TruthOverBS's banner

TruthOverBS

@TeamFUKR • 1,259 subscribers

Chris Mattei’s BFF | Spaces whisperer | Professional narrative dissector | BS exposer | Snark included

Videos

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.ai•Sponsored•Livecam

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

Exclusive private shows

1.2k viewers online

Private Show

Join now for exclusive access

Free preview available • Premium content

If I were jumping to conclusions JFK SHOWOFF appears to be speaking aggressively to JBrill. Imagine how this interaction would come across if they were having this exchange together in a bar.

If I were jumping to conclusions JFK SHOWOFF appears to be speaking aggressively to JBrill. Imagine how this interaction would come across if they were having this exchange together in a bar.

12,560 просмотров • 5 дней назад

“A lie left unchecked becomes someone else's truth. That's why the truth must always be spoken.”

“A lie left unchecked becomes someone else's truth. That's why the truth must always be spoken.”

12,451 просмотров • 7 дней назад

Happy Monday Nerds 🤓😎✌🏻

Happy Monday Nerds 🤓😎✌🏻

13,976 просмотров • 11 дней назад

“Straight from the horse’s mouth”🫠🤭

“Straight from the horse’s mouth”🫠🤭

33,014 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

For someone who repeatedly accused witnesses of killing John O’Keefe, it’s interesting to hear the blogger now say he has subpoena power and can use discovery to uncover information about who killed John. If he was confident enough in the evidence to publicly accuse the witnesses of murder, what exactly does he need discovery to figure out? He can’t have it both ways: certainty when making the accusation, but uncertainty when asked to prove it. You’d think the evidence would come before the accusation, not after. Those positions are difficult to reconcile. 👀

For someone who repeatedly accused witnesses of killing John O’Keefe, it’s interesting to hear the blogger now say he has subpoena power and can use discovery to uncover information about who killed John. If he was confident enough in the evidence to publicly accuse the witnesses of murder, what exactly does he need discovery to figure out? He can’t have it both ways: certainty when making the accusation, but uncertainty when asked to prove it. You’d think the evidence would come before the accusation, not after. Those positions are difficult to reconcile. 👀

16,014 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

We tried to tell you he hates his followers. Maybe it’ll finally sink in when he tells you himself.

We tried to tell you he hates his followers. Maybe it’ll finally sink in when he tells you himself.

10,766 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Justin asked for permission to get a suitcase from the basement and reacted the way anyone would when hearing gunshots in the home. That’s not exactly how content creators like Melanie Little and Justice Served have been portraying it. He was aware she was unstable; thankfully, the baby was already out of the house. Seems he was correct. And separate from that, having an unsecured service weapon in the home while off duty, when it’s not on her person or under her control, means it’s required to be secured. Leaving it unsecured in a bedroom raises serious safe storage concerns under Massachusetts law and likely violates department policy as well.

Justin asked for permission to get a suitcase from the basement and reacted the way anyone would when hearing gunshots in the home. That’s not exactly how content creators like Melanie Little and Justice Served have been portraying it. He was aware she was unstable; thankfully, the baby was already out of the house. Seems he was correct. And separate from that, having an unsecured service weapon in the home while off duty, when it’s not on her person or under her control, means it’s required to be secured. Leaving it unsecured in a bedroom raises serious safe storage concerns under Massachusetts law and likely violates department policy as well.

47,211 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

The jury foreman believed if manslaughter was available, Karen Read could have been found guilty. It’s too bad he stopped taking notes after the first witness, because Hank brought up the OUI manslaughter charge twice in his closing and explained it.

The jury foreman believed if manslaughter was available, Karen Read could have been found guilty. It’s too bad he stopped taking notes after the first witness, because Hank brought up the OUI manslaughter charge twice in his closing and explained it.

23,471 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Hank was savage. He took AJ's own example from the Voss interview and used it in his closing argument to explain second-degree murder to the jury. Using the other side's own words to make your point is a powerful move. Not that I needed another reason to love Hank even more.

Hank was savage. He took AJ's own example from the Voss interview and used it in his closing argument to explain second-degree murder to the jury. Using the other side's own words to make your point is a powerful move. Not that I needed another reason to love Hank even more.

21,430 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Something you’ll never see Kate Peter do. Aidan Kearney, already blocks dissenting opinions on X, and now he’s moving his chat to members-only while removing the stream from X, where he can’t control the comments. That’s not free speech. It’s an echo chamber where you have to pay $5 just to be heard.

Something you’ll never see Kate Peter do. Aidan Kearney, already blocks dissenting opinions on X, and now he’s moving his chat to members-only while removing the stream from X, where he can’t control the comments. That’s not free speech. It’s an echo chamber where you have to pay $5 just to be heard.

11,235 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Anyone else find this curious and concerning? Steve Verroneau, described by Reddington as his “right hand,” is involved with the taint team handling the blogger’s phone extractions. Dan Nardo, whom Reddington refers to as his “agent,” is in the blogger’s extraction and has been “messaging the blogger for years.” Mr. Nardo offers his services to law firms and also lives in the same small community as the bloggers attorney, Tim Bradl. Reddington previously represented Jen McCabe. Looking at all of these overlapping roles and relationships, there are obvious questions about potential conflicts and the safeguards in place. What exactly is going on here, and who is ensuring these connections are being properly addressed?

Anyone else find this curious and concerning? Steve Verroneau, described by Reddington as his “right hand,” is involved with the taint team handling the blogger’s phone extractions. Dan Nardo, whom Reddington refers to as his “agent,” is in the blogger’s extraction and has been “messaging the blogger for years.” Mr. Nardo offers his services to law firms and also lives in the same small community as the bloggers attorney, Tim Bradl. Reddington previously represented Jen McCabe. Looking at all of these overlapping roles and relationships, there are obvious questions about potential conflicts and the safeguards in place. What exactly is going on here, and who is ensuring these connections are being properly addressed?

12,248 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

If you're genuinely trying to find the "real k*llers", why wouldn't you want to revisit the evidence? Why wouldn't you want to test your theory against the timeline, the phone data, the vehicle data, and the physical evidence? Why wouldn't you want to support your conclusions with evidence and demonstrate exactly what established the "not guilty" verdict? There is a reason there is no alternative timeline. There is a reason the data is avoided. If the evidence supports the theory, show us.

If you're genuinely trying to find the "real k*llers", why wouldn't you want to revisit the evidence? Why wouldn't you want to test your theory against the timeline, the phone data, the vehicle data, and the physical evidence? Why wouldn't you want to support your conclusions with evidence and demonstrate exactly what established the "not guilty" verdict? There is a reason there is no alternative timeline. There is a reason the data is avoided. If the evidence supports the theory, show us.

15,432 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Surprise, Melanie Little is lying to her followers again. She’s claiming David Yannetti’s comments came from the blogger’s publicly shared phone extraction, when in fact they were filed verbatim in a motion filed by Cosgrove in the blogger's criminal case. (footnote 5). #melanielittle

Surprise, Melanie Little is lying to her followers again. She’s claiming David Yannetti’s comments came from the blogger’s publicly shared phone extraction, when in fact they were filed verbatim in a motion filed by Cosgrove in the blogger's criminal case. (footnote 5). #melanielittle

12,549 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Больше нет контента для загрузки