auspill
@aus_pill • 54,911 subscribers
i like Australia (auspilled)
Shorts
Videos
An Indian who attended Modi’s Melbourne rally claims he was abused by Australians after mocking an Australian counter-protest, claiming online that they were “poor” and “Centrelink people.” His response is a call for migrants from across the subcontinent to unite inside Australia in the name of their shared race, while declaring “we come from the land of Bose”, a militant Indian nationalist who raised an insurrection force against the British during WWII with Axis support. Social cohesion much?
auspill84,376 views • 5 days ago
Resurrecting this dead issue to activate women against the right at this existential moment in the immigration fight needs to be shut down. Recent polling has One Nation around 31% of the primary vote with immigration being the single biggest reason voters are backing them. That’s where the public’s attention is and that’s where the momentum is coming from. Immigration restriction exists under a social license, allowing unpopular or poorly thought-through policies has previously destroyed the right in Australia. Hanson’s EasyTax proposal in the 1998 federal election ruined One Nation electorally at a time when immigration was equally as salient a concern as today. It is entirely plausible we see a repeat of this with abortion. Abortion is a low-salience issue. Australians don’t rank it among their top political concerns, and it is nowhere near the vote mover that immigration has become. A February 2026 Redbridge poll for The Australia Institute (N=2,010) found 62% support access to abortion services, with another 25% supporting it in limited circumstances. Only 8% oppose it outright. Even among One Nation voters themselves, a substantial majority support access in at least some circumstances. Even if your concern is solely with sex-selective abortion, it has been empirically demonstrated that certain migrant communities (particularly from India and China) exhibit notably higher rates of early induced abortion, including patterns consistent with sex-selective practices that produce skewed sex ratios at birth far above the natural level. Australian-born women show lower rates. But regardless of the nuance of your preferred ban, attempts to legislate in this area walks a tightrope. The distinction between opposing sex-selective abortion and restricting abortion rights more broadly is unlikely to survive media coverage or partisan campaigning. Opponents will almost certainly present it as an attack on women’s bodily autonomy, regardless of the narrower intent and the electoral apocalypse will ensue. The left can no longer rely on accusations of racism to halt growing opposition to mass immigration. Instead, it is attempting to recast the right as anti-women, sexist and anti-abortion. That is particularly risky when women have been moving towards One Nation in significant numbers, and in some polls more than men. Australia has largely avoided the political gender divide seen elsewhere. Why hand opponents a wedge issue when the public is already delivering a mandate on immigration? The opportunity to secure meaningful change on immigration, demographics and our existential problem is rare and may not come again. Turning a low-priority social issue into a central political battle risks everything by energising opponents and distracting from the issue that created the momentum in the first place. Keep the focus on immigration. Don’t squander momentum when it is finally translating into political leverage. Have your vote of conscience as Labor and Liberals have done but don’t risk it as National platform or an artificial right wing position.
auspill140,467 views • 26 days ago
Just 7% of the world’s population is White, but when I asked strangers to guess, most thought it was upwards of 80%… This false sense of demographic security is dangerous, many have no idea they’re a global minority, and rapidly approaching the same status at home.
auspill579,369 views • 8 months ago
The seven men arrested after being rammed off the road by tactical police have been released, including one on an ASIO watch list. They say there’s “no evidence” and reaffirm that they drove 9 hours from Melbourne for a holiday. This video was taken outside the police station:
auspill480,674 views • 7 months ago
Lisa Jane Spencer made fun of Indians, Jews, and virtually every group in Australia, but was cancelled for making a joke about White people pretending to be Aboriginal. This is Aboriginality on full display: a system of weaponised guilt that has enabled the left and migrants to steal Australia. It is a highly sanctified doctrine designed to paralyse Australians with historical guilt. Under this system, Australia is forever "stolen land" and Whites are permanent "colonisers" with no moral right to control their own borders or destiny. Even jokes like Lisa's, which only brush against the fringes of this belief system, are defended aggressively by the left (and even some conservatives, due to its lifelong dominance), more fiercely than jokes about any other ethnicity, because without it the core base of the left's power collapses.
auspill69,738 views • 1 month ago
India has a far right government but Indians living in the West vote for left wing parties. Why? Because they want to import more of their own, and the left promises mass immigration. India has now overtaken Britain as the largest source of foreign-born people living in Australia. 3.5% of people living in Australia were born in India. Approximately 6% of Australia is ethnically Indian if you include those born here. In 2000, fewer than 100,000 Indians lived in Australia; now it’s over a million. That number has more than doubled in the last 10 years. RedBridge analysis shows 70–85% of Indians voted for Labor, even though they are often seen in Australia as “natural conservatives.” The explanation for this discrepancy, according to the analysis, is that the right’s rhetoric on immigration scared them off.
auspill159,096 views • 2 months ago
Too many people are unwilling or unable to comprehend the amount of ethnic resentment that even high skill, high income migrants have towards White people. She rants on about how much she’s given to the UK economy then cuts to chastising Whites for their ancestor’s actions.
auspill463,561 views • 10 months ago
The scale of Indian immigration is rarely understood, many still think Italian migration to Australia is the largest or most defining. They are completely wrong. There are more people who were born in India living in Australia than there those with even trace Italian ancestry, and most of those Indians have arrived in the last decade! While Italians were the first break from British monoculture which has defined Australia since its inception, the peak wave of Italians was just 2.3% of the population. This was a wave to alleviate the existential threat that Australia’s small population at the time posed and so the importation of a culturally adjacent European group was proposed. Whereas now, even years old census data, Indian born is 3.6% of the population and has doubled in the last 10 years. This wave is of a far more distant population culturally and ethically, brought in for just economic reasons. So even after adjusting for population growth, the Indian born community today is roughly 1.5x more dense than the Italian at its absolute height and with little to no nation building excuse. When you account for Indian ancestry and the broader migration of the subcontinent you’re looking at closer to 6%+. We were never asked.
auspill105,412 views • 2 months ago
Not even America’s actual greatest ally can flip James Fishback… Huge loss for A(ustralia)IPAC
auspill163,777 views • 4 months ago
Ben Roberts-Smith did not have 21 of his fellow soldiers come out against him in a coordinated campaign. Many of the witnesses were subpoenaed and reluctant to testify. One soldier told the court he didn’t even agree with the case, saying he was there “under extreme duress for killing bad dudes we went over there to kill.” We’re not actually having to choose between the good conscience of 21 SAS or BRS. It’s far more complicated. Prosecutors literally admitted they have almost no physical evidence. No crime scenes, no forensics, no bodies. The defamation case was decided on the lower balance of probabilities standard. Criminal charges require proof beyond reasonable doubt, very hard to attain with just testimony. Ben Roberts-Smith remains innocent until proven guilty.
auspill130,396 views • 3 months ago
