Gerard Rennick
@RennickGBR • 107,851 subscribers
Authorised G. Rennick, Chermside QLD 4032.
Shorts
Videos
Income splitting is not expensive Mr Chalmers! On Monday Bob Katter asked Jim Chalmers about splitting incomes for families. Chalmers responded by referring to costings that I commissioned to argue that splitting incomes was unaffordable and inequitable. Nothing could be further from the truth. The cost to split income was estimated to be $5.9 billion rising to $6.5 billion in the following year. Compared to the combined cost of childcare subsidies of circa $20 billion this is cheap. Income splitting would help approximately 2 million couples (4 million people) with children under 18 and parents of disabled children. (Could this not relieve the burden on NDIS as well?) Furthermore I had intended to fund the income splitting policy by abolishing specific (not general) grants for Aboriginal causes which is estimated to cost just under $6 billion. (One Nations costings of $30 billion are wrong) Most of this money is wasted on bureaucrats and activist policies like native title claims. In other words a small number of lawyers, bureaucrats and activists receive the bulk of the funding. Very little of it is spent on front line services. People First stands alone when it comes to policy formulation. Not only do we have the best policies we have actually costed them and have found savings to fund them. If you want to join a party that doesn’t just have the conviction, but also the ability to deliver real change then sign up to today.
Gerard Rennick21,273 просмотров • 2 дней назад
One Nation supporters. Please explain how this is okay? Barnaby getting slippery again just as he did when he failed to speak up against net zero when he was deputy Prime Minister. And let’s not forget he was part of the chorus telling you to get jabbed. Genuinely curious as to why you support these charlatans?
Gerard Rennick46,425 просмотров • 10 дней назад
CLARITY AROUND IMMIGRATION MATTERS This week we have seen all three major parties struggle to clarify their immigration policies. Yesterday the Labor Party backed down on the number of refugees they are taking, the Liberal Party has no number at all and One Nation have changed their 130,000 number from net to gross meaning their immigration number is not much lower than the Uniparty. People First has the most clear and concise policies of all political parties. You can see our immigration policy at this link: As you can see, not only will we reduce immigration numbers by the most, we will also install better systems to track and limit immigration. This is what sets People First apart from the others. We offer a systemic rational approach rather than an emotional incoherent approach to lowering immigration. Key points of our policy are: • cap permanent visas to 100,000 • cap student visas to 300,000 by increasing student visa fees to at least $20,000 to fund apprenticeships for Australians. This should reduce temporary visas by close to 500,000. •decrease bridging visas numbers by almost 400,000 to almost zero by tracking all visas by sponsor, tax file number and expiry date. Sponsors who allow their visa holders to overstay will be fined. •abolish the Indian migration and mobility treaty as the agreement is asymmetrical given India’s population and standard holders • expel visa holders with a criminal record. • limit government entitlements We believe these policies will reduce immigration for four to five years before overall immigration will flatten out to no more than 100,000. To support the only party that has a clear and concise immigration policy please sign up today at Whereas other parties will tell you what you want to hear, we will actually deliver on our solutions.
Gerard Rennick60,873 просмотров • 15 дней назад
Never give more power to the governing class - you can’t trust them “A former Australian politician “sold out their country, party and former colleagues” after being recruited by spies for a foreign regime, according to Australia’s domestic intelligence agency. The head of Asio, Mike Burgess, made the allegations as he outlined the prolific activities of a spy network he labelled “the A-team”, although he did not name the former politician nor the country involved.” ••••••••••• Here’s another reason I don’t support giving the Intelligence Agencies any more powers. A former politician was caught selling Australia out, (don’t they all!) and yet rather than prosecute the offending person, no charges were laid. Furthermore which country did the politician sell us out to? It’s just another example of how the governing class protect each other instead of the people they are meant to be serving.
Gerard Rennick47,201 просмотров • 23 дней назад
IGNORE SUPERANNUATION MISINFORMATION Further to yesterday’s post I think it’s important to dispel a few myths about superannuation going on some of the misinformed comments. 1. For low to middle income earners, putting money into superannuation comes at the expense of owning your own house. Having money in superannuation account when you retire is secondary to owning your own house. The Government has no right to deny people from owning their own home and that’s what compulsory superannuation does. 2. Superannuation comes out of wages. Paul Keating and Bill Kelty designed superannuation in a way that wage rises were paid into superannuation not into workers pockets. Please read the link below in which Paul Keating explains how he did this. It was very sly and very deceptive. 3. Finally Superannuation is not going to take pressure off the budget - Superannuation tax concessions are over $60 billion which is almost the same as the cost of the pension of $65 billion. The only winners out of super are grifters like the Labor party who are destroying the great Australian dream. If you want to take control of your retirement sign up today at
Gerard Rennick43,598 просмотров • 25 дней назад
COMPULSORY SUPERANNUATION MUST END - WE MUST STOP WEAPONISING OUR ENEMIES AND START EMPOWERING WORKING AUSTRALIANS Yesterday Pauline Hanson quite rightly said that people should be able to access their superannuation only to then clarify her remarks by saying she still supports compulsory superannuation. You can’t support both positions. Either people can keep their wages to make ends meet, or they can’t. Anyone who has tried to access their superannuation early knows that there is a mountain of paperwork to manage and unintended fees and taxes. The idea people need permission to access their super early to make ends meet is just cruel and inhumane. For too long conservative parties have been too weak when it comes to standing up to compulsory superannuation. It’s not achieving its aim of significantly reducing the percentage of retirees on the pension but it is making it harder for people to make ends meet or buy a home. The Labor party love superannuation because it is a river of gold for the union movement that use it to milk fees and push their ideology. People First is not unequivocal about compulsory superannuation. We want to end it once and for all and let Australians save for their retirement in the best way possible by allowing them to own their own home as soon as possible. We will do that making superannuation voluntary, allow unlimited contributions and withdrawals and make the first $25,000 earned in superannuation tax free regardless of your age. To help us free you from government control sign up today at
Gerard Rennick35,469 просмотров • 26 дней назад
Justice is yet to be delivered here in Australia. There was a lot of chatter last week regarding Anthony Fauci and his involvement in the cover up around the origins of Covid. But the cover up went much further than Fauci’s immediate circle of evil clowns. Here in Australia, the TGA knowingly covered up the death of a 52 year old man who died from the Pfizer vaccine in July 21. Despite being sent an autopsy report by a coroner in NSW that ruled death by the Pfizer vaccine, the TGA failed to report this case to the public. Not only did they fail to report the death, the TGA continued to tell people the Pfizer jab was safe and effective. Because the rollout of the TGA was on an emergency basis the TGA had an obligation to monitor the rollout for side effects and then act on key safety signals. The TGA failed to warn the public that death could be a side effect of the vaccine. It begs the question as to how many other deaths from the jab went unreported? What is so significant about this case however is that there is no greater authority on causation than the coroner. While the TGA could dismiss my questions in estimates as being wrong or misleading, the Coroner was the expert. What the TGA did in ignoring his determination was negligence pure and simple. Negligence that could be argued was industrial manslaughter because this death occurred early in the vaccine rollout. Had the TGA made people aware of the risks of the vaccine many injuries and deaths could have been prevented. The head of the TGA John Skerritt and his colleagues in various Health Departments should be charged for this cover up. Seeing justice and compensation for the thousands of people who had their lives destroyed by the Covid vaccines is something that needs to happen as soon as possible. To help us achieve that please sign up today at
Gerard Rennick51,196 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
When it comes to dealing with immigration, People First realises that it’s not enough to reduce the immigration rate, we need to keep it down. The fact is immigration has been used to mask the structural imbalances in our economy, particularly around education, housing and foreign investment. These imbalances need to be fixed if immigration is to remain low. We need to draw inspiration from our own national anthem and the words “Wealth for Toil.” We cannot keep importing workers whilst subsidising unproductive roles in bureaucracy, academia, renewables and gambling. In the 1980’s 20% of school leavers went to University. That figure is over 50% today. In absolute terms that means that almost 100,000 young Australians per annum are delaying entering the workforce per year. Not only that, most of those University graduates enter the professions instead of the trades there is a massive loss of domestic skilled labor. This has resulted in employers calling for high immigration instead of better more vocational focused education. People First intends to address this imbalance by funding more apprenticeships particularly through the Military. We will also increase funding for health education to reduce the number of foreign Doctors and Nurses employed in Australia. If you want to support a party that has the solutions and vision to fix the structural imbalances that has plagued Australia for too long then please sign up today at
Gerard Rennick19,648 просмотров • 14 дней назад
Well waddayaknow! More superannuation ticket clipping. Labor is going to put a levy on Self Managed Super Funds on top of other funds to cover the losses caused by shonky financial engineers. I thought the whole point of super was that people were supposed to take responsibility for saving for their own retirement? Of course that was always a lie as people were never asked if they wanted to hand their wages over to shonky financial engineers in the first place at a cost of $40 billion per annum in administrative costs. If people have to bail out other people then shouldn’t we just provide a strong pension system as a safety net rather than subsidise poor behaviour by the superannuation industry? If Australia wants to starting heading in the right direction we need to stop propping up the enormous power of the institutions which are the pure definition of socialists who spend your money and start protecting individuals who are the true capitalists. To put the people first instead of the establishment, sign up at ••••••••••••••• “Dr Mulino is also expected to announce changes to the widely panned Compensation Scheme of Last Resort, including removing the controversial 'but for' provision that sees victims of financial misconduct compensated for hypothetical losses. The CSLR hands up to $150,000 in compensation to victims of financial misconduct when the responsible firm is insolvent. As well, Dr Mulino is expected to bring SMSFs into the CSLR funding umbrella as the scheme faces a shortfall of $170m for the 2027 financial year. A special levy will apply to parts of the sector, including SMSFs and APRA-regulated funds, as well as others.”
Gerard Rennick39,771 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
CO2 is a gas, it cannot trap convection. This matters because convection is the process by which heat is carried away from the earth. What traps convection is gravity. It’s why the surface of the earth is warmer than say the top of Mt Everest... More 👇
Gerard Rennick1,009,104 просмотров • 3 лет назад
I’m out on my brothers property this week in Western Queensland with limited reception so taking a short break from politics. We came accross this guy this morning. At first I thought he might have been a venomous breed but Dad reckons he’s a python. He’s certainly much better looking than the kind found in Canberra. Anyone got any ideas?
Gerard Rennick132,889 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад
Did you know: The mRNA in Moderna’s vaccine is three times heavier than the mRNA in Pfizer’s vaccine!? Furthermore the mRNA sequence between the two is also different. Why? Either there’s a right amount or a wrong amount of mRNA and a right sequence or a wrong sequence of mRNA. The fact that Moderna and Pfizer Inc. are using different vaccines but claim to make the same spike protein tells you one, if not both are playing games with your health here! Furthermore there is nothing speculative about asking why the vaccine causes myocarditis. It’s called “Do no harm.” Genuine medical professionals would never speculate as to the side effect of a medical treatment. #auspol TGA Australia
Gerard Rennick556,473 просмотров • 3 лет назад
Despite claiming the vaccine was effective in preventing infection, Pfizer can’t explain why over 10 million people in Australia caught Covid less than 10 months after opening international borders. The excuse by Pfizer that the virus mutated doesn’t cut it. Unlike other pathogens such as bacteria and double stranded DNA viruses (smallpox), single stranded mRNA viruses mutate very easily. That’s why the design of the vaccine in regards to efficacy was flawed from the start because it needed it build up resistance to all 29 proteins in the Covid virus (I said vaccine in the clip - my apologies). Instead the vaccine only protects against the spike protein meaning that there was no protection against the other 28 proteins. As a result, the moment the spike protein mutated the vaccine became ineffective against the new mutation. Not to mention the speed at which antibodies and T Cells dropped off at 35 days in regards to the original strain. Spending money on a vaccine with such a short immune response but significant and unknown safety risks is reckless. #auspol Jikkyleaks 🐭
Gerard Rennick557,214 просмотров • 3 лет назад
Fauci is guilty as sin but will never be charged least he bring the entire Intellligence community down. “A US Senate committee chairman has warned ex-White House chief medical adviser Anthony Fauci could be held in contempt of Congress after he refused to answer questions at a combative hearing into his handling of the Covid pandemic. The former top infectious disease expert invoked his constitutional right against self-incrimination during testimony more than 100 times.” •••••••••••• Unfortunately 60 votes out of 100 are needed in the U.S. Senate to charge Fauci with contempt - it’s highly unlikely to happen. But anyone who saw Fauci’s testimony or rather lack of it in the Senate knows he’s guilty of covering up the origins of Covid. None of this is new to followers of this page. I’ve posted this clip before of Fauci in January 2017 warning of a surprise infectious disease outbreak, during Trumps upcoming term, the day before his term started. I mean who predicts infectious disease outbreaks in the context of a political term! Fauci didn’t just cover up the origins of Coronavirus, he orchestrated it in cooperation with the U.S. intelligence agencies. The same agencies that lied about the chemical weapons of mass destruction and the same agencies that overthrow any democratic leader the refuses to bend the knee to globalist banks. The biggest enemy to our way of life are Western Intelligence Agencies and the sooner they are gutted and replaced with genuine patriots the better.
Gerard Rennick32,811 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
The TGA finally admit myocarditis is an autoimmune response which means the vaccine causes autoimmune issues. Given biodistribution studies showed vaccine lipids entered all body organs this means all organs are at risk of autoimmune responses. No wonder Pfizer didn’t test for autoimmune responses in their trials! Is it just me or do others struggle to remember any mention of Covid causing myocarditis before the vaccine rollout. I seem to recall the initial hysteria was around Covid causing cytokine storms and respiratory problems with lots of pictures of people (young people at that) lying in bed with a ventilator struggling to breathe. Not pictures of people clutching hearts. Furthermore and I’m annoyed I didn’t ask this question how do health authorities know that people who had Covid didn’t actually get myocarditis from the vaccine given most of the adult population was vaccinated. It’s all to convenient to blame myocarditis on Covid, yet the authorities never tested the distribution and degradation of the vaccine spike protein so how can they rule out the vaccine having caused myocarditis for those who caught Covid. Let’s not forget the vaccine was codon optimised to increase the expression of spike protein, and the lipids were designed to enter all cells not just those with an ACE receptor. Given these enhancements increased the potency of the vaccine, I fail to see how the vaccine isn’t more toxic and dangerous than the virus. Finally, the TGA claim only 2 in 100,000 doses cause myocarditis from the vaccine. This is rubbish . That would mean only 1,200 people in Australia have myocarditis. I myself have spoken to hundreds of people who got it after the vaccine. #auspol TGA Australia #pfizer #moderna
Gerard Rennick507,740 просмотров • 3 лет назад
This is an earlier speech I gave in the Senate where I outlined how the Hawke/Keating government left future generations in debt, with no infrastructure and a bad education. Their policies that destroyed Australia can be outlined as follows: 1) The Tasmanian Dams decision meant that States were unable to build Infrastructure, particularly in the regions, because Federal left wing bureaucrats were given the power to block projects on any environmental or cultural grounds due to the Foreign Treaties power in the Constitution. 2) Keating lifted capital controls that saw private foreign debt lift from $8 billion to $800 billion in 23 years inflating the price of houses and forcing two parents to work to meet mortgage repayments. 3) John Button abolished tariffs on manufacturing that destroyed the sector and critical trade skills vital to the sovereignty of a country. 4) John Dawkins introduced HECs that used taxpayer funds to fund Universities with no quality assurance around education levels or employment placements. Our children have subsequently become broke and brainwashed and saddled with large debs and few employment prospects. 5) Paul Keating introduced compulsory superannuation (it was 10% when I gave this speech) that robbed people on low to median incomes of all of their savings making it impossible for young people to buy a house. I have been the only politician to call out the devastating impacts of the Hawke/Keating legacy. You won’t see Labor/Liberal/Greens or One Nation ever explain how we got into this mess or how to get out of it. We will unwind this devastating polices by making superannuation voluntary and expanding the apprenticeship places funded by increasing fees on foreign students. We will also hold a Federation Convention to remove the ambiguous responsibilities between State and Federal Governments so much need Infrastructure can be built. That’s why I ask you to support today.
Gerard Rennick33,706 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
“Netflix posted $1.47 billion in revenue in Australia in 2025, $1.35 billion of which was sent overseas as “distribution fees” to its parent entities. After its offshore fees, Netflix Australia had $119 million in revenue and $20 million in profit. It paid $16 million in income tax and paid a dividend of $41 million. This allows them to transfer vast amounts of money abroad, very little of which is taxable in Australia. Netflix had an effective local profit margin of 1.4 per cent of its total Australian revenue. “A distribution fee is paid by the company under this agreement, and the operating margin retained by the company is an arm’s length return in accordance with the Netflix Group’s transfer pricing policy,” the accounts say. There is no suggestion of wrongdoing by Netflix.” •••••••••••••• Globalists often talk about tariffs and how bad they are for free trade, but you rarely hear them complain about reverse tariffs whereby multinational companies can send profits offshore at tax rates much lower than onshore tax rates. Netflix has a local operating profit margin of 1.4% while their worldwide operating profit (see accounts in comments) was 28%. Multinationals get away with shifting so much money offshore because of our tax treaties allow them by setting withholding tax rates well below the onshore company tax rate. For example the withholding tax on royalties paid to the U.S. is just 5%. (See link below) Netflix can save 25% in every dollar it transfers offshore. So 25 cents on $1.35 billion transferred offshore is $338 million in lost company tax to Australia. To be fair to Netflix, some of the fees paid offshore should be offset by production costs but not at rate of 98.6% in the dollar. I.e 1.4% margin. is the only party that understands transfer pricing. We will apply a 25% withholding tax on all offshore payments that exceed the operating profit ratio of its worldwide entity.
Gerard Rennick64,272 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад
Reflecting on the Covid period again I think it’s worth posting a few old clips again. I should note Dr Melissa McCann has organised a class action against the government for vaccine injuries and the government is claiming it didn’t have a duty of care. Unbelievable gall from the government to make such a statement given the lockdowns, lockups and lockouts they imposed in the name of keeping you safe. If the government didn’t have a duty of care in regard to the vaccines then they didn’t have a duty of care to impose punitive rules are Covid either. If the government were going to stop you from working and participating in society if you didn’t take the jab then had a duty of care to be honest and transparent. This clip is one of many where the TGA is guilty of covering up the toxicity of the vaccine. Most vaccines are weakened, yet the TGA Non-Clinical report (FOI 2389-6 page 19) explicitly states that the Covid vaccine was codon optimised to increase the expression of the antigen. Rather than take questions on this uncomfortable point, John Skerritt obfuscates and refers back to the chair to shut me down. You’ll notice the smirk on his face as he was doing it showing his lack of concern for the serious nature of vaccine side effects. It was his document produced by the TGA. He knew exactly what I was talking about and if he didn’t he could have referred to another member of the TGA. I’ve subsequently been told that TGA employees were annoyed that Skerritt would never allow other TGA employees to answer questions. It suggests he was probably instructed to stone wall every question to order to protect his true employer - big pharma - rather than serve the people.
Gerard Rennick24,868 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
Which part of "Australians are sick of Foreign Investment" does Gina Rinehart not understand? On Thursday, Gina Rinehart gave a speech that Pauline Hanson attended, where she called for tax breaks and free land for Elon Musk, Taiwan and Israel. (Link in comments.) It's worth noting Rinehart just invested heavily in Musks new Space X company. To be shilling for the world's richest man is shameful and embarrassing. To say her views are alarming is an understatement. Australia's biggest political donar wants to treat Australia as nothing but an economic zone in which her billionaire friends and foreign countries can exploit. It's not the first time Rinehart has sold Australia out. She has previously publicly supported multiculturalism and importing foreign workers along with entering a joint venture to buy the Kidman properties with the Chinese. Australia needs to stand on its own two feet. That is why the Australian People's Party has a policy to introduce both an Infrastructure Bank and a Military Apprenticeship Scheme to fund and resource our own security needs. I am calling on One Nation to refund the money that they have taken from Gina Rinehart. For the last thirty years One Nation has pretended to be against foreign investment yet are now taking money from someone that is clearly in support of it. If Pauline Hanson refuses to do this then she can't be trusted - plain and simple. If you want a party that isn't backed by billionaires and won't give Australia away please sign up today at
Gerard Rennick50,072 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад
Unsurprisingly Labor has rolled out the fear campaign around keeping your wages. Never tried to get between the Labor Party and their rivers of gold from superannuation. No one does fear like the Labor party so if you’re going to threaten their grifting you need to come prepared. One Nation have left themselves wide open to Labor’s fear campaign by not having a clear policy alternative to compulsory superannuation. Labor are claiming house prices will rise if people can access their super. Whilst this may be a possibly it doesn’t have to occur if the right guardrails are put in. The easiest way to solve this issue is by lifting the minimum deposit required to buy a house. By doing this home buyers will end up with greater equity rather than more debt. Currently people can buy a house with a 5% deposit, meaning you only need $50,000 to buy a million dollar house. If the minimum deposit was increased to 10% you would need $100,000 to buy the same house. The increased equity can come from superannuation rather than taking on more debt. Minimum deposits used to be a lot higher to stop people from over leveraging into housing. Unfortunately lending standards were relaxed which has resulted in many people being unable to pay off their mortgage by the time they are retired. This of course ensured the working class stay entrapped to never ending mortgage payments. People First intends to slowly increase the minimum deposit required for a loan once superannuation becomes voluntary to stop people from borrowing too much money. The upside to this is that by keeping all of your wage including superannuation you will be able to save for the deposit much quicker, ensuring you have greater equity in your home and less debt to tie you down over your working career. If you want a political party that understands monetary policy and can use that to empower you and your family financially then please sign up at today.
Gerard Rennick16,137 просмотров • 21 дней назад