Bhavy☄️'s banner
Bhavy☄️'s profile picture

Bhavy☄️

@Bhavani_00007 • 7,763 subscribers

AI | SaaS | Startups | DM for collabs 📩

Shorts

Kimi K3.1 is basically the open-weight version of Opus 5.5 / GPT-6 Astra, but way cheaper I asked them to build a whale breaching scene. Kimi: $0.75 Opus 5.5: $3.01 Astra: $2.00 Gemini 4 Argon: $2.30 Comparable quality at a fraction of the cost.

Kimi K3.1 is basically the open-weight version of Opus 5.5 / GPT-6 Astra, but way cheaper I asked them to build a whale breaching scene. Kimi: $0.75 Opus 5.5: $3.01 Astra: $2.00 Gemini 4 Argon: $2.30 Comparable quality at a fraction of the cost.

72,488 görüntüleme

4 Argon vs Opus 5.5 vs GPT 6 Astra vs Kimi K3 I asked all four to build a 3D whale breaching scene. Argon's level of detail is on another level, and it wins on photorealism. Opus and Kimi look more realistic than Astra. But what a comeback from Google!! 🔥

4 Argon vs Opus 5.5 vs GPT 6 Astra vs Kimi K3 I asked all four to build a 3D whale breaching scene. Argon's level of detail is on another level, and it wins on photorealism. Opus and Kimi look more realistic than Astra. But what a comeback from Google!! 🔥

128,926 görüntüleme

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is actually insane. I asked it to build this whale breach scene using Claude Code as the harness, and it cost just $0.25. That's roughly 8x cheaper than Astra and Sol. I didn't expect MiniMax to be this good at 3D. In my testing, it even beats GPT 6.1 Sol, and the result looks better than the others while costing less than DeepSeek Flash’s version. What a comeback by MiniMax.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is actually insane. I asked it to build this whale breach scene using Claude Code as the harness, and it cost just $0.25. That's roughly 8x cheaper than Astra and Sol. I didn't expect MiniMax to be this good at 3D. In my testing, it even beats GPT 6.1 Sol, and the result looks better than the others while costing less than DeepSeek Flash’s version. What a comeback by MiniMax.

49,347 görüntüleme

POV: everyone’s got a macbook and you walk in with a gaming laptop 😂

POV: everyone’s got a macbook and you walk in with a gaming laptop 😂

1,018,692 görüntüleme

WTH, Ox Alpha is literally 10x better today. I gave it the exact same prompt I used yesterday, but the output is completely different. The quality is way better than yesterday. Is it learning continuously or something? 😭

WTH, Ox Alpha is literally 10x better today. I gave it the exact same prompt I used yesterday, but the output is completely different. The quality is way better than yesterday. Is it learning continuously or something? 😭

323,565 görüntüleme

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.

480,769 görüntüleme

Developers after Claude :

Developers after Claude :

381,060 görüntüleme

Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Tested both models with the same prompt at the highest reasoning level available. > Fable took 18 minutes to complete this test and cost $12.60 > Kimi K3 took 10 minutes and cost around $6.95 Which one wins here?

Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Tested both models with the same prompt at the highest reasoning level available. > Fable took 18 minutes to complete this test and cost $12.60 > Kimi K3 took 10 minutes and cost around $6.95 Which one wins here?

148,725 görüntüleme

WTH is Muse Wonder trying to do? I asked it to build a whale breaching scene, and it gave me this lol. I honestly expected a lot more. It’s pretty token hungry too. This cost me $3.20 Kimi, 3 month old model, built something better for just $2.50. Maybe 3D and frontend development aren’t its thing I’ll run a few more tests before judging it.

WTH is Muse Wonder trying to do? I asked it to build a whale breaching scene, and it gave me this lol. I honestly expected a lot more. It’s pretty token hungry too. This cost me $3.20 Kimi, 3 month old model, built something better for just $2.50. Maybe 3D and frontend development aren’t its thing I’ll run a few more tests before judging it.

41,525 görüntüleme

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 I asked both to build a 3D rocket launch in Three.js. MiniMax: $0.55 DeepSeek: $0.78 MiniMax came out cheaper, with a cleaner liftoff and a bigger flame trail. It understands intent really well, and it’s fast. I’d definitely love to use it for coding. Cheaper than DeepSeek and better quality. Loving it.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 I asked both to build a 3D rocket launch in Three.js. MiniMax: $0.55 DeepSeek: $0.78 MiniMax came out cheaper, with a cleaner liftoff and a bigger flame trail. It understands intent really well, and it’s fast. I’d definitely love to use it for coding. Cheaper than DeepSeek and better quality. Loving it.

18,047 görüntüleme

4 Argon vs Opus 5.5 vs GPT 6 Astra vs Kimi K3 I asked Argon to generate this rocket scene. Argon focuses more on detail, and I'm loving it. The result isn't as good as Opus or Kimi, but the realism is still there. and Its efficient. I never expected this from Google.

4 Argon vs Opus 5.5 vs GPT 6 Astra vs Kimi K3 I asked Argon to generate this rocket scene. Argon focuses more on detail, and I'm loving it. The result isn't as good as Opus or Kimi, but the realism is still there. and Its efficient. I never expected this from Google.

25,247 görüntüleme

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 Same prompt, 2 scenes: a harvester and farmers working. honestly? Qwen 3.8 impressed me. it just did what I asked. Grok 4.6 failed on coloring. Qwen>GLM> Grok> Gemini which one did better for you?

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 Same prompt, 2 scenes: a harvester and farmers working. honestly? Qwen 3.8 impressed me. it just did what I asked. Grok 4.6 failed on coloring. Qwen>GLM> Grok> Gemini which one did better for you?

110,316 görüntüleme

GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs Sol Astra: Took 11 minutes. This is from a follow-up after the first attempt had rendering and UI bugs. The smoke feels a little off. I expected more detail, but it did a good job understanding the intent. Cost: $12.85. Fable 5.1: Took 18 minutes to complete the same test with high detailing. Cost: $12.60. Kimi K3: Took 10 minutes with a similar level of output and cost only $6.95. SOL: Took 7 minutes, but the output seemed messy. Cost: $5.78. Personally, I like Kimi K3 for delivering similar quality with better token efficiency, followed by fable 5.1 for realism. What about you? I’ll do a couple more tests before coming to a conclusion.

GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs Sol Astra: Took 11 minutes. This is from a follow-up after the first attempt had rendering and UI bugs. The smoke feels a little off. I expected more detail, but it did a good job understanding the intent. Cost: $12.85. Fable 5.1: Took 18 minutes to complete the same test with high detailing. Cost: $12.60. Kimi K3: Took 10 minutes with a similar level of output and cost only $6.95. SOL: Took 7 minutes, but the output seemed messy. Cost: $5.78. Personally, I like Kimi K3 for delivering similar quality with better token efficiency, followed by fable 5.1 for realism. What about you? I’ll do a couple more tests before coming to a conclusion.

78,441 görüntüleme

I tested again Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 same prompt: a family having lunch in 3D. Qwen 3.8 wins again for me on quality. but Gemini finished in under 2 mins, the others took 6+. Which one wins for you?

I tested again Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 same prompt: a family having lunch in 3D. Qwen 3.8 wins again for me on quality. but Gemini finished in under 2 mins, the others took 6+. Which one wins for you?

71,444 görüntüleme

GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs SOL Astra is a clear jump from SOL. It understands intent really well. These models are getting so powerful, it’s hard to pick a winner. Fable is great at realism, while Kimi K3 has improved a lot since launch. Which one do you like?

GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs SOL Astra is a clear jump from SOL. It understands intent really well. These models are getting so powerful, it’s hard to pick a winner. Fable is great at realism, while Kimi K3 has improved a lot since launch. Which one do you like?

42,313 görüntüleme

I tested GLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3. Same prompts, both capped at $2 per scene. > Same cost, but GLM Flash couldn't build realistic scenes with proper physics. > Kimi K3 nailed it. It actually seemed to understand how objects should move and interact. What are your thoughts?

I tested GLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3. Same prompts, both capped at $2 per scene. > Same cost, but GLM Flash couldn't build realistic scenes with proper physics. > Kimi K3 nailed it. It actually seemed to understand how objects should move and interact. What are your thoughts?

43,560 görüntüleme

I tested Union Alpha. Asked it to generate this car scene in Three.js. It took 2 hours to get something I could show Honestly, this doesn’t feel anywhere close to Kimi’s level of realism. Feels more like another Flash model. Maybe another GLM? IDK. What do you think?

I tested Union Alpha. Asked it to generate this car scene in Three.js. It took 2 hours to get something I could show Honestly, this doesn’t feel anywhere close to Kimi’s level of realism. Feels more like another Flash model. Maybe another GLM? IDK. What do you think?

25,797 görüntüleme

GPT-6 Astra vs Kimi K3. I'm comparing these because the gap between US models and Chinese models is already getting small. If US AI labs slow down, they will be the ones most affected by it. > Astra did it in one shot 6m 20s and $8. > Kimi K3 got almost the same result, but I had to use 2 follow-up prompts. Total: 12 min and $6.35. The results are almost identical. If US labs slow down, China takes the AI race. They will ship Astra-level open-weight models. China is already good at this. Open weights become the default. That's a nightmare for US labs.

GPT-6 Astra vs Kimi K3. I'm comparing these because the gap between US models and Chinese models is already getting small. If US AI labs slow down, they will be the ones most affected by it. > Astra did it in one shot 6m 20s and $8. > Kimi K3 got almost the same result, but I had to use 2 follow-up prompts. Total: 12 min and $6.35. The results are almost identical. If US labs slow down, China takes the AI race. They will ship Astra-level open-weight models. China is already good at this. Open weights become the default. That's a nightmare for US labs.

26,050 görüntüleme

GPT 6.1 Sol vs Sonnet 5.5 vs Kimi K3 vs Grok 4.7 I asked all four to build a 3D rose, with each capped at $2. GPT 6.1 Sol took 21 mins. The result wasn’t very realistic, but the colors looked good. Sonnet 5.5 took ~7 mins and looked realistic. Kimi K3 also took ~7 mins and gave the best result IMO. Still setting a high bar for frontend work. I don’t know what’s stopping them from releasing Kimi K3.1. Grok 4.7 took ~25 mins in Grok CLI and gave an okayish result.

GPT 6.1 Sol vs Sonnet 5.5 vs Kimi K3 vs Grok 4.7 I asked all four to build a 3D rose, with each capped at $2. GPT 6.1 Sol took 21 mins. The result wasn’t very realistic, but the colors looked good. Sonnet 5.5 took ~7 mins and looked realistic. Kimi K3 also took ~7 mins and gave the best result IMO. Still setting a high bar for frontend work. I don’t know what’s stopping them from releasing Kimi K3.1. Grok 4.7 took ~25 mins in Grok CLI and gave an okayish result.

15,797 görüntüleme

I tested Qwen 3.8 Max vs Kimi K3 Same scene, lighting, props, detail requirements. Qwen's output is decent, but it's not close to Kimi K3. Qwen's output came out messy, text handling was off, and the composition felt unorganized next to Kimi's version. In my opinion, Qwen isn't second to Fable 5 either, and it's also below GPT-5.6 Sol. It's a solid model, but not at that tier. Kimi K3 is still clearly ahead here.

I tested Qwen 3.8 Max vs Kimi K3 Same scene, lighting, props, detail requirements. Qwen's output is decent, but it's not close to Kimi K3. Qwen's output came out messy, text handling was off, and the composition felt unorganized next to Kimi's version. In my opinion, Qwen isn't second to Fable 5 either, and it's also below GPT-5.6 Sol. It's a solid model, but not at that tier. Kimi K3 is still clearly ahead here.

34,045 görüntüleme

Videos