Carrie Ann
@carriecherry75 • 6,601 subscribers
Recovering Journalist. True Crime Junkie. Trial Paralegal. Marshall Grad.
Shorts
Videos
No, no, no, we’re not saying it’s a fake suicide, we’re saying “the methods that were chosen were insufficient to achieve the goal.” What’s the difference? What does that even mean? I’m so confused. And I’m not the only one apparently. The judge doesn’t get it either.
Carrie Ann39,968 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen
There’s debate in Melanie’s chat tonight about when Jen McCabe first testified that Karen Read said “I hit him.” Some people were saying it was at the first trial because of the testimony where Alan Jackson wanted her to go through her entire state grand jury transcript - and we learned she was asked 12 different ways and McCabe’s answer every time then was “Did I hit him? Could I have hit him?” However, it was actually at the federal grand jury in June 2023 when McCabe first officially attributed “I hit him” to Read, which Jackson pointed out was right after she and her family became the subject of public scorn when the 2:27 am Google search came to light.
Carrie Ann39,768 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
Linda Bailey's entire vibe was offensive. Her condescending way of describing Dan Markel completely negated the purpose of her testimony on behalf of Donna Adelson. Here's what I mean: Dan Markel is a Harvard educated attorney. He was a law school professor, spoke at conferences, authored journals, started an influential blog and was on his way up. Yet Linda Bailey - with her FSU degree and 37 years' experience practicing family law in Tallahassee, Florida - mocked and belittled him on the stand. She justified the nickname "Gibbers" by saying his motions and memorandums were gibberish. Without any proof, she claimed Markel drafted his own pleadings ("like he was drafting a law review article"), basically forcing his lawyers to just sign off. These are the words she used to describe the writings she is convinced are his: nonsense, inconsistent, verbose, wordy, hyperbolic, inflammatory. Most importantly, Bailey says they lacked legal merit. In 37 years, she had never ever seen filings this horrible. She was "taken aback" that a lawyer would have signed them and allowed them to be filed. And despite all of this, the entire point of Bailey's testimony was that, according to her, this divorce was not contentious. On the contrary, it was "routine" and "amicable" and everyone was "calm and measured." Sure, Linda. In getting those digs in against Markel, she was basically spewing nonsense and gibberish on the stand, no?
Carrie Ann43,325 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten
Kouri Richins’ defense attorney said in opening that Kouri indeed bought drugs from Carmen - at Eric’s request. In fact, they said, we’re gonna hear it straight from Kouri’s mouth. So I’m struggling with their tactics on cross of Carmen. Why do they need to discredit her or destroy her or bring up her learning disability or nitpick over whether the money was in a closet or a firepit? They admit Kouri bought drugs from Carmen. Is this strategy just to raise doubt over whether Kouri used the word “fentanyl”?
Carrie Ann25,961 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten
Keine weiteren Inhalte verfügbar