Shen Sean Chen's banner
Shen Sean Chen's profile picture

Shen Sean Chen

@ShenSeanChen • 12,670 subscribers

founder @waku_agent • https://t.co/sPSpu8yPx6 • youtube(38k) https://t.co/rMP0jaxHK1 • ex-google/mit • pokémon/onepiece fan

Videos

ShenSeanChen's profile picture

I dug into Pi because the greatest projects are usually built on top of one very simple building block. 𝗣𝗶 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝟳𝟳,𝟬𝟬𝟬 𝗚𝗶𝘁𝗛𝘂𝗯 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀: 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱, 𝘄𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲, 𝗲𝗱𝗶𝘁, 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗵. 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲. No MCP, no sub agents, no plan mode, no to-dos, no permission popups. Their site has a whole section called "what we did not build." So here's the whole logic by Mario Zechner: prompt in → agents.md + system prompt become one forkable JSON → loop starts → read / write / edit / bash → session saved as a tree → loop ends agent-loop.ts has only 792 lines. I think it's beautiful. Initially I was wondering if it's gonna be a little bit too basic. And yes out of the box it's weaker than Claude Code. But skipping MCP isn't purity, it's a context budget. One MCP can sit tens of thousands of tokens in your window every single turn, for a tool you use maybe 10% of the time. Pi moves that weight from always on to on demand. A skill is just markdown. An extension is one .ts file. A package ships both. I ran it in the terminal, then again as a coding sub agent inside my own harness Waku-Agent ( through a delegate_task tool. Same binary both times. You're paying setup time for a harness that stays yours. Full 22 min breakdown in the comments. Save the diagram 🔖 You Can Build Anything. You Can Learn Anything. 💪

Shen Sean Chen

59,186 次观看 • 3 个月前

ShenSeanChen's profile picture

𝗜 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗱 Grok Bot 𝗮𝗻𝗱 Muse 𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗯𝘆 𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗱𝗿𝗲𝘄 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝗵 𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗯𝘆 𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗱. One from SpaceXAI, one from AI at Meta under Alexandr Wang. Neither is open source, so I tried both and drew the architecture myself from whatever docs exist. Tbh I struggled quite a bit to find real use cases that can surprise me beyond what we have on Claude Code and Codex, but maybe we are just getting started on personal agent harnesses. 🌟 Github Repo (1.8k): 💻 Portable memory: ☕ Join our community: Some quick differences I found: Grok Bot gives your whole account one cloud VM where every Bot shares the browser, the /workspace, the terminal and the credentials, so a Bot is isolating a personality rather than a context. Muse gives each person one secure VM with a single agent, and a Sentinel sitting outside the container holding your tokens. Strip the branding off either one though and it's the same chain: one VM → connectors → routines → approval gate → memory What surprised me is that Muse ships a memory.md you can read, edit and download, but Grok Bot doesn't. I didn't find where it keeps memory at all. So I gave both of them Waku Agent memory over MCP instead, saved a fact in one harness, and the other one recalled it cold in a fresh chat. I also killed the shopping test halfway. I felt Amazon was built for humans to read and click, and I wasn't handing an agent my login username and password. Maybe the fast checkout use case is a better fit for software / AI product purchases. Watch it, then save both harness diagrams below. 🔖 You Can Build Anything. You Can Learn Anything. 💪

Shen Sean Chen

23,055 次观看 • 1 个月前

没有更多内容可加载