The Oracle
@Antaru_Ib • 4,140 subscribers
//entrepreneur.logistics.footballer⚽⭐. Chelsea fan💙⚽. #Abgafian. #Obidient. YBNL for life.
Shorts
Videos
The debate surrounding Manchester City’s 115 charges is heating up, and the questions are getting uncomfortable. From the political backing of Andy Burnham to the logistical nightmare of potential sanctions, the conversation dives deep into whether the Premier League can actually hold the club accountable without causing chaos in the English football pyramid. Is it possible to separate the ownership from the club, or is the greatest national game facing an impossible dilemma?
The Oracle175,877 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen
Manchester City are a huge club today, but they are not bigger than the Premier League. The Premier League was already one of the biggest and most commercially powerful leagues in world football before Manchester City became dominant, and it will remain that way regardless of what happens to City. Look at the clubs in England. Chelsea. Liverpool. Arsenal. Tottenham. Newcastle. Aston Villa. Manchester United and others. These clubs have enormous global fanbases, commercial power, history and international audiences. Chelsea alone has a massive global following and remains one of the biggest clubs in world football. So if Manchester City were relegated because of a regulatory decision, are people genuinely going to stop watching the Premier League? Are broadcasters suddenly going to abandon it? Will sponsors disappear? Will millions of supporters around the world suddenly stop watching Chelsea vs Liverpool, Arsenal vs Chelsea or Newcastle vs Tottenham? Of course not. And the argument that England would somehow lose its European relevance without City doesn’t hold much weight either. England would still have some of the biggest and most followed clubs in European football competing in UEFA competitions. The Premier League does not depend on one club to maintain its global status. And this is where the conversation about punishment gets complicated. You cannot argue that rules must be enforced, then say they should not be enforced because the consequences might cost money. If Manchester City are found to have breached the rules and the appropriate punishment is relegation, then the financial consequences cannot become a reason to ignore or weaken those rules. Manchester City’s rise has undoubtedly added to the Premier League’s global appeal. But the Premier League did not become globally relevant because of Manchester City. Manchester City became globally relevant because they were part of the Premier League.
The Oracle76,650 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen
Juventus were relegated to Serie B, hit with points deduction and stripped of their titles after the refereeing scandal. And they weren’t the only club punished. Fiorentina and Lazio were initially relegated too, while AC Milan received a points deduction for their involvement in the case. So if Manchester City are eventually found liable for the charges against them, why would football suddenly collapse if the authorities imposed a massive sporting punishment? 60 point deduction over 5 years, Relegation to the third tier, Titles stripped. Whatever sanction is ultimately imposed, the principle should be the same, the size of the club should not determine the seriousness of the punishment. Thank you Oracle ✌🏿
The Oracle47,982 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen
If it can be manipulated by politics then what’s the point of calling it a Game ?
The Oracle26,591 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen
Nobody and I mean NOBODY dead or alive does that low curling finish like Cole Palmer. 🫡 He has a whole collection of them, but the Manchester United one deserves its own museum. 😂😂 Onana genuinely thought he was saving it. Bro was already in position, watched the slow shot, dived perfectly, stretched but still couldn’t touch the ball🤣🤣. Perfect pace. Perfect placement. Straight into the corner. Palmer has turned that low curling finish into an art 🫡
The Oracle36,104 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
Keine weiteren Inhalte verfügbar