Eithan Haim MD's banner
Eithan Haim MD's profile picture

Eithan Haim MD

@EithanDHaimMD82,936 subscribers

Small Town General Surgeon. Whistleblower. Donate to legal fund at https://t.co/PpMWoWc1a6.

Shorts

This is where you can see Raskin and the person sitting next to him freaking out. They were frantically flipping pages. I could literally see the sulfur-smelling sweat starting to drip from his eyebrows. It was an amazing sight.

This is where you can see Raskin and the person sitting next to him freaking out. They were frantically flipping pages. I could literally see the sulfur-smelling sweat starting to drip from his eyebrows. It was an amazing sight.

193,099 views

Videos

EithanDHaimMD's profile picture

Walsh cites a ~35% rise in male breast reduction surgeries for 'gynecomastia' and reasonably infers these are actual men with hormonal issues. I believe this is more likely a consequence of widespread healthcare fraud in gender clinics. The scheme is that women are recorded as 'male' in the medical record and diagnosed with gynecomastia to enable insurance coverage for 'male' reduction mammoplasty. Consider a study by gender activists (screenshots for sources all in video clip) - the rise in "top surgery" (i.e. CPT codes for reduction mammoplasty) in gender patients tracks almost exactly with the statistic mentioned in video. Also, gender activists have long promoted this billing tactic. The Campaign for Southern Equality’s toolkit, for instance, explicitly recommends “breast hypertrophy” (gynecomastia) as a diagnosis to obtain insurance coverage for "top surgery." A few days after I discussed this toolkit in a Congressional hearing, they took the page offline. The rise Walsh cites also tracks with the AMA’s push for surgeons and insurers to improperly code these procedures as “reduction mammoplasty” rather than mastectomy - the former is far easier to get covered, while the latter typically requires a biopsy-proven cancer diagnosis, especially if it is a 'male' with gynecomastia as this represents an actual pathology. We know this occurs because it is precisely what forced Texas Children’s Hospital to pay a $10 million healthcare-fraud settlement. The details that are now public and easily verifiable. Of course, it is possible that the original claim could be true as well - the drastic rise in man-tits is something we see every day. However, the pervasive fraud in gender clinics is reason enough for reconsideration. And take it for what it's worth but I've seen actual medical records where this billing pattern is employed - happening all the time in places like New York and Michigan.

Eithan Haim MD

25,952 views • 1 month ago