Carrie Ann's banner

Carrie Ann

@carriecherry75 • 6,601 subscribers

Recovering Journalist. True Crime Junkie. Trial Paralegal. Marshall Grad.

Shorts

So I saw the foreperson comment that Donna Adelson yelled out “You convicted an innocent woman!” after the verdict was read. I couldn’t make out what she was saying before but after reading that comment, I can totally hear that now. And it explains Judge Everett’s response even more. Oh, Donna Donna Donna, you’re quite the drama queen.

So I saw the foreperson comment that Donna Adelson yelled out “You convicted an innocent woman!” after the verdict was read. I couldn’t make out what she was saying before but after reading that comment, I can totally hear that now. And it explains Judge Everett’s response even more. Oh, Donna Donna Donna, you’re quite the drama queen.

106,018 просмотров

Courtney Proctor’s pronunciation of “kindergarten” is like nails on a chalkboard. I’m a southerner so I asked my husband - whose mom has a weird New England accent (Massachusetts and Maine) - if this is how she says it. After looking at me like I was crazy, he told me the only person he knows who says it like that is Harry from Home Alone. That’s it!! He’s right!!

Courtney Proctor’s pronunciation of “kindergarten” is like nails on a chalkboard. I’m a southerner so I asked my husband - whose mom has a weird New England accent (Massachusetts and Maine) - if this is how she says it. After looking at me like I was crazy, he told me the only person he knows who says it like that is Harry from Home Alone. That’s it!! He’s right!!

13,218 просмотров

Videos

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.ai•Sponsored•Livecam

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

Exclusive private shows

1.2k viewers online

Private Show

Join now for exclusive access

Free preview available • Premium content

Remember when the prosecutor said the Commonwealth’s theory of why Lindsay Clancy chose methods of suicide that were “insufficient to meet the goal” would become “clearer” by the end of their case? Well, they rested today. Anyone figure it out?

Remember when the prosecutor said the Commonwealth’s theory of why Lindsay Clancy chose methods of suicide that were “insufficient to meet the goal” would become “clearer” by the end of their case? Well, they rested today. Anyone figure it out?

93,530 просмотров • 7 дней назад

No, no, no, we’re not saying it’s a fake suicide, we’re saying “the methods that were chosen were insufficient to achieve the goal.” What’s the difference? What does that even mean? I’m so confused. And I’m not the only one apparently. The judge doesn’t get it either.

No, no, no, we’re not saying it’s a fake suicide, we’re saying “the methods that were chosen were insufficient to achieve the goal.” What’s the difference? What does that even mean? I’m so confused. And I’m not the only one apparently. The judge doesn’t get it either.

39,968 просмотров • 18 дней назад

There’s debate in Melanie’s chat tonight about when Jen McCabe first testified that Karen Read said “I hit him.” Some people were saying it was at the first trial because of the testimony where Alan Jackson wanted her to go through her entire state grand jury transcript - and we learned she was asked 12 different ways and McCabe’s answer every time then was “Did I hit him? Could I have hit him?” However, it was actually at the federal grand jury in June 2023 when McCabe first officially attributed “I hit him” to Read, which Jackson pointed out was right after she and her family became the subject of public scorn when the 2:27 am Google search came to light.

There’s debate in Melanie’s chat tonight about when Jen McCabe first testified that Karen Read said “I hit him.” Some people were saying it was at the first trial because of the testimony where Alan Jackson wanted her to go through her entire state grand jury transcript - and we learned she was asked 12 different ways and McCabe’s answer every time then was “Did I hit him? Could I have hit him?” However, it was actually at the federal grand jury in June 2023 when McCabe first officially attributed “I hit him” to Read, which Jackson pointed out was right after she and her family became the subject of public scorn when the 2:27 am Google search came to light.

39,768 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Linda Bailey's entire vibe was offensive. Her condescending way of describing Dan Markel completely negated the purpose of her testimony on behalf of Donna Adelson. Here's what I mean: Dan Markel is a Harvard educated attorney. He was a law school professor, spoke at conferences, authored journals, started an influential blog and was on his way up. Yet Linda Bailey - with her FSU degree and 37 years' experience practicing family law in Tallahassee, Florida - mocked and belittled him on the stand. She justified the nickname "Gibbers" by saying his motions and memorandums were gibberish. Without any proof, she claimed Markel drafted his own pleadings ("like he was drafting a law review article"), basically forcing his lawyers to just sign off. These are the words she used to describe the writings she is convinced are his: nonsense, inconsistent, verbose, wordy, hyperbolic, inflammatory. Most importantly, Bailey says they lacked legal merit. In 37 years, she had never ever seen filings this horrible. She was "taken aback" that a lawyer would have signed them and allowed them to be filed. And despite all of this, the entire point of Bailey's testimony was that, according to her, this divorce was not contentious. On the contrary, it was "routine" and "amicable" and everyone was "calm and measured." Sure, Linda. In getting those digs in against Markel, she was basically spewing nonsense and gibberish on the stand, no?

Linda Bailey's entire vibe was offensive. Her condescending way of describing Dan Markel completely negated the purpose of her testimony on behalf of Donna Adelson. Here's what I mean: Dan Markel is a Harvard educated attorney. He was a law school professor, spoke at conferences, authored journals, started an influential blog and was on his way up. Yet Linda Bailey - with her FSU degree and 37 years' experience practicing family law in Tallahassee, Florida - mocked and belittled him on the stand. She justified the nickname "Gibbers" by saying his motions and memorandums were gibberish. Without any proof, she claimed Markel drafted his own pleadings ("like he was drafting a law review article"), basically forcing his lawyers to just sign off. These are the words she used to describe the writings she is convinced are his: nonsense, inconsistent, verbose, wordy, hyperbolic, inflammatory. Most importantly, Bailey says they lacked legal merit. In 37 years, she had never ever seen filings this horrible. She was "taken aback" that a lawyer would have signed them and allowed them to be filed. And despite all of this, the entire point of Bailey's testimony was that, according to her, this divorce was not contentious. On the contrary, it was "routine" and "amicable" and everyone was "calm and measured." Sure, Linda. In getting those digs in against Markel, she was basically spewing nonsense and gibberish on the stand, no?

43,325 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Kouri Richins’ defense attorney said in opening that Kouri indeed bought drugs from Carmen - at Eric’s request. In fact, they said, we’re gonna hear it straight from Kouri’s mouth. So I’m struggling with their tactics on cross of Carmen. Why do they need to discredit her or destroy her or bring up her learning disability or nitpick over whether the money was in a closet or a firepit? They admit Kouri bought drugs from Carmen. Is this strategy just to raise doubt over whether Kouri used the word “fentanyl”?

Kouri Richins’ defense attorney said in opening that Kouri indeed bought drugs from Carmen - at Eric’s request. In fact, they said, we’re gonna hear it straight from Kouri’s mouth. So I’m struggling with their tactics on cross of Carmen. Why do they need to discredit her or destroy her or bring up her learning disability or nitpick over whether the money was in a closet or a firepit? They admit Kouri bought drugs from Carmen. Is this strategy just to raise doubt over whether Kouri used the word “fentanyl”?

25,961 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

We were all Emily D. Baker in this moment. End of a long day + over-the-top drama - reason = fucking meltdown. WHAT IS HAPPENING??

We were all Emily D. Baker in this moment. End of a long day + over-the-top drama - reason = fucking meltdown. WHAT IS HAPPENING??

24,829 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

This triggered me. As someone who has dealt with the death of a spouse, the dismissive tone of Brennan’s “I’m sorry for your loss” felt cruel. Anyone else?

This triggered me. As someone who has dealt with the death of a spouse, the dismissive tone of Brennan’s “I’m sorry for your loss” felt cruel. Anyone else?

48,249 просмотров • 1 год назад

Yes, EDB! Thank you for putting into words the “what the actual fuck” feeling we all had while watching this. “I am perplexed by his incredulity.” This applies to most investigators in this case, actually.

Yes, EDB! Thank you for putting into words the “what the actual fuck” feeling we all had while watching this. “I am perplexed by his incredulity.” This applies to most investigators in this case, actually.

42,105 просмотров • 1 год назад

Yes! Alison Motta! The Consti-fucking-tution!

Yes! Alison Motta! The Consti-fucking-tution!

11,148 просмотров • 1 год назад

Больше нет контента для загрузки