Senator Gerard Rennick
@SenatorRennick • 97,508 subscribers
Senator for Queensland. Authorised G. Rennick, 90 Kittyhawk Dr Chermside QLD.
Shorts
Videos
Time to tell the truth about the real science. The science behind “climate change” is false. As I point out in this speech the amount of energy absorbed by CO2 is incredibly small and is quickly lost via convection (the wind) through the force of gravity. The idea that one CO2 molecule can heat up 10,000 N2 and O2 molecules by 1 degree and then maintain that increase in temperature is false. Assuming equal molecule weights that would require that the CO2 molecule is 10,000 degrees in order to confirm with Newton’s third law of motion or the 1st law of thermodynamics. This is clearly impossible. The temperature of the Sun is 5,700 degrees and the heat inside an internal combustion engine of a space ship is 3,000 degrees. Furthermore gases are terrible conductors of heat so it’s very difficult for gas to transfer heat to other molecules. This science of physics and in particular thermodynamics isn’t being taught in schools. It is allowing the climate alarmists to spread their false narrative about climate change which is being used to waste tens of billions of dollars on renewables which in itself is destroying our environment. Only People First has the technical understanding of the true science of heat - thermodynamics- to destroy the climate debate once and for all.
Senator Gerard Rennick89,361 views • 1 year ago
Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones made a Freudian slip yesterday. While spending 10 mins trying to convince Coalition MPs that the Digital Identity system will be voluntary, at the end of his speech he blurts out that once law it will be "mandated" later. #auspol
Senator Gerard Rennick141,683 views • 2 years ago
It’s time governments stopped lying about renewable energy. “The federal government’s wind farm subsidies are enriching foreign corporates and leaving Australians worse off, all in an effort to prop up unreliable and inefficient renewable energy projects,” said Mia Schlicht, Research Fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs. Today, the IPA released new research detailing how the federal government’s Large-scale Renewable Energy Target (LRET) guarantees a river of gold for predominantly foreign owned wind farms and how the cost is transferred to electricity consumers. The research found: In 2024, through the LRET subsidy scheme, a total of $1.04 billion was paid by electricity consumers to the 50 largest wind farms operating in Australia. 35 of Australia’s 50 largest wind farms, 70 per cent, are entirely or partially foreign owned. Australian energy consumers were forced to pay $689 million to foreign owned wind farms. “In the middle of a cost-of-living crisis, the federal government is forcing Australian electricity consumers to hand over $1 billion through hidden charges on their power bills to largely foreign owned companies, all in the name of net zero,” said Ms Schlicht. “How can the Prime Minister, having broken his promise to cut household power bills, justify sending over $689 million to foreign companies when mainstream Australians cannot afford their power bills?” To meet economy wrecking emissions reduction targets, the federal government forces electricity retailers to purchase large-scale generation certificates from renewable energy producers. This artificially inflates the demand for renewables, with added costs passed on to consumers.” ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• One of the biggest subsides that renewables get is the renewable energy target that forces energy retailers to buy renewable energy or they get penalised. This forces demand for renewables up in the short window that the sun is shining which increases the price of energy via your power bill. This scheme isn’t well understood but it should be, because if people knew how much it was increasing their power bills and that the money was going offshore they would be up in arms. People First will continue to lobby for the removal of the RET as it is unacceptable the energy prices are being forced up because of it. Quote from: #auspol
Senator Gerard Rennick61,248 views • 1 year ago
“Senator RENNICK: In TGA FOI 3390-11 there were 67 particles greater than 10 microns in a particular batch. That's about 1000 times greater than what the FDA recommended. Do you know what those 67 particles were? Dr Kerr: I have a bit to say to that. We have actually responded to that question before in SQ-24000188. The particles question we've also answered before. The particles in that particular document are not DNA, and we've responded to that question before. The particles. Senator RENNICK: So what are they? That's my question. Dr Kerr: They're normally particles in injectables. There are limits on them. Companies are supposed to check for those in their batch release process. But, ultimately, those particles are not DNA. Senator RENNICK: I'm not saying they are. I'm just asking: what are they? Dr Kerr: It's not related to the 10 nanograms per dose. Senator RENNICK: But is it a contaminant? If it's not DNA and it is not mRNA or a lipid, what is it? Dr Kerr: It's acceptable for pharmaceutical preparations to have a small number of particles present. Senator RENNICK: But my question is: what is the particle? That's a big particle, 10 microns. I mean, the lipids were like - Dr Kerr: I think l'd have to go back and have a look at that FOl to make sure it actually was 10 microns. Senator RENNICK: I can give it to you, if you like. Dr Kerr: Perhaps we could go back and have a look at it and take that on notice. Senator RENNICK: Okay. l'd like to know exactly what it was, if that's okay.” ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• And the answer is: “The specification for the particulates test in the European Pharmacopoeia is: The preparation complies with the test if the average number of particles present in the units tested does not exceed 6000 per container equal to or greater than 10 um and does not exceed 600 per container equal to or greater than 25 um. Therefore, the results for particulates shown in FOl 3390-11 are well within the pharmacopoeial requirements. The particles are not DNA. DNA is highly soluble in aqueous solution, so any DNA present in the vaccines would not appear as micron scale particles. Batch release testing includes residual DNA quantitation on every batch, and this ensures DNA (above trace amounts) would be detected. mRNA vaccines may contain trace amounts of residual DNA at no more than 10 nanograms (ng) of DNA per dose ( The limit of 10 ng per dose prevents the formation of particles large enough to be detected in the micron scale. All injectable or infusion products, including vaccines, are permitted to contain subvisible particles if they comply with the US FDA and European Pharmacopeia 2.9.19 specification for particulate matter. These limits were established after a long history of use of injectables without adverse events occurring in the presence of particulates within this specification. There is no requirement to identify subvisible particles counted in injectable or infusion products, however these particles are likely to consist of extraneous undissolved particulates from the manufacturing process (e.g. trace amounts of dust or fibres) and not DNA.” •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• And there you have it. The TGA don’t know what are they putting into your bodies. 10 microns is a big particle when you’re talking in biochemistry terms. It’s a third of a dose size of the lipids. Rather than actually answer my question as to what the particles are they skirt the answer by claiming they fall within European guidelines. The same as when they use the WHO guidelines to ignore autopsy reports about reported deaths. Furthermore, what does 6,000 per container mean? How big is the container? How many batches does a container hold? And does this apply to DNA? What this answer tells us is the TGA don’t know what is in the Covid-19 batches and they have misled the Senate by providing a misleading answer. #auspol
Senator Gerard Rennick66,062 views • 1 year ago
The TGA lies are easily exposed. “Someone from the Health Department emailed someone else in the Health Department “Foreign DNA can integrate with Chromosomal DNA in the absence of integrase, an enzyme in mammal cells.”” •••••••••••••••••••••••••• The lies and deflections by the TGA are numerous in this line of questioning. The mRNA vaccine may have been researched for decades but it was the first drug to have ever used a lipid to carry the active ingredient- mRNA - across the cell membrane. To claim that the impacts of the drug were well understood and tested is just plain false, especially in regard to cancer. After playing down the cancer risks of the mRNA vaccine acknowledged by one of their own staff, they then try to gaslight the fact that the makers of the mRNA vaccine, Moderna, even acknowledge there are cancer risks to the vaccine. Finally they don’t answer my question as to why they didn’t do any carcinogenic testing on the vaccine. Testing for the presence of DNA is not the same as testing for cancer. To claim that they tested that DNA was below the “acceptable standards” means nothing. Just because I’m driving below 60kms an hour doesn’t guarantee I can’t have an accident or am driving safely. The TGA are guilty of negligence in the rollout of the vaccine - plain and simple. They are continuing their negligence by denying the risks of the vaccine and the health impacts it is having on people. #auspol
Senator Gerard Rennick47,066 views • 1 year ago
Why are foreigners allowed to buy houses in Australia? “Chinese homebuyers have made a strong return to the Australian housing market, driven in part by the weaker dollar and the Chinese New Year holiday period. Peter Li of Plus Agency, which specialises in selling homes to Chinese buyers, said it had already seen a 20 per cent increase in enquiries for viewing properties during the Chinese New Year.” And “Australia has the highest ratio of international students per capita in the world by a large margin. Australian universities’ concentration of international students is unparalleled. Australia has roughly 2.5 times the number of international students per 100,000 population of second-placed United Kingdom and around three times Canada.” •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• In estimates I asked what the rules were in regard to foreigners buying houses in Australia. Foreign students are allowed to buy houses if they are studying here. This rule was introduced by Kevin Rudd in 2008 during the GFC to keep property prices high. This explains why the number of foreign students studying in Australia increased dramatically after the GFC. The Chinese buyers referred to in the article would be “foreign students” studying here no doubt funded by their parents or related entity. Foreign students or any other foreigners should not be allowed to buy either new property or existing property. It’s time the Australian government put the Australian people first. Quotes from: #auspol
Senator Gerard Rennick46,667 views • 1 year ago
These responses from the excess death inquiry matter because the witness has no vested interest in the vaccine, unlike the TGA who approved them. •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• “The lack of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic data which was available at the time of the rollout of these vaccines is very unique. It is very much the exception in the registration of pharmaceuticals. And it is acknowledged…….. that long term safety data wasn’t known.” #auspol
Senator Gerard Rennick58,632 views • 1 year ago
2:47
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
The Intelligence agencies need to be held accountable for the Covid lab leak. So it turns out that Intelligence agencies knew all along that Covid was a lab leak. I’ve been the only politician in Canberra saying this and the only politician who has called for the role of Edward Holmes, a professor from the University of Sydney to be explained. People First will continue to pursue the Intelligence Agencies for their deceit. He was the one who wrote and co-authored the Lancet paper that ridiculed the idea that the virus was a lab leak. It is was my view he is an intelligence asset and an enemy of the state for covering up the role of the intelligence agencies in funding and creating the Covid virus and the government induced pandemic. And I quote from the link below: “Within hours, Vallance spoke with intelligence officials in the United Kingdom and Holmes spoke with intelligence officials in Australia.” Why would Australian intelligence officials speak with Holmes? Why was he so special? Is it because he was the deputy director of the Chinese CDC. An odd role for an Australian to have. It is incumbent upon the ASIO to ask why he lied about the origins of Covid. I have actually asked ASIO why they aren’t pursuing Holmes, and they claim it’s not their responsibility. This proves that ASIO and ASIS are in on the cover up and are now in fact accessories to the deaths of thousands of Australians. The involvement of intelligence officials regarding Covid should be bigger news than the assassination of JFK or September 11, given the number of deaths. Quote from: #auspol
Senator Gerard Rennick38,323 views • 1 year ago
The hard questions never get answered do they. This is typical of how press conferences work. You only get to ask questions they want to answer. That’s how you get an invite as a journalist, don’t ask the hard questions. Perfect example of how the establishment media and the establishment politicians behave. It’s all a stage. Housing for young people is one of the most important issues of this election. If Albanese cared about it and had a solution for it, he could have answered it. #auspol
Senator Gerard Rennick34,677 views • 1 year ago