Tony Nikolic ⚖️ Corinthians 15:58- #Holdtheline™️'s banner
Tony Nikolic ⚖️ Corinthians 15:58- #Holdtheline™️'s profile picture

Tony Nikolic ⚖️ Corinthians 15:58- #Holdtheline™️

@TonyNikolic1012,013 subscribers

Civil - Human Rights / Whistleblower Lawyer ✝️🐭conservative- constitutional- Director-Australian Medical Network - journalism #Holdtheline (TM) COVID cases

Videos

TonyNikolic10's profile picture

The debate over judicial activism in Australia did not begin with COVID — but the pandemic exposed it in ways many Australians will never forget. Justice Robert Beech-Jones, now on the High Court, authored the Kassam v Hazzard judgment upholding NSW vaccine mandates. In that judgment, he went beyond determining legality and delivered extraordinary criticism toward dissenting figures, including Fair Work Commissioner Lyndall Dean, effectively signalling that opposing views on mandates fell outside acceptable public discourse. That context makes later revelations even more troubling. As reported by Sky News, Justice Beech-Jones was subsequently criticised for publicly attacking a conservative legal group Samuel Griffiths Society after his elevation to the High Court — conduct described as “without precedent”. When judges move from adjudicating disputes to publicly criticising ideological opponents, Australians are entitled to ask whether the line between impartial justice and institutional activism has been crossed. For countless Australians who lost jobs, careers and freedoms during COVID, this is not an abstract legal debate. It goes directly to public confidence in judicial neutrality, freedom of dissent, and whether opposing voices were silenced rather than fairly heard. For legal scholars breaking down laws to understand them and impart that knowledge on to students and interested community adds to the confusion. “Without precedent”: Australia’s newest High Court judge called out over attack on conservative legal group. Article below:👇

Tony Nikolic ⚖️ Corinthians 15:58- #Holdtheline™️

237,802 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

TonyNikolic10's profile picture

🚨 BREAKING: The Australian Human Rights Commission drops a bombshell report! 🚨 5 years too late, many injuries and deaths too late‼️‼️ It reveals shocking government overreach and human rights abuses during the pandemic. Courts stood by, failing to check executive power - they had an opportunity to balance the power but chose to follow unchecked pseudo science. The report although welcomed, is too late and deficient in many areas! Once again critical Areas were overlooked! Police acted like paramilitary units, echoing dark times in history such as Gestapo raids during WWII, or choking ladies for no mask, pepper spraying children for not wearing a mask, brutally attacking citizens peacefully airing grievances publicly, censoring doctors, deregistering doctors who raised concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy, jailing people for minor offences linked to their public views, employers fined by government if they did not mandate the injections, honest police, paramedics, firefighters and nurses terminated from jobs. School children prevented from Attending school despite such a low risk will provide skilled work shortages into the future! Meanwhile they open the immigration flood gates to compensate!! The world’s largest clinical trial as Greg Hunt (Health Minister for Australia at that time) stated February 2021. Employment with misconduct charges for not following the mandates. All these mandates and lockdowns did was more damage in public health and economy. Businesses closed down, families homeless. The vaccine injured gaslit and ignored, the deceased with Coroner pathology reports stating CAUSE OF DEATH WAS PFIZER INJECTION WERE RIDICULED AND HUMILIATED BY the ABC News. THIS WAS Australia 🇦🇺- No longer young and free! Was this response justified for a virus with a 99.5% survival rate? Ministers MUST be held accountable. 📽️ Watch the footage and decide for yourself if justice was served! #HumanRights #Accountability #Holdtheline “Truth is knowledge held back by power”! — See Spectator article here: Jikkyleaks 🐭 Jay Bhattacharya Senator Gerard Rennick Dr Dave Cartland BMedSc MBChB Ex-MRCGP Senator Ron Johnson Robert F. Kennedy Jr Robert W Malone, MD Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® PeterSweden Wouter Aukema Anne Merel Kloosterman “Sudden And Unexpected” Alexandra Marshall @JDVanceNewsX Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 Kash Patel Karoline Leavitt sabine hazan md Elon Musk Brook Jackson 💜 @BroadbentMP Neil Oliver Joe Rogan Lyndsey, RN 💜🐭 @TuckerCNews Maryanne Demasi, PhD Rebekah Barnett Dr Julie Sladden Paul Oosterhuis 🐭

Tony Nikolic ⚖️ Corinthians 15:58- #Holdtheline™️

120,704 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

TonyNikolic10's profile picture

By 2020–21, it was already clear: the COVID shots did not remain in the deltoid or at the injection site. The mRNA and lipid nanoparticles spread throughout the body, reaching every organ. What we are seeing today are not vague “vaccine injuries” — they are mRNA technology injuries. The mechanism is tied to lipid nanoparticles, systemic distribution, and even the potential for genetic reverse transcription. This is not new. From 2005, through 2015, and right up to 2020–21, researchers knew mRNA was hailed as the panacea of vaccine technology, yet the track record was troubling. Animals were dying in trials, adverse effects were being logged, and the risks were understood. Still, governments and industry pressed ahead. Pfizer’s own post-marketing evaluation study confirmed systemic distribution and safety concerns. Yet regulators, politicians, and experts focused not on accountability but on attacking those who demanded transparency. The injured were censored then — and they are still being cancelled today. It is shameful and disgraceful that our regulatory systems protect the manufacturer rather than the consumer. The burden of proof has been flipped: citizens must prove harm, while manufacturers are presumed safe. During this same period, in professional legal lectures — sometimes even with judges as presenters — mRNA technology was being championed as a breakthrough. Meanwhile, those injured were silenced and ignored. The truth is now undeniable: mRNA technology has harmed people, and the public was misled for decades.

Tony Nikolic ⚖️ Corinthians 15:58- #Holdtheline™️

21,458 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

TonyNikolic10's profile picture

In 1951, at the height of Cold War fear, the Australian government attempted to dissolve the Communist Party of Australia by legislative fiat. The party was declared a menace. A threat. An evil. Parliament said so — therefore it must be so. The High Court disagreed. In the Australian Communist Party v Commonwealth case, the Court struck down the legislation as unconstitutional. One of the most enduring moments came from Justice Fullagar, who offered a simple but devastating analogy. A lighthouse, he said, may appear dangerous to a ship in the dark, but that does not make it unlawful. Calling something a danger does not make it one in law. Labeling something “evil” does not magically confer constitutional power. That reasoning matters — profoundly — today. The proposed hate crime and speech laws are once again built on assertion rather than constitutional footing. They proceed from the idea that if the government declares certain speech harmful, dangerous, or hateful, then restriction must follow. But the rule of law does not work that way. It never has — at least not in a liberal democracy worthy of the name. The Constitution exists precisely to restrain governments when fear, moral panic, or political convenience tempt them to overreach. It is not there to ratify whatever Parliament believes is good for us “for our safety.” History teaches that those words — for your safety — are among the most dangerous ever uttered by the state. Each time Australians accept another purported intrusion justified by protection, we move the boundary of lawful power. Slowly. Quietly. Respectably. Until one day we wake up and discover there is no longer a liberal democracy left to defend — only the memory of one. If our institutions fail to protect constitutional limits, this is not merely institutional drift. It is institutional failure. And if it happens without resistance, it will have happened under our watch. That leaves a choice. Stand up — or stay silent. And silence is never neutral. As the lesson from The Silence of the Lambs reminds us, the most chilling moments do not come from the screams themselves, but from the long, subversive quiet that preceded them. Remember that. The rule of law is worth standing up for — at any cost. That is what the Constitution is for.

Tony Nikolic ⚖️ Corinthians 15:58- #Holdtheline™️

13,005 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Keine weiteren Inhalte verfügbar