Alex Becker 🍊🏆🥇
@ZssBecker • 1,325,370 subscribers
Hi. I like crypto and founded n run https://t.co/WpfsPC89vj
Shorts
Videos
![Hey so I had similar issues. I 1 shot my ads about 90% of the time now. If its speaking, you need to generate the voice in eleven (or record it) separately. Then layer on the actual text/script of the voice in the prompt like I have in the prompt below. THEN make sure it stick to it and doesnt try to ad/adjust movements. The audio must be locked over all or SD will try ad stuff/or adjust it to make up for body movements etc. Hope that helps (youll find how I did the script part in the dialogue section and you can see how I site the audio below) [Generation Goal] A photoreal selfie video, 3:4, 22 mm, in the look of a low-quality impromptu phone selfie video: the man from Image filming himself with the camera in his own hand while he walks through the kitchen in image2, talking to the viewer the whole way, lip-syncing to audio1, his facial expressions driven by Video and kept small and natural. Around the 8-second mark he steps over to a laptop open on the counter showing the ad account from joe p, turns the camera onto it and points at it briefly, then goes back to walking and filming around the kitchen. Amateur quality, the camera held a little above his head, looking around the room occasionally, slight camera sway and shifting angles. Soft, slightly blurry, not HD, not polished. No flashes, no flicker, no sudden brightness changes at any point. [No Words On Screen] No captions, no subtitles, no titles, no lower thirds, no watermarks, no logos, no UI, no timecode, no text overlaid on the video of any kind. The only words anywhere in the picture are the ones physically displayed on the laptop's own screen from joe p, seen as part of the room when the camera is on it. [Reference Material Roles] Image defines the man: his identity, face, hair, build, wardrobe and tattoos, carried identically. image2 defines the location: the kitchen's materials, layout, window, daylight and palette, used as the real place he is walking through, not a backdrop behind him. joe p defines what is on the laptop screen: the ad account dashboard, shown on the laptop's display exactly as pictured — the same layout, the same numbers, the same words — as the laptop's own screen content, not an overlay on the video and not a backdrop; it is seen only on that screen. Video defines his facial expression and the way his face and head move while he talks — the eyes, brow, small smirks, glances, head turns, the energy of his delivery — used as the driver for his face, taken at the small, natural scale of real conversation and never amplified; it does not define the character, the camera, the location, his body or his route, and it carries no audio. audio1 defines the voice and the complete dialogue. The dialogue is reused from audio1 verbatim — the same words, the same number of words, in the same order, at the same timing — and it is the only speech in the video. He lip-syncs to it in English; his mouth follows audio1, his expression follows Video. The camera is held by him; it is never seen. [Dialogue] In natural conversational English, the man says, word for word as recorded in audio1: "If you run Meta ads, upgrading your pixel to AI Swarm data is one of the easiest ways to boost your ad ROI 15 to 25% literally overnight. And if you give me five seconds, I'll show you where in your account to do this. It takes a couple of minutes just for those improved results. The average result we see when swapping in this pixel data is a huge drop in the cost to get a customer from ads. The account usually grows about 10 to 15% right away, and this is just because it makes the AI targeting on the platform so much better. Here's where it is in your account, and here's how to upgrade it without any changes to your ads. FYI, this isn't theory. We've done this for massive brands with huge growth in their ads.". This text and audio1 are the same dialogue; audio1 supplies the voice and the timing. No words are added, removed or changed. He keeps talking through the laptop moment without a pause in the dialogue. After the last word of audio1 he keeps his lips naturally closed without speaking further and stays in the shot, still moving a little, until the video ends. [Subjects and Relationships] One man, the man from Image, alone in the kitchen from image2, holding the camera loosely out in front of and a little above himself and talking into it like he's sending a quick video to a friend. He walks through the kitchen naturally as he talks — an easy wander, turning as he goes, looking around the room now and then, sometimes swinging the camera to show it, then back to his face — with the kitchen passing and changing behind him. An ordinary laptop sits open on the counter, its screen lit and showing the ad account from joe p; he goes to it once, shows it and points at it, and leaves it where it is. Nobody else in the shot. [Scale and Proportion] He is a full-height adult standing and walking in a large room with a high ceiling: his head, shoulders, arms and body in the same proportions as Image, at natural human scale against the kitchen in image2 — never shortened, compressed or shrunk to fit the picture, never bent or hunched; the room is big and he is a normal-sized man inside it. The laptop is normal laptop size on the counter, small against the room. [Camera] Selfie video held in his own hand, mostly a little above his head and tilted down so he's looking slightly up into it, his face and shoulders in the picture with room around him, the top of his arm sometimes entering at the bottom edge. The angle keeps shifting the way a real selfie does: the camera drifting higher, dropping to chest height, swinging out to the side when he looks around the room and coming back, a slight constant sway. At the laptop he turns the camera around onto the screen so the screen fills most of the picture, slightly angled, his pointing hand entering from the side, then swings it back onto his face. The picture bobs with each step, tilts, drifts off him and re-centres late, exposure easing slowly and smoothly as he passes the window. Amateur and natural: not smooth, not gliding, no stabilised glide, no zoom, no cut, single continuous take. No phone, no camera, no screen other than the laptop's, no second person ever visible. [Picture Quality] The whole video looks like a quick low-quality front-camera phone selfie, not a production: soft and slightly out of focus throughout, fine detail mushy, mild noise and grain over everything and heavier in the shadows, colours a little washed and flat, highlights clipping softly, the window gently blown out when it's behind him, focus occasionally hunting and settling late, motion smear when the camera swings. Small-sensor look: the background a bit blurry and smeared behind him, softer than he is, with his face the only thing close to sharp and even that only just. When the camera is on the laptop, the screen reads as a real lit screen filmed by a phone — a little soft, slightly glowing, the dashboard from joe p still recognisable and its layout and numbers intact. Low resolution feel, slight compression softness, a touch of smearing on edges, nothing crisp. Not HD, not sharp, not clean, no commercial polish, no cinematic look, no studio look. Brightness stays steady and continuous from first frame to last: no flashes, no strobing, no flicker, no light bursts, no white or bright pops, no sudden jumps in exposure, no glints or reflections that flare up, the laptop screen a steady even glow, every change in brightness slow and gradual. [Lighting] The kitchen's own light from image2 is the only light: broad, soft, cool, steady overcast daylight from the big window, with a faint neutral fill from the room; the light never flashes, pulses or flickers. It hits him the way it hits the room — soft and even, cool, no warm cast — and shifts slowly and naturally on his face as he moves and turns: brighter and flatter when the window is behind the camera, a soft edge on his hair and shoulder when the window is behind him. The laptop screen adds only a faint steady glow on his hand when he points at it. Rendered at low phone-video quality: flat, slightly noisy, soft, auto-exposure catching up gradually. His face always readable through the softness, skin natural and unpolished, no sheen. [Performance] Relaxed, casual, talking to a friend, his face understated the whole way: his eyes stay at their natural relaxed openness as in Image and are never opened wide — no wide-eyed moments, no staring, no bug-eyed emphasis; his brows stay low and relaxed, never raised high; his expressions are small and real — a slight smirk at most, a small nod, a glance — never exaggerated, never a big smile, never a big reaction, never theatrical, nothing larger than a person actually does when chatting to a friend. His expression, eye movement and head movement follow Video at that small natural scale. Natural eye contact with the camera most of the time, looking away to glance around the room as he walks and turns, breathing normally, blinking naturally, small head movements and free-hand gestures with his other hand, mouth movements matching audio1 exactly without over-articulating. At the laptop the point is quick and offhand — a loose finger toward the screen for a moment, still talking — not a presentation. Casual, slightly amateur energy, never posed, never presenting, never stiff. [Event Script] He's already walking and mid-sentence as it opens, the camera a little above him, the kitchen moving behind him. He wanders through the room as he talks, glancing around it now and then and letting the camera swing to catch the window and the rest of the kitchen before bringing it back to himself, the angle drifting as he goes. Around 8 seconds in, still talking, he steps over to the laptop open on the counter, turns the camera around onto its screen showing the ad account from joe p and points at the screen briefly with his free hand, the point lasting only a moment, then swings the camera back onto his face, pushes off the counter and goes back to wandering and filming around the kitchen as before. By the last words he's slowed to a natural stop, still looking up into the camera; the last word lands, his lips close, he keeps the camera on himself with a small natural shift of weight until the end. [Audio] Audio is audio1 passed through unchanged, at its original speed and full length; no generated speech, no added or removed words, no narration, no music, no other voices. Under it, the natural sound of the room: his footsteps on the hard floor, soft room tone, the faint handling sound of a camera held in a moving hand, a small tap when he points at the screen, all quiet beneath his voice. [Maintain Consistency] The same man from Image throughout — face, hair, wardrobe, tattoos unchanged for the full scene, his eyes at the same natural openness and his expressions small and understated from first frame to last. The same kitchen from image2 throughout — its materials, window, daylight and palette consistent from every angle he turns to. The laptop screen shows the ad account from joe p and only that, the same before, during and after he points at it. One continuous take, no cuts, no transitions, no second camera. The low-quality phone selfie look held for the full length: soft, noisy, slightly blurry, never sharpening up into HD or a polished look. Brightness continuous and steady the whole way through: no flashes, no flicker, no pops of light at any point.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2113320998527221875/amplify_video_thumb/2113320291661189120/img/e3Jc-HWn8IjPBP2Y.jpg)
Hey so I had similar issues. I 1 shot my ads about 90% of the time now. If its speaking, you need to generate the voice in eleven (or record it) separately. Then layer on the actual text/script of the voice in the prompt like I have in the prompt below. THEN make sure it stick to it and doesnt try to ad/adjust movements. The audio must be locked over all or SD will try ad stuff/or adjust it to make up for body movements etc. Hope that helps (youll find how I did the script part in the dialogue section and you can see how I site the audio below) [Generation Goal] A photoreal selfie video, 3:4, 22 mm, in the look of a low-quality impromptu phone selfie video: the man from Image filming himself with the camera in his own hand while he walks through the kitchen in image2, talking to the viewer the whole way, lip-syncing to audio1, his facial expressions driven by Video and kept small and natural. Around the 8-second mark he steps over to a laptop open on the counter showing the ad account from joe p, turns the camera onto it and points at it briefly, then goes back to walking and filming around the kitchen. Amateur quality, the camera held a little above his head, looking around the room occasionally, slight camera sway and shifting angles. Soft, slightly blurry, not HD, not polished. No flashes, no flicker, no sudden brightness changes at any point. [No Words On Screen] No captions, no subtitles, no titles, no lower thirds, no watermarks, no logos, no UI, no timecode, no text overlaid on the video of any kind. The only words anywhere in the picture are the ones physically displayed on the laptop's own screen from joe p, seen as part of the room when the camera is on it. [Reference Material Roles] Image defines the man: his identity, face, hair, build, wardrobe and tattoos, carried identically. image2 defines the location: the kitchen's materials, layout, window, daylight and palette, used as the real place he is walking through, not a backdrop behind him. joe p defines what is on the laptop screen: the ad account dashboard, shown on the laptop's display exactly as pictured — the same layout, the same numbers, the same words — as the laptop's own screen content, not an overlay on the video and not a backdrop; it is seen only on that screen. Video defines his facial expression and the way his face and head move while he talks — the eyes, brow, small smirks, glances, head turns, the energy of his delivery — used as the driver for his face, taken at the small, natural scale of real conversation and never amplified; it does not define the character, the camera, the location, his body or his route, and it carries no audio. audio1 defines the voice and the complete dialogue. The dialogue is reused from audio1 verbatim — the same words, the same number of words, in the same order, at the same timing — and it is the only speech in the video. He lip-syncs to it in English; his mouth follows audio1, his expression follows Video. The camera is held by him; it is never seen. [Dialogue] In natural conversational English, the man says, word for word as recorded in audio1: "If you run Meta ads, upgrading your pixel to AI Swarm data is one of the easiest ways to boost your ad ROI 15 to 25% literally overnight. And if you give me five seconds, I'll show you where in your account to do this. It takes a couple of minutes just for those improved results. The average result we see when swapping in this pixel data is a huge drop in the cost to get a customer from ads. The account usually grows about 10 to 15% right away, and this is just because it makes the AI targeting on the platform so much better. Here's where it is in your account, and here's how to upgrade it without any changes to your ads. FYI, this isn't theory. We've done this for massive brands with huge growth in their ads.". This text and audio1 are the same dialogue; audio1 supplies the voice and the timing. No words are added, removed or changed. He keeps talking through the laptop moment without a pause in the dialogue. After the last word of audio1 he keeps his lips naturally closed without speaking further and stays in the shot, still moving a little, until the video ends. [Subjects and Relationships] One man, the man from Image, alone in the kitchen from image2, holding the camera loosely out in front of and a little above himself and talking into it like he's sending a quick video to a friend. He walks through the kitchen naturally as he talks — an easy wander, turning as he goes, looking around the room now and then, sometimes swinging the camera to show it, then back to his face — with the kitchen passing and changing behind him. An ordinary laptop sits open on the counter, its screen lit and showing the ad account from joe p; he goes to it once, shows it and points at it, and leaves it where it is. Nobody else in the shot. [Scale and Proportion] He is a full-height adult standing and walking in a large room with a high ceiling: his head, shoulders, arms and body in the same proportions as Image, at natural human scale against the kitchen in image2 — never shortened, compressed or shrunk to fit the picture, never bent or hunched; the room is big and he is a normal-sized man inside it. The laptop is normal laptop size on the counter, small against the room. [Camera] Selfie video held in his own hand, mostly a little above his head and tilted down so he's looking slightly up into it, his face and shoulders in the picture with room around him, the top of his arm sometimes entering at the bottom edge. The angle keeps shifting the way a real selfie does: the camera drifting higher, dropping to chest height, swinging out to the side when he looks around the room and coming back, a slight constant sway. At the laptop he turns the camera around onto the screen so the screen fills most of the picture, slightly angled, his pointing hand entering from the side, then swings it back onto his face. The picture bobs with each step, tilts, drifts off him and re-centres late, exposure easing slowly and smoothly as he passes the window. Amateur and natural: not smooth, not gliding, no stabilised glide, no zoom, no cut, single continuous take. No phone, no camera, no screen other than the laptop's, no second person ever visible. [Picture Quality] The whole video looks like a quick low-quality front-camera phone selfie, not a production: soft and slightly out of focus throughout, fine detail mushy, mild noise and grain over everything and heavier in the shadows, colours a little washed and flat, highlights clipping softly, the window gently blown out when it's behind him, focus occasionally hunting and settling late, motion smear when the camera swings. Small-sensor look: the background a bit blurry and smeared behind him, softer than he is, with his face the only thing close to sharp and even that only just. When the camera is on the laptop, the screen reads as a real lit screen filmed by a phone — a little soft, slightly glowing, the dashboard from joe p still recognisable and its layout and numbers intact. Low resolution feel, slight compression softness, a touch of smearing on edges, nothing crisp. Not HD, not sharp, not clean, no commercial polish, no cinematic look, no studio look. Brightness stays steady and continuous from first frame to last: no flashes, no strobing, no flicker, no light bursts, no white or bright pops, no sudden jumps in exposure, no glints or reflections that flare up, the laptop screen a steady even glow, every change in brightness slow and gradual. [Lighting] The kitchen's own light from image2 is the only light: broad, soft, cool, steady overcast daylight from the big window, with a faint neutral fill from the room; the light never flashes, pulses or flickers. It hits him the way it hits the room — soft and even, cool, no warm cast — and shifts slowly and naturally on his face as he moves and turns: brighter and flatter when the window is behind the camera, a soft edge on his hair and shoulder when the window is behind him. The laptop screen adds only a faint steady glow on his hand when he points at it. Rendered at low phone-video quality: flat, slightly noisy, soft, auto-exposure catching up gradually. His face always readable through the softness, skin natural and unpolished, no sheen. [Performance] Relaxed, casual, talking to a friend, his face understated the whole way: his eyes stay at their natural relaxed openness as in Image and are never opened wide — no wide-eyed moments, no staring, no bug-eyed emphasis; his brows stay low and relaxed, never raised high; his expressions are small and real — a slight smirk at most, a small nod, a glance — never exaggerated, never a big smile, never a big reaction, never theatrical, nothing larger than a person actually does when chatting to a friend. His expression, eye movement and head movement follow Video at that small natural scale. Natural eye contact with the camera most of the time, looking away to glance around the room as he walks and turns, breathing normally, blinking naturally, small head movements and free-hand gestures with his other hand, mouth movements matching audio1 exactly without over-articulating. At the laptop the point is quick and offhand — a loose finger toward the screen for a moment, still talking — not a presentation. Casual, slightly amateur energy, never posed, never presenting, never stiff. [Event Script] He's already walking and mid-sentence as it opens, the camera a little above him, the kitchen moving behind him. He wanders through the room as he talks, glancing around it now and then and letting the camera swing to catch the window and the rest of the kitchen before bringing it back to himself, the angle drifting as he goes. Around 8 seconds in, still talking, he steps over to the laptop open on the counter, turns the camera around onto its screen showing the ad account from joe p and points at the screen briefly with his free hand, the point lasting only a moment, then swings the camera back onto his face, pushes off the counter and goes back to wandering and filming around the kitchen as before. By the last words he's slowed to a natural stop, still looking up into the camera; the last word lands, his lips close, he keeps the camera on himself with a small natural shift of weight until the end. [Audio] Audio is audio1 passed through unchanged, at its original speed and full length; no generated speech, no added or removed words, no narration, no music, no other voices. Under it, the natural sound of the room: his footsteps on the hard floor, soft room tone, the faint handling sound of a camera held in a moving hand, a small tap when he points at the screen, all quiet beneath his voice. [Maintain Consistency] The same man from Image throughout — face, hair, wardrobe, tattoos unchanged for the full scene, his eyes at the same natural openness and his expressions small and understated from first frame to last. The same kitchen from image2 throughout — its materials, window, daylight and palette consistent from every angle he turns to. The laptop screen shows the ad account from joe p and only that, the same before, during and after he points at it. One continuous take, no cuts, no transitions, no second camera. The low-quality phone selfie look held for the full length: soft, noisy, slightly blurry, never sharpening up into HD or a polished look. Brightness continuous and steady the whole way through: no flashes, no flicker, no pops of light at any point.
Alex Becker 🍊🏆🥇137,673 次观看 • 19 天前
So...I just killed my software HYROS... (+$20k contest) And the team at HYROS and I are damn proud of it. For the last year we optimized HYROS's tracking to be vibe coded with. Today we released a FULL app powered by our data that you can add or build ANY tracking feature into in a few prompts. The app has the full functionality of HYROS EXCEPT it's fully yours to vibe build on top of. The MD/way it's built is specifically so LLMs like Claude can easily add/remove/create any tracking or attribution feature you want with zero coding or dev experience. We handle the hard part : The tracking, data management, infrastructure. We then power YOUR custom app with our data/tracking. You get to use/construct/apply the however you damn please whenever you damn well want. There's no point to using any tracking software anymore just for its UI features. You can have a full suite of features CUSTOM to you on command today fully powered by the most accurate tracking online (Hyros AI swarm data) It's so flexible you could even build your own affiliate tracking platform on top of it if you wanted. The era of logging into one-size-fits-all analytics apps and waiting months for features is dead. Now every HYROS user can have an attribution system and models that are 1-to-1 custom to them, with any feature they want, in a matter of minutes. FYI we are doing a $20k contest/giveaway for whoever builds the coolest apps and features with this, in our HYROS Skool group. Just Google "HYROS Skool" to find it. Links to set up docs/our git for this app are there as well.
Alex Becker 🍊🏆🥇151,305 次观看 • 1 个月前
New vid : Follow & Comment "1". 1 will win a $2,000 NEO Tokyo s2. (Must like/follow/share) 3 will win $500 in Bytes. The 2025 bull might of just started. Here are the coins that will pump us to Valhalla and WHY. Also : I will be uploading straight to Twitter/X going forward. Please chuck some likes/comments if you appreciate that and want more if it and I'll do it more.
Alex Becker 🍊🏆🥇405,674 次观看 • 2 年前
3:54
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
"You are not living life, you live like a robot!" (Vid Banned From YT) Is what I get when people see my 4am schedule n find out I work 16 hours a day, don't drink, no sugar, dont game, party, indulge... They are the ones not living n will die only with regret. Here's why
Alex Becker 🍊🏆🥇541,435 次观看 • 3 年前
A Stupid Simple Way To Make Literal Millions With AI When most talk about AI $, it's some Chat GPT cheese. No. AI has blown software open, billions will be made. Here is what I am doing, you should too. (Like this? Give a like+comment, 2 will win $500) The key here is b2b SaaS The way I build and built my first 9 figure company is by looking at BREAKAGE points in b2b businesses. At every stage of a business there are "leaks" or "optimizers" that can either SAVE or increase revenue. For example for a construction company think of all the steps to make money Attracting a client, closing a client, legal agreements, contractor hiring, materials/tool cost, engineers, landscaping, project management. At each of these stages there is a way to save them or make them money. For example if you had an AI bot that automatically kept tabs on and reported on the cheapest materials on the market and bought them for the company you'd cut logistics, material cost etc... On a 10 million $$ job that is 50-100k+. You can then easily charge 5-10k for access to the AI. EVERY business works in these ways and has its own set of unique "breakage points" This video is how I find them and develop software for them.
Alex Becker 🍊🏆🥇537,330 次观看 • 3 年前
The Ultimate "50x Investment Treasure Map" Of Metaverse Crypto My full guide to what I believe will be the easiest 20x+ in investing in the next 2 years +Exactly where I think the biggest easy wins will be (Give a like + comment, 2 will win a $2000 NT Citizen NFT) What people seem to be missing is that AI will completely change how the gaming space works. We will start seeing 3 things primarily -INFINITE games : These are games where AI can endlessly create AAA content, even with a small dev team. -MERGING of game universes : Similar to "Ready Player 1" I see thje world folding into a few BIG metaverses with the games already inside them -AI NFT assets : Right now NFTs dont really make sense because they are stuck to 1 game. In the future NFTs will have the AI modeling data cooked into them allowing ANY game to import LARGE chunks of NFTs and then AI will use the data to model the item into the game effortlessly If you combine all these together, we are going to see much bigger implications to NFTs/In game assets/digital currency as games will become more like giant blobs of many games/worlds with HUNDREDS of different teams working on them with their own AIs building their "part of the world". NFTs will also cross digital planes, giving them far more weight in gaming/metaverse status. NEXT I believe by 2035 MANY people will spend most of their time in VR and connected to AR. This means working, socializing AND gaming. The only way to transact, verify ownership and do business transactions (say paying someone to YOUR AR ad on their shirt) will be via blockchain and NFT tech. Again this will create a huge wave. FINALLY : The main course, the easy X's All the above is cool, but they are long term thesis's. The SHORT term is this The metaverse narrative is building right now. Its a matter of TIME before a game pops off on Twitch that heavily uses NFTs and gets bigger than Axie. I'm talking mainstream use. Once this happens the ENTIRE game crypto market (currently at 8 bil) will sky rocket to at least 100 but more than likely 300-500. Good coins, bad coins, all will blow past old all time highs regardless of merit and we will see a "meme coin" like mania...the pent-ultimate shit coin rally. Anyone who is prepared for this narrative early and gets in when see the makers I discuss on this video can in my opinion hit 20-50x consistently during this time. FYI...If you want the edge here, you should be in NEO Tokyo. Enjoy the vid!
Alex Becker 🍊🏆🥇505,939 次观看 • 3 年前
New vid : Follow & Comment "1". 1 will win a $2,000 NEO Tokyo s2. (Must like/follow/share) 3 will win $500 in Bytes. If you are selling you are an idiot. Look at this. LOOK AT IT. We are on the cusp of the biggest bull ever. Here is why n how it will look. Also : I will be uploading straight to Twitter/X going forward. Please chuck some likes/comments if you appreciate that and want more if it and I'll do it more.
Alex Becker 🍊🏆🥇324,470 次观看 • 2 年前
Lol. If u didnt know. I ran a contest last night where thousands of people had to watch a stream of this on loop for 6 hours straight to get 1 of 11 allos to my meme drop. 1 man (me) should not wield such power, but I accept and promise to keep abusing it in funny ways.
Alex Becker 🍊🏆🥇241,781 次观看 • 1 年前
I'm all for criticism. I thought the market would keep going up and we'd get a big new ETH ATH. We did not. It went to shit. That said. I never promised anything. I was incredibly clear how high risk my bet was on these coins and that we were going to zero if the market reversed. Saying I was wrong. Sure. Fair. Saying I promised returns and not even mentioning my other is well..Unfair. Advice I constantly stated like -If your new stick to top 10 coins -Do not get into mid/low caps if you cannot stomach losing everything -That if your in this for less than a few years, do not touch low caps I took huge risk in low caps. The risk didn't pay off. I never ever once said it wasn't a massive risk and covered this exact outcome as likely. I said this every damn video at length. Have a nice day.
Alex Becker 🍊🏆🥇74,512 次观看 • 5 个月前
How To Reprogram Your Personality To "Freak Ambition Mode" When I talk about my routine/ambitions on here I get "thats good, I dont have that drive" Stop. Do this and your personality will default to DRIVEN. (Like this? Give a like+comment, 2 will win $500) The simple truth is that most people have spent their entire life in such a fog and a dopamine overdose, that they have no idea who they are or what "drives" them. Their entire personality is buried under endless amounts of lifestyle baggage, so much that they think that the "fog" is their actual personality. It's not. Based on my habits I can shift from "9000% crush the world/positive outlook" guy to hardly having the willpower to work on my business or exercise. These are the step I use to radically change my personality and if you do them you might just find you have crazy "drive" just like me.
Alex Becker 🍊🏆🥇371,405 次观看 • 3 年前
