Echoes of Kim Soo Hyun_CN
@EchoesOfKSH_CN • 1,199 subscribers
From China, with unwavering love. Always with Kim Soo Hyun❤️
Shorts
Videos
![[Video] 20251217 | YouTube Lawyer’s Analysis Video - Translation “Kim Sae-ron Recording Deemed ‘Inconclusive’ by the National Forensic Service — Does It Have Legal Evidentiary Value?” Hello, this is Attorney Jo Gi-hyun, representative of Daehan Jungang. Regarding the audio recording released by Kim Se-ui of Garosero, which has been presented as evidence to support the claim that Kim Soo-hyun engaged in inappropriate relations with Kim Sae-ron, the National Forensic Service (NFS) has concluded that it is “impossible to determine” whether the recording was manipulated. If this recording is classified as “inconclusive,” how should the legal disputes surrounding Kim Soo-hyun be addressed, and how are they likely to be handled? This recording attempts to prove that there was an inappropriate relationship between Kim Soo-hyun and the late Kim Sae-ron. However, if it is not even possible to determine whether the recording is authentic or fabricated, then the recording itself inherently suffers from a failure to function properly as evidence. From a legal structural standpoint, this means that it is not Kim Soo-hyun who must prove his innocence, but rather the party attacking him must prove the existence of immoral conduct. Under these circumstances, the National Forensic Service’s conclusion of “inconclusive” actually places Kim Soo-hyun in a more favorable legal position. Let us examine this more specifically. Kim Soo-hyun has filed a criminal complaint against Kim Se-ui on the grounds of defamation through the dissemination of false information. In response, Kim Se-ui’s side asserts that Kim Soo-hyun and Kim Sae-ron had an inappropriate relationship and has submitted this audio recording as evidence. In other words, Kim Se-ui’s position is as follows: Even if the formal elements of defamation are satisfied, the content he disclosed is not false, and its disclosure was necessary in the public interest because it reflects the truth. From Kim Soo-hyun’s perspective, since the National Forensic Service did not definitively conclude that the recording was manipulated, there may, on a formal level, remain some degree of uncertainty as to whether Kim Se-ui was spreading false information or stating the truth. However, the fundamental issue is this: The party who initiated the attack is Kim Se-ui, and the core of his allegation is that Kim Soo-hyun engaged in immoral and improper conduct. The central piece of evidence supporting this allegation is precisely this audio recording. Yet now, even the authenticity of this crucial evidence cannot be determined. This means that the content asserted by Kim Se-ui carries a high likelihood of being interpreted as false information. From a civil law perspective, this issue becomes even more critical. Currently, multiple companies and advertisers have filed large-scale damage claims against Kim Soo-hyun, citing the alleged inappropriate relationship between Kim Soo-hyun and Kim Sae-ron as the basis for their lawsuits. But the problem is this: The core evidence used to determine whether such an inappropriate relationship existed—the audio recording—cannot be authenticated even by the National Forensic Service. Under these circumstances, how much probative value can this recording truly have in civil litigation? Especially in today’s reality, where AI-based synthesis and manipulation technologies are rapidly advancing, it is absolutely unacceptable in legal disputes to criminalize, demonize, and effectively put someone on trial based solely on materials that are known to carry the possibility of fabrication or manipulation. #WeStandWithKimSooHyun #김수현 #KimSooHyun #金秀賢 #キムスヒョン #คิมซูฮยอน](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2001309094012199044/amplify_video_thumb/2001307712605564928/img/kAIJB-hz2DsW1fZL.jpg)
[Video] 20251217 | YouTube Lawyer’s Analysis Video - Translation “Kim Sae-ron Recording Deemed ‘Inconclusive’ by the National Forensic Service — Does It Have Legal Evidentiary Value?” Hello, this is Attorney Jo Gi-hyun, representative of Daehan Jungang. Regarding the audio recording released by Kim Se-ui of Garosero, which has been presented as evidence to support the claim that Kim Soo-hyun engaged in inappropriate relations with Kim Sae-ron, the National Forensic Service (NFS) has concluded that it is “impossible to determine” whether the recording was manipulated. If this recording is classified as “inconclusive,” how should the legal disputes surrounding Kim Soo-hyun be addressed, and how are they likely to be handled? This recording attempts to prove that there was an inappropriate relationship between Kim Soo-hyun and the late Kim Sae-ron. However, if it is not even possible to determine whether the recording is authentic or fabricated, then the recording itself inherently suffers from a failure to function properly as evidence. From a legal structural standpoint, this means that it is not Kim Soo-hyun who must prove his innocence, but rather the party attacking him must prove the existence of immoral conduct. Under these circumstances, the National Forensic Service’s conclusion of “inconclusive” actually places Kim Soo-hyun in a more favorable legal position. Let us examine this more specifically. Kim Soo-hyun has filed a criminal complaint against Kim Se-ui on the grounds of defamation through the dissemination of false information. In response, Kim Se-ui’s side asserts that Kim Soo-hyun and Kim Sae-ron had an inappropriate relationship and has submitted this audio recording as evidence. In other words, Kim Se-ui’s position is as follows: Even if the formal elements of defamation are satisfied, the content he disclosed is not false, and its disclosure was necessary in the public interest because it reflects the truth. From Kim Soo-hyun’s perspective, since the National Forensic Service did not definitively conclude that the recording was manipulated, there may, on a formal level, remain some degree of uncertainty as to whether Kim Se-ui was spreading false information or stating the truth. However, the fundamental issue is this: The party who initiated the attack is Kim Se-ui, and the core of his allegation is that Kim Soo-hyun engaged in immoral and improper conduct. The central piece of evidence supporting this allegation is precisely this audio recording. Yet now, even the authenticity of this crucial evidence cannot be determined. This means that the content asserted by Kim Se-ui carries a high likelihood of being interpreted as false information. From a civil law perspective, this issue becomes even more critical. Currently, multiple companies and advertisers have filed large-scale damage claims against Kim Soo-hyun, citing the alleged inappropriate relationship between Kim Soo-hyun and Kim Sae-ron as the basis for their lawsuits. But the problem is this: The core evidence used to determine whether such an inappropriate relationship existed—the audio recording—cannot be authenticated even by the National Forensic Service. Under these circumstances, how much probative value can this recording truly have in civil litigation? Especially in today’s reality, where AI-based synthesis and manipulation technologies are rapidly advancing, it is absolutely unacceptable in legal disputes to criminalize, demonize, and effectively put someone on trial based solely on materials that are known to carry the possibility of fabrication or manipulation. #WeStandWithKimSooHyun #김수현 #KimSooHyun #金秀賢 #キムスヒョン #คิมซูฮยอน
Echoes of Kim Soo Hyun_CN18,933 views • 6 months ago
![[Daily Dose of Soohyun] 20230421 | Appointed as Honorary Ambassador for the National Tax Service So handsome😍 #KimSoohyun BREAKTHROUGH #SoohyunUnleashed](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1927701872665575899/amplify_video_thumb/1927701657087037441/img/rRArypLqVQi5NLqi.jpg)
20251202 | God of Business Livestream - Excerpt 1 As soon as I arrived at the Gangnam Police Station, I went straight to the head of the investigation team and asked one question: “Are you close with Kim Se-ui?” The head of the investigation team completely didn’t understand why Kim Se-ui kept bringing this up. He said, “No, we really have nothing to do with each other. Who would be close with Kim Se-ui?” I had also wanted to ask Kim Se-ui directly, but he didn’t answer either. It might have seemed a bit impolite, but I just got straight to the point. Then the team leader said that there was absolutely no connection. Also, this is now my third time being questioned at the Gangnam Police Station. The same victim being questioned three times? Guys, that’s something that has never happened in history. I went into the interrogation room. The team leader and the investigators were both tense to the point of being neurotic. They told me that I absolutely could not record anything. I said okay, I won’t record. Then I asked, “Why not?” He said, “Did you tell anyone that you came to the Gangnam Police Station this afternoon?” I said, “Maybe I did, maybe I didn’t.” But they had already received countless calls. Guys, do not call the Gangnam Police Station, seriously. The investigators cannot conduct their work properly. You might think, “It’s okay to talk about my own business,” but if you call and say things like, “Investigate properly, you idiots!” and then hang up, that’s absolutely not okay. There were also people who, in a moment of impulse, would call just to yell. I’m telling you this because I’m concerned for you: if you keep yelling, you could actually get arrested. Even if you use a public phone, it can be traced. There are still ongoing cases. Being rude to the investigators won’t help; you could end up in prison because of it. So, investigations need to be conducted properly, and you need to speak reasonably. In short, the questions from the investigators are now more difficult, and I answered them honestly. There has never been a case where the same victim is questioned three times. I said, as long as they call me, I will come at any time. Whenever they need me, I will go immediately and answer their questions. These investigators also don’t know much about YouTube. They weren’t aware of the recordings I previously made public, so I handed over all the related materials to them. Overall, I feel this is a very positive sign, guys, so we should be able to get the outcome we want. As for what Kim Se-ui said to those YouTubers before, do you remember? He said he only spent a few hours investigating the 16 cases. That was completely false. Now he has already been investigated twice, and may have to be questioned one or two more times in the future. Don’t believe what he said. Also, he has never used a false accusation to sue anyone. Because there are so many cases, the investigations have to be scheduled separately, about two to three hours per case. Already gone twice, still need to go two more times. This investigation is not a joke. Guys, now even the head of the police department admits that the previous investigation was not thorough. Could the result come out badly this time? The investigators are not idiots. Kim Soo-hyun’s case will also have a result soon. It should be released very shortly. #WeStandWithKimSooHyun #김수현 #KimSooHyun #金秀賢 #キムスヒョン #คิมซูฮยอน
Echoes of Kim Soo Hyun_CN12,936 views • 6 months ago
No more content to load