Sense Receptor's banner
Sense Receptor's profile picture

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor88,409 subscribers

Asking questions, making connections.

Videos

SenseReceptor's profile picture

WHITNEY WEBB on the military now "realizing [its] initial dream for the internet" "LifeLog [has become] Facebook" "Total Information Awareness [has become] Palantir" "we're coming... close to the end game" "A lot of these 'Big Tech'... companies are just masquerading... [they] were created by military intelligence" "I think it's important to keep in mind too that even going beyond Palantir, the Internet itself was created by the military" "And... now we're coming kind of close to the end game in terms of full circle of them kind of realizing their initial dream for the Internet" This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from a discussion with Ryan Cristian, Hrvoje Morić, et al. posted to the Corbett Report YouTube channel on May 29, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "I mean, I remember stories 10 years ago about massive NSA data centers in like Utah and various states before people were even talking about data centers, about all the information they've been compiling on people. "And I think it's important to keep in mind too that even going beyond Palantir, the Internet itself was created by the military. And I think now we're coming kind of close to the end game in terms of full circle of them kind of realizing their initial dream for the Internet. "And then, you know, in the case of Palantir, you know, I argue, and a lot of my research points to various efforts within the DARPA military sphere aimed at the Internet being privatized. For example, LifeLog becoming Facebook, Total Information Awareness becoming Palantir. You know, these have become reality. "A lot of these big, 'Big Tech' Silicon Valley companies are just masquerading as we just started in our garage. And we're regular guys. Like, no, these are guys that were created by military intelligence and they privatized these programs and we have willingly given them our data and we continue to do so. "And so even if you have Palantir having access to privileged information, think about something in that same family of company, like Clearview AI, for example, which is also Peter Thiel–connected, that has amassed this huge database used for facial recognition by law enforcement and militaries. So, you know, to arrest and also to murder people. "And they just scraped most of that from stuff, pictures people freely and willingly posted. We voluntarily gave a lot of our data away, and they've been able to scrape a lot more of it than you, than you probably think."

Sense Receptor

61,944 views • 17 hours ago

SenseReceptor's profile picture

WHITNEY WEBB on "Thiel-verse oligarchs" aiming to turn the US into a "sovcorp" run by a CEO "Palantir is...being set up to be the beta test" "[these] people...want one company to replace [America's] governing structure" "[NYT] literally called [Palantir] the one seeing eye" This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from a discussion with Ryan Cristian (The Last American Vagabond), Hrvoje Morić (Geopolitics & Empire), et al. posted to the Corbett Report YouTube channel on May 29, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "There is this push from the— from Peter Thiel, the Thiel-verse and all of these tech oligarchs that are aligned with him, not to single him out, but it's a squad, to basically create a— turn the US Government into a private corporation, which it technically already is. The multinational corporation runs everything, right? "But it's a way to sort of formalize that and have, you know, a national CEO run the country, as a dictator. And they call it, you know, either Sovcorp for 'sovereign corporation' or govcorp, a governing corporation. "And I think Palantir is basically being set up to be the beta test for that because not only have they been handed the military, and our entire intelligence community, they've now under, under the current iteration of Trump, been handed all of our agricultural data, all of our health care data, and IRS, you know, I mean, it has just expanded and become total. "And I think that's extremely concerning when you consider the people that run this are literally ideologically aligned with people that want one company to replace the governing structure of the, of the country. "So... if we allow them to continue to do this Palantir, will they already— I mean, the New York Times said they know already know everything about you and literally called them the one seeing eye. And Total Information Awareness is the pyramid with the beam covering the earth, you know? I mean they're just like rubbing it in your face. "But what it ultimately comes down to is that, you know, obviously those of us in independent media putting ourselves out there, we're putting a certain amount of data into the void, with the hope that people will wake up and do something about it. "But if you are watching this and this stuff concerns you, starve them of your data as much as possible. And I think the most powerful thing you can do is get rid of your smartphone. I know Hakeem sells alternatives, but, if you really need one, you know, but you do not need to have an Android or an Apple device on you. You can live without it. You lived without it before. "And... I mean, it's the biggest generator of data for them and their whole plan fails if people just mass non-comply with them. It's very important."

Sense Receptor

79,418 views • 5 days ago

SenseReceptor's profile picture

Michael Savage nails the insane absurdity of the FBI's Charlie Kirk assassination narrative: "Something's wrong...we're supposed to believe a guy is on the run after killing Charlie Kirk, and he pauses in the woods to reinstall a barrel and then he leaves it for us to find?" This clip is from a video Savage (Michael Savage) posted to X today, September 11, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Something's wrong. I know I shouldn't do this. I'm risking an awful lot to go up against this FBI, the maga FBI. Something's very wrong with what I just heard. I mean, I watched it. I was hoping that they had caught the bastard who shot Charlie. So we saw a video of a person jumping off the roof. It looked very legitimate to me. However, there was no rifle in his hand. "Now, the Mauser does not break down very easily. Incidentally, for those of you who know weapons, something's wrong with the whole thing. They're trying to claim he removed the barrel from the Mauser and fit the receiver and stock in his backpack and barrel in his pants, like, all in two seconds. It is not easy to remove a Mauser barrel or index it after reinstalling and remain accurate. "We are not hearing or seeing reality. And by the way, the photo of the rifle allegedly left in the woods has the barrel installed. So we're supposed to believe a guy is on the run after killing Charlie Kirk, and he pauses in the woods to reinstall a barrel and then he leaves it for us to find? The FBI to find. I don't believe a word of it. "I shouldn't do this. I know I'm putting myself at risk, but I can't take it anymore. I can't take the bullshit from this fucking government is lying to us. Something's wrong. Something's so wrong, it's sickening. "They found the rifle and they're getting the prints. Are you stupid? Are you that stupid? Are you that dumb? The man jumps off the roof. There's no rifle there. Oh, it's in his backpack. I just told you moron, that this rifle doesn't break down that easily. And then it's supposed to be reassembled while he's on the run. Wait, I'll stop now and reassemble it and leave it in the woods in a box, wrapped in a towel. He left breadcrumbs. Oh, and the trans anti. The trans stuff on the cartridges. Bullshit. Something is wrong with this whole fucking picture."

Sense Receptor

4,450,605 views • 8 months ago

SenseReceptor's profile picture

Former BlackRock fund manager Ed Dowd on mass tokenization and "The Great Taking" "Tokenization... gives a central planner the ability to veto... transactions" "It's a massive land grab and power grab" "[But] I think [it's] a bridge too far and people will get very agitated" This clip of Dowd (Edward Dowd), a former BlackRock fund manager and co-founder of Phinance Technologies, is taken from a discussion with Brannon Howse (Brannon Howse) posted to YouTube on May 27, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Well, we need to stop it. And I don't know what we can do, but it's certainly alarming. "And this tokenization of everything, basically the way Catherine Austin Fitts describes it, and I agree with her, right now, currently, when you have a sale, or a purchase, there are two parties. There's me and there's the company. Tokenization introduces a third person in the party who gets to approve that transaction. "Right now, I can interact with someone and buy something, and someone can interact with me and buy something that I offer. You get tokenization involved, it gives a central planner the ability to veto the transaction. And I think that is definitely anti-humanity, anti-freedom, anti-capitalism. It's a massive land grab and power grab. "And look, tokenization would introduce the ability of someone to a third party to approve or not approve the transaction. I mean, you want to go to the dystopian end of this. Let's say central planners decided they wanted meat quotas. And you go to the, the grocery store and you, I guess you've already had your meat quota for the month. They would be able to block that transaction at the register. "So the person at the register couldn't do anything and would tell you to return the meat. And if you try to take it out of there, you'd be stealing even though you had the money. "[And] I will say this. If they try the Great Taking or they try this mass tokenization, I think that's a bridge too far and people will get very agitated. And if you really want to inflame and enrage the populace, especially in America, try taking their assets or telling them they're worth— Try telling someone their stock portfolio is worth one tenth of what it was because we needed to bail out the system. That's not going to go over very well."

Sense Receptor

56,206 views • 6 days ago

SenseReceptor's profile picture

THOMAS MASSIE on Trump trying to whip his vote on the 2020 restatement that war powers resides with Congress "His argument... [was] that he could bluff Iran into doing what he wanted" "[But that would've] given [Trump] the power to declare war without Congress's involvement" "he didn't convince me. I did vote for the resolution that restated the Constitution... says you got to come to Congress if you want to have a war with Iran" "his first mistake may have been making Marco Rubio Secretary of State" "his second mistake would be letting Lindsey Graham on that airplane so many times, whispering in his ear" "finally, [maybe his] biggest mistake is letting Israel control too much of his policy. Perhaps it was taking $200 million from Miriam Adelson" This clip of Massie (Thomas Massie) is taken from an interview with James Patrick (James Patrick) posted to YouTube on May 21, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "In January of 2020, I had a conversation with President Trump about war with Iran. Now, to put this in context, they killed Soleimani, not on Iranian soil, but in Iraq. And he was an Iranian general. And then, we had a drone flying over there, and they shot it down. "Now, whether it was over Iran or over the water, I don't know. Maybe we'll never know. But at that point, the president threatened to take action against Iran for that, and he was being encouraged to do so by members of his cabinet. "So we had a vote here in Congress in January of 2020, and the President heard that I was going to vote for no war. Basically, the vote was a restatement of the Constitution and that war powers resided in Congress. It was to say that President Trump cannot go to war with Iran without an act of Congress. "There were only three Republicans who voted for that. But the president heard that I was going to vote for it. So he called me up to whip me on this vote, and he said, I'm more, anti-war than you are. And I said, well, you— In fact, you are. You've not started a war. You're the first president that hasn't started a war. "Now, remember, this was his fourth year in office, 2020. You're the first president that hasn't started a war that I could vote for since I was 18. And he said, I guess you're right. Thank you for saying that. "His argument to me was that if we didn't constrict his ability to rattle the sabers and threaten war, that he could bluff Iran into doing what he wanted and therefore avoid war. And they said, well, that would work just fine unless they call your bluff. And then now we've given you the power to declare war without Congress's involvement, and you're obligated to war if your intention was to bluff. Now you're obligated to war. "And, that day, he didn't convince me. I did vote for the resolution that restated the Constitution that says you got to come to Congress if you want to have a war with Iran. Now, fortunately, that war did not happen. But here we are in his second term, and I think he's— "You know, his first mistake may have been making Marco Rubio Secretary of State. And then his second mistake would be letting Lindsey Graham on that airplane so many times, whispering in his ear. And then, you know, finally, it may be the biggest mistake is letting Israel control too much of his policy. Perhaps it was taking $200 million from Miriam Adelson. "That was a mistake that, I think, led largely to him being predisposed to listening to Israel's interests over America's interests with regard to war with Iran."

Sense Receptor

64,624 views • 7 days ago