African Stream's banner
African Stream's profile picture

African Stream

@african_stream115,432 subscribers

African Stream is a pan-African digital media organisation providing a voice to Africans at home and abroad through cutting-edge, African-centred content.

Shorts

SUCKER PUNCH FOR ‘PARROTING’ THE U.S. LINE Few things have enraged Africans at home and in the diaspora as much lately as the recent remarks by the Pentagon’s top commander for Africa - and this clip of TikToker Junior🎵 punching his computer monitor as it displays General Michael Langley slandering Burkina Faso’s President Ibrahim Traoré makes clear just how unhappy about it we are. During a 3 April US Senate hearing, Langley alleged that Traoré had used his country’s gold to pay for his personal protection. It’s clear that the US and other Western forces have started a propaganda campaign against the revolutionary leader to tarnish his name, and - after news of another foiled coup against him - many fear he could suffer the same fate as other great pan-African leaders who stood up to the West (such as Burkina Faso’s Thomas Sankara and DRC’s Patrice Lumumba). But what was especially grating about Langley’s remarks is that they were delivered by one of us - or rather, one who looks like us. Despite his Black skin, Langley is a puppet for Uinterestsst. Or, as Junior🎵 mocks him after punching the monitor - a ‘parakeet,’ parroting his master’s line. 📹 Video Credit: juniorafrica_ (TikTok)

SUCKER PUNCH FOR ‘PARROTING’ THE U.S. LINE Few things have enraged Africans at home and in the diaspora as much lately as the recent remarks by the Pentagon’s top commander for Africa - and this clip of TikToker Junior🎵 punching his computer monitor as it displays General Michael Langley slandering Burkina Faso’s President Ibrahim Traoré makes clear just how unhappy about it we are. During a 3 April US Senate hearing, Langley alleged that Traoré had used his country’s gold to pay for his personal protection. It’s clear that the US and other Western forces have started a propaganda campaign against the revolutionary leader to tarnish his name, and - after news of another foiled coup against him - many fear he could suffer the same fate as other great pan-African leaders who stood up to the West (such as Burkina Faso’s Thomas Sankara and DRC’s Patrice Lumumba). But what was especially grating about Langley’s remarks is that they were delivered by one of us - or rather, one who looks like us. Despite his Black skin, Langley is a puppet for Uinterestsst. Or, as Junior🎵 mocks him after punching the monitor - a ‘parakeet,’ parroting his master’s line. 📹 Video Credit: juniorafrica_ (TikTok)

21,998 Aufrufe

WHO IS FUNDING TERRORIST GROUPS IN AFRICA? How are t*rrorist groups able to finance their activities? That’s the question raised by Nigerian General Christopher Musa after captured Boko Haram fighters were found in possession of hard currency. The level of organisation and logistics required to maintain operations for 15 years is no mean feat - likely beyond the capacities of mere rag-tag militias. A plausible explanation is external support, and precedent exists to warrant suspicion. The Sahel’s t*rrorism crisis post-2011 can be directly linked to Libya, where insurgents, armed and funded by Western powers to overthrow pan-African icon Muammar Gaddafi, trickled south after the job was done. This turned the Sahel into the world’s new epicentre of t*rrorism, with countries such as Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger most affected. Western support for t*rrorist groups is also documented elsewhere. Leaks concerning the State Department revealed correspondence between Jake Sullivan and his then-boss Hillary Clinton, with one email reading, "AQ [Al Qaeda] is on our side in Syria." The US also armed the Taliban in Afghanistan to fight its adversary, the Soviet Union. Back to Africa, countries like Mali have directly accused France of violating Malian airspace and delivering weapons to armed groups in 2022, and of training t*rrorists in 2021. Have a watch, and let us know where you think Boko Haram gets its money.

WHO IS FUNDING TERRORIST GROUPS IN AFRICA? How are t*rrorist groups able to finance their activities? That’s the question raised by Nigerian General Christopher Musa after captured Boko Haram fighters were found in possession of hard currency. The level of organisation and logistics required to maintain operations for 15 years is no mean feat - likely beyond the capacities of mere rag-tag militias. A plausible explanation is external support, and precedent exists to warrant suspicion. The Sahel’s t*rrorism crisis post-2011 can be directly linked to Libya, where insurgents, armed and funded by Western powers to overthrow pan-African icon Muammar Gaddafi, trickled south after the job was done. This turned the Sahel into the world’s new epicentre of t*rrorism, with countries such as Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger most affected. Western support for t*rrorist groups is also documented elsewhere. Leaks concerning the State Department revealed correspondence between Jake Sullivan and his then-boss Hillary Clinton, with one email reading, "AQ [Al Qaeda] is on our side in Syria." The US also armed the Taliban in Afghanistan to fight its adversary, the Soviet Union. Back to Africa, countries like Mali have directly accused France of violating Malian airspace and delivering weapons to armed groups in 2022, and of training t*rrorists in 2021. Have a watch, and let us know where you think Boko Haram gets its money.

21,562 Aufrufe

'FOREIGN AID' IS A BRIBE Many people outside of Africa would be surprised to hear that some Africans were glad about the recent US foreign aid cuts. To understand why, here's a very short 2022 video by activist and content creator @mariamtheugandan (Instagram) in which she calls out this so-called aid for what it really is - namely, a bribe paid to 'underdeveloped' countries for the right to keep on exploiting their resources. A report published 2017 by UK and African equality and development campaigners and NGOs titled 'Honest Accounts 2017: How the World Profits from Africa's Wealth' detailed how Africa loses far more than it receives. While African countries get around $19 billion in aid in the form of grants annually, $68 billion is "taken out in capital flight, mainly by multinational companies deliberately misreporting the value of their imports or exports to reduce tax." Meanwhile, an "estimated $29 billion a year is being stolen from Africa in illegal logging, fishing and the trade in wildlife/plants." As former African Union envoy to the US Arikana Chihombori-Quao said in a 2018 interview with Voice of America, "They [the West] loot from us at night, and during the day, they come back and give us a pittance of the loot in the name of aid." This looting is only made possible by the African political elite, which pockets the supposed 'development aid' while rolling out the red carpet for their Western sponsors to come and extract resources. The aid rarely invests in infrastructure projects, which the continent is crying out for; instead, it prioritises vanity projects that serve the donating country far more than the recipient. Video credit: @MariamTheUgandan (instagram)

'FOREIGN AID' IS A BRIBE Many people outside of Africa would be surprised to hear that some Africans were glad about the recent US foreign aid cuts. To understand why, here's a very short 2022 video by activist and content creator @mariamtheugandan (Instagram) in which she calls out this so-called aid for what it really is - namely, a bribe paid to 'underdeveloped' countries for the right to keep on exploiting their resources. A report published 2017 by UK and African equality and development campaigners and NGOs titled 'Honest Accounts 2017: How the World Profits from Africa's Wealth' detailed how Africa loses far more than it receives. While African countries get around $19 billion in aid in the form of grants annually, $68 billion is "taken out in capital flight, mainly by multinational companies deliberately misreporting the value of their imports or exports to reduce tax." Meanwhile, an "estimated $29 billion a year is being stolen from Africa in illegal logging, fishing and the trade in wildlife/plants." As former African Union envoy to the US Arikana Chihombori-Quao said in a 2018 interview with Voice of America, "They [the West] loot from us at night, and during the day, they come back and give us a pittance of the loot in the name of aid." This looting is only made possible by the African political elite, which pockets the supposed 'development aid' while rolling out the red carpet for their Western sponsors to come and extract resources. The aid rarely invests in infrastructure projects, which the continent is crying out for; instead, it prioritises vanity projects that serve the donating country far more than the recipient. Video credit: @MariamTheUgandan (instagram)

18,892 Aufrufe

WHO IS FUNDING TERRORIST GROUPS IN AFRICA? How are t*rrorist groups able to finance their activities? That’s the question raised by Nigerian General Christopher Musa after captured Boko Haram fighters were found in possession of hard currency. The level of organisation and logistics required to maintain operations for 15 years is no mean feat - likely beyond the capacities of mere rag-tag militias. A plausible explanation is external support, and precedent exists to warrant suspicion. The Sahel’s t*rrorism crisis post-2011 can be directly linked to Libya, where insurgents, armed and funded by Western powers to overthrow pan-African icon Muammar Gaddafi, trickled south after the job was done. This turned the Sahel into the world’s new epicentre of t*rrorism, with countries such as Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger most affected. Western support for t*rrorist groups is also documented elsewhere. Leaks concerning the State Department revealed correspondence between Jake Sullivan and his then-boss Hillary Clinton, with one email reading, "AQ [Al Qaeda] is on our side in Syria." The US and the UK also armed and funded Mujahideen in Afghanistan to fight its adversary, the Soviet Union. Back to Africa, countries like Mali have directly accused France of violating Malian airspace and delivering weapons to armed groups in 2022, and of training t*rrorists in 2021. Have a watch, and let us know where you think Boko Haram gets its money.

WHO IS FUNDING TERRORIST GROUPS IN AFRICA? How are t*rrorist groups able to finance their activities? That’s the question raised by Nigerian General Christopher Musa after captured Boko Haram fighters were found in possession of hard currency. The level of organisation and logistics required to maintain operations for 15 years is no mean feat - likely beyond the capacities of mere rag-tag militias. A plausible explanation is external support, and precedent exists to warrant suspicion. The Sahel’s t*rrorism crisis post-2011 can be directly linked to Libya, where insurgents, armed and funded by Western powers to overthrow pan-African icon Muammar Gaddafi, trickled south after the job was done. This turned the Sahel into the world’s new epicentre of t*rrorism, with countries such as Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger most affected. Western support for t*rrorist groups is also documented elsewhere. Leaks concerning the State Department revealed correspondence between Jake Sullivan and his then-boss Hillary Clinton, with one email reading, "AQ [Al Qaeda] is on our side in Syria." The US and the UK also armed and funded Mujahideen in Afghanistan to fight its adversary, the Soviet Union. Back to Africa, countries like Mali have directly accused France of violating Malian airspace and delivering weapons to armed groups in 2022, and of training t*rrorists in 2021. Have a watch, and let us know where you think Boko Haram gets its money.

16,692 Aufrufe

Videos

african_stream's profile picture

AFRICAN STREAM IS CLOSING DOWN This is, sadly, a farewell to you, our loyal followers and supporters. Under relentless attack, we’ve made the painful decision to shut down African Stream—a platform that many of you’ve come to trust and love. This decision was not made lightly. The smear by then–US Secretary of State Antony Blinken on September 13, 2024, labelling African Stream “Kremlin propagandists”—triggered a wave of censorship. Within days, YouTube, Meta, Google, and TikTok removed our accounts, and we were demonetised on X. These actions shattered our ability to survive financially. Personal accounts were restricted. What followed was a daily uphill battle. Now, we’re left with only one path: closure. We are deeply grateful for your unwavering support. Your comments, your messages, your shares—you made us stronger, sharper, and more determined. We are deeply proud of the work we’ve done since 2022: bringing attention to the most underreported and misrepresented continent. The imperalists want to perpetuate the dominant narrative that Africa is underdeveloped due to corruption and the mismanagement of resources. They want to remove colonialism, neo-colonialism and imperialism from the picture. We refused to play by those rules. For that, we paid the price. But it’s a price we would pay again and again. Refusing to play by their rules led to NBC saying we spread ‘disinformation’ without providing a single example of what ‘disinformation’ we shared. Voice of America condemned us for reporting a fact: since the George W. Bush administration, every US president has authorised drone strikes on Somalia. As we responded to every smear piece, we just grew bigger and stronger until, finally, those in positions of power realised the smears weren’t working, and the rest is history. We will cease posting as of July 1, 2025, except for a few remaining documentaries from Liberia and Mali. With your support, we managed to ruffle many feathers. Please continue the fight and keep the Pan-African flag flying. Thank you for helping us build African Stream. As we always say: #WeAreAllAfricanStream.

African Stream

589,677 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

african_stream's profile picture

JAMAICANS BARRED FROM OWN BEACHES: END THE BAN! Imagine living on a beautiful island with picturesque beaches - but you’re not allowed to visit them. That’s what life is like for Jamaicans, where less than 1% of the sandy coastline is open to the public. It’s a colonial legacy of the 1956 Beach Control Act, which grants private landowners extensive - almost exclusive - rights over coastal areas, effectively barring residents from enjoying their own shores. As a result of this exclusion, prime beachfronts are predominantly reserved for private entities and foreign tourists, with Jamaicans marginalised in their homeland. Under British rule, laws were instituted to favour the interests of the colonial power and its economic expansion at the expense of the local community. Although Jamaica achieved independence, these colonial-era statutes persist, perpetuating stark social and economic disparities. This clip is part of a campaign calling for an end to the colonial-era beach law. In it, Mikaela Loach - It’s Not That Radical 📖🇵🇸 argues that denying locals access to their natural resources not only infringes upon their rights but also undermines their cultural heritage and identity. It’s a prime example of exclusionary colonial practices creating systemic inequities impacting the quality of life of Jamaicans today, even after their so-called independence from the UK in 1962. Video credit: Mikaela Loach - It’s Not That Radical 📖🇵🇸y

African Stream

546,652 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

african_stream's profile picture

FIRESTONE: HOW U.S. RUBBER GIANT STILL BURNS LIBERIA African Stream officially closed down at the end of July. But before making that decision, we had already been working on this important documentary about the American rubber company Firestone and its history of exploitation. In 1926, Firestone signed a deal with Liberia’s government to lease 1 million acres of land, 10% of the entire country, for just six cents an acre. Backed by the U.S. government and designed to secure a steady rubber supply for American industry, the deal marked the start of a deeply exploitative relationship. For decades, Liberian workers, many of them children, were forced to tap between 500 and 750 rubber trees a day in gruelling conditions. Some earned as little as 24 cents for a full day’s work. While Firestone grew into one of the world’s largest rubber producers, Liberia was left with environmental destruction, impoverished communities, and virtually no national development from the wealth extracted. After Liberia’s brutal civil war, a new agreement was signed in 2005. But critics argue the terms still overwhelmingly favoured Firestone. The company continues to control vast plantations, while surrounding communities remain locked in poverty. When we visited Barclay Farm, a village next to the Firestone rubber plantations, residents told us they still face crumbling infrastructure, undrinkable water, inadequate healthcare, and limited opportunities nearly a century after the original deal. For many Liberians, Firestone is not just a company; it is a symbol of neocolonial extraction and a reminder that so-called “investment” often means exploitation without accountability. This documentary is part one of a three-part documentary series on Liberia, which we will release over the course of the following week. After that, there will be no more African Stream content.

African Stream

103,959 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten