Dr. Brian L. Cox's banner
Dr. Brian L. Cox's profile picture

Dr. Brian L. Cox

@BrianCox_RLTW34,980 subscribers

Senior Fellow @MLInstitute. JSD & fmr prof @CornellLaw. MA @JSchool_CU. Ret. @USArmy (11B, 25R, 25V, 11A, 27A). Tar Heel x2. Views my own. Rangers Lead the Way.

Shorts

This is the most telling clip of this entire exchange between Ro Khanna & Secretary of War Pete Hegseth Pete Hegseth. Ro: "You don't even know how we pay in terms of the missiles that hit the Iranian school." Guess who else keeps using "the Iranian school" in public messaging. Terrorists in Iran. Ro should consider going to join them since that's clearly where his loyalties lie. First of all, the expectation that a sitting Secretary of War will assign a specific dollar amount to how much an armed conflict will "cost the American people" is absurd. That's exactly what Ro does in this exchange - though of course he doesn't cite his source or explain his methodology. Still, the rhetorical "cost" must be measured in comparison with the price for maintaining the pre-conflict status quo. As The White House recently explained, "More Americans have been killed by Iran than any other terrorist regime on Earth." ( And "roughly one in every six American combat fatalities in Iraq were attributable to Iran." ( Not to mention the potential cost of allowing Iran to develop nuclear weapons, considering that we now know they ALREADY have missiles that can reach most of continental Europe - including ~30 bases where ~68K 🇺🇸 troops are stationed. Ro doesn't seem to want to talk about any of that while he's trying to corner SECWAR into giving a simple answer to a complicated question that ultimately depends on how the "cost" is measured. Based on our previous exchanges here X, the part that I find most telling - and irritating - of all is the off-hand reference to the Minab school attack, though. All the rhetoric about this incident is currently based on speculative media reporting from anonymous sources. Yet the terrorist regime in Iran keeps emphasizing the incident in their public messaging because it plays well for Iran's useful idiots throughout the West - like Ro here. Even if we assume speculative media coverage is true, nothing that has been reported so far suggests a war crime was committed. At worst, it seems possible that the attack constitutes failure to take feasible precautions in the attack...which is NOT a "war crime" by any legitimate, doctrinal standard. But that doesn't stop useful idiots like Ro here from focusing on this incident AS THOUGH it were a war crime since doing so plays well in whatever bullshit public narrative he's trying to spin for the American people. Just like the terrorists in Iran keep doing...for the exact same reason. Besides, the munitions that have been employed so far have debilitated IRGCs military capabilities that the terrorists in Iran had spent decades & spent untold billions to accumulate. Ignoring this while reducing everything that has happened in the last ~2 months to "the missiles that hit the Iranian school" is just...dumb. If you look at Ro's TL right now it's clear he thinks he "schooled" SECWAR Hegseth (as Ed Krassenstein claims in a post Ro retweeted) in this exchange. In reality, all Ro did was confirm yet again why he's just another useful idiot who also happens to have a seat in Congress. I've said it before to Ro, and I'll say it again: stay in your lane. Leave LOAC analysis to Department of War 🇺🇸. And actual experts...like me.

This is the most telling clip of this entire exchange between Ro Khanna & Secretary of War Pete Hegseth Pete Hegseth. Ro: "You don't even know how we pay in terms of the missiles that hit the Iranian school." Guess who else keeps using "the Iranian school" in public messaging. Terrorists in Iran. Ro should consider going to join them since that's clearly where his loyalties lie. First of all, the expectation that a sitting Secretary of War will assign a specific dollar amount to how much an armed conflict will "cost the American people" is absurd. That's exactly what Ro does in this exchange - though of course he doesn't cite his source or explain his methodology. Still, the rhetorical "cost" must be measured in comparison with the price for maintaining the pre-conflict status quo. As The White House recently explained, "More Americans have been killed by Iran than any other terrorist regime on Earth." ( And "roughly one in every six American combat fatalities in Iraq were attributable to Iran." ( Not to mention the potential cost of allowing Iran to develop nuclear weapons, considering that we now know they ALREADY have missiles that can reach most of continental Europe - including ~30 bases where ~68K 🇺🇸 troops are stationed. Ro doesn't seem to want to talk about any of that while he's trying to corner SECWAR into giving a simple answer to a complicated question that ultimately depends on how the "cost" is measured. Based on our previous exchanges here X, the part that I find most telling - and irritating - of all is the off-hand reference to the Minab school attack, though. All the rhetoric about this incident is currently based on speculative media reporting from anonymous sources. Yet the terrorist regime in Iran keeps emphasizing the incident in their public messaging because it plays well for Iran's useful idiots throughout the West - like Ro here. Even if we assume speculative media coverage is true, nothing that has been reported so far suggests a war crime was committed. At worst, it seems possible that the attack constitutes failure to take feasible precautions in the attack...which is NOT a "war crime" by any legitimate, doctrinal standard. But that doesn't stop useful idiots like Ro here from focusing on this incident AS THOUGH it were a war crime since doing so plays well in whatever bullshit public narrative he's trying to spin for the American people. Just like the terrorists in Iran keep doing...for the exact same reason. Besides, the munitions that have been employed so far have debilitated IRGCs military capabilities that the terrorists in Iran had spent decades & spent untold billions to accumulate. Ignoring this while reducing everything that has happened in the last ~2 months to "the missiles that hit the Iranian school" is just...dumb. If you look at Ro's TL right now it's clear he thinks he "schooled" SECWAR Hegseth (as Ed Krassenstein claims in a post Ro retweeted) in this exchange. In reality, all Ro did was confirm yet again why he's just another useful idiot who also happens to have a seat in Congress. I've said it before to Ro, and I'll say it again: stay in your lane. Leave LOAC analysis to Department of War 🇺🇸. And actual experts...like me.

22,976 просмотров

Videos

Periodic reminder that "direct action" is merely a progressive euphemism for "domestic terrorism." #ICYMI I've conveniently compiled a collection of security cam, GoPro & body cam footage of the break-in Elbit Systems UK for which "Palestine Action" domestic terrorists were sentenced today & for whom Zack Polanski here is shedding crocodile tears. After the first incident of vandalizing an Elbit UK facility in July 2020, the group announced on Twitter (account now deactivated): "Palestine Action has launched; join us; get mobilised; take action; end complicity in Israel’s war crimes & apartheid regime." Notice the distortion of the language of international law in the last clause there, since this is my primary area of specialization. The gov't has (correctly) not concluded munitions exported from 🇬🇧 have been used by Israel ישראל to commit "war crimes" in Gaza. At most, Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office justified suspension of ~30 arms export licenses in Sep 2024 by claiming "there is a clear risk that certain items, if exported, might be used to commit or facilitate a serious violation of IHL." I concluded in a critical analysis here X that the "legal explanation" for doing so "is dangerously flawed & utterly unconvincing" (link to 🧵 in 1st reply). Even so, a "clear risk" that war crimes may be committed isn't conclusive evidence that Israel Defense Forces has in fact committed widespread & systemic war crimes. Plus, as erroneous as the decision was to suspend certain export licenses, GOV.UK is actually *complying* with its int'l law obligations pursuant to the Arms Trade Treaty by *monitoring* use of arms exports & suspending licenses upon a "clear risk" finding (dubious though it may be). Likewise, 🇬🇧 has not determined 🇮🇱 is committing "apartheid" or "genocide." Yet, Palestine Action has justified their campaign of domestic terrorism - sorry, "direct action" - as a movement to end 🇬🇧 "complicity" in these violations of int'l law. As a call to action, the group has encouraged "all those who support justice and equality to join our movement, get active with us, and help to build a campaign capable of ending the UK’s complicity in apartheid" (webpage no longer available). Yet, the methods it adopts to "get active" & qualify for the definition of terrorism pursuant to domestic law. That is, 🇬🇧 law defines "terrorism" (in part) as an act involving "serious violence against a person" or "serious damage to property" where the act "is designed to influence the government ... or to intimidate the public or a section of the public" and it is "made for the purpose of advancing a political ... or ideological cause." If you want to see visual evidence of the "serious violence" or "serious damage" elements, watch the attached video if you haven't already. If you want to see evidence of the influence / intimidate / ideology elements, go read the excerpts of the group's public messaging presented above again. During trial, Police Sergeant Kate Evans testified that her "spine was shattered" when one of the terrorists smashed it with a sledgehammer. Police Constable Aaron Buxton also testified the same terrorist swung the sledgehammer at him "multiple times," likely making contact with his right calf & service radio. PS Evans testified that during the incident, she said "something like 'you have just hit me with a sledgehammer,'" and the terrorist "just started telling me I'm complicit in genocide again." Just think about that for a second. A criminal suspect smashed a law enforcement officer's spine with a sledgehammer, and he attempted to excuse his actions by claiming the officer is "complicit in genocide." These terrorists are enemies of the state - by intent & design. And the leader The Green Party just claimed it's "gut wrenching" to see them jailed. That makes him & his party terrorist sympathizers rather than a serious political party. They & their terrorist friends should be relegated back to the margins of civil society where they have always belonged.
3:51

Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

BrianCox_RLTW's profile picture

Periodic reminder that "direct action" is merely a progressive euphemism for "domestic terrorism." #ICYMI I've conveniently compiled a collection of security cam, GoPro & body cam footage of the break-in Elbit Systems UK for which "Palestine Action" domestic terrorists were sentenced today & for whom Zack Polanski here is shedding crocodile tears. After the first incident of vandalizing an Elbit UK facility in July 2020, the group announced on Twitter (account now deactivated): "Palestine Action has launched; join us; get mobilised; take action; end complicity in Israel’s war crimes & apartheid regime." Notice the distortion of the language of international law in the last clause there, since this is my primary area of specialization. The gov't has (correctly) not concluded munitions exported from 🇬🇧 have been used by Israel ישראל to commit "war crimes" in Gaza. At most, Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office justified suspension of ~30 arms export licenses in Sep 2024 by claiming "there is a clear risk that certain items, if exported, might be used to commit or facilitate a serious violation of IHL." I concluded in a critical analysis here X that the "legal explanation" for doing so "is dangerously flawed & utterly unconvincing" (link to 🧵 in 1st reply). Even so, a "clear risk" that war crimes may be committed isn't conclusive evidence that Israel Defense Forces has in fact committed widespread & systemic war crimes. Plus, as erroneous as the decision was to suspend certain export licenses, GOV.UK is actually *complying* with its int'l law obligations pursuant to the Arms Trade Treaty by *monitoring* use of arms exports & suspending licenses upon a "clear risk" finding (dubious though it may be). Likewise, 🇬🇧 has not determined 🇮🇱 is committing "apartheid" or "genocide." Yet, Palestine Action has justified their campaign of domestic terrorism - sorry, "direct action" - as a movement to end 🇬🇧 "complicity" in these violations of int'l law. As a call to action, the group has encouraged "all those who support justice and equality to join our movement, get active with us, and help to build a campaign capable of ending the UK’s complicity in apartheid" (webpage no longer available). Yet, the methods it adopts to "get active" & qualify for the definition of terrorism pursuant to domestic law. That is, 🇬🇧 law defines "terrorism" (in part) as an act involving "serious violence against a person" or "serious damage to property" where the act "is designed to influence the government ... or to intimidate the public or a section of the public" and it is "made for the purpose of advancing a political ... or ideological cause." If you want to see visual evidence of the "serious violence" or "serious damage" elements, watch the attached video if you haven't already. If you want to see evidence of the influence / intimidate / ideology elements, go read the excerpts of the group's public messaging presented above again. During trial, Police Sergeant Kate Evans testified that her "spine was shattered" when one of the terrorists smashed it with a sledgehammer. Police Constable Aaron Buxton also testified the same terrorist swung the sledgehammer at him "multiple times," likely making contact with his right calf & service radio. PS Evans testified that during the incident, she said "something like 'you have just hit me with a sledgehammer,'" and the terrorist "just started telling me I'm complicit in genocide again." Just think about that for a second. A criminal suspect smashed a law enforcement officer's spine with a sledgehammer, and he attempted to excuse his actions by claiming the officer is "complicit in genocide." These terrorists are enemies of the state - by intent & design. And the leader The Green Party just claimed it's "gut wrenching" to see them jailed. That makes him & his party terrorist sympathizers rather than a serious political party. They & their terrorist friends should be relegated back to the margins of civil society where they have always belonged.

Dr. Brian L. Cox

17,531 просмотров • 3 дней назад

Больше нет контента для загрузки