Frank McCormick
@CBHeresy • 88,125 subscribers
Educator | Writer | Political Dissident 🇺🇸 Saying What Other Teachers Won’t 🍎🔥
Shorts
Videos
0:33
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
Whenever this happens I like to immediately begin eating as much of their food on the table as possible.
Frank McCormick34,173 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce
This is what the Chicago Teachers Union did today instead of teaching children, the majority of whom are already academically behind. This speaker is a “youth organizer” (indoctrinator) and refers to the Trump administration as a “white supremacist regime.” Defund the CTU!
Frank McCormick229,856 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce
This is a fascinating 2022 conversation with Candace Owens because I’m outlining the dangers of collective guilt, conspiratorial reasoning, and demagogic politics; precisely the framework she would later adopt in her attacks on Jews. She agreed. What happened to her?
Frank McCormick14,550 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce
In response to my ChatGPT post, Candace Owens just live-streamed texts between her and Charlie Kirk. Look, I’m a reasonable man. Maybe I was wrong, but there is one small detail I can’t ignore: She didn’t actually show the dates. Don’t be mad- I’m just asking questions.
Frank McCormick241,286 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce
“What’s the deal with ICE in Minnesota? Isn’t it cold enough there?”
Frank McCormick122,045 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce
HOLY SHIT HE MARRIED ERIKA NOT YOU GET OVER IT YOU SICK PSYCHOTIC BITCH
Frank McCormick91,355 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce
Dear Ian Carroll, I want to take a moment to address what you said about me and my comments in your video—without snark or personal animus. When you say, “The Jews are wonderful,” and insist you’re merely exploring a connection between Israel, Epstein, and Jewish influence, I want to believe you. But based on your past statements, I think at best, you are naively playing with fire, and at worst, you are being disingenuous—aware that making certain insinuations under the guise of intellectual curiosity is enough to set in motion others who will state more explicitly what you only imply. It’s not any single remark that alarms me, but the pattern of statements you’ve made, including: 1.Suggesting that Israel was behind 9/11 and that Israelis—or Jews—celebrated the attacks, even going so far as to claim Israel mocked 9/11 in its 10/7 post about “dancing again.” 2.Claiming that the Scofield Bible was bankrolled by the Rothschilds as a Zionist operation to subvert Christianity and advance Jewish/Zionist interests. 3.Failing to push back in a conversation on the Hodgetwins podcast when it was suggested that Jews are “behind pornography” as part of an anti-civilizational plot. Instead, you commented that you had heard about it and found it intriguing. While you didn’t originate the claim, public figures have a responsibility to challenge such narratives when they are put forward in front of large audiences. Again, this isn’t about one isolated comment but the totality of your rhetoric, which indicates you are either recklessly entertaining antisemitic tropes or deliberately introducing them in a way that lets others take them further. As with all conspiracy theories, there are kernels of truth. No theory is entirely fabricated—they gain traction because they weave in elements of reality. But that doesn’t make them harmless. I believe you are irresponsibly connecting horrific events—9/11, pedophilia sex rings, and the subversion of Christianity—directly to the only Jewish nation on earth. While you may insist you are only criticizing Israel’s government, your language and framing suggest otherwise. Maybe this is naïveté on your part. I’m not saying the rise in antisemitism—or the increasing risk Jews face in America—is solely your responsibility. But you are, knowingly or not, helping lay the groundwork for the kind of rhetoric that has historically fueled antisemitic oppression and violence. I hope you reflect honestly on this, even if only small parts resonate with you. I will always defend your right to say whatever you want—I’m not calling for you to be deplatformed or banned. But I am asking you to consider the responsibility that comes with influence, and the ways in which our words can shape discourse for better or worse. Thank you for your time.
Frank McCormick279,497 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce
Dude is literally withdrawing from fentanyl in this video and he thinks he’s ready for a civil war?
Frank McCormick65,548 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce
1:01
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
I did not need to see Jack Posobiec being a weird theater kid in the woods…
Frank McCormick13,519 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce
This is the result of a school system run by liberal white women who are “morally conflicted” about disciplining young Black men. When I was teaching, there was a pathological aversion to acknowledging the disproportionate number of Black boys with conduct disorders—outside of the predominant, ideologically-driven belief that white people and “whiteness” were ultimately to blame. (The “poverty argument” was simply an extension of this, since it was ultimately claimed that poverty caused these behaviors—rather than being a product of a culture and localized society that tolerates, or is at least afraid to confront, them.) To be sure, these behaviors often had a strong familial component. It didn’t take long, after meeting some of the parents, to understand why their children were behaving antisocially in school. But here’s the tragic irony: the school system’s failure to actively address these behavioral disorders—due to liberal educator pathology—exacerbated the problem. Why? Because, sadly, for many of these kids, the only “normal” adults they encountered were at school. For better or worse, teachers and school staff functioned as surrogate parents—and often, arguably, better ones, as they weren’t drug users, abusers, criminals, or simply incompetent. Yet—and this is the tragic part—the limited opportunity these students had to interact with a healthier and more stable adult environment was distorted by a school culture that didn’t treat them as human beings capable of rising above their circumstances. Instead, it treated them as “noble victims” whose antisocial, and at times savage, behavior was seen as a burden for white people to bear. And so, these children were allowed to continue engaging in behaviors that teachers and administrators would never tolerate from their own kids. They were subjected instead to experimental progressive behavioral philosophies and “interventions” that, at best, were ineffective—and at worst, actually incentivized the antisocial behavior by rewarding it with outcomes (such as specific forms of adult attention) the children craved. As a result, our school systems—particularly those in high-poverty urban centers—have produced, or at least facilitated the development of, young Black adults who have been conditioned by the system to behave however they want. And because, during most of their formative years, this behavior was never truly corrected or challenged, many are shocked—and enraged—when the real world pushes back through the enforcement arm of the law. Every video I’ve seen of a young Black man in a confrontation with police—aggressively resisting until severe force is used—reminds me of students I had who were allowed to do the same with minimal consequences from school staff. I spent many years trying to be the teacher who held them accountable and produced real behavioral change. Sometimes, it worked. But more often, any success I had was undercut by colleagues who refused to adopt similar expectations and consequences—or by superiors who actively undermined my efforts because they didn’t like the “optics” of the disproportionate disciplinary record you’d inevitably accumulate when working to reform a troubled Black teenager. If you think that sounds like a soul-destroying environment to work in, you’d be
Frank McCormick15,130 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce