D. Dean Johnson
@ddeanjohnson • 20,547 subscribers
Independent journalist. "Obi-Wan Kenobi of the deeper dive."—Billy Cox. Anti-apophenia. Mirador (free): https://t.co/OMPhWASN23
Videos
![DAVID GRUSCH SUGGESTS THAT FRIENDS AND OFFICIALS WHO HELPED HIM MAY HAVE BEEN TARGETED WITH DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS Former intelligence officer David Grusch, now a policy advisor to Rep. Eric Burlison, said that "close friends of mine that were helping me in my [UAP-related] investigation" suffered medical effects consistent with being targeted with "directed energy weapon systems" (DEW). He also suggested that "key government officials helping me" suffered such medical effects. Grusch did not say in so many words that he believed that individuals were targeted with DEW specifically BECAUSE they were involved with his UAP-related activities, but in context that seemed to be implied. Grusch did not provide any names or other details, except to say that the incidents were reported to "the FBI and counterintelligence elements, but there was little to no help." FBI FBI_Response These claims came during an interview with Chris Farrell of Judicial Watch ⚖️, posted May 5, 2026. This clip is 54 seconds from the 75-minute interview, presented under Fair Use (17 U.S. Code § 107) for noncommercial purposes of facilitating education, commentary, research and debate. The complete interview is available on Judicial Watch's YouTube channel. In addition, Grusch said, during an interview on the Fox News Channel on June 13, 2026, "I've had anomalous health incidents happen to people that were helping me in my investigation, you know, Havana Syndrome, if you will."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2067955778980290937/amplify_video_thumb/2067953504451170304/img/LjuyYTqgjugbZHbM.jpg)
DAVID GRUSCH SUGGESTS THAT FRIENDS AND OFFICIALS WHO HELPED HIM MAY HAVE BEEN TARGETED WITH DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS Former intelligence officer David Grusch, now a policy advisor to Rep. Eric Burlison, said that "close friends of mine that were helping me in my [UAP-related] investigation" suffered medical effects consistent with being targeted with "directed energy weapon systems" (DEW). He also suggested that "key government officials helping me" suffered such medical effects. Grusch did not say in so many words that he believed that individuals were targeted with DEW specifically BECAUSE they were involved with his UAP-related activities, but in context that seemed to be implied. Grusch did not provide any names or other details, except to say that the incidents were reported to "the FBI and counterintelligence elements, but there was little to no help." FBI FBI_Response These claims came during an interview with Chris Farrell of Judicial Watch ⚖️, posted May 5, 2026. This clip is 54 seconds from the 75-minute interview, presented under Fair Use (17 U.S. Code § 107) for noncommercial purposes of facilitating education, commentary, research and debate. The complete interview is available on Judicial Watch's YouTube channel. In addition, Grusch said, during an interview on the Fox News Channel on June 13, 2026, "I've had anomalous health incidents happen to people that were helping me in my investigation, you know, Havana Syndrome, if you will."
D. Dean Johnson158,264 просмотров • 18 дней назад
MALMGREN “MISSING SCIENTIST” MYTH-MAKING At a Disclosure Foundation event on Capitol Hill on June 25, 2026, economist Pippa Malmgren indicated she believes that “a whole bunch of our most important scientists” in the U.S. and China have disappeared. She suggested this may be because “there’s an obstacle to the technological process that’s so severe that people are being removed." She called it “a national security issue,” “a civilizational issue,” and even a concern for markets. I don't know about China, but with respect to the U.S., her words were, in my opinion, extravagant nonsense, even when delivered in a portentous tone by a personable intellectual. I have read of no U.S. case in recent years in which a “most important scientist” has died or disappeared under circumstances that truly suggest the involvement of goon squads protecting deep secrets (UFO-related or other) or suppressing exotic technology. The recent U.S. “missing scientists” narrative is fantasy spun from tragic, mundane, and in some cases sordid material. Two accomplished engineers (one ex-U.S. Air Force) involved in some important programs have gone missing, but neither in circumstances that truly suggest they were victims of sinister forces. Two genuinely prominent scientists were murdered, but in each case authorities identified an assailant with a prior personal or local connection to the victim. The other cases seem to be a random grab bag of suicides, natural or accidental deaths, and unresolved missing-person cases that fit recognizable patterns of personal crisis or outdoor accident far better than conspiratorial targeting. Most of the people on the expanded cable/social-media roster were not scientists, even loosely defined, and many had tenuous (if any) links to classified or exotic-technology work. Great pain has been inflicted on some families by dragging their dead or missing loved ones into these manufactured narratives. This is not the first time that Pippa Malmgren has peddled preposterous tales of lethal conspiracies (UFO-themed and other) in the face of readily available contrary evidence. Perhaps the time draws near when some of the other far-fetched and bizarre tales should be explored in greater detail.
D. Dean Johnson17,552 просмотров • 11 дней назад
DAVID GRUSCH -- REMARKS ON CURRENT "BATTLE," FUTURE PLANS, AND CHARLATANS In an interview with Chris Farrell posted May 5, 2026, former intelligence officer David Grusch, now a policy advisor on the congressional staff of Eric Burlison, said "we're in the middle of a battle right now, and we need the President to help us win this battle of government transparency." Grusch asserted that he "never wanted to be a public personality" and would prefer not to be "on the public stage." He also said, "I promise I'll write a book after this is all over. It'll be my leadership meditations...I'll do a media tour or something like that." Grusch remarked, "This subject brings out a lot of charlatans, a lot of people who want attention, a lot of people who want to generate certain narratives." He did not identify any specific individuals as examples of the people he had in mind. This clip is 51 seconds from a 75-minute interview, presented under Fair Use (17 U.S. Code § 107) for noncommercial purposes of facilitating education, commentary, research and debate. The complete interview is available on Judicial Watch's YouTube channel.
D. Dean Johnson23,907 просмотров • 20 дней назад
![DAVID GRUSCH ON WASTE, GOLDEN DOME, AND "GREATER ROT" Pertinent to upcoming action by the U.S. House of Representatives on the Fiscal Year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA, H.R. 8800), David Grusch (former intelligence officer and currently a special advisor on the congressional staff of Eric Burlison) recently opined that there is substantial "waste, fraud, and abuse" in the world of classified programs, and characterized some such programs as "jobs programs for contractors." Grusch cited as an example some of the research programs that have now been incorporated into the Golden Dome for America missile defense development program, which was launched by an executive order issued by President Trump on January 27, 2025. "The goods that they're selling don't really work," Grusch said, referring back to his experience reviewing some such programs "about six years ago." The Trump Administration’s budget materials call for roughly $17.5 billion for Golden Dome during fiscal year 2027, including a portion to be authorized in the NDAA. Grusch did not comment on his view of the Golden Dome program as a whole, but only on the purported elements of waste and abuse. Grusch asserted that the abuse he believes exists in the form of undisclosed UAP-related reverse-engineering programs is "a symptom of this greater rot in the deep state....And I speak from [the perspective of] somebody who had that broad access, but also the acumen to actually understand a lot of these programs." This clip is from an exchange with Chris Farrell of Judicial Watch, released May 5, 2026. The clip is 141 seconds from a 75-minute interview, presented under Fair Use (17 U.S. Code § 107) for noncommercial purposes of facilitating education, commentary, research and debate. An image of a transcript of this clip is attached to the first reply. The complete interview is available on Judicial Watch's YouTube channel. Substantive replies relevant to the assertions presented by David Grusch in this specific clip are welcome here. However, replies dealing mainly with other unrelated assertions by Grusch (or with other UAP matters) do not belong in this thread; those who egregiously violate this advisory may be blocked.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2066567013376385430/amplify_video_thumb/2066543760423469056/img/gH3kb7RNyHA8cOcV.jpg)
DAVID GRUSCH ON WASTE, GOLDEN DOME, AND "GREATER ROT" Pertinent to upcoming action by the U.S. House of Representatives on the Fiscal Year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA, H.R. 8800), David Grusch (former intelligence officer and currently a special advisor on the congressional staff of Eric Burlison) recently opined that there is substantial "waste, fraud, and abuse" in the world of classified programs, and characterized some such programs as "jobs programs for contractors." Grusch cited as an example some of the research programs that have now been incorporated into the Golden Dome for America missile defense development program, which was launched by an executive order issued by President Trump on January 27, 2025. "The goods that they're selling don't really work," Grusch said, referring back to his experience reviewing some such programs "about six years ago." The Trump Administration’s budget materials call for roughly $17.5 billion for Golden Dome during fiscal year 2027, including a portion to be authorized in the NDAA. Grusch did not comment on his view of the Golden Dome program as a whole, but only on the purported elements of waste and abuse. Grusch asserted that the abuse he believes exists in the form of undisclosed UAP-related reverse-engineering programs is "a symptom of this greater rot in the deep state....And I speak from [the perspective of] somebody who had that broad access, but also the acumen to actually understand a lot of these programs." This clip is from an exchange with Chris Farrell of Judicial Watch, released May 5, 2026. The clip is 141 seconds from a 75-minute interview, presented under Fair Use (17 U.S. Code § 107) for noncommercial purposes of facilitating education, commentary, research and debate. An image of a transcript of this clip is attached to the first reply. The complete interview is available on Judicial Watch's YouTube channel. Substantive replies relevant to the assertions presented by David Grusch in this specific clip are welcome here. However, replies dealing mainly with other unrelated assertions by Grusch (or with other UAP matters) do not belong in this thread; those who egregiously violate this advisory may be blocked.
D. Dean Johnson19,327 просмотров • 22 дней назад
THE MORPHING STORY OF ALIEN ISOTOPE "115" Of all the rote things Bob Lazar fans repeat about his claims, among the most wildly erroneous is the assertion that Lazar has "always told the same story." Most who have really studied early Lazar materials (as opposed to the greatly cleaned up narratives peddled by such storytellers as George Knapp and Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell) find the "same story" assertion to be truly laughable. Offhand, I cannot think of a significant element of Bob Lazar's UFO-related tales, or his claims about his own background, on which Lazar has NOT made contradictory statements. It is not just that Lazar has lied promiscuously--he has also lied lazily, trusting that his promoters will smooth things over, as indeed they have, from the beginning, and decade after decade. The examples are innumerable--Lazar's educational and scientific credentials, his criminal history, the nature of his role at the Los Alamos laboratory, et cetera, et cetera. Contemporary promoters such as Joe Rogan have repeatedly embraced and amplified cleaned-up or disproven Lazar claims without apparent awareness of, or evident concern, about their history. Just for example, let's take Lazar's claims about a purported alien isotope that he said defeats gravity and churns out power like the sun. Lazar claims to have figured out the secrets of this material while working as a physicist for a super-secret government program that supposedly possessed nine intact alien craft, at least one of which, he said, was being flown (in 1989!). He claimed also to possess/control a quantity of this alien material. This claim has been featured for decades in Lazar-promoting narratives such as Jeremy Corbell's 2018 film "Bob Lazar: Area 51 & Flying Saucers." See also the clip from a 2014 George Knapp speech below. Lazar claimed this miraculous substance is a stable isotope of "Element 115," the element with 115 protons, now officially known as moscovium (symbol: Mc). No such stable isotope is known to science; the five lab-created isotopes of moscovium all have half-lives that are fractions of a second. But the concept of a "stable isotope of Element 115" postulates that some certain number of neutrons would constitute an isotope that would endure indefinitely and would also, in Lazar’s tale, somehow manifest both gravity-defeating and sun-like power-producing properties. For those who know Lazar’s history only through the streamlined narratives promoted by Knapp, Corbell, and other storytellers, it may come as a surprise that Lazar has contradicted himself about both the number of protons and the number of neutrons in the purported super-powered alien substance. Yet those are the very two variables that define, respectively, an element, and an isotope of an element. In a Sept. 22, 1990 interview with author Michael Lindemann, Lazar said, "I was the one who identified 115. That was my only contribution to the project. And I don't stand on the fact that it's 115, but if it's not, it's 114. It's right in there." So here we see Lazar, early on, claiming to have identified ‘Element 115’ as the substance that made the alien craft work--except he was not even sure that the element in question had 115 protons! It might have 114! "It's right in there"! Yet the number of protons is, of course, what defines an element in the first place. This 1990 statement by itself is sufficient to make the entire "Element 115" tale laughable. But that's not all. A given element can have very different properties depending on the number of neutrons. An isotope is defined precisely by the number of neutrons. Yet Lazar has also said contradictory things about the number of neutrons in the alien isotope. "Atomic mass" can mean several things depending on context, but when shown as a whole number (no decimal) for a specific isotope, it is understood to mean "mass number"-- that is, the sum of the number of protons plus the number of neutrons. Around 1989, Lazar told his pal Joe Vaninetti that the mass of the alien substance was 271; if the super-isotope had 115 protons, that would mean it had 156 neutrons. Yet many later years on his United Nuclear website, Lazar sold mugs and T-shirts blazoned with a diagram for what he then called "Lazarium" (his modest nomenclature for "Element 115"), but showing the "atomic mass" of the alien isotope as 299--so that would be 184 neutrons. 156? 184? Bob Lazar smuggled in 28 additonal neutrons to his original alien isotope. Why might he have done that? Perhaps because, in between those two incompatible claims, element 115 was actually synthesized for the first time, in Russia, in 2003. To date, five isotopes have been synthesized, with neutron numbers ranging from 171 to 175, and within that observed series the half-life INCREASED along with mass number. Especially in light of that real-world data, Lazar’s 1989 neutron number of 156 seemed especially implausible. His subsequent adoption of a much higher number, 184, moved his story into the neutron-rich region that nuclear theory associates with increased stability in superheavy nuclei. We should not be surprised that a scientist-impersonating serial scam artist churns out contradictory nonsense--but please, don't tell us that he has been consistent in his fabrications. Protons and neutrons aside, consider this: Bob Lazar has long claimed to have personal possession or control of a quantity of this super-powered alien substance--but in over 30 years, he has never submitted samples to independent labs. Think of that--the man has claimed to possess a gravity-defeating isotope that cannot have been made by the hand of man. This claim, if true, would constitute undeniable physical proof of alien visitation and alien technology! Why are so many expending so much energy into searching out and arguing about debatable observations and fuzzy videos, IF there is physical proof in hand? Why don't Lazar and his promoters not schedule a televised press conference next week and, in full view of the world audience, turn over slivers of the alien isotope to three independent labs, at least one foreign (in France, maybe)? If the story were true, "disclosure" would soon follow, with vindication, awards and honors for all involved, and so forth. Yes, I am aware of the assertion that somehow Lazar's control of the alien isotope has been a guarantee of his personal safety from government goons (for over 30 years!), but that is manifestly utter nonsense. If such a substance existed, any danger would attach to its continued possession, and would be obviated by its public revelation under TV lights and subsequent proof by independent analyses. At that point, the genie would be out of the bottle, the "whistleblower" vindicated and safe, with accolades and awards flowing in from across the globe. The purported alien-tech "gatekeepers" would be jumping off bridges. But that press conference and those lab analyses will never happen, because the Lazar-Knapp-Corbell "Element 115" sub-story is a gullibility test, which so many continue to flunk. Looking at you, Joe Rogan. But if you disagree, then it is not too late to take up the cry: Disclosure now! Free the alien isotope!
D. Dean Johnson18,422 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад
ENERGY SEC. GRANHOLM: "I HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE" OF UAP REVERSE-ENGINEERING Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) today (5-23-24) asked Energy Sec. Granholm about any current or past DoE role in "reverse engineering technologies recovered from UAP." Granholm: "I have no knowledge of that."
D. Dean Johnson28,314 просмотров • 2 лет назад
Больше нет контента для загрузки