Hugo Lennon
@aus_pill • 56,366 subscribers
i like Australia (auspilled)
Shorts
Videos
White authors are explicitly excluded from this bookstore in Australia, we investigated how far their ban goes..
Hugo Lennon415,505 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
Indian Prime Minister starts his speech to 30,000 Indians in Melbourne by acknowledging the ‘traditional owners’ of Australia. Welcome to Country ceremonies like this erode Australian sovereignty by framing Europeans as guests, and Aboriginals the owners.
Hugo Lennon225,509 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад
Noticing a pattern across the West of veterans broken by what’s demographically become of the countries they fought for
auspill645,568 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад
Just 7% of the world’s population is White, but when I asked strangers to guess, most thought it was upwards of 80%… This false sense of demographic security is dangerous, many have no idea they’re a global minority, and rapidly approaching the same status at home.
Hugo Lennon580,120 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад
The seven men arrested after being rammed off the road by tactical police have been released, including one on an ASIO watch list. They say there’s “no evidence” and reaffirm that they drove 9 hours from Melbourne for a holiday. This video was taken outside the police station:
Hugo Lennon480,833 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад
Too many people are unwilling or unable to comprehend the amount of ethnic resentment that even high skill, high income migrants have towards White people. She rants on about how much she’s given to the UK economy then cuts to chastising Whites for their ancestor’s actions.
auspill463,561 просмотров • 1 год назад
Resurrecting this dead issue to activate women against the right at this existential moment in the immigration fight needs to be shut down. Recent polling has One Nation around 31% of the primary vote with immigration being the single biggest reason voters are backing them. That’s where the public’s attention is and that’s where the momentum is coming from. Immigration restriction exists under a social license, allowing unpopular or poorly thought-through policies has previously destroyed the right in Australia. Hanson’s EasyTax proposal in the 1998 federal election ruined One Nation electorally at a time when immigration was equally as salient a concern as today. It is entirely plausible we see a repeat of this with abortion. Abortion is a low-salience issue. Australians don’t rank it among their top political concerns, and it is nowhere near the vote mover that immigration has become. A February 2026 Redbridge poll for The Australia Institute (N=2,010) found 62% support access to abortion services, with another 25% supporting it in limited circumstances. Only 8% oppose it outright. Even among One Nation voters themselves, a substantial majority support access in at least some circumstances. Even if your concern is solely with sex-selective abortion, it has been empirically demonstrated that certain migrant communities (particularly from India and China) exhibit notably higher rates of early induced abortion, including patterns consistent with sex-selective practices that produce skewed sex ratios at birth far above the natural level. Australian-born women show lower rates. But regardless of the nuance of your preferred ban, attempts to legislate in this area walks a tightrope. The distinction between opposing sex-selective abortion and restricting abortion rights more broadly is unlikely to survive media coverage or partisan campaigning. Opponents will almost certainly present it as an attack on women’s bodily autonomy, regardless of the narrower intent and the electoral apocalypse will ensue. The left can no longer rely on accusations of racism to halt growing opposition to mass immigration. Instead, it is attempting to recast the right as anti-women, sexist and anti-abortion. That is particularly risky when women have been moving towards One Nation in significant numbers, and in some polls more than men. Australia has largely avoided the political gender divide seen elsewhere. Why hand opponents a wedge issue when the public is already delivering a mandate on immigration? The opportunity to secure meaningful change on immigration, demographics and our existential problem is rare and may not come again. Turning a low-priority social issue into a central political battle risks everything by energising opponents and distracting from the issue that created the momentum in the first place. Keep the focus on immigration. Don’t squander momentum when it is finally translating into political leverage. Have your vote of conscience as Labor and Liberals have done but don’t risk it as National platform or an artificial right wing position.
auspill141,594 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад
India has a far right government but Indians living in the West vote for left wing parties. Why? Because they want to import more of their own, and the left promises mass immigration. India has now overtaken Britain as the largest source of foreign-born people living in Australia. 3.5% of people living in Australia were born in India. Approximately 6% of Australia is ethnically Indian if you include those born here. In 2000, fewer than 100,000 Indians lived in Australia; now it’s over a million. That number has more than doubled in the last 10 years. RedBridge analysis shows 70–85% of Indians voted for Labor, even though they are often seen in Australia as “natural conservatives.” The explanation for this discrepancy, according to the analysis, is that the right’s rhetoric on immigration scared them off.
auspill159,485 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад
One Nation decided to give up its mandate to radically change Australia's immigration and instead acquiesced to the demands of big business to adopt a migration policy not so dissimilar to Labor. Absolute betrayal. They're not going to improve without pressure so everyone needs to rhetorically apply pressure and withdraw whatever support you have left. We can't be blindly led by traitors dressed in orange.
Hugo Lennon57,814 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
The quickest way to waste an opening on immigration is to let the political fight become about something else. The polling makes electoral risk of an abortion debate obvious, a Redbridge survey of 2,010 Australians, published in March 2026, found 62% supported abortion access, another 25% supported access only in limited circumstances, and just 8% opposed it. More importantly for One Nation, the divide exists inside its own support base. Among its voters, 50% supported access and another 34% supported access in limited circumstances. Only 9% opposed it. That means 84% supported abortion access in at least some circumstances. There is also a difference between what a proposal technically does and the political argument it creates. A narrowly framed restriction on sex-selective abortion may be defensible to its supporters on those specific grounds. But they cannot assume the public debate will remain confined to those grounds, especially when figures like Howe are associated with it. When accusations of racism fail to persuade voters concerned about immigration, an argument about women’s rights offers another way to pull those voters back. Why make that argument easier? Why give people who are reconsidering their political loyalties a fresh reason to retreat to their old ones? Even supporters of a narrow abortion reform should recognise the risk. If their proposal becomes associated with a complete ban, the broader controversy can swallow the reform itself. None of this requires abandoning personal convictions. MPs can hold different views and exercise conscience votes, as they have in other parties. Every moral disagreement does not need to become a national platform or a test of whether someone belongs on the right. If the objective is meaningful, lasting immigration reform, then protecting the coalition needed to deliver it should come first. That means keeping attention on immigration and resisting letting activists revive dead issues that divide its own supporters. Political opportunities can disappear much faster than they arrive. Don’t let them turn an opening on immigration into an election about abortion.
Hugo Lennon32,451 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
An Indian who attended Modi’s Melbourne rally claims he was abused by Australians after mocking an Australian counter-protest, claiming online that they were “poor” and “Centrelink people.” His response is a call for migrants from across the subcontinent to unite inside Australia in the name of their shared race, while declaring “we come from the land of Bose”, a militant Indian nationalist who raised an insurrection force against the British during WWII with Axis support. Social cohesion much?
Hugo Lennon87,233 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад
