ComeWithFacts's banner
ComeWithFacts's profile picture

ComeWithFacts

@ComeWithFacts3,959 subscribers

Court filings. Case timelines. Receipts. Industry accountability Independent research | Real-time updates | An unorthodox investigative journalist

Shorts

🚨BREAKING: Newly released body cam footage CONFIRMS Megan Thee Stallion did step on glass — officers at the scene state she cut her foot on a broken liquor bottle exiting the SUV. Liquid seen spilled on the ground. No mention of gunfire injuries. We’ve been told for months that the clip showing Megan stepping on something while exiting the vehicle was from a plastic bottle. That was false. It was glass — confirmed by the police officers on the scene. These body cam videos and others were suppressed, despite showing clear contradictions in Megan’s story. There were multiple instances that should’ve raised reasonable doubt, but the prosecution, Megan, and her team did everything they could to distort the facts. For whatever reason, Tory had to take the fall. They didn’t care about him. His life meant nothing to them. It’s time to let him go. Free Tory Lanez now!

🚨BREAKING: Newly released body cam footage CONFIRMS Megan Thee Stallion did step on glass — officers at the scene state she cut her foot on a broken liquor bottle exiting the SUV. Liquid seen spilled on the ground. No mention of gunfire injuries. We’ve been told for months that the clip showing Megan stepping on something while exiting the vehicle was from a plastic bottle. That was false. It was glass — confirmed by the police officers on the scene. These body cam videos and others were suppressed, despite showing clear contradictions in Megan’s story. There were multiple instances that should’ve raised reasonable doubt, but the prosecution, Megan, and her team did everything they could to distort the facts. For whatever reason, Tory had to take the fall. They didn’t care about him. His life meant nothing to them. It’s time to let him go. Free Tory Lanez now!

3,987,507 次观看

I’m not going to make excuses for the clip at the end of the video the president posted on Truth Social, but when media reports on something like this, they should post everything and give context so people can see the full scope and make their own decisions. If people still disagree after seeing it all, that’s fine. But cutting things into pieces to steer public reaction is manipulative. For clarity, here is the full context of what happened. See the clips attached: • Full video that was posted on Donald Trump’s Truth Social page discussing voting machines and what he believes happened in the 2020 election, which is now the subject of a major federal investigation • A clip that shows the ending of that video, where it abruptly transitions into a separate AI-generated segment • The original, longer AI video inspired by The Lion King, depicting Trump as the king of the jungle and various politicians as animals I don’t think that AI video should have been made at all, and I don’t know how it ended up attached to the voting machine video. It does look bad, including how certain figures were portrayed. The Obama and Joe Biden were depicted as apes. People deserve the beginning, the middle, and the end so they can form their own opinions instead of being pushed into one. I also noticed certain media companies and so-called journalists rushing to highlight this for a gotcha moment. That’s what people really need to pay attention to. Watch how coordinated efforts suddenly shift the conversation away from specific people and specific topics.

I’m not going to make excuses for the clip at the end of the video the president posted on Truth Social, but when media reports on something like this, they should post everything and give context so people can see the full scope and make their own decisions. If people still disagree after seeing it all, that’s fine. But cutting things into pieces to steer public reaction is manipulative. For clarity, here is the full context of what happened. See the clips attached: • Full video that was posted on Donald Trump’s Truth Social page discussing voting machines and what he believes happened in the 2020 election, which is now the subject of a major federal investigation • A clip that shows the ending of that video, where it abruptly transitions into a separate AI-generated segment • The original, longer AI video inspired by The Lion King, depicting Trump as the king of the jungle and various politicians as animals I don’t think that AI video should have been made at all, and I don’t know how it ended up attached to the voting machine video. It does look bad, including how certain figures were portrayed. The Obama and Joe Biden were depicted as apes. People deserve the beginning, the middle, and the end so they can form their own opinions instead of being pushed into one. I also noticed certain media companies and so-called journalists rushing to highlight this for a gotcha moment. That’s what people really need to pay attention to. Watch how coordinated efforts suddenly shift the conversation away from specific people and specific topics.

127,860 次观看

Now they unfollowed Megan’s legal team’s law firm (Quinn Emanuel). I’m cryingggg. I said it’s already too late. Shoulda kept that follow bwahahahaha🤣🤣🤣🤣 If nothing is going on, why unfollow them now? Before and after⬇️

Now they unfollowed Megan’s legal team’s law firm (Quinn Emanuel). I’m cryingggg. I said it’s already too late. Shoulda kept that follow bwahahahaha🤣🤣🤣🤣 If nothing is going on, why unfollow them now? Before and after⬇️

46,635 次观看

Megan was in the hospital safe and sound. When exactly was the police going to shoot them? Tory, Kelsey, and Quan were already in jail. So where in this was Megan preventing them from getting shot? Why did she OFFER that information about her stepping on glass days prior? Where was the police woman being a bitch that might shoot them? She said she thought the Doctor’s were the police? Howwww??? I bet she won’t tell where she was when got that prior cut🤭🤣 How many lies by Megan Pete are allowed, before the enablers say enough is enough? All I see are “she lied about this thing for that.” Or “she lied about that for this.” At what point will the women especially that are defending her, get tired? Imagine if that was your son. Specifically your black son. What if a woman cared more about her “image” than his LIFE? What then? I guess it needs to happen to your families in order to feel the same pain as Tory's. Free Tory Lanez

Megan was in the hospital safe and sound. When exactly was the police going to shoot them? Tory, Kelsey, and Quan were already in jail. So where in this was Megan preventing them from getting shot? Why did she OFFER that information about her stepping on glass days prior? Where was the police woman being a bitch that might shoot them? She said she thought the Doctor’s were the police? Howwww??? I bet she won’t tell where she was when got that prior cut🤭🤣 How many lies by Megan Pete are allowed, before the enablers say enough is enough? All I see are “she lied about this thing for that.” Or “she lied about that for this.” At what point will the women especially that are defending her, get tired? Imagine if that was your son. Specifically your black son. What if a woman cared more about her “image” than his LIFE? What then? I guess it needs to happen to your families in order to feel the same pain as Tory's. Free Tory Lanez

49,280 次观看

Watching the Roc Nation casino hearing, a few things stood out: they went over time, dismissed passionate community voices, and even lectured on “respect”—that line coming from none other than Desiree Perez herself. Many supporters were reportedly bused in, then left before locals spoke. Opponents live and work there, raising real concerns: Roc Nation’s job plan ranks lowest of the bids, and it’s the only proposal that threatens another industry—Broadway. If one casino gets in, what stops another, until Times Square loses its identity? Locals feel disrespected, lied to, and unheard.

Watching the Roc Nation casino hearing, a few things stood out: they went over time, dismissed passionate community voices, and even lectured on “respect”—that line coming from none other than Desiree Perez herself. Many supporters were reportedly bused in, then left before locals spoke. Opponents live and work there, raising real concerns: Roc Nation’s job plan ranks lowest of the bids, and it’s the only proposal that threatens another industry—Broadway. If one casino gets in, what stops another, until Times Square loses its identity? Locals feel disrespected, lied to, and unheard.

12,368 次观看

Videos

ComeWithFacts's profile picture

I’m not going to make excuses for the clip at the end of the video the president posted on Truth Social, but when media reports on something like this, they should post everything and give context so people can see the full scope and make their own decisions. If people still disagree after seeing it all, that’s fine. But cutting things into pieces to steer public reaction is manipulative. For clarity, here is the full context of what happened. See the clips attached: • Full video that was posted on Donald Trump’s Truth Social page discussing voting machines and what he believes happened in the 2020 election, which is now the subject of a major federal investigation • A clip that shows the ending of that video, where it abruptly transitions into a separate AI-generated segment • The original, longer AI video inspired by The Lion King, depicting Trump as the king of the jungle and various politicians as animals I don’t think that AI video should have been made at all, and I don’t know how it ended up attached to the voting machine video. It does look bad, including how certain figures were portrayed. The Obama and Joe Biden were depicted as apes. People deserve the beginning, the middle, and the end so they can form their own opinions instead of being pushed into one. I also noticed certain media companies and so-called journalists rushing to highlight this for a gotcha moment. That’s what people really need to pay attention to. Watch how coordinated efforts suddenly shift the conversation away from specific people and specific topics.

ComeWithFacts

127,860 次观看 • 5 个月前

ComeWithFacts's profile picture

Tamika Mallory has finally decided to address the controversy surrounding Jay-Z’s continued relationship with Target during the boycott. I’ve already shared my own thoughts on the situation, but I wanted to highlight her explanation because, in my opinion, it perfectly illustrates why I believe many activists and public figures apply different standards depending on who they’re talking about. Take a listen. Key Takeaways from Tamika Mallory: • She said she didn’t initially see the criticism because she has been busy organizing activism efforts, events, and work in Washington, D.C. According to her, her son eventually brought the online criticism to her attention after people began saying she wouldn’t speak on the issue because it involved Jay-Z. • She stated that no one can silence or muzzle her and that she has never had relationships requiring her to stay quiet in exchange for support. She said people at Roc Nation, including executives like Desiree Perez, know she speaks her mind and has never been afraid to disagree with them. • She explained that Jay-Z’s relationship with Target was already established long before the boycott began. According to her, the boycott was aimed at discouraging new partnerships with Target, not requiring existing partners to end longstanding business relationships. • She contrasted that with pastors and others who entered into new partnerships with Target after the boycott began, saying those were the types of deals she believed undermined the movement. My Thoughts: In my opinion, this explanation raises more questions than it answers. If the boycott made exceptions for longstanding business relationships, where were those guidelines communicated publicly? This is the first time I’ve heard that distinction being made. More importantly, why does that same grace not extend to everyday people? What about elderly individuals whose closest store is Target? Parents with young children who rely on the nearest Target for medicine, diapers, groceries, or other necessities? Many people were criticized simply for shopping there out of convenience or necessity. Why is Jay Z’s longstanding corporate relationship viewed as an acceptable exception, while ordinary people trying to care for their families were often judged more harshly? Toward the end of the discussion, Tamika said she wished wealthy people had voluntarily chosen not to continue doing business with Target during the boycott. But after spending much of the conversation explaining why his existing relationship made the situation different, that statement felt contradictory to me. What I find most interesting is that Tamika says she was so busy organizing and doing activism work that she didn’t initially see the criticism. Yet, when it comes to other people exercising their own freedom of speech, freedom of expression, or making decisions she disagrees with, she always seems to find the time to weigh in, criticize, and even chastise them. Now that the criticism is directed at someone she has a relationship with, we’re hearing explanation after explanation and exception after exception. In my opinion, that’s the hypocrisy. My issue isn’t whether people choose to boycott Target or not. Everyone’s circumstances are different, and people should make the decisions that are best for themselves and their families. My issue is the apparent double standard. Fair Use Notice: This video contains excerpts used for purposes of commentary, criticism, news reporting, and discussion. The clips are presented in accordance with the principles of fair use under 17 U.S.C. § 107. All rights to the original content remain with their respective owners. Source: TMI Podcast (Tamika Mallory & Mysonne) Referenced Timestamp: Approximately 25:00

ComeWithFacts

17,555 次观看 • 17 天前