best of 백현이 ❤️
@bestofbyunbaek • 140,490 subscribers
The ultimate hype account for BAEKHYUN! 🔥 ♡ Here for B. All for B. Only for B. ♡ News, Media, and Fan Projects for the Fearless, Brave & Humble. Inquiries: DM.
Shorts
Videos
![We have observed that a portion of the timeline regarding the CBX vs. SM dispute has been misinterpreted, leading to speculation and confusion, particularly concerning the issue of pooled accounting. To clarify, during the emergency press conference held on June 10, CBX’s legal representative did indeed address the matter of accounting records [video attached] The lawyer stated: “Thinking that this would clearly become a legal issue, I requested settlement data from my clients. In particular, Article 14 of the Popular Culture and Arts Industry Development Act mandates that accounting books regarding popular culture planning and compensation must be maintained separately. I even had doubts as to whether SM was conducting proper accounting. While SM claimed they could not disclose the accounting books because information regarding other artists might be mixed in, such records should not have been prepared in a way that mixes information with other artists in the first place.” This statement does not suggest that income from all activities was combined and redistributed among others/group/elsewhere. Rather, it indicates that the accounting records were not properly separated per artist, as required by law. In other words, the issue raised concerns improper organization and lack of separation in bookkeeping, where other artists’ financial data appear to have been maintained within the same records. This creates significant difficulty in clearly identifying individual earnings and verifying whether settlements have been calculated accurately and fairly. Furthermore, this lack of separation was reportedly used as a justification by SM Entertainment to deny access to detailed settlement data, citing the risk of exposing other artists’ information. Given this context, it is important to refrain from making assumptions that extend beyond what was explicitly stated. The concern raised was about transparency, compliance with legal standards, and the ability to verify financial accuracy—shared or redistributed income has not been addressed.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2036470165362319856/ext_tw_video_thumb/2036469985326014466/pu/img/m-PibsaBwW_mY8wj.jpg)
We have observed that a portion of the timeline regarding the CBX vs. SM dispute has been misinterpreted, leading to speculation and confusion, particularly concerning the issue of pooled accounting. To clarify, during the emergency press conference held on June 10, CBX’s legal representative did indeed address the matter of accounting records [video attached] The lawyer stated: “Thinking that this would clearly become a legal issue, I requested settlement data from my clients. In particular, Article 14 of the Popular Culture and Arts Industry Development Act mandates that accounting books regarding popular culture planning and compensation must be maintained separately. I even had doubts as to whether SM was conducting proper accounting. While SM claimed they could not disclose the accounting books because information regarding other artists might be mixed in, such records should not have been prepared in a way that mixes information with other artists in the first place.” This statement does not suggest that income from all activities was combined and redistributed among others/group/elsewhere. Rather, it indicates that the accounting records were not properly separated per artist, as required by law. In other words, the issue raised concerns improper organization and lack of separation in bookkeeping, where other artists’ financial data appear to have been maintained within the same records. This creates significant difficulty in clearly identifying individual earnings and verifying whether settlements have been calculated accurately and fairly. Furthermore, this lack of separation was reportedly used as a justification by SM Entertainment to deny access to detailed settlement data, citing the risk of exposing other artists’ information. Given this context, it is important to refrain from making assumptions that extend beyond what was explicitly stated. The concern raised was about transparency, compliance with legal standards, and the ability to verify financial accuracy—shared or redistributed income has not been addressed.
best of 백현이 ❤️280,065 次观看 • 6 个月前
📢 VOTE FOR BAEKHYUN ON HANTEO TOP 10! 🎉 You can vote using 3 apps: 📲 🩷 WHOSFAN 💙 FANCAST 💜 MUBEAT Not sure how? Watch the video tutorials, start collecting points, and vote for Baekhyun now! 💪✨ Voting period: 🗓️ Round 1: Jan 16 – Jan 25 (KST) 🗓️ Final Round: Jan 27 – Feb 7 (KST) Let’s win Baekhyun another award! 🏆🪄😍 #백현 #BAEKHYUN
best of 백현이 ❤️119,285 次观看 • 9 个月前
We’d like to clear up some misinterpretations regarding Baekhyun’s ment during Reverie Singapore. He also said the similar words “Now is the time to become one with me” during Reverie Manila. This phrase is a cue for fans to follow his lead using the lightstick during “Garden in the Air.” attached here is a video from Reverie Manila. Unfortunately, some have misunderstood this and made a bigger issue out of it than intended, which may affect Baekhyun. We hope this clarification helps, and we appreciate your understanding.
best of 백현이 ❤️87,179 次观看 • 11 个月前
Baekhyun Crowned Most Recommended Artist at WIEA! 🌟❤️🔥 The Weibo International Entertainment Awards fan event took place earlier this April, where fans voted for their most recommended artist. Our star Baekhyun claimed TOP 1 with 213k fan recommendations! 🎉🔥 Now, he’s about to light up the WIEA stage in Macau on April 26! Get ready for Baekhyun! ✨🤩
best of 백현이 ❤️28,511 次观看 • 5 个月前
