the difference? Please keep reading. Regeneration is rooted in indigenous wisdom & Regenerative Ag (Agroecology/Agriculture) is about restoring functioning ecosystems as well as reestablishing human connection to land. This way we're a PART of natural biodiverse ecosystems rather than apart from them. "Rewilding" fails to recognize the role of indigenous people in nurturing landscapes. So, you can't "re" wild something that was never truly wild in most places for, at least, the past 12,000 years. Rewilding is based on a myth of pristine wilderness created by early conservationists like John Muir, who denigrated & demeaned First Nation people before being part of the movement that forced First Nations off of their sacred land to form parks. (For more info read: Ecomodernism (rewilding taken to an extreme), in particular, is the further disconnection of man from nature. So this represents even more steps in the wrong direction down a colonial path traveled too many times before. cc. Allan Savory Sustainable Food Trust Caroline Grindrod Frédéric Leroy Pablo Manzano 🦋 & 🦣
REGENETARIANISM תִּקּוּן עוֹלָם30,152 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce
![From a soil science perspective, Monbiot's opening comments are easy to deconstruct. Either he's unaware of or doesn't understand any of the recent soil & range science that he claims to have read and asserts is so definitively on his side. He also doesn't see to be aware of the full extent of land degradation or how ruminants cycle both nutrients AND microbes. or for that matter how soil organic matter [SOM] is formed. With soil erosion and w/o new SOM formation, there's not going to be much plant succession because soil succession has to happen first. Though Monbiot really has no clue how semi-arid and arid ecosystems work. Most importantly, he doesn't seem to understand, that the enteric CH4 ruminants produce is the same CO2 captured via photosynthesis, converted to a chain of glucose (cellulose) than further converted to SCFA's and CH4 before being broken back down to CO2 and H2O by hydroxyl radicals. This is what I call the PMOH cycle and described in this blog: Per this study, less than 8 to 14% of cellulose cattle consume is converted to CH4 in the rumen: So basically every time ruminants cycle CO2 fixed as cellulose to SFCA's/CH4 back to CO2 & H2O via tropospheric OH, most of the fixed CO2 is converted to other carbon compounds and a lot less ends back in the atmosphere with or without any short of long term soil carbon storage ....though most exuded carbon from plants ends up as necromass (dead soil microbes) which bound to minerals is recalcitrant. Any mycorrhizal fungi networks also are huge carbon pools. 90% of these networks are arbuscular in grassland ecosystems. So here's another paper Monbiot is obviously unaware of: The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi [AMF] networks also access the minerals needed to form MAOM (mineral associated organic matter) which again is more recalcitrant (ie stays in the soil and isn't transient (labile carbon). In healthy soils, also other sources of nitrogen are available thanks to rhizophagy...something Dr. Lal isn't up to speed on. Super oxides produced by plants strip the nitrogen out of the walls of bacteria being consumed (bacteria is about 20% N), plus endophytes (bacteria in plants) produce nitric oxide that when combined with super oxides forms nitrates readily used by plants (see the attached video). So no additional nitrogen has to be added to the ecosystem as an external input. I also discuss that in this blog: AMF are also able to source nitrogen from organic nitrogen (free amino acids). Where do these come from? Again from necromass. This paper deals with that: AMF also reduces N2) emissions: Well managed grazing allows AMF networks to flourish by keeping root systems intact. Grazing the tops off of plants actually redirects carbon in phoelm of a plants vascular network to go into the soil rather than to seed. Ruminant saliva also increases plant growth. Though suppose Monbiot didn't read either of these papers as well: As for rewilding, grasslands had lots of ruminants even in the UK (wisent, auroch, Irish Elk, etc). Both wild and domesticated ruminants emit methane. So as Pablo Manzano 🦋 & 🦣' recent paper demonstrated, grassland ecosystems with domesticated or wild ruminants produce similar amounts of methane. Re-establishing or "rewilding" beavers also increases methane. Why? Up to 53% of all CH4 emissions come from aquatic environments. I cite this source (Rosentreter, J.A. et al 2021) and give more details in this blog: Anyway, if I feel so inspired, I'll take a moment to deconstruct his arguments even further. But as usual, Monbiot has once again demonstrated he's still at the peak of Mount Stupid on the Dunning-Kruger Effect curve. So much of the soil science is relatively new and constantly evolving. Anyone who is so absolute really has no clue what he or she is talking about. Thus anyone who makes absolute and certain claims like Monbiot made is just a zealot with an agenda, not someone who thinks like a scientist. Karl Thidemann Seth Itzkan (cofounder Soil4Climate Inc.) Jamie Blackett John Lewis-Stempel Frédéric Leroy Frank Mitloehner Peter Ballerstedt @ffinlocostain Joanna Blythman Sustainable Food Trust Neal Spackman Savory Institute 🌱🐂🌍 Allan Savory Judith D. Schwartz JayneBuxton Leverhulme Centre for Nature Recovery Robb Wolf James Melville 🚜 James Rebanks Bear Grylls OBE Carbon Cowboys @glomalin Regenerative Farming Ireland Joel Williams Peasant with a PhD Stuart Meikle Zwartbles Ireland • Suzanna Crampton Gareth Wyn Jones](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1679215513573167105/ext_tw_video_thumb/1679215276708220928/pu/img/7vpZpQKmH0XZgaVK.jpg)
From a soil science perspective, Monbiot's opening comments are easy to deconstruct. Either he's unaware of or doesn't understand any of the recent soil & range science that he claims to have read and asserts is so definitively on his side. He also doesn't see to be aware of the full extent of land degradation or how ruminants cycle both nutrients AND microbes. or for that matter how soil organic matter [SOM] is formed. With soil erosion and w/o new SOM formation, there's not going to be much plant succession because soil succession has to happen first. Though Monbiot really has no clue how semi-arid and arid ecosystems work. Most importantly, he doesn't seem to understand, that the enteric CH4 ruminants produce is the same CO2 captured via photosynthesis, converted to a chain of glucose (cellulose) than further converted to SCFA's and CH4 before being broken back down to CO2 and H2O by hydroxyl radicals. This is what I call the PMOH cycle and described in this blog: Per this study, less than 8 to 14% of cellulose cattle consume is converted to CH4 in the rumen: So basically every time ruminants cycle CO2 fixed as cellulose to SFCA's/CH4 back to CO2 & H2O via tropospheric OH, most of the fixed CO2 is converted to other carbon compounds and a lot less ends back in the atmosphere with or without any short of long term soil carbon storage ....though most exuded carbon from plants ends up as necromass (dead soil microbes) which bound to minerals is recalcitrant. Any mycorrhizal fungi networks also are huge carbon pools. 90% of these networks are arbuscular in grassland ecosystems. So here's another paper Monbiot is obviously unaware of: The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi [AMF] networks also access the minerals needed to form MAOM (mineral associated organic matter) which again is more recalcitrant (ie stays in the soil and isn't transient (labile carbon). In healthy soils, also other sources of nitrogen are available thanks to rhizophagy...something Dr. Lal isn't up to speed on. Super oxides produced by plants strip the nitrogen out of the walls of bacteria being consumed (bacteria is about 20% N), plus endophytes (bacteria in plants) produce nitric oxide that when combined with super oxides forms nitrates readily used by plants (see the attached video). So no additional nitrogen has to be added to the ecosystem as an external input. I also discuss that in this blog: AMF are also able to source nitrogen from organic nitrogen (free amino acids). Where do these come from? Again from necromass. This paper deals with that: AMF also reduces N2) emissions: Well managed grazing allows AMF networks to flourish by keeping root systems intact. Grazing the tops off of plants actually redirects carbon in phoelm of a plants vascular network to go into the soil rather than to seed. Ruminant saliva also increases plant growth. Though suppose Monbiot didn't read either of these papers as well: As for rewilding, grasslands had lots of ruminants even in the UK (wisent, auroch, Irish Elk, etc). Both wild and domesticated ruminants emit methane. So as Pablo Manzano 🦋 & 🦣' recent paper demonstrated, grassland ecosystems with domesticated or wild ruminants produce similar amounts of methane. Re-establishing or "rewilding" beavers also increases methane. Why? Up to 53% of all CH4 emissions come from aquatic environments. I cite this source (Rosentreter, J.A. et al 2021) and give more details in this blog: Anyway, if I feel so inspired, I'll take a moment to deconstruct his arguments even further. But as usual, Monbiot has once again demonstrated he's still at the peak of Mount Stupid on the Dunning-Kruger Effect curve. So much of the soil science is relatively new and constantly evolving. Anyone who is so absolute really has no clue what he or she is talking about. Thus anyone who makes absolute and certain claims like Monbiot made is just a zealot with an agenda, not someone who thinks like a scientist. Karl Thidemann Seth Itzkan (cofounder Soil4Climate Inc.) Jamie Blackett John Lewis-Stempel Frédéric Leroy Frank Mitloehner Peter Ballerstedt @ffinlocostain Joanna Blythman Sustainable Food Trust Neal Spackman Savory Institute 🌱🐂🌍 Allan Savory Judith D. Schwartz JayneBuxton Leverhulme Centre for Nature Recovery Robb Wolf James Melville 🚜 James Rebanks Bear Grylls OBE Carbon Cowboys @glomalin Regenerative Farming Ireland Joel Williams Peasant with a PhD Stuart Meikle Zwartbles Ireland • Suzanna Crampton Gareth Wyn Jones
REGENETARIANISM מידת האמת20,775 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce
Daha fazla içerik yok.