Web3 Wesley's banner

Web3 Wesley

@Web3Wesley • 5,227 subscribers

Cofounder at @Crescendoweb3 Marketing | Core Contributor @WolvesDAO 🐺 | https://t.co/soXC8va4pD

Videos

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.ai•Sponsored•Livecam

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

Exclusive private shows

1.2k viewers online

Private Show

Join now for exclusive access

Free preview available • Premium content

As AI moves into robots, aviation, and surgery, one question matters more than performance: Who’s accountable when something goes wrong? This interview with Inference Labs 's co- founder Colin G (intern arc) dives into verifiable inference, cryptographic guarantees, and why trust is the missing layer for physical AI. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 — Intro to Inference Labs and its mission 03:29 — Core AI verification and audit systems 05:51 — Why Web3 is needed for AI trust 11:28 — Robotics, safety, and accountability 18:52 — Human–robot trust and the future

As AI moves into robots, aviation, and surgery, one question matters more than performance: Who’s accountable when something goes wrong? This interview with Inference Labs 's co- founder Colin G (intern arc) dives into verifiable inference, cryptographic guarantees, and why trust is the missing layer for physical AI. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 — Intro to Inference Labs and its mission 03:29 — Core AI verification and audit systems 05:51 — Why Web3 is needed for AI trust 11:28 — Robotics, safety, and accountability 18:52 — Human–robot trust and the future

28,697 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Everyone keeps asking: "What's wrong with web3 gaming?" Spoiler: It's not cold start problems. It's not player retention. It's not lack of narrative. Web3 gave a generation of non-game developers access to millions in funding. They thought: “Let’s launch a token, spin up a studio, and build the next Fortnite… but with NFTs.” Reality: most had never built a real game before. So what happened? • Games got released way too early • Content was nonexistent • No real core loop, no polish • Empty lobbies from day one • And then they wondered: "Why aren’t players staying?" Because the games suck. The problem isn’t player liquidity or tooling. It’s that the people building these games had no business building games in the first place. They didn’t understand pacing, balance, content pipelines, or how to keep players engaged. A lot of Web3 games are just barely-playable prototypes disguised as live games. Why? Because these studios ran out of money before they were ready—or never scoped the game properly to begin with. And it’s not just the games. It’s the studios themselves. • No clear leadership. • No product vision. • No dev pipeline. • No publishing strategy. Just vibes, Discord mods, and Tokenomics spreadsheets. And you wonder why the token is going down only? Now enter AI. Cool tools. Great potential. But let’s be clear: AI doesn’t fix bad judgment. If you don’t know how to design and ship a good game, AI isn’t going to save you. It’ll just help you fail faster. The edge AI offers in this space is to the people who already know what they’re doing. A real game designer with AI is dangerous. AI can scale content, speed up dev time, automate workflows—yes. But none of that matters if the core game is still boring. If the team doesn’t understand games. If no one wants to play. TLDR: AI won't save Web3 gaming. But it might amplify the few studios that know what they’re doing. The rest? They'll just fail faster—with slightly smarter bots. I am still bullish on a select few web3 games, but the majority are going to die and for good reason. Rant over

Everyone keeps asking: "What's wrong with web3 gaming?" Spoiler: It's not cold start problems. It's not player retention. It's not lack of narrative. Web3 gave a generation of non-game developers access to millions in funding. They thought: “Let’s launch a token, spin up a studio, and build the next Fortnite… but with NFTs.” Reality: most had never built a real game before. So what happened? • Games got released way too early • Content was nonexistent • No real core loop, no polish • Empty lobbies from day one • And then they wondered: "Why aren’t players staying?" Because the games suck. The problem isn’t player liquidity or tooling. It’s that the people building these games had no business building games in the first place. They didn’t understand pacing, balance, content pipelines, or how to keep players engaged. A lot of Web3 games are just barely-playable prototypes disguised as live games. Why? Because these studios ran out of money before they were ready—or never scoped the game properly to begin with. And it’s not just the games. It’s the studios themselves. • No clear leadership. • No product vision. • No dev pipeline. • No publishing strategy. Just vibes, Discord mods, and Tokenomics spreadsheets. And you wonder why the token is going down only? Now enter AI. Cool tools. Great potential. But let’s be clear: AI doesn’t fix bad judgment. If you don’t know how to design and ship a good game, AI isn’t going to save you. It’ll just help you fail faster. The edge AI offers in this space is to the people who already know what they’re doing. A real game designer with AI is dangerous. AI can scale content, speed up dev time, automate workflows—yes. But none of that matters if the core game is still boring. If the team doesn’t understand games. If no one wants to play. TLDR: AI won't save Web3 gaming. But it might amplify the few studios that know what they’re doing. The rest? They'll just fail faster—with slightly smarter bots. I am still bullish on a select few web3 games, but the majority are going to die and for good reason. Rant over

20,708 просмотров • 1 год назад

Больше нет контента для загрузки