MR.FANTASTIX's banner

MR.FANTASTIX

@DOCMAGA1 • 6,277 subscribers

If I repost you, it is an endorsement and I will not charge. Here to finally get MAGA to organize a political party. I AM (not) THE SMARTEST GUY IN THE ROOM

Shorts

🚨🚨CHARLIE KIRK CRIME SCENE PART 2 Candace Owens ELIZABETH LANE The Dan Merrell Interview: Yesterday, as many of you saw, I posted after interviewing several people involved in the crime scene cleanup. I learned the cleanup was treated as a biohazard, which explained why the University handled it the way they did. I shared receipts and questioned whether Dan Merrell had even been there. I was quickly corrected by Sup Citizen who provided proof that Dan was indeed on site. Dan is the contractor whose interview sparked many conspiracy theories about who ordered the cleanup and how quickly it was done. This led to a lot of speculation about the speed of the work. Today I had an extensive interview with him. I found Dan to be honest, sincere, and clearly devastated by Charlie Kirk’s murder. Before getting into the details, here’s some context: During our conversation, Dan said a few things that I realized could cause him problems. I interrupted and asked, “Dan, we are on the record here — would you like me to keep that off the record?” He immediately said yes, and I respected that. Those comments may have materially changed the tone of this interview even more. For those who doubt my integrity, I have had private conversations with Buckley Carlson and others. I’ve even received recordings I could have posted, but I deleted them when asked. I don’t burn sources. In the interview, I asked Dan point blank: Did the FBI or the Governor call you or contact you in any way? He replied: “No.” Do you have direct knowledge that the FBI or Governor called anyone involved at the scene? He again said: "No." Dan then told me: “My words are being twisted so badly. The shit I’m enduring — my wife and I — this is insane.” He expressed deep regret for getting involved and especially for an emotional video he made right after the assassination. “You’ve probably seen it. I wish I hadn’t. It was such an emotional time.” (I have never seen the video) He described the constant harassment he and his family have faced. When I asked about the person who claimed the FBI and Governor ordered the rushed cleanup, Dan said, “I think he was really trying to make himself look like a big shot. He was a strange guy… a few things he did, I don’t know why.” (I would later come to the same conclusion after more interviews) Dan confirmed he was only a small part of the cleanup. The job was minor — he wasn’t even sure how much they billed. When I told him I had the invoice (roughly $6k), he verified it was accurate. He was contacted on September 14 — four days after the assassination — via text from a University employee. None of the messages mentioned the FBI or Governor. (Dan read me the text messages aloud) I asked if the FBI took any soil as evidence. He said no. An uncle of one of the crew members hauled the biohazard soil to an approved disposal site. (Dan did not witness this personally he described a 550? as hauling away the soil, again, he could not state as fact) When I asked if FBI or investigators were present while he worked, he said, “I’m not sure. There were some guys up there — security — but I don’t know for sure.” Dan is very aware his name is now tied to the “exploding mic” theory and other conspiracies. He feels his words have been distorted and manipulated. He asked me directly if he came across as misleading in the Jimmy Rex podcast. I told him no — he never stated as fact that the Governor or FBI ordered a rushed cleanup. I proceeded to tell him that people seem to draw their own conclusions. We proceeded to talk about how his words were being portrayed with certain podcasters. On Candace Owens, Dan said: “Candace has a way of… putting out a theory, then changing… you know…” (He agreed when I said she avoids painting herself into a corner.) During our discussion, Dan advised that Most people in his area believe Tyler Robinson did it. Dan’s personal view: “I don’t think a .30-06 did that damage. I just don’t think it’s possible.” We had a detailed discussion about the wound and the exact area where Charlie fell. Dan confirmed Charlie was under a pop-up tent on the grass — not on a raised platform. The paving work was done just outside the main blood-soaked area. (some people thought Charlie was on stage/platform and therefore the blood-soaked scene was exaggerated) He expressed amazement that someone could get into that shooting position without being noticed. We agreed on this point. We both agreed that this shot was straight-on, and a genuine point of concern. (How was he NOT spotted?) We mulled the possibilities. (I would get an answer later) I asked Dan if anyone had reached out to him, any of the current investigators, podcasters, journalists to ask him anything since he has come back into the focus of the investigation again. He replied, "All of these idiots saying things, you are the FIRST person to actually call me to verify any of this." At this point, I expressed shock, surely someone would have reached out to him, I repeated my question, he said adamantly "no, nobody has reached out, you are the first and only, I regret the entire thing." "We were coming together as a community for Charlie; this has been hard." This interview made one thing clear to me: Charlie was killed on September 10. The FBI had the scene for approximately three full days and eight hours before releasing it. The University was closed through at least that Sunday. (Although it appears some people did get access) Dan strikes me as an honest, hard-working man. Nothing about his answers felt rehearsed. He should not be harassed, accused, or made fun of. I’ve attached a clip of the ground crew cleaning the area. I cannot make out the words in the video, but this video seems is claimed to have been taken while the University was closed. It is not the greatest quality, but it seems genuine. I will continue releasing more interviews with witnesses, UVU police, and additional crew members. Today was long and productive. But the important thing to take away--I would learn in an interview later, that the FBI/Governor making any calls is based on a single source, who when pressed, would not show any evidence. My UVU Campus Police interview was abruptly cut short. I will detail this soon. My fear is that it will feed into the conspiracy theorists more, but I have to report what I am told accurately. No matter where this goes, I’m here for it. I appreciate respectful discourse even from those who disagree. When I make opinion posts, they are pretty clear. But when I do interview posts, I stick to the facts. Dan and I agreed to talk again. Feel Free to drop any questions you may want asked, I will let you know with a reply.

🚨🚨CHARLIE KIRK CRIME SCENE PART 2 Candace Owens ELIZABETH LANE The Dan Merrell Interview: Yesterday, as many of you saw, I posted after interviewing several people involved in the crime scene cleanup. I learned the cleanup was treated as a biohazard, which explained why the University handled it the way they did. I shared receipts and questioned whether Dan Merrell had even been there. I was quickly corrected by Sup Citizen who provided proof that Dan was indeed on site. Dan is the contractor whose interview sparked many conspiracy theories about who ordered the cleanup and how quickly it was done. This led to a lot of speculation about the speed of the work. Today I had an extensive interview with him. I found Dan to be honest, sincere, and clearly devastated by Charlie Kirk’s murder. Before getting into the details, here’s some context: During our conversation, Dan said a few things that I realized could cause him problems. I interrupted and asked, “Dan, we are on the record here — would you like me to keep that off the record?” He immediately said yes, and I respected that. Those comments may have materially changed the tone of this interview even more. For those who doubt my integrity, I have had private conversations with Buckley Carlson and others. I’ve even received recordings I could have posted, but I deleted them when asked. I don’t burn sources. In the interview, I asked Dan point blank: Did the FBI or the Governor call you or contact you in any way? He replied: “No.” Do you have direct knowledge that the FBI or Governor called anyone involved at the scene? He again said: "No." Dan then told me: “My words are being twisted so badly. The shit I’m enduring — my wife and I — this is insane.” He expressed deep regret for getting involved and especially for an emotional video he made right after the assassination. “You’ve probably seen it. I wish I hadn’t. It was such an emotional time.” (I have never seen the video) He described the constant harassment he and his family have faced. When I asked about the person who claimed the FBI and Governor ordered the rushed cleanup, Dan said, “I think he was really trying to make himself look like a big shot. He was a strange guy… a few things he did, I don’t know why.” (I would later come to the same conclusion after more interviews) Dan confirmed he was only a small part of the cleanup. The job was minor — he wasn’t even sure how much they billed. When I told him I had the invoice (roughly $6k), he verified it was accurate. He was contacted on September 14 — four days after the assassination — via text from a University employee. None of the messages mentioned the FBI or Governor. (Dan read me the text messages aloud) I asked if the FBI took any soil as evidence. He said no. An uncle of one of the crew members hauled the biohazard soil to an approved disposal site. (Dan did not witness this personally he described a 550? as hauling away the soil, again, he could not state as fact) When I asked if FBI or investigators were present while he worked, he said, “I’m not sure. There were some guys up there — security — but I don’t know for sure.” Dan is very aware his name is now tied to the “exploding mic” theory and other conspiracies. He feels his words have been distorted and manipulated. He asked me directly if he came across as misleading in the Jimmy Rex podcast. I told him no — he never stated as fact that the Governor or FBI ordered a rushed cleanup. I proceeded to tell him that people seem to draw their own conclusions. We proceeded to talk about how his words were being portrayed with certain podcasters. On Candace Owens, Dan said: “Candace has a way of… putting out a theory, then changing… you know…” (He agreed when I said she avoids painting herself into a corner.) During our discussion, Dan advised that Most people in his area believe Tyler Robinson did it. Dan’s personal view: “I don’t think a .30-06 did that damage. I just don’t think it’s possible.” We had a detailed discussion about the wound and the exact area where Charlie fell. Dan confirmed Charlie was under a pop-up tent on the grass — not on a raised platform. The paving work was done just outside the main blood-soaked area. (some people thought Charlie was on stage/platform and therefore the blood-soaked scene was exaggerated) He expressed amazement that someone could get into that shooting position without being noticed. We agreed on this point. We both agreed that this shot was straight-on, and a genuine point of concern. (How was he NOT spotted?) We mulled the possibilities. (I would get an answer later) I asked Dan if anyone had reached out to him, any of the current investigators, podcasters, journalists to ask him anything since he has come back into the focus of the investigation again. He replied, "All of these idiots saying things, you are the FIRST person to actually call me to verify any of this." At this point, I expressed shock, surely someone would have reached out to him, I repeated my question, he said adamantly "no, nobody has reached out, you are the first and only, I regret the entire thing." "We were coming together as a community for Charlie; this has been hard." This interview made one thing clear to me: Charlie was killed on September 10. The FBI had the scene for approximately three full days and eight hours before releasing it. The University was closed through at least that Sunday. (Although it appears some people did get access) Dan strikes me as an honest, hard-working man. Nothing about his answers felt rehearsed. He should not be harassed, accused, or made fun of. I’ve attached a clip of the ground crew cleaning the area. I cannot make out the words in the video, but this video seems is claimed to have been taken while the University was closed. It is not the greatest quality, but it seems genuine. I will continue releasing more interviews with witnesses, UVU police, and additional crew members. Today was long and productive. But the important thing to take away--I would learn in an interview later, that the FBI/Governor making any calls is based on a single source, who when pressed, would not show any evidence. My UVU Campus Police interview was abruptly cut short. I will detail this soon. My fear is that it will feed into the conspiracy theorists more, but I have to report what I am told accurately. No matter where this goes, I’m here for it. I appreciate respectful discourse even from those who disagree. When I make opinion posts, they are pretty clear. But when I do interview posts, I stick to the facts. Dan and I agreed to talk again. Feel Free to drop any questions you may want asked, I will let you know with a reply.

31,752 次观看

I always find it interesting that people say "explosion" on Charlie when the further you get away from Charlie, the louder that gunshot sound is. To me, that gunshot sounds like you would expect it to sound if you were near it and it sounds like you would expect it to sound if you were a few hundred yards away. I understand how phone microphones work and compress, but NOT ONE PODSLOPPER has debunked the acoustic proof that this was a gunshot, NOT ONE. Until you debunk that, YOU HAVE NOTHING. In this comparison, I turned the VOLUME UP on the closer microphone, you can tell I did it, it is not scientific, but believe your eyes and ears. NO EXPLOSION ON CHARLIE. Candace Owens Baron Coleman

I always find it interesting that people say "explosion" on Charlie when the further you get away from Charlie, the louder that gunshot sound is. To me, that gunshot sounds like you would expect it to sound if you were near it and it sounds like you would expect it to sound if you were a few hundred yards away. I understand how phone microphones work and compress, but NOT ONE PODSLOPPER has debunked the acoustic proof that this was a gunshot, NOT ONE. Until you debunk that, YOU HAVE NOTHING. In this comparison, I turned the VOLUME UP on the closer microphone, you can tell I did it, it is not scientific, but believe your eyes and ears. NO EXPLOSION ON CHARLIE. Candace Owens Baron Coleman

10,709 次观看

Videos

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.ai•Sponsored•Livecam

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

Exclusive private shows

1.2k viewers online

Private Show

Join now for exclusive access

Free preview available • Premium content

GO BEARS!!! Hey Stew Peters Ana Escobar Candace Owens FUCK ALL THE WAY OFF. Andrew Wilson has just RUINED YOUR ENTIRE CAREERS you pieces of trash. DRIP DRIP MFERS. Your entire BULLSHIT JUST CRASHED and this is not even the beginning. Hey Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 Guess what? Your day is coming soon. LMFAO Oh, and the PIC METADATA, suck it all you conspiritards. You just got SOAKED. Hey Baron Coleman, was that heartbreaking video JACKIE KENNEDY ENOUGH FOR YOU, ASSHOLE??? Stew Peters go back to rap you piece of shit.

GO BEARS!!! Hey Stew Peters Ana Escobar Candace Owens FUCK ALL THE WAY OFF. Andrew Wilson has just RUINED YOUR ENTIRE CAREERS you pieces of trash. DRIP DRIP MFERS. Your entire BULLSHIT JUST CRASHED and this is not even the beginning. Hey Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 Guess what? Your day is coming soon. LMFAO Oh, and the PIC METADATA, suck it all you conspiritards. You just got SOAKED. Hey Baron Coleman, was that heartbreaking video JACKIE KENNEDY ENOUGH FOR YOU, ASSHOLE??? Stew Peters go back to rap you piece of shit.

337,754 次观看 • 6 天前

Here is the most explosive 9 minutes of Stream Since the Charlie Kirk assassination. This nine minutes DESTROYS Candace Owens Stew Peters Baron Coleman Ana Escobar credibility. This shows ALL. It shows the Kirk family settling down to watch the Bears Vs. Vikings on 9-8-25, it has the entire family even ERIKA KIRK with metadata. The fact this even came down to this is a testimony to all the DUMBASS people who are the sewer of society, drug dealing, cop impersonating, failed attorney with pedophile clients, LYING GRIFTING pieces of shit on the planet who just had to make a buck by lying. But they would not be possible without all the wine drinking SSRI taking women and beta males who do not have the moral courage to do what is right. Furthermore, the EXPLODING MIC--INTACT AND IN EVIDENCE, along with Charlie's clothes. I am surprised Andrew let that out of the bag, but, it's done. Furthermore, THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING YOU PRICKS. Get your attorneys ready MOTHER FUCKERS. Get the deportation papers for Liz Lane, time to kick the commies in the ASS. PAY CLOSE Attention to the final 2 seconds you dregs of society. YOUR FUCKED.

Here is the most explosive 9 minutes of Stream Since the Charlie Kirk assassination. This nine minutes DESTROYS Candace Owens Stew Peters Baron Coleman Ana Escobar credibility. This shows ALL. It shows the Kirk family settling down to watch the Bears Vs. Vikings on 9-8-25, it has the entire family even ERIKA KIRK with metadata. The fact this even came down to this is a testimony to all the DUMBASS people who are the sewer of society, drug dealing, cop impersonating, failed attorney with pedophile clients, LYING GRIFTING pieces of shit on the planet who just had to make a buck by lying. But they would not be possible without all the wine drinking SSRI taking women and beta males who do not have the moral courage to do what is right. Furthermore, the EXPLODING MIC--INTACT AND IN EVIDENCE, along with Charlie's clothes. I am surprised Andrew let that out of the bag, but, it's done. Furthermore, THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING YOU PRICKS. Get your attorneys ready MOTHER FUCKERS. Get the deportation papers for Liz Lane, time to kick the commies in the ASS. PAY CLOSE Attention to the final 2 seconds you dregs of society. YOUR FUCKED.

281,245 次观看 • 6 天前

UPDATE ON THE 7:17 PM MIDFIRST BANK COMMERCIAL: Candace Owens Stew Peters I found something significant. Great Corroboration Evidence for Andrew Wilson recording. I synchronized a recording of the Minnesota-area Vikings-Bears broadcast to the actual kickoff to the actual time of the Video shown on the DRIP Broadcast. It was all I could locate online at the moment. The 9-8-25 Game. The Monday Night Game in Question Kickoff occurs at 41:11 in the recording. According to the NFL the Kickoff of the game was at 5:17 Phoenix Time. So, at 41:11 kickoff occurs. Per the NFL the game Kicked off at 5:16:57 but close enough to 5:17 Exactly two hours later - 2:41:11, corresponding to approximately 7:17 PM Phoenix time - the Minnesota feed is in a LOCAL COMMERCIAL BREAK, and a local financial/banking advertisement is airing. This establishes something important: the claimed 7:17 PM timelines is synced up with an actual local-ad window in other markets, rather than in- game action- Furthermore, they usually reserve those ad breaks in local for the same type of ad category, thus, having a financial vehicle in Minnesota area would correspond to a financial vehicle in the Phoenix area. The chances of that being ANY OTHER GAME in any other year to synchronize is astronomical and BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. Since you do not believe the METADATA this CANNOT BE FAKED. At 7:17 Phoenix Time, the game was in the 3rd quarter on a local commercial break and a financial vehicle break. This corresponds to the TIME/DATE and What was being shown the Erika Kirk Video. RECEIPTS ATTACHED: LEFT SIDE OF SCREEN IS The Actual kickoff. The game was supposed to kick off at 5:20 but kicked off slightly earlier 5:17 This evidence ALONE is significant and backs the video. Also, this entire game link is ONLINE, feel free to check my work. But this is POWERFUL evidence that the video in question is real, authentic and the Metadata was not faked. So, for the cult who thought they had something, Sorry, NO SOUP FOR YOU. Also, the ACTUAL KICK-OFF was slightly after 5:17 Phoenix Time when the ball was kicked per the VIDEO.

UPDATE ON THE 7:17 PM MIDFIRST BANK COMMERCIAL: Candace Owens Stew Peters I found something significant. Great Corroboration Evidence for Andrew Wilson recording. I synchronized a recording of the Minnesota-area Vikings-Bears broadcast to the actual kickoff to the actual time of the Video shown on the DRIP Broadcast. It was all I could locate online at the moment. The 9-8-25 Game. The Monday Night Game in Question Kickoff occurs at 41:11 in the recording. According to the NFL the Kickoff of the game was at 5:17 Phoenix Time. So, at 41:11 kickoff occurs. Per the NFL the game Kicked off at 5:16:57 but close enough to 5:17 Exactly two hours later - 2:41:11, corresponding to approximately 7:17 PM Phoenix time - the Minnesota feed is in a LOCAL COMMERCIAL BREAK, and a local financial/banking advertisement is airing. This establishes something important: the claimed 7:17 PM timelines is synced up with an actual local-ad window in other markets, rather than in- game action- Furthermore, they usually reserve those ad breaks in local for the same type of ad category, thus, having a financial vehicle in Minnesota area would correspond to a financial vehicle in the Phoenix area. The chances of that being ANY OTHER GAME in any other year to synchronize is astronomical and BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. Since you do not believe the METADATA this CANNOT BE FAKED. At 7:17 Phoenix Time, the game was in the 3rd quarter on a local commercial break and a financial vehicle break. This corresponds to the TIME/DATE and What was being shown the Erika Kirk Video. RECEIPTS ATTACHED: LEFT SIDE OF SCREEN IS The Actual kickoff. The game was supposed to kick off at 5:20 but kicked off slightly earlier 5:17 This evidence ALONE is significant and backs the video. Also, this entire game link is ONLINE, feel free to check my work. But this is POWERFUL evidence that the video in question is real, authentic and the Metadata was not faked. So, for the cult who thought they had something, Sorry, NO SOUP FOR YOU. Also, the ACTUAL KICK-OFF was slightly after 5:17 Phoenix Time when the ball was kicked per the VIDEO.

74,381 次观看 • 4 天前

FACT: Charlie Kirk NEVER ONCE REFERRED TO HIS KIDS as having a nanny or a babysitter. Candace Owens is the biggest liar on the planet. If you low iq tards do not give it up at this point, you are just plain evil. No Christ is King, nothing. YOU ARE EVIL. You are pathetic, damaged, evil people who deserve ALL THE WORST this life has to offer. The fact this lying, evil witch is now trying to say she HAD THIS ON HER TIMELINE is so pathetic, so outrageous it is incredible. Yet, low iq people and Russian bot farms and the Carlson brothers will still support this wretched human being.

FACT: Charlie Kirk NEVER ONCE REFERRED TO HIS KIDS as having a nanny or a babysitter. Candace Owens is the biggest liar on the planet. If you low iq tards do not give it up at this point, you are just plain evil. No Christ is King, nothing. YOU ARE EVIL. You are pathetic, damaged, evil people who deserve ALL THE WORST this life has to offer. The fact this lying, evil witch is now trying to say she HAD THIS ON HER TIMELINE is so pathetic, so outrageous it is incredible. Yet, low iq people and Russian bot farms and the Carlson brothers will still support this wretched human being.

97,666 次观看 • 6 天前

Well, Well well, what do you know, Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 doing it again. Editing CLIPS to make something seem like it completely is not. On his page he just put this video, implying Blake made a mistake that made Charlie walk off the set in disgust. But what really happened? What did this absolutely DISGUSTING HUMAN BEING do in this clip? You guessed it, he edited the clip to give it a completely different perspective. In my video below, you will see the REAL SITUATION, Charlie was not UPSET at Blake, he was using the BATHROOM. He even said it. Diligent wanted you to think he walked off the set upset at Blake. He is SUCH A POS. Diligent is the biggest FRAUD on the planet. This METH-DRUG DEALER is a despicable human being. He wants people to think Charlie walked off in Disgust. NOT WHAT HAPPENED AT ALL, the REAL VIDEO IS BELOW. What a piece of shit. Diligent DUMBASS DEBUNKED AGAIN. Charlie TOOK 4 BATHROOM Breaks during this event, NOT ONCE DID HE STORM OFF IN DISGUST.

Well, Well well, what do you know, Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 doing it again. Editing CLIPS to make something seem like it completely is not. On his page he just put this video, implying Blake made a mistake that made Charlie walk off the set in disgust. But what really happened? What did this absolutely DISGUSTING HUMAN BEING do in this clip? You guessed it, he edited the clip to give it a completely different perspective. In my video below, you will see the REAL SITUATION, Charlie was not UPSET at Blake, he was using the BATHROOM. He even said it. Diligent wanted you to think he walked off the set upset at Blake. He is SUCH A POS. Diligent is the biggest FRAUD on the planet. This METH-DRUG DEALER is a despicable human being. He wants people to think Charlie walked off in Disgust. NOT WHAT HAPPENED AT ALL, the REAL VIDEO IS BELOW. What a piece of shit. Diligent DUMBASS DEBUNKED AGAIN. Charlie TOOK 4 BATHROOM Breaks during this event, NOT ONCE DID HE STORM OFF IN DISGUST.

13,830 次观看 • 2 天前

😆😆😆Anybody have some LOZENGERS? Lozengers anyone? Lozenges Candace, dumbass. Her Sherlock Holmes skills of deductive reasoning had her gather that Charlie may have had a sore throat. The bigger questions is, if she was such a GREAT FRIEND, why didn't she know Charlie took these all the time? She is such a moron. Candace Owens

😆😆😆Anybody have some LOZENGERS? Lozengers anyone? Lozenges Candace, dumbass. Her Sherlock Holmes skills of deductive reasoning had her gather that Charlie may have had a sore throat. The bigger questions is, if she was such a GREAT FRIEND, why didn't she know Charlie took these all the time? She is such a moron. Candace Owens

48,062 次观看 • 25 天前

Thanks Candace Owens for releasing the Aspen video after all your minions called it AI. First, I zoom in and you can plainly see, Charlie's mole is almost impossible to see, Second, the SHAKING water EARTHQUAKE grift is over. I zoomed in on that as well. Simple physics. So now, when you post the entire video and edit out the question to Charlie on who is in charge, people will know you claimed to have sat on it for 7 months, which is a lie. But hey, Candace Wars 3, Return of the Grift.

Thanks Candace Owens for releasing the Aspen video after all your minions called it AI. First, I zoom in and you can plainly see, Charlie's mole is almost impossible to see, Second, the SHAKING water EARTHQUAKE grift is over. I zoomed in on that as well. Simple physics. So now, when you post the entire video and edit out the question to Charlie on who is in charge, people will know you claimed to have sat on it for 7 months, which is a lie. But hey, Candace Wars 3, Return of the Grift.

122,321 次观看 • 3 个月前

Dumbass Diligent gets caught in another lie, editing clips, let's play this out...............shall we........... Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 you are a manipulating liar. Oh, and I have so much more coming bro. So much more. Hit it...........

Dumbass Diligent gets caught in another lie, editing clips, let's play this out...............shall we........... Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 you are a manipulating liar. Oh, and I have so much more coming bro. So much more. Hit it...........

19,539 次观看 • 24 天前

Interesting day for the podsloppers. It appears Candace Owens has STIFFED Mitch Snow out of the promised money and fundraising that she did for him. If you recall, I had done a post saying I had information saying he had been promised money to come on her show and make those accusations that he had made. But Candace stiffed him? SHOCKER. In return, Mitch Snow is now claiming ELIZABETH LANE is in fact a nefarious operator. SHOCKER. But while this was going on today, the podsloppers wanted to keep you distracted from a lie regarding 92 people who were doxxing Queen Dipshit. But here is @shadyladykady AFTER she left the group stating this NEVER happened. SHOCKER. Perhaps they were trying to distract from this unearthed video by Dolla Store Dave where it certainly appears VALHALLA was going to EXPOSE the podsloppers for something--he was upset that Candace was giving Mitch Snow a fundraiser--I wonder if my source saying he was promised MONEY from Candace to say those things was in fact true? I had offered Mitch Snow and interview and he declined. I posted about that. I also saw a fascinating video absolutely CRUSHING Baron Coleman funeral timeline bullshit. SHOCKER that video is attached. Isn't it interesting these people can NEVER get actual experts to back ANYTHING they say? Remember, Baron Coleman is the guy who was a confidential informant and orchestrated a WHISPER CAMPAIGN to taint a jury. So, we have a pizza delivery boy Nazi, a narcissist, a Russian operative and an unethical attorney and their bullshit is falling apart? SHOCKER. I thought it was going to be a BAD WEEK for the people who believe Tyler actually did it? It certainly sounds like Valhalla is threatening to expose something about Candace in this video--- Oh, and I forgot, I have actually interviewed REAL Neurosurgeons and Medical Examiners and Guess what? I will actually release their names, that report is coming next week and SHOCKER Baron Coleman is full of shit, again. ENJOY THE DEBUNKING AND THE INFIGHTING....................🤣🤣🤣 When Truth is on your side, it is so much easier to get along.

Interesting day for the podsloppers. It appears Candace Owens has STIFFED Mitch Snow out of the promised money and fundraising that she did for him. If you recall, I had done a post saying I had information saying he had been promised money to come on her show and make those accusations that he had made. But Candace stiffed him? SHOCKER. In return, Mitch Snow is now claiming ELIZABETH LANE is in fact a nefarious operator. SHOCKER. But while this was going on today, the podsloppers wanted to keep you distracted from a lie regarding 92 people who were doxxing Queen Dipshit. But here is @shadyladykady AFTER she left the group stating this NEVER happened. SHOCKER. Perhaps they were trying to distract from this unearthed video by Dolla Store Dave where it certainly appears VALHALLA was going to EXPOSE the podsloppers for something--he was upset that Candace was giving Mitch Snow a fundraiser--I wonder if my source saying he was promised MONEY from Candace to say those things was in fact true? I had offered Mitch Snow and interview and he declined. I posted about that. I also saw a fascinating video absolutely CRUSHING Baron Coleman funeral timeline bullshit. SHOCKER that video is attached. Isn't it interesting these people can NEVER get actual experts to back ANYTHING they say? Remember, Baron Coleman is the guy who was a confidential informant and orchestrated a WHISPER CAMPAIGN to taint a jury. So, we have a pizza delivery boy Nazi, a narcissist, a Russian operative and an unethical attorney and their bullshit is falling apart? SHOCKER. I thought it was going to be a BAD WEEK for the people who believe Tyler actually did it? It certainly sounds like Valhalla is threatening to expose something about Candace in this video--- Oh, and I forgot, I have actually interviewed REAL Neurosurgeons and Medical Examiners and Guess what? I will actually release their names, that report is coming next week and SHOCKER Baron Coleman is full of shit, again. ENJOY THE DEBUNKING AND THE INFIGHTING....................🤣🤣🤣 When Truth is on your side, it is so much easier to get along.

33,015 次观看 • 1 个月前

Maybe it is time someone starts digging into every single detail of Candace Owens life. I mean, just as ruthless, vile and mean as what has been done to Erica Kirk. For Instance, misuse of Adderall is a gateway drug to cocaine. Camndace Owens has openly talked about abusing Adderall. That is gateway drug to Cocaine. Her behavior these days could be the result of an acute cocaine problem. Listen to long term effects: People may: Rub or wipe their nose repeatedly. Sniff frequently. Have a runny nose without a cold. Paranoia A person may believe: Others are watching or following them. (French Berets, Cartel just to name a few) People are conspiring against them. 🤣🤣🤣 Friends or family are lying to or plotting against them.🤣🤣 Innocent events have hidden meanings directed at them.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 In severe cases, cocaine-induced psychosis can involve hallucinations and fixed delusions. Tell me this does not describe Candace Owens? She talks about popping Xanax, which is a common drug used to come down from Cocaine and allow people to function normally. Mixing Cocaine and Xanax will also cause blackouts.............I know she has talked about having blackouts. Paranoia, itching, sense of persecution, watch the video below, there is NO dispute she has written and talked about abusing drugs. NONE, especially the gateway drugs to Cocaine. But this video has many, many signs of possible drug abuse. If this was Erica Kirk, can you IMAGINE what they would do with this information? It is my OPINION that Candace Owens projects her inadequacies on Erica Kirk. Maybe it is time for someone to really get into her life, turn it upside down and take every single detail and turn it into a podcast, internet post and other social media highlights. Or perhaps her fans should step in and help her, Hitler also seduced the masses while having serious drug problem. The parallels between her and Hitler are scary actually. Candace, maybe it is time you reach out for help. Mybe your new bestie Hunter Biden would be willing to intervene? FEAR THE DRUGGO!!!! I hope for the sake of your baby, that this is not true. But the only person who will get me to stop asking questions about this is you, Candace Owens. Your late night X meltdowns, the paranoia, the strange behavior, perhaps it all makes sense now. Please don't be mad, I am just asking questions.

Maybe it is time someone starts digging into every single detail of Candace Owens life. I mean, just as ruthless, vile and mean as what has been done to Erica Kirk. For Instance, misuse of Adderall is a gateway drug to cocaine. Camndace Owens has openly talked about abusing Adderall. That is gateway drug to Cocaine. Her behavior these days could be the result of an acute cocaine problem. Listen to long term effects: People may: Rub or wipe their nose repeatedly. Sniff frequently. Have a runny nose without a cold. Paranoia A person may believe: Others are watching or following them. (French Berets, Cartel just to name a few) People are conspiring against them. 🤣🤣🤣 Friends or family are lying to or plotting against them.🤣🤣 Innocent events have hidden meanings directed at them.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 In severe cases, cocaine-induced psychosis can involve hallucinations and fixed delusions. Tell me this does not describe Candace Owens? She talks about popping Xanax, which is a common drug used to come down from Cocaine and allow people to function normally. Mixing Cocaine and Xanax will also cause blackouts.............I know she has talked about having blackouts. Paranoia, itching, sense of persecution, watch the video below, there is NO dispute she has written and talked about abusing drugs. NONE, especially the gateway drugs to Cocaine. But this video has many, many signs of possible drug abuse. If this was Erica Kirk, can you IMAGINE what they would do with this information? It is my OPINION that Candace Owens projects her inadequacies on Erica Kirk. Maybe it is time for someone to really get into her life, turn it upside down and take every single detail and turn it into a podcast, internet post and other social media highlights. Or perhaps her fans should step in and help her, Hitler also seduced the masses while having serious drug problem. The parallels between her and Hitler are scary actually. Candace, maybe it is time you reach out for help. Mybe your new bestie Hunter Biden would be willing to intervene? FEAR THE DRUGGO!!!! I hope for the sake of your baby, that this is not true. But the only person who will get me to stop asking questions about this is you, Candace Owens. Your late night X meltdowns, the paranoia, the strange behavior, perhaps it all makes sense now. Please don't be mad, I am just asking questions.

40,959 次观看 • 2 个月前

Imagine my surprise when I wake up and I see Candace Owens Cult saying either Andrew Wilson or Erica Kirk had to be lying about the message from Charlie on 9-9-25 that the left was going to kill him, Imagine how unsurprised I was to learn that of course, they were LYING again. Do you people ever stop lying? I'd like to remind you, on 9-6-25 I put out a warning tweet that online rhetoric from domestic groups had intelligence services worried that trouble was brewing within days or weeks. The bottom line is your bullshit this morning about Erica Kirk is yet another lie.

Imagine my surprise when I wake up and I see Candace Owens Cult saying either Andrew Wilson or Erica Kirk had to be lying about the message from Charlie on 9-9-25 that the left was going to kill him, Imagine how unsurprised I was to learn that of course, they were LYING again. Do you people ever stop lying? I'd like to remind you, on 9-6-25 I put out a warning tweet that online rhetoric from domestic groups had intelligence services worried that trouble was brewing within days or weeks. The bottom line is your bullshit this morning about Erica Kirk is yet another lie.

23,436 次观看 • 1 个月前

In case you missed it, as it turns out, TPUSA deliberately sent out that video to troll the trolls. They knew Candace Owens Ian Carroll and all the minions would do exactly what they did. Candace knows the statement was made and never dropped that vide. EPIC. Well done Turning Point USA

In case you missed it, as it turns out, TPUSA deliberately sent out that video to troll the trolls. They knew Candace Owens Ian Carroll and all the minions would do exactly what they did. Candace knows the statement was made and never dropped that vide. EPIC. Well done Turning Point USA

46,079 次观看 • 3 个月前

One of my favorite clips to show what monsters these people are. Baron Coleman suggesting Charlie Kirk may have been in involved in HIS OWN ASSASSINATION. Plan gone awry, he is suggesting it was possible that they were staging an assassination attempt to elevate Charlie's profile and it went bad. I don't care who you are, this should disgust you. I especially love Brandi and Billi giving possible affirmation to this beyond idiotic theory with their facial expressions. How anyone can give him any credibility is beyond me. Take an event, blame the Jews and watch the cash roll. I am glad that Thomas Massie and Tucker Qatarlson are forming a new party--The Woke REICH is a good name. Yeee Haw!! Intellectually honest my ass.

25,742 次观看 • 1 个月前

So, I have been watching the video for hours. I am pretty sure I see a gun, I see him doing something in the area of the screwdriver was found and I see a recoil, but first, let's break it down, this first video, I think it is clear he is running with a gun, this looks like the barrel to me. Excuse my poor editing, I was trying to give you an area to look at to see the barrel--inevitably, a cultist will take a still from this video where I prematurely circled the area so you know what area to look, and they will claim "NO GUN" you watch. Anyway, I do not care, first part is proving a gun was on that roof and I clearly see it, do you?

So, I have been watching the video for hours. I am pretty sure I see a gun, I see him doing something in the area of the screwdriver was found and I see a recoil, but first, let's break it down, this first video, I think it is clear he is running with a gun, this looks like the barrel to me. Excuse my poor editing, I was trying to give you an area to look at to see the barrel--inevitably, a cultist will take a still from this video where I prematurely circled the area so you know what area to look, and they will claim "NO GUN" you watch. Anyway, I do not care, first part is proving a gun was on that roof and I clearly see it, do you?

24,969 次观看 • 2 个月前

Hi Candace Owens you said on your page this video proves that Tyler Robinson never assembled a gun. But here is my big question: Why does this video cut out at 12:17:17 to 12:22? Wouldn't be because something was happening in that time frame, would it? Clearly edited out time on this video. Also, quite lying to people when you know the video showing Tyler going all over campus and crystal-clear footage of his face on the stairs exist. Yeah, you are right Candace, Charlie's killer is going to be caught, Interesting though, a scorned jealous obsessive psycho has always been motive, where were you that day?

Hi Candace Owens you said on your page this video proves that Tyler Robinson never assembled a gun. But here is my big question: Why does this video cut out at 12:17:17 to 12:22? Wouldn't be because something was happening in that time frame, would it? Clearly edited out time on this video. Also, quite lying to people when you know the video showing Tyler going all over campus and crystal-clear footage of his face on the stairs exist. Yeah, you are right Candace, Charlie's killer is going to be caught, Interesting though, a scorned jealous obsessive psycho has always been motive, where were you that day?

23,997 次观看 • 1 个月前

Yesterday, Owen Benjamin 🐻 hopped on one of my threads rushing to the defense of his new buddies Baron Coleman and Candace Owens now he has 100x the followers I do, so I have no doubt he can ratio me. However, he is another one of these "Justice for Charlie" investigators, so I thought I would see what this dude is like. He came on my thread saying we could not rule out SUICIDE by Charlie because he has "listened" to Erica Kirk. The implication obvious. Imagine my surprise when I received a video of him calling Candace a narcissist who married George Farmer for money. Shocker. Imagine my surprise when I found him saying George Farmer was gay and taking "VOWS TO COCKS" and insinuated he was having sex with the Tate brothers, another SHOCKER. Imagine my surprise when I found out he hated Charlie Kirk, absolutely despised him. SHOCKER. He accused Charlie of being gay and a drug abuser. So, why is he so interested in this case? I wonder. another SHOCKER. So, then I remembered this was the dude who did that dumbass video of the gun in the pants saying he was 6'8 blah blah blah. But at the end, priceless, he was tagging Candace, Baron and others for the "Please look at me" I am on your side now🤣🤣 But the more I read about Owen, the more impressed I got. He is very special person. God showed us his divine power. In fact, I am truly impressed and amazed at Owen, we all should be. God never ceases to amaze me. Owen is the 8th wonder of the world, and I am so thankful and Owen affirms my faith. I never thought I would see an 80-inch walking, talking pile of SHIT. Thank you, God, for showing your infinite power and humor when you made Owen.

Yesterday, Owen Benjamin 🐻 hopped on one of my threads rushing to the defense of his new buddies Baron Coleman and Candace Owens now he has 100x the followers I do, so I have no doubt he can ratio me. However, he is another one of these "Justice for Charlie" investigators, so I thought I would see what this dude is like. He came on my thread saying we could not rule out SUICIDE by Charlie because he has "listened" to Erica Kirk. The implication obvious. Imagine my surprise when I received a video of him calling Candace a narcissist who married George Farmer for money. Shocker. Imagine my surprise when I found him saying George Farmer was gay and taking "VOWS TO COCKS" and insinuated he was having sex with the Tate brothers, another SHOCKER. Imagine my surprise when I found out he hated Charlie Kirk, absolutely despised him. SHOCKER. He accused Charlie of being gay and a drug abuser. So, why is he so interested in this case? I wonder. another SHOCKER. So, then I remembered this was the dude who did that dumbass video of the gun in the pants saying he was 6'8 blah blah blah. But at the end, priceless, he was tagging Candace, Baron and others for the "Please look at me" I am on your side now🤣🤣 But the more I read about Owen, the more impressed I got. He is very special person. God showed us his divine power. In fact, I am truly impressed and amazed at Owen, we all should be. God never ceases to amaze me. Owen is the 8th wonder of the world, and I am so thankful and Owen affirms my faith. I never thought I would see an 80-inch walking, talking pile of SHIT. Thank you, God, for showing your infinite power and humor when you made Owen.

20,058 次观看 • 1 个月前

This is exactly how the playbook works, thank you Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 for doing exactly the thing we always knew you did. Yesterday, Andrew had called Ralph and at first, because of the crazies that follow the Candace cult and the FACT that @DiligentDenize secretly recorded the owner and in fact did manipulate the interview, understandably Ralph was hesitant to go on the record with ANYONE. So when Andrew called him, Ralph did not want to go on the record based on what happened last time. I told him Andrew could absolutely be trusted and would not manipulate, edit or mislead. So what do these people do? They leave out the important part of the video DOING EXACTLY WHAT THE INTERVIEW WAS ABOUT, how they manipulate, mislead and take out of context. I guess this was not the GOTCHA y'all think it was. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

This is exactly how the playbook works, thank you Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 for doing exactly the thing we always knew you did. Yesterday, Andrew had called Ralph and at first, because of the crazies that follow the Candace cult and the FACT that @DiligentDenize secretly recorded the owner and in fact did manipulate the interview, understandably Ralph was hesitant to go on the record with ANYONE. So when Andrew called him, Ralph did not want to go on the record based on what happened last time. I told him Andrew could absolutely be trusted and would not manipulate, edit or mislead. So what do these people do? They leave out the important part of the video DOING EXACTLY WHAT THE INTERVIEW WAS ABOUT, how they manipulate, mislead and take out of context. I guess this was not the GOTCHA y'all think it was. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

12,204 次观看 • 1 个月前

Yesterday, TPUSA dropped a bombshell: according to the organization, Candace Owens threatened to “burn down” TPUSA. That disclosure allows me to finally discuss something I was working on MONTHS AGO-something I deliberately refused to publish because, despite having an extremely credible source, I could not independently corroborate it. And that distinction matters. I don't publish an allegation simply because it fits a narrative I like. I could not publish, despite that I believe this, I could not get any corroboration. If I published 1/10 of what I get, I would be breaking new ridiculous stories every single day, like other grifters on this app. But my stories hold because I make sure they hold, I do the work. I want to be clear, I am not presenting this story as fact, but after the bombshell released yesterday, I think people are entitled to know some of the things I have learned about Candace Owens. Months ago, one source I consider exceptionally reliable told me that Candace Owens wanted to return to TPUSA --potentially as CEO or in another senior position that would give her substantial influence or control within the organization. I took the allegation seriously enough to investigate it. I sent the attached message to several people who had contacts or sources inside TPUSA, asking them to corroborate what I had been told. I cannot emphasize enough the credibility of the source. However, I could not get any corroboration, so I did not and could not publish, that is not how I work. That's what you're supposed to do when you actually give a damn about getting a story right. My source was not anonymous, and the source would have been in a position to know what the source claimed. But yesterday's revelation changes the evidentiary landscape. It does NOT independently prove every detail my source gave me. I'm not going to pretend it does. But it provides enough independent context that the information I received months ago deserves to be disclosed and scrutinized. And here's the rest of what my source alleged: I was told that Candace wanted back into TPUSA leadership and that when it became apparent Erika Kirk was NOT going to bring her back-and instead intended to distance herself and the organization from Owens-the relationship deteriorated dramatically. Look at the timeline. In the beginning, Candace was publicly supportive of Erika and TPUSA. She accepted that Tyler Robinson was the killer. There wasn't some sprawling conspiracy involving TPUSA. There wasn't a campaign portraying the organization and people surrounding Charlie as suspicious characters in their own friend's murder. Candace even said Erica gave on of the most consequential speeches in American History. Then something changed. According to my source, the rejection came first. The war came afterward. My source's allegation was that once Owens realized there would be no triumphant return to TPUSA and no position of influence waiting for her, she turned against the organization. Now TPUSA itself alleges that Owens threatened to “burn down” the organization. That does not automatically prove my source's entire account. But it sure as hell makes the information I was given months ago considerably more relevant. And there is another important piece of evidence here: my contemporaneous messages. I didn't manufacture this source story yesterday after TPUSA made its allegation. I was privately attempting to corroborate it MONTHS AGO. The messages exist. They establish that this information was in my possession long before yesterday's disclosure. This is why I am releasing them now. People can examine the timeline and evidence and draw their own conclusions. But here's the difference between investigation and grifting: I had a story that would have generated enormous attention months ago, and I SAT ON IT because I couldn't corroborate it. I didn't turn one source into three. I didn't turn suspicion into evidence. I didn't turn an allegation into a fact. I kept digging. Now an organization directly involved in this dispute has publicly made an allegation that materially overlaps with the behavior my source described months ago. That doesn't close the case. It means the story I refused to publish is now a story worth examining. And on top of the other stories I am working on, I intend on pursuing this, HARDER.

Yesterday, TPUSA dropped a bombshell: according to the organization, Candace Owens threatened to “burn down” TPUSA. That disclosure allows me to finally discuss something I was working on MONTHS AGO-something I deliberately refused to publish because, despite having an extremely credible source, I could not independently corroborate it. And that distinction matters. I don't publish an allegation simply because it fits a narrative I like. I could not publish, despite that I believe this, I could not get any corroboration. If I published 1/10 of what I get, I would be breaking new ridiculous stories every single day, like other grifters on this app. But my stories hold because I make sure they hold, I do the work. I want to be clear, I am not presenting this story as fact, but after the bombshell released yesterday, I think people are entitled to know some of the things I have learned about Candace Owens. Months ago, one source I consider exceptionally reliable told me that Candace Owens wanted to return to TPUSA --potentially as CEO or in another senior position that would give her substantial influence or control within the organization. I took the allegation seriously enough to investigate it. I sent the attached message to several people who had contacts or sources inside TPUSA, asking them to corroborate what I had been told. I cannot emphasize enough the credibility of the source. However, I could not get any corroboration, so I did not and could not publish, that is not how I work. That's what you're supposed to do when you actually give a damn about getting a story right. My source was not anonymous, and the source would have been in a position to know what the source claimed. But yesterday's revelation changes the evidentiary landscape. It does NOT independently prove every detail my source gave me. I'm not going to pretend it does. But it provides enough independent context that the information I received months ago deserves to be disclosed and scrutinized. And here's the rest of what my source alleged: I was told that Candace wanted back into TPUSA leadership and that when it became apparent Erika Kirk was NOT going to bring her back-and instead intended to distance herself and the organization from Owens-the relationship deteriorated dramatically. Look at the timeline. In the beginning, Candace was publicly supportive of Erika and TPUSA. She accepted that Tyler Robinson was the killer. There wasn't some sprawling conspiracy involving TPUSA. There wasn't a campaign portraying the organization and people surrounding Charlie as suspicious characters in their own friend's murder. Candace even said Erica gave on of the most consequential speeches in American History. Then something changed. According to my source, the rejection came first. The war came afterward. My source's allegation was that once Owens realized there would be no triumphant return to TPUSA and no position of influence waiting for her, she turned against the organization. Now TPUSA itself alleges that Owens threatened to “burn down” the organization. That does not automatically prove my source's entire account. But it sure as hell makes the information I was given months ago considerably more relevant. And there is another important piece of evidence here: my contemporaneous messages. I didn't manufacture this source story yesterday after TPUSA made its allegation. I was privately attempting to corroborate it MONTHS AGO. The messages exist. They establish that this information was in my possession long before yesterday's disclosure. This is why I am releasing them now. People can examine the timeline and evidence and draw their own conclusions. But here's the difference between investigation and grifting: I had a story that would have generated enormous attention months ago, and I SAT ON IT because I couldn't corroborate it. I didn't turn one source into three. I didn't turn suspicion into evidence. I didn't turn an allegation into a fact. I kept digging. Now an organization directly involved in this dispute has publicly made an allegation that materially overlaps with the behavior my source described months ago. That doesn't close the case. It means the story I refused to publish is now a story worth examining. And on top of the other stories I am working on, I intend on pursuing this, HARDER.

14,560 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨🚨🚨ANOTHER HUGE LIE FROM CANDACE OWENS..........WHOA! This one is a whopper Candace Owens Has ZERO COLLEGE DEGREES. But yet, here she is telling her fans that she has TWO DEGREES--LMFAO talk about Projection. You people are pathetic, you simp for this woman all day long and she gets caught in a million lies. Here is another one, for the record, Candace Owens FLUNKED OUT. Sallie Mae did not tell her she could not go back, already approved loans were HIGHLY unlikely to get pulled back, however, people who FLUNKED OUT, their loans were not reinstated if they tried to go back. She has zero degrees, once again Queen of the Grift caught in another lie. Her jealousy of Erica Kirk is unwavering.

🚨🚨🚨ANOTHER HUGE LIE FROM CANDACE OWENS..........WHOA! This one is a whopper Candace Owens Has ZERO COLLEGE DEGREES. But yet, here she is telling her fans that she has TWO DEGREES--LMFAO talk about Projection. You people are pathetic, you simp for this woman all day long and she gets caught in a million lies. Here is another one, for the record, Candace Owens FLUNKED OUT. Sallie Mae did not tell her she could not go back, already approved loans were HIGHLY unlikely to get pulled back, however, people who FLUNKED OUT, their loans were not reinstated if they tried to go back. She has zero degrees, once again Queen of the Grift caught in another lie. Her jealousy of Erica Kirk is unwavering.

27,641 次观看 • 3 个月前

Here is a video of Police searching near the area where they found the gun, what do you notice? NO DOGS............This was roughly 30-45 minutes after the shooting. This corroborates what I had reported weeks ago regarding the dogs.

Here is a video of Police searching near the area where they found the gun, what do you notice? NO DOGS............This was roughly 30-45 minutes after the shooting. This corroborates what I had reported weeks ago regarding the dogs.

18,452 次观看 • 2 个月前